The article “Caution is needed in interpreting the results of comparative studies regarding oncological operations by minimally invasive versus laparotomic access”, DOI number: 10.1590/0100-6991e20202458, published in the Journal of the Brazilian College of Surgeons. 47:e20202458.
Where it reads:
Pedro Ricardo de Oliveira Fernandes,
It should read:
Pedro Ricardo de Oliveira Fernandes, TCBC-SP
Where it reads:
13. Yaxley JW, Coughlin GD, Chambers SK, Occhipinti S, Samaratunga H, Zajdlewicz L, et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy: early outcomes from a randomised controlled phase 3 study. Lancet. 2016;388(10049):1057-66.
It should read:
13- Parekh DJ, Isildinha M R, Castle EP, Gonzalgo ML, Woods ME, Svatek, RS et al. Robot-assisted radical cystectomy versus open radical cystectomy in patients with bladder cancer (RAZOR): an open-label, randomised, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2018; 391(10139): 2525-36 apud Azman S. RAZOR: cistectomia radical robótica X aberta. Onconews, 2018 Jun 28.
14. Yaxley JW, Coughlin GD, Chambers SK, Occhipinti S, Samaratunga H, Zajdlewicz L, et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy: early outcomes from a randomised controlled phase 3 study. Lancet. 2016;388(10049):1057-66.
Publication Dates
-
Publication in this collection
30 Nov 2020 -
Date of issue
2020
