Enzymatic association in the diets of laying hens raised in an alternative cage-free system

Associação enzimática na ração de poedeiras criadas em sistema “cage-free” alternativo

Abstract:

The objective of this work was to evaluate the use of enzyme combinations in diets, with different nutritional uplift matrices, for hens raised in an alternative cage-free system. The experiment was carried out with 800 Isa Brown laying hens aged 24-30 weeks, distributed in a 2x2 factorial arrangement, with two combinations of enzymes (phytase and xylanase) and two nutritional matrices (conventional and overvalued uplifts). The treatments were: T1, phytase (450 FTU per kilogram) + xylanase (12,000 BXU per kilogram), using matrix I (100 Kcal kg^-1 apparent metabolizable energy, 0.16% calcium, 0.15% available phosphorus, 0.03 sodium, and 0.02% digestible lysine); T2, phytase (1,500 FTU per kilogram) and matrix I; T3, phytase (450 FTU per kilogram) + xylanase (12,000 BXU per kilogram), using matrix II (120 Kcal kg^-1 apparent metabolizable energy, 0.22% calcium, 0.20% available phosphorus, 0.04% sodium, and 0.05% digestible lysine); and T4, phytase (1,500 FTU per kilogram) and matrix II. Productive performance variables and external and internal egg quality were analyzed. The use of phytase or of the phytase + xylanase combination, independently of the nutritional matrix used, met the nutrient requirements of the animals and maintained their productive performance. However, the combination phytase + xylanase and the adoption of matrix I was more efficient.

Index terms:
egg quality; nutritional matrix; phytase; welfare; xylanase

Resumo:

O objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar o uso de associações enzimáticas em rações, com diferentes matrizes nutricionais, para poedeiras criadas em sistema “cage-free” alternativo. O experimento foi realizado com 800 poedeiras Isa Brown de 24-30 semanas de idade, distribuídas em arranjo fatorial 2x2, com duas associações de enzimas (fitase e xilanase) e duas matrizes nutricionais (convencional e supervalorizada). Os tratamentos foram: T1, fitase (450 FTU por kilogram) + xilanase (12.000 BXU por kilogram), com uso da matriz I (100 Kcal kg^-1 de energia metabolizável aparente, 0,16% de cálcio, 0,15% de fósforo disponível, 0,03% de sódio e 0,02% de lisina digestível); T2, fitase (1.500 FTU por kilogram) e matriz I; T3, fitase (450 FTU por kilogram) + xilanase (12.000 BXU por kilogram), com uso da matriz II (120 Kcal kg^-1 de energia metabolizável aparente, 0,22% de cálcio, 0,20% de fósforo disponível, 0,04 de sódio e 0,05% de lisina digestível); e T4, fitase (1.500 FTU por kilogram) e matriz II. Foram analisadas variáveis de desempenho produtivo e qualidade externa e interna dos ovos. O uso de fitase ou da associação fitase + xilanase, independentemente da matriz nutricional utilizada, conseguiu atender às exigências nutricionais dos animais e manter o seu desempenho produtivo. Porém, a combinação fitase + xilanase e a adoção da matriz I foi mais eficiente.

Termos para indexação:
qualidade de ovos; matriz nutricional; fitase; bem-estar; xilanase

Introduction

Brazilian egg production has been growing fast and reached 49 billion units in 2019, with a consumption per capita of 230 units per year (ABPA, 2020).

However, recently, European Union countries have enacted laws on animal welfare that set strict criteria for poultry farming, such as the ban of laying cages, and the world trend has been to follow this cage-free standard (Weeks et al., 2016).

Among the new strategies for egg production is the free-range system, which allows accessing paddocks with grasses that offer benefits to laying hens, such as: the establishment of social and hierarchical relationships; an increased repertoire of activities, including foraging and investigating; and a greater space and freedom to express behaviors that are considered essential for these animals (Lay Jr et al., 2011).

In the free-range system, birds also need balanced diets that meet their nutritional requirements for maximum productive efficiency (Tutkun et al., 2018). Pasture intake, for example, can have a negative impact on voluntary feed intake, which may lead to undernourishment caused by a reduced absorption of energy, as well as of macro- and micronutrients. This negative effect may be explained by the lack of endogenous enzymes to digest fiber, resulting in a reduced nutrient availability. Therefore, exogenous enzyme supplementation may be a solution to overcome the low nutrient availability due to an uncontrolled fiber intake by free-range layers (Iqbal et al., 2018).

Exogenous enzymes, such as phytase and xylanase, have emerged as an alternative to increase the nutritional value of feedstuffs, as well as to increase digestibility coefficients, especially of nutrients linked to non-starch polysaccharides and antinutritional factors, such as phytate (Ferreira et al., 2015).

Phytase belongs to the group of phosphatases that hydrolyze phytate and release phosphorus and other minerals and proteins (Manangi et al., 2018). Studies have recommended 500 phytase units (FTU) per kilogram as the ideal inclusion level of phytase in poultry diets (Cowieson et al., 2009). However, recently, higher dietary additions of phytase (more than 1,000 FTU per kilogram) have been suggested (Manobhavan et al., 2016). According to Kim et al. (2017), the superdosing of phytase in laying hen diets has a positive effect on egg production rate.

Xylanase is mainly responsible for the hydrolysis of xylan, the main constituent of plant cell wall hemicellulose, increasing digestive motility and reducing energy expenditure in digestion and absorption (Cowieson et al., 2010). According to Souza et al. (2012), xylanase supplementation in laying hen diets resulted in an increase in apparent metabolizable energy (AME) and, consequently, improved the productive performance of the birds.

The results obtained with the use of phytase and xylanase imply in a series of practical techniques for poultry feeding, such as the use of nutritional matrices with uplift of calcium, phosphorus, metabolizable energy, crude protein, and amino acids (Nagata et al., 2011). Research suggests that these enzymes, when combined, have an additive action, which enhances their effects; however, studies on the topic are still limited, especially regarding cage-free production systems (Iqbal et al., 2018).

The objective of this work was to evaluate the use of enzyme combinations in diets, with different nutritional uplift matrices, for hens raised in an alternative cage-free system.

Materials and Methods

The research was conducted in an egg farm located in the rural area of the municipality of Ouro, in the state of Santa Catarina, Brazil (27°19’49”S, 51°35’53’’W), in partnership with Embrapa Suínos e Aves. The experiment was carried out from December 18, 2017, to January 29, 2018, comprising a six-week production cycle. The study was approved by the ethics committee on animal use of Embrapa Suínos e Aves, protocol number 015/2018.

Eight hundred Isa Brown laying hens, aged 24-30 weeks, were housed in a wooden shed, divided into 20 floor pens with 5.6 m² area and 10 cm-thick pine wood shavings covering the floor. Each pen had a perch and a wooden nest with eight nesting boxes, containing wood shavings at the bottom; pendulum feeders and nipple drinkers were installed. A small door allowed accessing an external paddock of 5.6 m², covered with a 10 cm layer of sand for laying. This production system is a mid-term laying rearing system, mixing cage-free practices with free-range production criteria.

At the beginning and at the end of the six-week cycle, birds were weighed individually, for each experimental unit. The eggs laid on the last day of the six-week period in each pen were weighed individually, and arithmetic means were calculated. Based on their weight, 20 eggs were selected, with a margin of ±5% mean weight. After selection, the eggs were identified and evaluated. For analytical purposes, 10 eggs were used for the internal quality analysis and 10 eggs for shell strength determination.

Four treatments were carried out in a complete randomized block design, in a 2x2 factorial arrangement, with two combinations of enzymes (phytase and xylanase) and two nutritional matrices (conventional and overvalued uplifts, with five replicates and 40 birds per experimental unit). The blocks were established according to bird weight at 19 weeks of age. The treatments were: T1, phytase [450 phytase activity unit (FTU) per kilogram] + xylanase [12,000 birch xylan units (BXU) per kilogram], using nutritional uplift matrix I (100 Kcal kg^-1 AME, 0.16% calcium, 0.15% available phosphorus, 0.03% sodium, and 0.02% digestible lysine); T2, phytase (1,500 FTU per kilogram), also using matrix I; T3, phytase (450 FTU per kilogram) + xylanase (12,000 BXU per kilogram), using nutritional adjustment matrix II (120 Kcal kg^-1 AME, 0.22% calcium, 0.20 available phosphorous, 0.04% sodium, and 0.05% digestible lysine); and T4, phytase (1,500 FTU per kilogram), also using matrix II.

Considering the experiment was set to support practical validation, there was no negative control treatment, as the use of phytase is a common and consolidated concept in the egg production system. Therefore, the enzyme doses and nutritional matrices were explored based on this premise.

Nutritional uplifts were considered for the diet formulations, which, in practice, implied in the reduction of the nutritional contents in the diet, formulated to meet the normal nutritional requirements for the laying hen phase, according to the management guide for the Isa Brown line (ISA, 2007); the energetic and nutritional values of each ingredient were determined following Rostagno (2017). The experimental diets were based on corn, soybean meal, wheat bran, minerals, vitamins, and amino acids (Table 1).

Table 1.
Composition of the experimental diets fed to laying hens raised in a free-range system.

Ingredients (%)		Matrix I(1)		Matrix II(2)
		Phy + Xyl(3)	Phytase (1,500 FTU per kg)	Phy + Xyl	Phytase (1,500 FTU per kg)
Corn		59.04	59.04	60.00	60.00
Soybean meal 46%		21.57	21.57	21.43	21.43
Wheat bran		7.500	7.500	7.500	7.500
Limestone		9.290	9.290	9.300	9.300
Dicalcium phosphate		0.248	0.248	0.000	0.000
Soybean oil		1.590	1.590	1.070	1.070
Common salt		0.266	0.266	0.240	0.240
DL-methionine		0.156	0.156	0.156	0.156
L-lysine HCL		0.060	0.060	0.025	0.025
Vitamin and mineral supplement(4)		0.170	0.170	0.170	0.170
Mycotoxin sequestrant(5)		0.100	0.100	0.100	0.100
Phytase		0.0045	0.015	0.0045	0.015
Xylanase		0.0075	0.000	0.0075	0.000
Total		100.00	100.00	100.00	100.00
Nutritional composition
	Metabolizable energy (Kcal kg-1)	2750	2750	2730	2730
	Crude protein (%)	15.00	15.00	15.00	15.00
	Crude fiber (%)	2.88	2.88	2.89	2.89
	Calcium (% )	3.64	3.64	3.58	3.58
	Available phosphorus (%)	0.16	0.16	0.11	0.11
	Total phosphorus (%)	0.41	0.41	0.36	0.36
	Sodium (%)	0.12	0.12	0.11	0.11
	Linoleic acid (% )	2.31	2.31	2.06	2.06
	Fat (%)	4.35	4.35	3.88	3.88
	Digestible methionine (%)	0.36	0.36	0.36	0.36
	Digestible methionine + cystine (%)	0.60	0.60	0.60	0.60
	Digestible lysine (%)	0.71	0.71	0.68	0.68
	Digestible threonine (%)	0.48	0.48	0.48	0.48
	Digestible tryptophan (%)	0.16	0.16	0.16	0.16

• ⁽¹⁾Matrix I, 100 Kcal kg^-1 apparent metabolizable energy, 0.16% calcium, 0.15% available phosphorus, 0.03% sodium, and 0.02% digestible lysine. ⁽²⁾Matrix II, 120 Kcal kg^-1 apparent metabolizable energy, 0.22% calcium, 0.20% available phosphorous, 0.04% sodium, and 0.05% digestible lysine. ⁽³⁾ Phy + Xyl, phytase (450 FTU per kilogram) + xylanase (12,000 BXU per kilogram). ⁽⁴⁾Product composition (guarantee levels per kilogram of product): 3,330 mg copper, 16,653 mg iron, 33,343 mg manganese, 101 mg selenium, 33,333 mg zinc, 4,000.800 IU vitamin A, 1,000.200 IU vitamin D3, 16,670 IU vitamin E, 1,674 mg vitamin K3, 980 mg vitamin B1, 10,000 mcg vitamin B2, 1,030 mg folic acid, 4,983 mg pantothenic acid, 16,670 mg niacin, 100 mg biotin, 140,592 mg choline, and 666.50 mg iodine. ⁽⁵⁾Aluminosilicate toxin binder.

Laying hen performance was measured using: egg production ratio (%), average egg weight, egg mass, feed conversion ratio, and bird livability (%). For internal quality evaluation, before broken, the eggs were individually weighed. To assess specific gravity, all eggs were placed in buckets with saline solutions, from the lowest to the highest concentration of sodium chloride, ranging from 1.066 to 1.102, with an interval of 0.004 (Zumbado, 1983).

Soon afterwards, the eggs were carefully opened and placed individually in Petri dishes where thick albumen height was measured using a digital caliper. This measure, together with egg weight, was used to calculate the Haugh unit (HU) by the formula described by Card & Nesheim (1966): $HU=100\text{log}\left(h+7.57-1.7w^{0.37}\right)$, where h is thick albumen height (mm) and w is egg weight (g).

Yolk color was assessed using the CR-400 chroma meter (Konica Minolta Inc., Tokyo, Japan). The parameters measured were those of the Commission International de I’Eclairage (CIEL) system (McLaren, 1976): L*, lightness; a*, red/green coordinate; and b*, yellow/blue coordinate. Using parameters a* and b*, parameter C* (chroma) was obtained, indicating color saturation measures, by the formula: $C*={\left[{\left(a*\right)}^2+{\left(b*\right)}^2\right]}^{1/2}$.

After the color analysis, yolk and albumen were separated. The yolk was weighed individually on a digital scale to calculate the yolk percentage of each egg, using the formula: $\%G=\left(\text{yolk weight}/\text{egg weight}\right)\times 100$.

After weighed, the yolks were placed in another Petri dish, where their diameter (mm) and height (mm) were measured with a digital caliper, in order to obtain the yolk index value through the relationship between these two measures. Albumen weight (g) was obtained by calculating the difference between total egg weight and shell and yolk weights. Using weight, it was possible to calculate the albumen percentage of each egg.

Shell breaking strength was determined in the equatorial region of the egg with the aid of the TA.X T2 texture analyzer (Stable Micro Systems, Surrey, United Kingdom), using a 2 mm rupture probe, which recorded the force (kgf) necessary to break the shell.

The shells were washed with water and dried at room temperature for 72 hours. After drying, they were individually weighed on a digital scale and then fragments of the shell were removed from three egg regions (basal, apical, and medial). The thickness of each fragment was measured using the 293-230-30 digital micrometer, with a 0.001 mm resolution (Mitutoyo Company, Kawasaki, Japan). To obtain the final value of shell thickness, an arithmetic mean was calculated using the values of the three egg regions (Barbosa et al., 2012).

The data of the evaluated variables were tested for normality and homoscedasticity by Shapiro-Wilk’s and Levene’s tests, respectively. With these assumptions met, the variables were then subjected to the analysis of variance, using the Statistix statistical software (Analytical Software, Tallahassee, FL, USA) in a 2×2 factorial arrangement. The means of the responses were compared by the F-test, at 5% probability, and the means of each treatment were compared by Tukey’s test, also at 5% probability.

Results and Discussion

There was no interaction (p>0.05) between enzymes and nutritional matrixes for any of the analyzed variables of productive performance (Table 2).

Table 2.
Productive performance of laying hens fed different enzyme combinations in the period of 24 to 30 weeks of age in a free-range system.

Treatment		Egg production (%)	Average egg weight (g)	Egg mass (g per bird per day)	FCR (kg per dozen)	Livability (%)
Enzyme
	Phytase + xylanase(1)	95.84	59.18	57.24	1.42	100.0
	Phytase (1,500 FTU per kg)	94.66	58.60	55.15	1.45	99.51
Nutritional matrix
	Matrix I(2)	95.04	59.54	57.10	1.43	99.51
	Matrix II(3)	95.46	58.23	55.29	1.44	100.0
Probability
	Enzyme	0.1468	0.3167	0.0034*	0.0040*	0.1286
	Nutritional matrix	0.5894	0.0396*	0.0101*	0.8618	0.1286
	Enzyme x nutritional matrix	0.5129	0.5421	0.4461	0.8468	0.1286
Coefficient of variation (%)		1.64	1.91	1.73	1.33	0.67

• (1)Phytase, 450 FTU per kilogram; and xylanase, 12,000 BXU per kilogram. ⁽²⁾Nutritional matrix I: 100 Kcal kg^-1 apparent metabolizable energy, 0.16% calcium, 0.15% available phosphorous, 0.03% sodium, and 0.02% digestible lysine. ⁽³⁾Nutritional matrix II: 120 Kcal kg^-1 apparent metabolizable energy, 0.22% calcium, 0.20% available phosphorous, 0.04% sodium, and 0.05% digestible lysine. FCR, feed conversion ratio per dozen eggs. *Significant by the F-test, at 5% probability.

All productive performance variables for the specific phase evaluated are within the range suggested by the Isa Brown - Management Guide (ISA, 2007). This means that phytase (1,500 FTU per kilogram) alone or the combination phytase (450 FTU per kilogram) + xylanase (12,000 BXU per kilogram), independently of the used nutritional uplift, guaranteed the productive performance of the birds according to their potential.

When assessing the isolated effect of the enzyme strategy, the combination phytase + xylanase resulted in a higher egg mass value and in a better feed conversion ratio per dozen eggs (Table 2).

The obtained results are in line with those reported by Rezende et al. (2013), who also found that the enzyme improved the feed conversion ratio per dozen eggs. According to the authors, phytase makes complexed phosphorus available to phytic acid, improving its utilization, as well as other nutrients (calcium, iron, manganese, zinc, protein, and metabolizable energy) previously unavailable due to the complexation of the enzyme with phytate.

Taylor et al. (2018) observed a positive interaction between phytase and xylanase for the feed conversion ratio. The improvement in this ratio is attributed to the increase in nutrient availability in the substrate degraded by phytase. In addition, the presence of xylanase increases the permeability of the cell wall aleurone present in the diets, improving phytase action on phytate degradation.

Matrix I promoted higher values of egg weight and egg mass in relation to matrix II, set for greater dietary nutritional reductions (Table 2).

Costa et al. (2009) concluded that the energy requirement of laying hens is conditioned to factors such as body weight, weight gain, and egg mass production. Therefore, significant reductions in the energy level of the diets can affect these variables, as observed for egg mass in the present study.

Diets formulated with available phosphorus and calcium levels far below bird requirements can impair the feed conversion ratio and reduce nutrient metabolizability coefficients, resulting in a lower egg mass and weight (Tejedor et al., 2001). Moreover, dietary available phosphorus deficiency results in a severe reduction in phosphorus intake, and very low levels of this mineral can impair bird performance (Parmer et al., 1987).

Regarding the external quality of the eggs, there was an interaction between the inclusion of enzymes and nutritional matrices for shell percentage (Table 3). As a result of breaking down the interaction for shell percentage (Table 4), matrix II supplemented with phytase (1,500 FTU per kilogram) alone presented the highest value (10.20%) for this parameter.

Table 3.
External quality of the eggs of laying hens fed different enzyme combinations in the period of 24 to 30 weeks of age in a free-range system.

Treatment	Specific gravity	ST (μm)	Shell percentage	BS (kgf)
Enzyme
Phytase + xylanase(1)	1,088.8	0.4263	9.88	3.36
Phytase (1,500 FTU per kg)	1,088.9	0.4319	9.96	3.33
Nutritional matrix
Matrix I(2)	1,088.8	0.4291	9.91	3.35
Matrix II(3)	1,088.8	0.4290	9.93	3.34
Probability
Enzyme	0.8902	0.0867	0.5895	0.6264
Nutritional matrix	0.9280	0.5089	0.8740	0.8937
Enzyme x nutritional matrix	0.0528	0.1270	0.0065*	0.3168
CV (%)	0.41	5.47	5.42	13.12

• ⁽¹⁾Phytase, 450 FTU per kilogram; and xylanase, 12,000 BXU per kilogram. ⁽²⁾Nutritional matrix I: 100 Kcal kg^-1 apparent metabolizable energy, 0.16% calcium, 0.15% available phosphorous, 0.03% sodium, and 0.02% digestible lysine. ⁽³⁾Nutritional matrix II: 120 Kcal kg^-1 apparent metabolizable energy, 0.22% calcium, 0.20% available phosphorous, 0.04% sodium, and 0.05% digestible lysine. ST, shell thickness; BS, breaking strength; and CV, coefficient of variation.*Significant difference by the F-test, at 5% probability.

Table 4.
Interaction breakdown for shell percentage of the eggs of laying hens fed different enzyme combinations in the period of 24 to 30 weeks of age in a free-range system⁽¹⁾.

Nutritional matrix	Phytase + xylanase(2)	Phytase (1,500 FTU per kg)
	Shell percentage
Matrix I(3)	10.09	9.74B
Matrix II(4)	9.67b	10.20Aa

• ⁽¹⁾Different letters, uppercase in the same column and lowercase in the same row, indicate significant differences by Tukey’s test, at 5% probability. ⁽²⁾Phytase, 450 FTU per kilogram; and xylanase, 1,2000 BXU per kilogram. ⁽³⁾Nutritional matrix I: 100 Kcal kg^-1 apparent metabolizable energy, 0.16% calcium, 0.15% available phosphorous, 0.03% sodium, and 0.02% digestible lysine. ⁽⁴⁾Nutritional matrix II: 120 Kcal kg^-1 apparent metabolizable energy, 0.22% calcium, 0.20% available phosphorous, 0.04% sodium, and 0.05% digestible lysine.

Studies have shown that, as the level of phosphorus in the diet increases, there is a reduction in shell quality indices. Borrmann et al. (2001), for example, observed the influence of phosphorus and phytase on eggshell percentage. The obtained results suggest that the effect of phytic phosphorus hydrolysis by phytase is more significant when the diet contains a lower level of calcium.

There was no interaction between enzymes and nutritional matrix for any of the egg internal quality parameters (Table 5). However, yolk percentage was affected by the enzymes, showing the highest value with the combination phytase + xylanase. Together, these two enzymes increased yolk percentage and, consequently, egg mass (Table 2). An increase in egg mass due to the increase in the amount of albumen and yolk has been reported as one of the main effects of supplementing the diets of laying hens with enzymes (Soto-Salanova & Wyatt, 1997). In contrast, Oba et al. (2013) found no difference in the percentage of yolk when feeding layers with diets containing different levels of an enzyme complex (carbohydrases, phytase, and protease).

Table 5.
Internal quality of the eggs of laying hens fed different enzyme combinations in the period of 24 to 30 weeks of age in a free-range system.

Treatment		Yolk (%)	Yolk index	Albumen (%)	Haugh unit	L*	a*	b*	Chroma
Enzyme
	Phytase + xylanase(1)	24.72	0.3723	65.65	91.47	59.13	-6.40	41.85	42.39
	Phytase 1,500 FTU per kg	24.06	0.3809	65.65	91.06	58.92	-6.43	40.94	41.46
Nutritional matrix
	Matrix I(2)	24.30	0.3819	65.64	91.02	58.99	-6.32	41.92	42.42
	Matrix II(3)	24.47	0.3713	65.66	91.50	59.05	-6.50	40.86	41.43
Probability
	Enzyme	0.0039*	0.1192	0.6111	0.6040	0.5292	0.7514	0.0418*	0.0347*
	Nutritional matrix	0.4807	0.0546	0.5622	0.5436	0.8519	0.0745	0.0191*	0.0265*
	Enzyme x nutritional matrix	0.7414	0.0804	0.0738	0.8502	0.1341	0.4366	0.7403	0.8726
CV (%)		6.34	9.91	3.94	5.87	3.98	10.88	7.58	7.32

• ⁽¹⁾Phytase, 450 FTU per kilogram; and xylanase, 12,000 BXU per kilogram. ⁽²⁾Nutritional matrix I: 100 Kcal kg^-1 apparent metabolizable energy, 0.16% calcium, 0.15% available phosphorous, 0.03% sodium, and 0.02% digestible lysine. ⁽³⁾Nutritional matrix II: 120 Kcal kg^-1 apparent metabolizable energy, 0.22% calcium, 0.20% available phosphorous, 0.04% sodium, and 0.05% digestible lysine. L*, lightness; a*, color parameter a; b*, color parameter b; and CV, coefficient of variation. *Significant difference by the F-test, at 5% probability.

There was an effect of enzymes and nutritional matrix on color parameter b*, which indicates the color in the range from yellow (+b*) to blue (-b*), and on chroma, the ratio of a* to b* (Table 5). The combination phytase + xylanase and matrix I affected yolk color intensity. Similar results were obtained by Brunelli et al. (2012), who found that birds fed diets containing phytase (1,000 FTU per kilogram) laid eggs with more orange yolks than those fed diets without the enzyme. Pirgozliev et al. (2010) observed that the supplementation of xylanase (12,000 and 16,000 BXU per kilogram) in the diet intensified the color of the egg yolk.

The improvement in egg yolk pigmentation by adding xylanase can be explained by the greater digestibility of hemicellulose, a component of the plant cell wall, resulting in a greater release and use of pigments (Çiftci et al., 2003). One of the effects of supplementing the diets of laying hens with phytase is the increase in pigment absorption, since phytic acid has a depigmenting and antioxidant activity (Soto-Salanova & Wyatt, 1997).

Conclusion

The combination phytase (450 FTU per kilogram) + xylanase (12,000 BXU per kilogram), with the adoption of matrix I (100 Kcal kg^-1 apparent metabolizable energy, 0.16% calcium, 0.15% available phosphorus, 0.03% sodium, and 0.02% digestible lysine), is more efficient to maintain the egg quality of laying hens raised in a free-range system.

Acknowledgments

To Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), for financial support; and to Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciência Animal Tropical of Universidade Federal do Tocantins (UFT) and to Embrapa Suínos e Aves, for the opportunity to carry out the experiment.

References

• ABPA. Associação Brasileira de Proteína Animal. Relatório anual 2020. Available at: <Available at: http://abpa-br.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/abpa_relatorio_anual_2020_portugues_web.pdf >. Accessed on: Aug. 8 2020.
  » http://abpa-br.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/abpa_relatorio_anual_2020_portugues_web.pdf
• BARBOSA, V.M.; BAIÃO, N.C.; MENDES, P.M.M.; ROCHA, J.S.R; POMPEU, M.A.; LARA, L.J.C.; MARTINS, N.R.S.; NELSON, D.L.; MIRANDA, D.J.A.; CUNHA, C.E.; CARDOSO, D.M.; CARDEAL, P.C. Avaliação da qualidade da casca dos ovos provenientes de matrizes pesadas com diferentes idades. Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, v.64, p.1036-1044, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-09352012000400033.
  » https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-09352012000400033
• BORRMANN, M.S.L.; BERTECHINI, A.G.; FIALHO, E.T.; OLIVEIRA, B.L. Efeitos da adição de fitase com diferentes níveis de fósforo disponível em rações de poedeiras de segundo ciclo. Revista Ciências Agrotécnicas, v.25, p.181-187, 2001.
• BRUNELLI, S.R.; PINHEIRO, J.W.; FONSECA, N.A.N.; SILVA, C.A. da. Efeito de diferentes níveis de farelo de gérmen de milho desengordurado em dietas suplementadas com fitase para poedeiras comerciais. Semina: Ciências Agrárias, v.33, p.1991-2000, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2012v33n5p1991.
  » https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2012v33n5p1991
• CARD, L.E.; NESHEIM, M.C. Poultry production. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger, 1966. 399p.
• ÇIFTCI, İ.; YENICE, E.; GÖKÇEYREK, D.; ÖZTÜRK, E. Effects of energy level and enzyme supplementation in wheat-based layer diets on hen performance and egg quality. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section A - Animal Science, v.53, p.113-119, 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09064700310017967.
  » https://doi.org/10.1080/09064700310017967
• COSTA, F.G.P.; QUIRINO, B.J.S.; GIVISIEZ, P.E.N.; SILVA, J.H.V.; ALMEIDA, H.H.S.; COSTA, J.S.; GOULART, C.C. Poedeiras alimentadas com diferentes níveis de energia e óleo de soja na ração. Archivos de Zootecnia, v.58, p.405-411, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21071/az.v58i223.5181.
  » https://doi.org/10.21071/az.v58i223.5181
• COWIESON, A.J.; BEDFORD, M.R.; RAVINDRAN, V. Interactions between xylanase and glucanase in maize-soy-based diets for broilers. British Poultry Science, v.51, p.246-257, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00071661003789347.
  » https://doi.org/10.1080/00071661003789347
• COWIESON, A.J.; BEDFORD, M.R.; SELLE, P.H.; RAVINDRAN, V. Phytate and microbial phytase: implications for endogenous nitrogen losses and nutrient availability. World’s Poultry Science Journal, v.65, p.401-418, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043933909000294.
  » https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043933909000294
• FERREIRA, C.B.; GERALDO, A.; VIEIRA FILHO, J.A.; BRITO, J.A.G.; BERTECHINI, A.G.; PINHEIRO, S.R.F. Associação de carboidrases e fitase em dietas valorizadas e seus efeitos sobre desempenho e qualidade dos ovos de poedeiras leves. Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, v.67, p.249-254, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-7051.
  » https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-7051
• IQBAL, Z.; ROBERTS, J.; PEREZ-MALDONADO, R.A.; GOODARZI BOROOJENI, F.; SWICK, R.A.; RUHNKE, I. Pasture, multi-enzymes, benzoic acid and essential oils positively influence performance, intestinal organ weight and egg quality in free-range laying hens. British Poultry Science, v.59, p.180-189, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2017.1403566.
  » https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2017.1403566
• ISA. Institut de Sélection Animale. ISA Brown Management Guide. 2007. Available at: <Available at: http://www.isapoultry.com >. Accessed on: Sept. 17 2020.
  » http://www.isapoultry.com
• KIM, J.H.; PITARGUE, F.M.; JUNG, H.; HAN, G.P.; CHOI, H.S.; KIL, D.Y. Effect of superdosing phytase on productive performance and egg quality in laying hens. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, v.30, p.994-998, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.17.0149.
  » https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.17.0149
• LAY JR, D.C.; FULTON, R.M.; HESTER, P.Y.; KARCHER, D.M.; KJAER, J.B.; MENCH, J.A.; MULLENS, B.A.; NEWBERRY, R.C.; NICOL, C.J.; O’SULLIVAN, N.P.; PORTER, R.E. Hen welfare in different housing systems. Poultry Science, v.90, p.278-294, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2010-00962.
  » https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2010-00962
• MANANGI, M.K.; MAHARJAN, P.; COON, C.N. Effect of different concentrations of dietary P and Ca on plasma inorganic P and urinary P excretion using noncolostomized and colostomized broilers. Poultry Science, v.97, p.522-530, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pex305.
  » https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pex305
• MANOBHAVAN, M.; ELANGOVAN, A.V.; SRIDHAR, M.; SHET, M.; AJITH, S.; PAL, D.T.; GOWDA, N.K.S. Effect of super dosing of phytase on growth performance, ileal digestibility and bone characteristics in broilers fed corn-soya-based diets. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition, v.100, p.93-100, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jpn.12341.
  » https://doi.org/10.1111/jpn.12341
• MCLAREN, K. XIII - The development of the CIE 1976 (L* a* b*) uniform colour space and colour-difference formula. Coloration Technology, v.92, p.338-341, 1976. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-4408.1976.tb03301.x.
  » https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-4408.1976.tb03301.x
• NAGATA, A.K.; RODRIGUES, P.B.; ALVARENGA, R.R.; ZANGERONIMO, M.G.; DONATO, D.C.Z.; SILVA, J.H.V. da. Carcass characteristics of broilers at 42 days receiving diets with phytase in different energy and crude protein levels. Ciência e Agrotecnologia, v.35, p.575-581, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-70542011000300020.
  » https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-70542011000300020
• OBA, A.; PINHEIRO, J.W.; SILVA, C.A. da; CASTRO-GOMEZ, R.J.H.; BENITEZ, C.R.; UENO, F.Y.; BORGES, C.A.; ALMEIDA, M. de. Características produtivas, qualitativas e microbiológicas de galinhas poedeiras alimentadas com diferentes níveis de complexo enzimático. Semina: Ciências Agrárias, v.34, p.4179-4186, 2013. Supl. 2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2013v34n6Supl2p4179.
  » https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2013v34n6Supl2p4179
• PARMER, T.G.; CAREW, L.B.; ALSTER, F.A.; SCANES, C.G. Thyroid function, growth hormone, and organ growth in broilers deficient in phosphorus. Poultry Science, v.66, p.1995-2004, 1987. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0661995.
  » https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0661995
• PIRGOZLIEV, V.; BEDFORD, M.R.; ACAMOVIC, T. Effect of dietary xylanase on energy, amino acid and mineral metabolism, and egg production and quality in laying hens. British Poultry Science, v.51, p.639-647, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2010.514325.
  » https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2010.514325
• REZENDE, J.C.R.; LAURENTIZ, A.C. de; FILARDI, R. da S.; FASCINA, V.B.; BERTO, D.A.; SOBRANE FILHO, S.T. Níveis de fósforo e fitase para poedeiras comerciais leves. Boletim de Indústria Animal, v.70, p.149-157, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17523/bia.v70n2p149.
  » https://doi.org/10.17523/bia.v70n2p149
• ROSTAGNO, H.S. (Ed.). Tabelas brasileiras para aves e suínos: composição de alimentos e exigências nutricionais. 4.ed. Viçosa: Ed. da UFV, 2017. 488p.
• SOTO-SALANOVA, M.F.; WYATT, C.L. Uso de enzimas para alcanzar el maximo potencial de las materias primas para dietas de avicultura. Minneapolis: Midwest Poultry Federation Convention, 1997.
• SOUZA, K.M.R. de; FARIA, D.E. de; NAKAGI, V. de S.; CARÃO, Á.C. de P.; PACHECO, B.H.C.; TREVISAN, R.B.; GOMES, G.A. Metabolizable energy values of diets supplemented with xylanase determined with laying hens. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, v.41, p.2433-2440, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982012001200008.
  » https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982012001200008
• TAYLOR, A.E.; BEDFORD, M.R.; PACE, S.C.; MILLER, H.M. The effects of phytase and xylanase supplementation on performance and egg quality in laying hens. British Poultry Science, v.59, p.554-561, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2018.1483575.
  » https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2018.1483575
• TEJEDOR, A.A.; ALBINO, L.F.T.; ROSTAGNO, H.S.; VIEITES, F.M. Efeito da adição da enzima fitase sobre o desempenho e a digestibilidade ileal de nutrientes. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, v.30, p.802-808, 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982001000300027.
  » https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982001000300027
• TUTKUN, M.; DENLI, M.; DEMIREL, R. Productivity and egg quality of two commercial layer hybrids kept in free-range system. Turkish Journal of Agriculture - Food Science and Technology, v.6, p.1444-1447, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v6i10.1444-1447.2070.
  » https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v6i10.1444-1447.2070
• WEEKS, C.A.; LAMBTON, S.L.; WILLIAMS, A.G. Implications for welfare, productivity and sustainability of the variation in reported levels of mortality for laying hen flocks kept in different housing systems: a meta-analysis of ten studies. PLoS ONE, v.11, e0146394, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0146394.
  » https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0146394
• ZUMBADO, M. La gravedad especifica para determinar la calidad del cascarón. Avicultura Profesional, v.1, p.8-10, 1983.

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  14 May 2021
• Date of issue
  2021

History

• Received
  24 Sept 2020
• Accepted
  25 Jan 2021