Como as áreas verdes urbanas influenciam diferentes dimensões do comportamento sustentável

Ferraz, Leonardo; Petroni, Liége Mariel; Santos, Emerson Gomes dos

Leonardo Ferraz

Definition of research problem

Development of hypotheses or research questions (empirical studies)

Theoretical foundation / Literature review

Data collection

Analysis and interpretation of data

Critical revision of the manuscript

Manuscript writing

Universidade de São Paulo, Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9044-5035

Liége Mariel Petroni

Definition of research problem

Development of hypotheses or research questions (empirical studies)

Theoretical foundation / Literature review

Analysis and interpretation of data

Critical revision of the manuscript

Manuscript writing

Universidade Federal do Pampa, São Gabriel, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3108-1926

Emerson Gomes dos Santos

Definition of research problem

Development of hypotheses or research questions (empirical studies)

Theoretical foundation / Literature review

Definition of methodological procedures

Statistical analysis

Analysis and interpretation of data

Critical revision of the manuscript

Manuscript writing

Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Osasco, São Paulo, Brazil

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3037-5001

Authors

1 - Leonardo Ferraz Institution: University of São Paulo, Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil. PhD Student from University of São Paulo E-mail: leoferraz@usp.br

2 - Liége Mariel Petroni Institution: Federal University of Pampa São Gabriel, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Doctor from University of São Paulo E-mail: lmpetroni@uol.com.br

3 - Emerson Gomes dos Santos Institution: Federal University of São Paulo Osasco, São Paulo, Brazil. Doctor in Production Engineering E-mail: emerson.gomes@unifesp.br

Conflict of Interest

The authors have stated that there is no conflict of interest.

Variable	Description
Refuse¹	Little, if the sum of items 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, and 24 was less than the median. A lot, if this sum was more than the median
Recycle/Reuse¹	Little, if the sum of items 10, 11, 17, and 18 was less than the median. A lot, if this sum was more than the median.
Financial reduction¹	Little, if the sum of items 4, 6, 7, 8, and 9 was less than the median. A lot, if this sum was more than the median.
Visiting the park	Number of visits to the park weekly (Group 1: 1 or 2; Group 2: 3 or 4; Group 3: 5,6 or 7)
Gender	Male or Female
Age	Age in years
Marital status	Married or Other
Children	0, 1, 2 or more
Number of people in household	Alone, 2, 3 or more

Dimensions	Item	Per item¹	Per scale¹
Refuse	19. When I see something harmful to the environment, I report it to the environmental control agencies or a nonprofit that can address the issue.	0.380 (0.071)	0.495 (0.047)
	20. When I buy wooden products, I check if they have a certificate confirming they were obtained without harm to the environment.	0.380 (0.071)
	21. I stop buying products from companies that do something harmful to society or the environment.	0.380 (0.071)
	22. I participate and encourage others to pressure politicians to create laws that help consumers choose, use, or dispose of products.	0.425 (0.093)
	23. If I find an advertisement inappropriate, I speak out about it and/or encourage others to do the same.	0.582 (0.045)
	24. I discuss what people and society can do to solve environmental issues with my friends and family	0.508 (0.064)
Recycle / Reuse	10. I use both sides of the paper when I need to print something.	0.423 (0.107)	0.464 (0.087)
	11. My household separates recyclables	0.511 (0.084)
	17. I separate electronic waste (light bulbs, batteries, technology equipment).	0.479 (0.093)
	18. I donate clothes and other items I no longer use.	0.413 (0.187)
Financial reduction	4. I wait for food to cool before putting it in the refrigerator.	0.309 (0.103)	0.430 (0.055)
	6. My household plans food purchases.	0.478 (0.057)
	7. I plan clothes purchases.	0.425 (0.059)
	8. I always ask for a receipt.	0.469 (0.056)
	9. I read product labels carefully before deciding to purchase.	0.413 (0.065)
Reduction of natural resources	2. I avoid leaving lights on in empty rooms.	0.545 (0.094)	0.577 (0.080)
	3. I switch off electronics when not in use.	0.651 (0.066)
	15. I turn off the computer’s monitor when I have finished using it.	0.531 (0.095)
Non scalable	1.I turn off the tap while brushing my teeth.	-	-
	5. I avoid throwing oil down the sink.	-
	12. My household buys organic products.	-
	13. I buy products that use recycled material.	-
	14. I have short showers - less than 10 minutes.	-
	16. I use public transport when commuting during the week.	-

		Frequency	Percentage
Visiting the park	Group 1: 1 or 2 times per week	48	35.8%
	Group 2: 3 or 4 times per week	50	37.3%
	Group 3: 5, 6, or 7 times per week	36	26.9%
Gender	Male	68	50.7%
Gender	Female	66	49.3%
Marital status	Married	69	51%
Marital status	Other	65	49%
Children	0	72	54%
	1	38	28%
	2 or more	24	18%
Number of people in household	Alone	36	27%
	2	51	38%
	3 or more	47	35%
Total	Total	134	100.0%

	Variable		Estimation	Standard Error	p value	Odds ratio	Limit Inf.	Limit Sup.
Refuse	Visiting the park	Group 2: 3 or 4 times per week	0.534	0.433	0.218	1.705	0.729	3.986
	Visiting the park	Group 3: 5, 6, or 7 times per week	1.398	0.478	0.003	4.049	1.587	10.333
	Gender	Female	0.051	0.367	0.889	1.053	0.513	2.159
	Age		-0.007	0.023	0.752	0.993	0.950	1.038
	Marital status	Others	-0.389	0.492	0.430	0.678	0.258	1.779
	Children	1	-0.003	0.561	0.996	0.997	0.332	2.991
	Children	2 or more	0.408	0.700	0.560	1.504	0.381	5.931
	Number of people in household	2	-0.120	0.534	0.823	0.887	0.311	2.527
	Number of people in household	3 or more	0.361	0.637	0.571	1.434	0.411	4.998
	Constant		-0.264	0.956	0.783	0.768	0.000	0.000
	Variable		Estimation	Standard Error	p value	Odds ratio	Limit Inf.	Limit Sup.
Recycle/Reuse	Visiting the park	Group 2: 3 or 4 times per week	0.628	0.474	0.185	1.874	0.740	4.749
	Visiting the park	Group 3: 5, 6, or 7 times per week	0.393	0.505	0.437	1.481	0.550	3.989
	Gender	Female	-0.788	0.395	0.046	0.455	0.209	0.986
	Age		-0.039	0.025	0.125	0.962	0.915	1.011
	Marital status	Others	1.664	0.560	0.003	5.282	1.764	15.819
	Children	1	-0.922	0.605	0.127	0.398	0.122	1.301
	Children	2 or more	-0.998	0.766	0.193	0.369	0.082	1.654
	Number of people in household	2	-0.703	0.598	0.240	0.495	0.153	1.599
	Number of people in household	3 or more	-1.776	0.710	0.012	0.169	0.042	0.681
	Constant		2.454	1.096	0.025	11.633	0.000	0.000
	Variable		Estimation	Standard Error	p value	Odds ratio	Limit Inf.	Limit Sup.
Financial reduction	Visiting the park	Group 2: 3 or 4 times per week	0.507	0.444	0.254	1.660	0.695	3.963
	Visiting the park	Group 3: 5, 6, or 7 times per week	0.852	0.487	0.080	2.344	0.903	6.087
	Gender	Female	0.246	0.372	0.508	1.279	0.617	2.652
	Age		0.033	0.023	0.150	1.034	0.988	1.082
	Marital status	Others	-0.356	0.508	0.483	0.700	0.258	1.897
	Children	1	0.416	0.562	0.459	1.516	0.504	4.564
	Children	2 or more	1.137	0.742	0.126	3.118	0.728	13.352
	Number of people in household	2	0.044	0.552	0.937	1.045	0.354	3.081
	Number of people in household	3 or more	-0.249	0.643	0.698	0.780	0.221	2.747
	Constant		-1.747	0.984	0.076	0.174	0.000	0.000
	Variable		Estimation	Standard Error	p value	Odds ratio	Limit Inf.	Limit Sup.
Reduction of natural resources	Visiting the park	Group 2: 3 or 4 times per week	-0.789	0.480	0.100	0.454	0.177	1.164
	Visiting the park	Group 3: 5, 6, or 7 times per week	-0.153	0.500	0.760	0.858	0.322	2.285
	Gender	Female	0.171	0.397	0.666	1.187	0.545	2.583
	Age		0.076	0.026	0.004	1.079	1.024	1.136
	Marital status	Others	0.491	0.534	0.358	1.633	0.573	4.653
	Children	1	0.427	0.614	0.487	1.532	0.460	5.104
	Children	2 or more	-0.735	0.748	0.326	0.479	0.111	2.078
	Number of people in household	2	-0.949	0.596	0.111	0.387	0.120	1.245
	Number of people in household	3 or more	-1.163	0.706	0.099	0.313	0.078	1.246
	Constant		-2.143	1.027	0.037	0.117	0.000	0.000

[1] Authors

1 - Leonardo Ferraz Institution: University of São Paulo, Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil. PhD Student from University of São Paulo E-mail: leoferraz@usp.br

Brasil

Brasil

Como as áreas verdes urbanas influenciam diferentes dimensões do comportamento sustentável

RESUMO

Objetivo:

Metodologia:

Resultados:

Implicações:

Originalidade: