Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Empirical research on Innovation in Family Business: literature review and proposal of an integrative framework

ABSTRACT

Objective:

Institutionalism as an adaptation theory has contributed to the understanding of the changing characteristics in governance structures. At the same time, community ecology, as an evolution theory, has enhanced not only the study of relations across a collective of interacting populations within a region, but also the evaluation of change within organizational communities. The objective of this research is to analyze the relations and interactions of a business network using institutional ecology concepts.

Design/methodology/approach:

We applied the methods of institutionalism, as an adaptation theory, and community ecology, as evolution theory, in a network comprised of 45 businesses. Data for the flow of resources and institutional ecology were obtained using two separate instruments (designed by the researchers). Netdraw was used to graphically represent the various layers of the network and Ucinet 6 to generate the matrices.

Findings:

While theory identifies information, services, decisions, solutions and money as resources, as far as the workers in the businesses researched are concerned, the first four flow naturally within the business network, but money is perceived as a resource that should always originate in the other nodes of the ecosystem.

Practical implications:

Network stakeholders will make decisions that both strengthen relations among the members of the institutional arrangement and support the selection of institutional contexts more favorable to perform their activities.

Originality:

This is the first work to apply economic-evolutive theories in order to analyze the relations and interactions in a business network.

Keywords:
Institutional ecology; Institutional mapping; Business networks; Network analysis

RESUMO

Objetivo:

O objetivo deste trabalho é apresentar os resultados de uma revisão sistemática da literatura a respeito de pesquisas empíricas sobre a inovação na Empresa Familiar (EF).

Método:

Uma ampla revisão da literatura com base em uma análise em profundidade de 59 estudos empíricos foi realizada.

Resultados:

A revisão apresenta um quadro integrador, identificando principais determinantes e dimensões da inovação, e resume as principais avenidas de pesquisa e as lacunas existentes, a fim de orientar futuras pesquisas.

Implicações práticas:

O artigo resume o progresso das principais pesquisas sobre a inovação na Empresa Familiar em todo o mundo. Consequentemente, permite melhores decisões por parte dos dirigentes dessas empresas.

Contribuições:

O estudo da inovação na Empresa Familiar emergiu como campo de pesquisa prolífico ao longo dos últimos anos, mas o conhecimento atual sobre como essas empresas inovam é ainda fragmentado e incompleto. Consequentemente, houve demanda para mais pesquisas nesse campo.

Palavras-chave:
Empresa familiar; inovação; estrutura de propriedade; envolvimento da família

Texto completo disponível apenas em PDF.

Full text available only in PDF format.

REFERÊNCIAS

  • Anderson, R. C., Duru, A., & Reeb, D. M. (2012). Investment policy in family controlled firms. Journal of Banking & Finance, 36(6), 1744-1758. (*)
  • Battisti, G., & Iona, A. (2009). The intra-firm diffusion of complementary innovations: Evidence from the adoption of management practices by British establishments. Research Policy, 38(8), 1326-1339. (*)
  • Baysinger, B. D., Kosnik, R. D., & Turk, T. A. (1991). Effects of board and ownership structure on corporate R&D strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 34(1), 205-214. (*)
  • Beck, L., Janssens, W., Debruyne, M., & Lommelen, T. (2011). A study of the relationships between generation, market orientation, and innovation in family firms. Family Business Review, 24(3), 252-272. (*)
  • Benavides-Velasco, C. A., Quintana-García, C., & Guzmán-Parra, V. F. (2013). Trends in family business research. Small Business Economics, 40(1), 41-57.
  • Bergfeld, M. M. H., & Weber, F. M. (2011). Dynasties of innovation: highly performing German family firms and the owners’ role for innovation. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 13(1), 80-94. *)
  • Biancolino, C. A., Maccari, E. A., & Pereira, M. F. (2013). Innovation as a tool for generating value in the IT services sector. RBGN - Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios, 15(48), 410-426.
  • Bird, B., Welsch, H., Astrachan, J. H., & Pistrui, D. (2002). Family business research: The evolution of an academic field. Family Business Review , 15(4), 337-350.
  • Block, J., Miller, D., Jaskiewicz, P., & Spiegel, F. (2013). Economic and technological importance of innovations in large family and founder firms: An analysis of patent data. Family Business Review , 26(2), 180-199.
  • Block, J. H. (2012). R&D investments in family and founder firms: An agency perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 27(2), 248-265. (*)
  • Borges, A. F., Lescura, C., & Oliveira, J. L. (2012). O campo de pesquisas sobre empresas familiares no Brasil: Análise da produção científica no período 1997-2009. Organizações & Sociedade, 19(61), 315-332.
  • Borges, A. L., Lima, J. B., & Andrade, D. M. (2014). Práticas de inovação em empresa familiar: Estudo de caso. RPCA - Revista Pensamento Contemporâneo em Administraçao, 8(3), 37-54.
  • Carney, M., & Gedajlovic, E. (2003). Strategic innovation and the administrative heritage of east asian family business groups. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 20(1), 5-26.
  • Casillas, J. C., & Acedo, F. (2007). Evolution of the intellectual structure of family business literature: A bibliometric study of FBR. Family Business Review , 20(2), 141-162.
  • Casillas, J. C., & Moreno, A. M. (2010). The relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and growth: The moderating role of family involvement. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 22(3-4), 265-291. (*)
  • Casillas, J. C., Moreno, A. M., & Barbero, J. L. (2011). Entrepreneurial orientation of family firms: Family and environmental dimensions. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 2(2), 90-100. (*)
  • Cassia, L., De Massis, A., & Pizzurno, E. (2011). An exploratory investigation on NPD in small family businesses from Northern Italy. International Journal of Business, Management and Social Sciences, 2(2), 1-14. (*)
  • Cassia, L., De Massis, A., & Pizzurno, E. (2012). Strategic innovation and new product development in family firms: An empirically grounded theoretical framework. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, 18(2), 198-232. (*)
  • Chang, S., Wu, W., & Wong, Y. (2010). Family control and stock market reactions to innovation announcements. British Journal of Management, 21(1), 152-170. (*)
  • Chen, H. L., & Hsu, W. T. (2009). Family ownership, board independence, and R&D investment. Family Business Review , 22(4), 347-362. (*)
  • Chin, C. L., Chen,Y. J., Kleinman, G., & Lee, P. (2009). Corporate ownership structure and innovation: Evidence from Taiwan’s electronics industry. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 24(1), 145-175. (*)
  • Chirico, F., & Nordqvist, M. (2010). Dynamic capabilities and transgenerational value creation in family firms: The role of organizational culture. International Small Business Journal, 28(5), 487-504. (*)
  • Choi, S. B., Park, B. I., & Hong, P. (2012). Does ownership structure matter for firm technological innovation performance? The case of Korean firms. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 20(3), 267-288. (*)
  • Chrisman, J. J., Chua, J. H., De Massis, A., Frattini, F., & Wright, M. (2014a). The ability and willingness paradox in family firm innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(3), 310-318.
  • Chrisman, J .J., Fang, H., Kotlar, J., & De Massis, A. (2014b) A note on family influence and the adoption of discontinuous technologies in family firms. Journal of Product Innovation Management , 32(3), 384-388.
  • Chrisman, J. J., & Patel, P. C. (2012). Variations in R&D investments of family and nonfamily firms: Behavioral agency and myopic loss aversion perspectives. Academy of Management Journal , 44(4), 976-997. (*)
  • Chua, J. H., Chrisman, J. J., & Sharma, P. (1999). Defining the family business by behaviour. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23(4), 19-39.
  • Classen, N., Carree, M., Gils, A., & Peters, B. (2014). Innovation in family and non-family SMEs: An exploratory analysis. Small Business Economics , 42(3), 595-609.
  • Classen, N., Van Gils, A., Bammens, Y., & Carree, M. A. (2012). Accessing resources from innovation partners: The search breadth of family SMEs. Journal of Small Business Management, 50(2), 191-215. (*)
  • Clausen, T. H., & Pohjola, M. (2013). Persistence of product innovation: comparing breakthrough and incremental product innovation. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 25(4), 369-385.
  • Craig, J., & Dibrell, C. (2006). The natural environment, innovation, and firm performance: A comparative study. Family Business Review , 19(4), 275-288. (*)
  • Craig, J., & Moores, K. (2006). A 10-year longitudinal investigation of strategy, systems, and environment on innovation in family firms. Family Business Review , 19(1), 1-10. (*)
  • Crossan, M. M., & Apaydin, M. (2010). A multi-dimensional framework of organizational innovation: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Management Studies, 47(6), 1154-1191.
  • Cruz, C., & Nordqvist, M. (2012). Entrepreneurial orientation in family firms: A generational perspective. Small Business Economics , 38(1), 33-49. (*)
  • Czarnitzki, D., & Kraft, K. (2004). Firm leadership and innovative performance: Evidence from seven EU countries. Small Business Economics , 22(5), 325-332. (*)
  • Czarnitzki, D., & Kraft, K. (2009). Capital control, debt financing and innovative activity. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 71(2), 372-383. (*)
  • Damanpour, F. (1991). Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of Management Journal , 34(3), 555-590.
  • De Cleyn, S. H., & Braet, J. (2012). Do board composition and investor type influence innovativeness in SMEs? International Entrepreneurial Management Journal, 8(3), 285-308. (*)
  • De Massis, A., Frattini, F., & Lichtenthaler, U. (2013). Research on technological innovation in family firms: Present debates and future directions. Family Business Review , 26(1), 10-31.
  • De Massis, A., Frattini, F., Pizzurno, E., & Cassia, L. (2015). Product innovation in family Vs. non-family firms: An exploratory analysis. Journal of Small Business Management , 53(1), 1-36. (*)
  • Dess, G. G., Lumpkin, G. T., & Covin, J. G. (1997). Entrepreneurial strategy making and firm performance: Tests of contingency and configurational models. Strategic Management Journal, 18(9), 677-695.
  • Dess, G. G., & Picken, J. C. (2000). Changing roles: Leadership in the 21st century. Organizational Dynamics, 28(3), 18-34.
  • Dibrell, C., & Moeller, M. (2011). The impact of a service-dominant focus strategy and stewardship culture on organizational innovativeness in family-owned businesses. Journal of Family Business Strategy , 2(1), 43-51. (*)
  • Donckels, R., & Fröhlich, E. (1991). Are family businesses really different? European experiences from STRATOS. Family Business Review , 4(2), 149-160. (*)
  • Duréndez, A., Madrid-Guijarro, A., & García-Pérez-De-Lema, D. (2011). Innovative culture, management control systems and performance in small and medium-sized Spanish family firms. Innovar, 21(40), 137-153. (*)
  • Dyer, W. J. (2006). Examining the “Family Effect” on firm performance. Family Business Review , 19(4), 253-273.
  • Galve-Górriz, C., & Salas-Fumás, V. (2011). Growth strategies, professionalization, ownership structure and performance across generations of a family firm. African Journal of Business Management, 5(9), 3589-3604. (*)
  • Gedajlovic, E., Carney, M., Chrisman, J. J., & Kellermanns, F. W. (2012). The adolescence of family firm research: Taking stock and planning for the future. Journal of Management, 38(4), 1010-1037.
  • Gomez-Mejia, L. R., Haynes, K. T., Nunez-Nickel, M., Jacobson, K. J. L., & Moyano-Fuentes, J. (2007). Socio-emotional wealth and business risks in family-controlled firms: Evidence from Spanish olive oil mills. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(1), 106-137.
  • Gonçalves, J. R. S. C. (2000). As empresas familiares no Brasil. RAE - Revista de Administração de Empresas, 7(1), 7-12.
  • González-Ferrero, M., Guzmán-Vásquez, A., Pombo-Vejarano, C., & Trujillo-Dávila, M. A. (2011). Revisión de la literatura de empresas familiares: Una perspectiva financiera. Academia, Revista Latinoamericana de Administración, 47, 18-42.
  • Grundström, C., Öberg, C., & Rönnbäck, A. R. (2012). Family-owned manufacturing SMEs and innovativeness: A comparison between within-family successions and external takeovers. Family Business Strategy, 3(3), 162-173. (*)
  • Gudmundson, D., Tower, C. B., & Hartman, E. A. (2003). Innovation in small businesses: Culture and ownership structure do matter. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 8(1), 1-18. (*)
  • Gurrieri, A. R. (2008). Knowledge network dissemination in a family-firm sector. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 37(6), 2380-2389. (*)
  • Habbershon, T. G., & Williams, M. (1999). A resource-based framework for assessing the strategic advantages of family firms. Family Business Review , 12(1), 1-25.
  • Habbershon, T. G., Williams, M., & Macmillan, I. (2003). A Unified systems perspective of family firm performance. Journal of Business Venturing , 18(4), 441-448.
  • Handler, W. (1989). Methodological issues and considerations in studying family businesses. Family Business Review , 2(3), 257-276.
  • Hausman, A. (2005). Innovativeness among small businesses: Theory and propositions for future research. Industrial Marketing Management, 34(8), 773-782. (*)
  • Hsu, L., & Chang, H. (2011). The role of behavioral strategic controls in family firm innovation. Industry and Innovation, 18(7), 709-727. (*)
  • Huang, Y., Ding, H., & Kao, M. (2009). Salient stakeholder voices: Family business and green innovation adoption. Journal of Management and Organization, 15(3), 309-326. (*)
  • Jensen, M. C. (1986). Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. American Economic Review, 76(2), 323-329.
  • Kellermanns, F., Eddleston, K., Sarathy, R., & Murphy, F. (2012). Innovativeness in family firms: a family influence perspective. Small Business Economics , 38(1), 85-101. (*)
  • Keupp, M. M., Palmié, M., & Gassmann, O. (2012). The strategic management of innovation: A systematic review and paths for future research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 14(4), 367-390.
  • Kim, H., Kim, H., & Lee, P. M. (2008). Ownership structure and the relationship between financial slack and R&D investments: Evidence from Korean firms. Organization Science, 19(3), 404-418. *)
  • Kotlar, J., Fang, H., De Massis, A., & Frattini, F. (2014). Profitability goals, control goals, and the R&D investment decisions of family and nonfamily firms. Journal of Product Innovation Management , 31(6), 1128-1145.
  • Kraiczy, N., Hack, A., & Kellermanns, F. (2014). New product portfolio performance in family firms. Journal of Business Research, 67(6), 1065-1073.
  • Kraus, S., Harms, R., & Fink, M. (2011). Family firm research: Sketching a research field. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management , 13(1), 32-47.
  • Kraus, S., Pohjola, M., & Koponen, A. (2012). Innovation in family firms: An empirical analysis linking organizational and managerial innovation to corporate success. Review of Managerial Science, 6(3), 265-286. (*)
  • Lara De Oliveira, J., Albuquerque, A. L., & Pereira, R. D. (2012). Governança, successão e prossionalização em uma empresa familiar: (Re)arrajando o lugar da família multigeracional. RBGN - Revista Brasileira de Gestao de Negocios, 14(43), 176-192.
  • Lichtenthaler, U., & Muethel, M. (2012). The impact of family involvement on dynamic innovation capabilities: Evidence from German manufacturing firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice , 36(6), 1235-1253. (*)
  • Litz, R. (1995). The family business: Toward definitional clarity. Family Business Review , 8(2), 100-104.
  • Litz, R., Pearson, A. W., & Litchfield, S. (2012). Charting the future of family business research: Perspectives from the field. Family Business Review , 25(1), 16-32.
  • Llach, J., Marqués, P., Bikfalvi, A., & Simon, A. (2012). The innovativeness of family firms through the economic cycle. Journal of Family Business Management, 2(2), 96-109. (*)
  • Llach, J., & Nordqvist, M. (2010). Innovation in family and non-family businesses: A resource perspective. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing, 2(3-4), 381-399. (*)
  • Martí, J., Menéndez-Requejo, S., & Rottke, O. M. (2013). The impact of venture capital on family businesses: Evidence from Spain. Journal of World Business, 48(3), 420-430.
  • Matzler, K., Veider, V., Hautz, J., & Stadler, C. (2015). The impact of family ownership, management, and governance on innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management , 32(3), 319-333.
  • Mcadam, R., Reid, R., & Mitchell, N. (2010). Longitudinal development of innovation implementation in family-based SMEs: The effects of critical incidents. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, 16(5), 437-456. (*)
  • Mccann, J. E., Leon-Guerrero, A. Y., & Haley, J. D. (2001). Strategic goals and practices of innovative family businesses. Journal of Small Business Management , 39(1), 50-59. (*)
  • Moraes, A. C. T., Fº., Barone, F. M., & Pinto, M. O. (2011). A produção científica em empresas familiares: Um enfoque conceitual. Revista de Administração Pública, 45(6), 1971-1991.
  • Morck, R., & Yeung, B. (2003). Agency problems in large family business groups. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice , 27(4), 367-382.
  • Munari, F., Oriani, R., & Sobrero, M. (2010) The effects of owner identity and external governance systems on R&D investments: A study of Western European firms. Research Policy , 39(8), 1093-1104. (*)
  • Muñoz-Bullón, F., & Sánchez-Bueno, M. J. (2011). The impact of family involvement on the R&D intensity of publicly traded firms. Family Business Review , 24(1), 62-70. (*)
  • Muñoz-Bullón, F., & Sánchez-Bueno, M. J. (2012). Do family ties shape the performance consequences of diversification? Evidence from the European Union. Journal of World Business , 47(3), 469-477.
  • Nagano, M. S., Stefanovitz, J. P., & Vick, T. E. (2014). Caracterização de processos e desafios de empresas industriais brasileiras na gestão da inovação. RBGN - Revista Brasileira de Gestao de Negocios , 16(51), 163-179.
  • Naldi, L., Nordqvist, M., Sjöberg, K., & Wiklund, J. (2007). Entrepreneurial orientation, risk taking, and performance in family firms. Family Business Review , 20(1), 33-47. (*)
  • Niehm, L. S., Tyner, K., Fitgerald, M. A., & Shelley, M. (2010). Technology adoption in small family-owned businesses: Accessibility, perceived advantage, and information technology literacy. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 31(4), 498-515. (*)
  • Nóbrega, G. J., & Hoffmann, V. E. (2014). Family business and the creation of entrepreneurship through their internal resources. RPCA - Revista Pensamento Contemporâneo em Administração, 8(2), 92-105.
  • Nohria, N., & Gulati, R. (1996). Is slack good or bad for innovation? Academy of Management Journal , 39(5), 1245-1264.
  • Ordanini, A., Rubera, G., & Defillippi, R. (2008). The many moods of inter-organizational imitation: A critical review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 10(4), 375-398.
  • Pittino, D., & Visintin, F. (2009). Innovation and strategic types of family SMEs: A test and extension of Miles and Snow’s configurational model. Journal of Enterprising Culture, 17(3), 257-295.(*)
  • Porter, M. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations London, England: Macmillan.
  • Price, D. P., Stoica, M., & Boncella, R. J. (2013). The relationship between innovation, knowledge, and performance in family and non-family firms: An analysis of SMEs. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 2(14), 1-20.
  • Resende, P. C., Jr.; Guimarães, T. A. (2012). Inovação em serviços: O estado da arte e uma proposta de agenda de pesquisa. RBGN - Revista Brasileira de Gestao de Negocios , 14(44), 293-313.
  • Rogers, E. (1983). The Diffusion of Innovation (3rd ed.). New York: The Free Press.
  • Schmid, T., Achleitner, A., Ampenberger, M., & Kaserer, C. (2014). Family firms and R & D behaviour: New evidence from a large-scale survey. Research Policy , 43(1), 233-244.
  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). Theory of economic development Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Shan, J., & Jolly, D. R. (2013). Technological innovation capabilities, product strategy, and firm performance: The electronics industry in China. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 30(3), 159-172.
  • Sharma, S., Chrisman, J. J., & Gersick, K. E. (2012). 25 years of family business review: Reflections on the past and perspectives for the future. Family Business Review , 25(1), 5-15.
  • Short, J. C., Payne, G. T., Brigham, K. H., Lumpkin, G. T., & Broberg, J. C. (2009). Family firms and entrepreneurial orientation in publicly traded firms: A comparative analysis of the S&P 500. Family Business Review , 2(1), 9-24. (*)
  • Siebels, J., & Zu Knyphausen-Aufseß, D. (2012). A review of theory in family business research: The implications for corporate governance. International Journal of Management Reviews, 14(3), 280-304.
  • Sirmon, D. G., Arregle, J. L., Hitt, M. A., & Webb, J. W. (2008). The role of family influence in firms’ strategic responses to threat of imitation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice , 32(6), 979-998. (*)
  • Smith, M. (2007). Real managerial differences between family and non-family firms, International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research , 13(5), 278-295.
  • Stewart, A. (2008). Who could best complement a team of family business researchers-scholars down the hall or in another building? Family Business Review , 21(4), 279-293.
  • Tagiuri, R., & Davis, J. A. (1996). Bivalent attributes of the family firm. Family Business Review , 9(2), 199-208.
  • Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management , 14(3), 207-222.
  • Tribo, J. A., Berrone, P., & Surroca, J. (2007). Do the type and number of blockholders influence R&D investments? New evidence from Spain. Corporate Governance, 15(5), 828-842. (*)
  • Uhlaner, L. M., Berent-Brawn, M. M., Jeurissen, R. J. M., & Wit, G. (2012). Beyond size: Predicting engagement in environmental management practices of Dutch SMEs. Journal of Business Ethics, 109(4), 411-429. (*)
  • Wagner, W. (2010). Corporate social performance and innovation with high social benefits: A quantitative analysis. Journal of Business Ethics , 94(4), 581-594. (*)
  • Weismeier-Sammer, D. (2011). Entrepreneurial behavior in family firms: A replication study. Journal of Family Business Strategy , 2(3), 128-138. (*)
  • Westhead, P. (1997). Ambitions, external environment and strategic factor differences between family and non-family companies. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 9(2), 127-158. (*)
  • Wright, M., & Kellermanns, F. W. (2011). Family firms: A research agenda and publication guide. Journal of Family Business Strategy , 2(4), 187-198.
  • Yildirim, H., & Saygin, S. (2011). Effects of owners’ leadership style on manufacturing family firms’ entrepreneurial orientation in the emerging economies: An empirical investigation in Turkey. European Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Sciences, 32, 26-32. (*)
  • Zahra, S. A. (2005). Entrepreneurial risk taking in family firms. Family Business Review , 18(1), 23-40. (*)
  • Zellweger, T. M., Nason, R. S., & Nordqvist, M. (2012). From longevity of firms to transgenerational entrepreneurship of families: Introducing family entrepreneurial orientation. Family Business Review , 25(2), 136-155. (*)
  • Zellweger, T., & Sieger, P. (2012). Entrepreneurial orientation in long-lived firms. Small Business Economics , 38(1), 67-84. (*)
  • 8
    Evaluation process: Double Blind Review

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    Apr-Jun 2015

History

  • Received
    27 Feb 2014
  • Accepted
    17 June 2015
Fundação Escola de Comércio Álvares Penteado Fundação Escola de Comércio Álvares Penteado, Av. da Liberdade, 532, 01.502-001 , São Paulo, SP, Brasil , (+55 11) 3272-2340 , (+55 11) 3272-2302, (+55 11) 3272-2302 - São Paulo - SP - Brazil
E-mail: rbgn@fecap.br