Cardiopulmonary resuscitation for lay people: Evaluation of videos from the perspective of digital health literacy

Authors’ contribution

Study concept and design: Sara Rodrigues Vilela, Jacqueline Andréia Bernardes Leão-Cordeiro. Obtaining data: Sara Rodrigues Vilela, Katarinne Lima Moraes, Karina Suzuki, Virginia Visconde Brasil. Data analysis and interpretation: Sara Rodrigues Vilela, Jacqueline Andréia Bernardes Leão-Cordeiro, Katarinne Lima Moraes, Karina Suzuki, Virginia Visconde Brasil, Antonio Márcio Teodoro Cordeiro Silva. Statistical analysis: Antonio Márcio Teodoro Cordeiro Silva. Obtaining financing: Sara Rodrigues Vilela. Drafting the manuscript: Sara Rodrigues Vilela, Jacqueline Andréia Bernardes Leão-Cordeiro, Katarinne Lima Moraes, Karina Suzuki, Virginia Visconde Brasil, Antonio Márcio Teodoro Cordeiro Silva. Critical review of the manuscript as to its relevant intellectual content: Jacqueline Andréia Bernardes Leão-Cordeiro, Katarinne Lima Moraes, Karina Suzuki, Virginia Visconde Brasil, Antonio Márcio Teodoro Cordeiro Silva. All authors approved the final version of the text.

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared that there is no conflict of interest.

No.	Items (N=121)	Yes		No
No.	Items (N=121)	n	f(%)	n	f(%)
01	It provided guidance on site safety verification	22	18.2	99	81.8
02	It checked responsiveness	76	62.8	45	37.2
03	It checked breathing/chest expansion verification	63	52.1	58	47.9
04	It provided guidance on the emergency service request	71	58.7	50	41.3
05	It advised to start chest compressions, in case of absent breathing	73	60.3	48	39.7
06	It provided guidance on the need for the maneuver to be performed on a flat/rigid surface	22	18.2	99	81.8
07	It followed the C-A-B sequence	43	35.5	78	64.5
08	It provided guidance on the proper location of the hands in chest compressions	59	48.8	62	51.2
09	It dealt with correct positioning of the hands	44	36.4	77	63.6
10	It provided guidance on a minimum depth of the compressions of 2 inches (5 cm)	40	33.1	81	66.9
11	It reinforced the importance of chest return	16	13.2	105	86.8
12	It provided guidance on the request for the Automatic External Defibrillator (AED)	21	17.4	100	82.6
13	It addressed speed of the compressions (from 100/min to 120/min)	51	42.1	70	57.9
14	It provided guidance on minimizing interruptions in compressions	09	7.4	112	92.6
15	It provided guidance on continuing compressions until arrival of rescue team	40	33.1	81	66.9
16	It provided guidance on when to stop the compressions	31	25.6	90	74.4

No.	Compliance with the items in the instrument (N=121)	Yes		No
No.	Compliance with the items in the instrument (N=121)	n	f(%)	n	f(%)
1	The production date of the video is included in the video description field	116	95.9	5	4.1
2	The title of the video is informative, it clearly presents what will be addressed	87	71.9	34	28.1
3	The author of the video identifies him/herself (professional/student)	49	40.5	72	59.5
4	The author of the video identifies him/herself (name)	61	50.4	60	49.6
5	The author cites the main references used to produce the content disclosed in video	9	7.4	112	92.6
6	The author uses means to contribute to didactics (realistic simulation, blackboard, mannequin or slide)	107	88.4	14	11.6
7	The author of the video generates reflective and inferential questions to the viewers about the subject matter addressed	31	25.6	90	74.4
8	It provides/makes available sources of diverse content-related information in the video description field	8	6.6	113	93.4
9	Sound quality is adequate, what is spoken is heard and understood	96	79.3	25	20.7
10	It is a talking head with complementary material (video in which the person speaks to the camera, but is interrupted by other images, animations, graphs, illustrations)	34	28.1	87	71.9
11	Sound and image coincide	115	95.0	6	5.0
12	It has subtitles	87	71.9	34	28.1
13	Clear and objective language	70	57.9	51	42.1
14	The images (figures, etc.) are clear and depict the content covered	106	87.6	15	12.4
15	Adequate lighting (it allows for good visualization of the content)	109	90.1	12	9.9
16	No noise or music interfering with understanding of the content during speech	105	86.8	16	13.2
17	The author of the video is linked to some educational or care institution related to the subject matter	74	61.2	47	38.8
18	The video presents the symbol of the institution to which the author is linked	50	41.3	71	58.7
19	If the video contains a written part, the font size used is easy to view	61	50.4	60	49.6
20	The diverse information presented in the video follows national or international content protocols	62	51.2	59	48.8

[1] Corresponding author
Jacqueline Andréia Bernardes Leão-Cordeiro E-mail: jacqueline_cordeiro@ufg.br

Brasil

Brasil

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation for lay people: Evaluation of videos from the perspective of digital health literacy

Abstract

Objective:

Method:

Results:

Conclusion: