Sistema de indicadores de sostenibilidad del desarrollo del turismo: un estudio de caso del município de Areia - PB

Silva, Nicole Cavalcanti; Cândido, Gesinaldo Ataíde

doi:10.7784/rbtur.v10i3.955

Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Brasil

Revista Brasileira de Pesquisa em Turismo

Español English

Brasil

Español English

sumário « anterior atual seguinte »

Sumário

Artigo • Rev. Bras. Pesq. Tur. 10 (3) • Dic 2016 • https://doi.org/10.7784/rbtur.v10i3.955 copiar

Sistema de indicadores de sostenibilidad del desarrollo del turismo: un estudio de caso del município de Areia - PB

Autoría SCIMAGO INSTITUTIONS RANKINGS

Resumén

El propósito de este artículo es identificar y analizar el nivel de sostenibilidad del turismo en el municipio de Areia - PB, aplicando la metodología del Sistema de Indicadores de Sostenibilidad del Desarrollo del Turismo (SISDTur), propuesto por Hanai (2009). La investigación se caracteriza por ser descriptivo y exploratorio, cuantitativo, el análisis completo de los datos secundarios y observación no participante. Se establecieron tres etapas de criterios de análisis de datos: El análisis de los indicadores de que los datos recogidos se analizaron por medio de técnicas estadísticas: media, desviación estándar y coeficiente de variación; Análisis de las dimensiones; Información general y de la sostenibilidad. Los resultados indican que el municipio ha investigado en parte insostenible, lo demuestra la gama estándar de sostenibilidad y la insostenibilidad a causa de las seis dimensiones de la sostenibilidad de dos presentados en la sostenibilidad intermedia, dos parcialmente insostenibles, y dos insostenible. Esta situación exige nuevas y mejores formas de trabajar de los gestores públicos en la ejecución de los planes de inversión y proyectos que pueden facilitar su mejora y contribuir al desarrollo sostenible del turismo en el municipio.

Palabras clave:
Turismo; Indicadores de sostenibilidad; Desarrollo sostenible; Areia - PB

Indicators	Mean	Standard deviation	CV (%)
1) The amount of water consumed by the tourist does not affect the local consume.	2.69	1.54	57.25
2) There are programs to reduce the consumption, waste, or reuse of water.	2.52	1.61	63.89
3) The water quality is monitored.	2.48	1.59	64.11
4) The amount of solid waste generated by tourism is substantial.	2.90	1.34	46.21
5) There are programs to reduce the amount of solid waste.	2.69	1.40	52.04
6) There is solid waste sorting and recycling.	2.65	1.53	57.74
7) The amount of energy consumed by a tourist in a given period does not affect the consumption of local production, and it is a small proportion.	3.17	1.60	50.47
8) There programs to reduce energy consumption.	2.60	1.62	62.31
9) Wastewater is treated.	3.02	1.64	54.30
10) There are preservation areas, restored or in process of restoration.	3.63	1.41	38.84
11) There are programs or devices to improve air quality.	1.83	1.11	60.66
12) There is an interpetive guided program for environmental or cultural education.	3.42	1.32	38.60
13) There are associations of environmental groups in the locality.	3.35	1.31	39.10
14) There is a process of environmental or tourism certification.	3.33	1.31	39.34

Indicators	Mean	Standard deviation	CV (%)
1) There is a good amount of local typical products supply (handicrafts, souvenirs, etc.).	4.48	1.06	23.66
2) There is a good amount of architectonic, archeological, and historical heritage assets	4.38	0.97	22.15
3) There is a good amount of events and traditional popular festivities of cultural expressions.	3.60	1.35	37.50
4) There are acts of vandalism committed by tourists against cultural artifacts.	2.23	1.37	61.43
5) There are acts of vandalism committed by residents against cultural artifacts.	3.08	1.46	47.40
6) There were changes in the way people dress and interest in learning new languages.	3.21	1.26	39.25
7) There were changes in the perception about parking difficulties in the main streets.	3.46	1.63	47.11

Indicators	Mean	Standard Deviation	CV (%)
1) A good number of local residents work in the hospitality industry.	3.02	1.57	51.99
2) There are initiatives of professional training for employees who are local residents.	3.27	1.44	44.04
3) There are employees, local residents, with professional training in tourism.	3.63	1.20	33.06
4) The permanent jobs in the tourism industry are more than temporay jobs.	2.75	1.46	53.09
5) Local population is satisfied with the tourism activity.	3.65	1.35	36.99

Indicators	Mean	Standard Deviation	CV (%)
1) Tourism activity generates income and employment for the local population.	4.15	1.27	30.60
2) Tourism companies stay for long in the tourism destination.	3.58	1.20	33.52
3) Tourism establishments work weekend and holidays.	3.67	1.39	37.87
4) Tourists spend a good amount of financial resources per day in tourism establishments.	3.90	1.12	28.72
5) Annual investments in tourism are balanced and meet the increased demand	3.06	1.30	42.48

Indicators	Mean	Standard Deviation	CV (%)
1) The accommodation supply is sufficient to meet tourism demand.	3.08	1.51	49.03
2) There is accessibility access for people with mobility impairments or other special needs.	2.13	1.35	63.38
3) There is monitoring and control of visits.	3.67	1.31	35.69
4) There is programming of educational activities and guided tours to environmental or cultural attractions.	3.46	1.24	35.84
5) Tourists spend time visiting cultural or environmental attractions.	3.04	1.04	34.21
6) Tourism companies and tourists respect the carrying capacity of the attractions.	3.35	1.18	35.22
7) There is balance between the number of guides and tourists.	3.02	1.44	47.68
8) There are many incidents involving tourists or visitors.	1.71	1.08	63.16
9) Tourists were pleased with the provided services and repeat the visit to the municipality.	4.02	1.11	27.61
10) There are admission fees to contribute to protection, conservation, or use of the tourism attractions.	2.42	1.35	55.79
11) There are facilities and structures to minimize the environmental impacts from tourism.	2.40	1.27	52.92

Indicators	Mean	Standard Deviation	CV (%)
1) Training and technical support in tourism is sufficient to meet tourism demand.	2.88	1.38	47.92
2) Local community participates in the development and management of local tourism planning.	3.21	1.38	42.99
3) There are promotional and marketing strategies for the tourism products.	3.54	1.32	37.29
4) There is legislation to protect historical heritage in the locality.	4.33	1.12	25.87
5) There is legislation to protect natural heritage in the locality.	4.08	1.11	27.21

Associação Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Turismo Rua Silveira Martins, 115 - cj. 71, Centro, Cep: 01019-000, Tel: 11 3105-5370 - São Paulo - SP - Brazil
E-mail: edrbtur@gmail.com

Acompanhe os números deste periódico no seu leitor de RSS

[1] E-mail: nickolecavalcanti@gmail.com