Prey preference of the stone crab Platyxanthus crenulatus (Decapoda: Platyxanthidae) in laboratory conditions

Abstract

The preference for a particular type of prey implies an active behavioral choice of the predator. The present work deals with the prey preference of the large stone crab Platyxanthus crenulatus among similar sized gastropods and bivalves of different substrates using a recent proposed methodology based on a two-stage approach. In laboratory, crabs received different mollusk species separately to determine the consumption in number of each species when choice was not possible. Further, crabs were offered the same mollusc species but together to record differences of specific consumption when choice was possible. Results were then compared to assess prey preferences. Platyxanthus crenulatus is able to effectively attack and consume the majority of the sympatric mollusk species, although preferred the dominant species Brachidontes rodriguezii over the others. Such preference seems to be driven by shell shape and thickness which may be a common pattern in prey preference among large stone crab species.

bivalves; gastropods; South-western Atlantic; trophic behavior; xanthids

• Addison, B. 2009. Shell Traits of a Marine Mussel Mediate Predation Selectivity by Crabs and Sea Stars. Journal of Shellfish Research, 28(2): 299-303.
• Aronhime, B.R. and Brown, K.M. 2009. The roles of profit and claw strength in determining mussel size selection by crabs. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 379: 28-33.
• Begon M.; Harper, J.L. and Townsend, C.R. 1996. Ecology: individuals, populations and communities. Blackwell Sci., Oxford. 2^da edición inglesa: (1990), Ed. Omega, Barcelona. 1068 p.
• Bourdeau, P.E. and O'connor, N.J. 2003. Predation by the nonindigenous asian shore crab Hemigrapsus sanguineus on macroalgae and mollusks. Northeastern naturalist, 10(3): 319- 334.
• Boschi, E.E. 1964. Los Crustáceos Decápodos Brachyura del Litoral Bonaerense (República Argentina). Boletín Institucional de Biología Marina 6, 100 p.
• Brown, K.M.; Keenan, S.F. and Banks, P.D. 2005. Dominance hierarchies in xanthid crabs: roles in resource-holding potential and field distributions. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 291: 189-196.
• Cledón, M. and Nuñez, J.D. 2010. Siphon nipping facilitates lethal predation in the clam Mesodesma mactroides (Reeve, 1854) (Molluska: Bivalva). Marine Biology, 157: 737-745.
• Creswell, P.D. and McLay, C.L. 1990. Handling times, prey size and species selection by Cancer novaezelandiae feeding on molluskan prey. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 140: 13-28.
• Ebersole, E.L. and Kennedy, V.S. 1995. Prey preferences of blue crabs Callinectes sapidus feeding on three bivalve species. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 118:167-177.
• Farias, N.E. 2011. Habitat and life history of the purple stone crab Platyxanthus crenulatus (Milne Edwards 1897) (Brachyura: Platyxanthidae) PhD Thesis. Departamento de Biología. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. 145 pp.
• Gerhart, S.D. and Bert, T.M. 2008. Life-history aspects of stone crabs (Genus Menippe): size at maturity, growth, and age. Journal of Crustacean Biology, 28: 252-261.
• Gordon, D.P. and Wear, R.G. 1999. A new ctenostome bryozoan ectosymbiotic with terminal moult paddle crabs (Portunidae) in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Zoology, 26(4): 373-380.
• Johnson, D.H. 1980. The comparison of usage and availability measurements for evaluating resource preference. Ecology, 61(1): 65-71.
• Juanes, F. 1992. Why do decapod crustaceans prefer small-sized molluskan prey? Marine Ecology Progress Series, 87: 239-249.
• Mascaró, M. and Seed, R. 2001. Choice of prey size and species in Carcinus maenas (L.) feeding on four bivalves of contrasting shell morphology. Hidrobiología, 449: 159-170.
• Menge, B.A.; Lubchenco, J. and Ashkenas, L.R. 1985. Diversity, heterogeneity and consumer pressure in a tropical rocky intertidal community. Oecologia, 65: 394-405.
• Micheli, F. 1995. Behavioral plasticity in prey-size selectivity of the blue crab Callinectes sapidus feeding on bivalve prey. Journal of Animal Ecology, 64(1): 63-74.
• Morales, C. and Antezana, T. 1983. Diet selection of the Chilean stone crab Homalaspis plana. Marine Biology, 77: 79- 83.
• Newman, S.P.; Handy, R.D. and Gruber, S.H. 2010. Diet and prey preference of juvenile lemon sharks Negaprion brevirostris Marine Ecology Progress Series, 398: 221-234.
• Ng, P.K.L.; Guinot, D. and Davie P. 2008. Systema Brachyororum: Part I. An annotated checklist of extant brachyuran crabs of the world. The Raffles Bulletin of Zoology, 17: 1-286.
• Palmer, A.1985. Adaptive value of shell variation in Thais lamellosa: effect of thick shells on vulnerability to and preference by crabs. Veliger, 27(4): 349 - 356.
• Penchaszadeh, P.E. 1973. Ecología de la comunidad del Mejillín (Brachidontes rodriguezii D'Orb) en el mediolitoral rocoso de Mar del Plata (Argentina): el proceso de recolonización. Physis, 32(84): 51-64.
• Penchaszadeh, P.E. 2004. Caracoles, almejas y mejillones. p. 253-270. In: Boschi E.E. and Cousseau M.B. (eds.) La vida entre mareas: vegetales y animales de las costas de Mar del Plata, Argentina. Publicaciones Especiales INIDEP, Mar del Plata, Argentina.
• Saunders, M.I.; Thompson, P.A.; Jeffs, A.G.; Säwström, C.; Sachlikidis, N.; Beckley L.E. and Waite, A.M. 2012. Fussy Feeders: phyllosoma larvae of the Western rocklobster (Panulirus cygnus) demonstrate prey preference. PLoS ONE 7(5): e36580. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0036580.
• Scelzo, M.A.; Martinez Arca, J. and Lucero, N.M. 2002. Densidad, diversidad y biomasa de la macrofauna componente de los fondos de pesca "Camarón-langostino", frente a Mar del Plata, Argentina (1998-1999). Revista de Investigación y Desarrollo Pesquero, 15: 43-65.
• Seed, R. and Hughes, R.N. 1995. Criteria for prey size-selection in molluskivorous crabs with contrasting claw morphologies. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 193: 177-195.
• Singer, M.C. 2000. Reducing ambiguity in describing plant-insect interactions: "preference", "acceptability" and "electivity". Ecology Letters, 3: 159-162.
• Smallegange, I.M. and van der Meer, J. 2003. Why do shore crabs not prefer the most profitable mussels? Journal of Animal Ecology, 72: 599-607.
• Smallegange, I.M.; Hidding, B.; Eppenga, J.M.A. and van der Meer, J. 2008. Optimal foraging and risk of claw damage: How flexible are shore crabs in their prey size selectivity? Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 367: 157-163.
• Taplin, R.H. 2007. Experimental design and analysis to investigate predator preferences for prey. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 344: 116-122.
• Underwood, A.J.; Chapman, M.G. and Crowe, T.P. 2004. Identifying and understanding ecological preferences for habitat or prey. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 300: 161-187.
• Underwood, A.J. and Clarke, K.R. 2005. Solving some statistical problems in analyses of experiments on choices of food and on associations with habitat. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 318: 227-237.
• Virnstein, R.W. 1977. The importance of predation by crabs and fishes on benthic infauna in Chesapeake Bay. Ecology, 58: 1199-1217.
• Yamada S.B. and Boulding, E.G. 1998. Claw morphology, prey size selection and foraging efficiency in generalist and specialist shell-breaking crabs. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 220: 191-211.

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  27 Jan 2015
• Date of issue
  June 2013

History

• Received
  11 May 2012
• Accepted
  18 Feb 2013