Metallo-β-lactamase-production in meropenem-susceptible Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates: risk for silent spread

ARTICLES

Metallo-β-lactamase-production in meropenem-susceptible Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates: risk for silent spread

Renata Cristina PicãoI, II, ⁺; Floristher Elaine Carrara-Marroni^{III, VI}; Ana Cristina Gales^I; Emerson José Venâncio^IV; Danilo Elias Xavier^I; Maria Cristina Bronharo Tognim^V; Jacinta Sanchez Pelayo^VI

^ILaboratório ALERTA, Departamento de Infectologia, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil

^IIDepartamento de Microbiologia Médica, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil

^IIIDepartamento de Patologia, Análises Clínicas e Toxicologia, Universidade Estadual de Maringá, Maringá, PR, Brasil

^IVDepartamento de Ciências Patológicas, Universidade Estadual de Maringá, Maringá, PR, Brasil

^VDepartamento de Ciências Básicas da Saúde, Universidade Estadual de Maringá, Maringá, PR, Brasil

^VIDepartamento de Microbiologia, Universidade Estadual de Londrina, Londrina, PR, Brasil

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to characterize two metallo-β-lactamases (MBLs)-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolates showing meropenem susceptibility. Antimicrobial susceptibility was assessed by automated testing and Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute agar dilution method. MBL production was investigated by phenotypic tests. Molecular typing was determined by pulsed field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). MBL-encoding genes, as well as their genetic context, were identified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and sequencing. The location of bla_IMP-16 was determined by plasmid electrophoresis, Southern blot and hybridization. Transcriptional levels of bla_IMP-16, mexB, mexD, mexF, mexY, ampC and oprD were determined by semi-quantitative real time PCR. The P. aeruginosa isolates studied, Pa30 and Pa43, showed imipenem and meropenem susceptibility by automated testing. Agar dilution assays confirmed meropenem susceptibility whereas both isolates showed low level of imipenem resistance. Pa30 and Pa43 were phenotypically detected as MBL producers. PFGE revealed their clonal relatedness. bla_IMP-16 was identified in both isolates, carried as a single cassette in a class 1 integron that was embedded in a plasmid of about 60-Kb. Pa30 and Pa43 overexpressed MexAB-OprM, MexCD-OprJ and MexXY-OprM efflux systems and showed basal transcriptional levels of ampC and oprD. MBL-producing P. aeruginosa that are not resistant to meropenem may represent a risk for therapeutic failure and act as silent reservoirs of MBL-encoding genes.

Key words: β-lactam resistance - β-lactamase - meropenem - efflux pumps - Gram-negative non-fermenting

The carbapenems represent important therapeutic options for serious infections caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. However, P. aeruginosa that are resistant to these antimicrobials have emerged and spread within hospital settings worldwide. This pathogen may become resistant to the carbapenems by modulating and combining different intrinsic mechanisms such as down regulation or loss of porins, especially OprD, overexpression of efflux pumps, substantial production of its chromosomal AmpC β-lactamase and target alterations (Lister et al. 2009). Alternatively, P. aeruginosa may acquire genes encoding metallo-β-lactamases (MBL), enzymes that are able to inactivate carbapenems efficiently and thus are considered the most clinically significant mechanism of carbapenem resistance in this species (Walsh 2008).

Over the last decades, different MBLs have been identified in P. aeruginosa from numerous geographic regions (Sacha et al. 2008). Noteworthy, carbapenem-susceptible P. aeruginosa clinical isolates that carried MBL-encoding genes have been reported (Martins et al. 2007, Pellegrino et al. 2008, Naas et al. 2011). Clinical isolates showing either diminished or no expression of MBL-encoding genes may present the carbapenem-susceptible phenotype. In the above referenced reports, however, the expression of MBL-encoding genes was not determined (Martins et al. 2007, Pellegrino et al. 2008, Naas et al. 2011). Nevertheless, these findings are worrisome since carbapenem-susceptible MBL producers may act as reservoirs of such resistance determinants with potential risk for silent spread. In the present paper, we report the occurrence of meropenem-susceptible P. aeruginosa clinical isolates producers of the MBL IMP-16. The expression of genes associated with carbapenem resistance was investigated, as well as the genetic context and location of the bla_IMP-16 gene.

SUBJECTS, MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial isolates - During 2003, two P. aeruginosa clinical isolates, namely Pa30 and Pa43, were recovered from different patients hospitalized in a teaching hospital located in the city of Londrina, southern Brazil. Pa30 was isolated from a necrotic tissue culture of a 24 year-old male patient presenting a surgical wound infection and Pa43 was recovered from the urine of a 54 year-old male patient with urinary tract infection. The genetic relatedness of Pa30 and Pa43 was evaluated by pulsed field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) of SpeI-digested DNA samples, as previously described (Picão et al. 2009).

Species identification, susceptibility testing and screening for carbapenemase production - Species identification and routine antibiogram of Pa30 and Pa43 isolates were performed using the MicroScan Walkaway automated system (Dade Behring, West Sacramento, CA) with Combo negative CN30 Panels. Antimicrobials tested included piperacillin, piperacillin-tazobactam, ceftazidime, cefepime, aztreonam, imipenem, meropenem, amikacin, gentamicin, tobramycin and ciprofloxacin. Susceptibility profiles of isolates were confirmed by Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) agar dilution for amikacin, ciprofloxacin, ceftazidime, cefepime, imipenem and meropenem. P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853 and Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 strains were used as quality control in susceptibility testing assays (CLSI 2009, 2012).

MBL phenotypic detection, identification of MBL-encoding genes and analysis of their genetic environment - Isolates Pa30 and Pa43 were phenotypically screened for MBL production using both modified Hodge and double disk synergy tests, as previously described (Lee et al. 2003, Picão et al. 2008). A multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) targeting the MBL-encoding genes bla_IMP, bla_VIM, bla_SPM, bla_GIM and bla_SIM was performed, using previous published primers and cycling conditions (Mendes et al. 2007). The genetic environment of bla_IMP was determined by PCR using the specific primers to anneal at the 5' and 3' conserved sequences of class 1 integrons, followed by amplicon sequencing (Naas et al. 2011). Sequencing reactions were performed using specific primers with automated ABI 3130 sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). The nucleotide and deduced protein sequences were analyzed with online software available at the National Center for Biotechnology Information website (ncbi.nlm.nih.gov).

Genetic location of bla_IMP-16 - Plasmid extraction was performed by the Kieser technique (Kieser 1984). E. coli NCTC 50192 harbouring four plasmids of 154, 66, 38 and 7-kb was used as molecular size marker in gel electrophoresis assays. Hybridization of plasmid extracts was performed after gel electrophoresis and Southern blotting, which was performed by capillary transfer onto Hybond-N⁺ nylon membrane (GE Healthcare, UK). Labelling of bla_IMP-16 specific probe and signal detection were carried out using a nonradioactive labelling and detection kit according to the manufacturer's instructions (GE Healthcare, UK).

Relative quantification of mRNA by real time PCR (RT-PCR) - Transcriptional levels of bla_IMP-16 and also of genes encoding components of efflux pumps (mexB, mexD, mexF, mexY), chromosomal cephalosporinase (ampC) and OprD porin (oprD) were determined with a Mastercycler Realplex apparatus (Eppendorf, Germany). Total RNA was isolated from logarithmic cultures of each strain using the RNase Mini Kit, following the manufacturer's recommendations (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Five micrograms of total RNA was submitted to cDNA conversion using random primers by High Capacity cDNA Archive Kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, USA). Semi-quantitative RT-PCR was performed with Platinum SYBR Green Supermix (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, USA), using specific primers for the chromosomal genes mexB, mexD, mexF, mexY, ampC and oprD, as previously described (Xavier et al. 2010), and also for the acquired MBL-encoding gene, bla_IMP-16 (Mendes et al. 2007). Amplification was carried out in triplicate from cDNA preparations. The relative transcriptional levels were calculated according to ΔΔC_T method by Realplex4 software following the manufacture's recommendations (Eppendorf, Germany). Briefly, the ΔΔCt method provides the relative gene expression levels by averaging cycle threshold (Ct) values from triplicate RT-PCR reactions for the target and housekeeping genes. The range of expression levels obtained for the triplicates, which incorporates the standard deviation (SD) of the ΔΔCt value into the fold-difference, was used to calculate the confidence interval (CI) considering a confidence level of 95%. Additionally, in order to minimize the error and preserve the accuracy and robustness of this test, we have excluded and repeated those triplicate reactions whose average of Ct values had presented a SD value higher than 0.20. The rpsL endogenous gene was used as the housekeeping gene and the wild-type P. aeruginosa PA01 was used as the reference strain to determine the relative expression levels of those chromosomal genes, while, for the analysis of the acquired MBL-encoding gene expression, we have included as the reference strain a previously characterized IMP-16-producing P. aeruginosa (isolate 101-4704) which is fully resistant to carbapenems [imipenem and meropenem minimum inhibitory concentration (MICs), 256 µg/mL and 128 µg/mL, respectively], ceftazidime (MIC > 256 µg/mL) and cefepime (MIC 64 µg/mL) (Mendes et al. 2004).

The efflux systems MexAB-OprM, MexCD-OprJ, MexEF-OprN and MexXY-OprM were considered overexpressed when the transcriptional levels of mexB, mexD, mexE and mexY were at least two, 100, 100 and 4 fold higher than those of the wild-type reference strain PAO1, respectively (Xavier et al. 2010). Reduced oprD expression and overexpression of ampC were considered relevant when their transcriptional levels were ≤ 70% and ≥ 10-fold, respectively, compared to that of the PAO1 reference strain (Xavier et al. 2010).

RESULTS

For surveillance purposes, during 2003, all ceftazidime-resistant P. aeruginosa isolates recovered in a tertiary teaching hospital located in Londrina were screened for carbapenemase production. Isolates Pa30 and Pa43 recovered in this period were initially subjected to automated susceptibility testing. Both isolates showed susceptibility to aztreonam, piperacillin-tazobactam, imipenem and meropenem but resistance to ceftazidime, cefepime, ciprofloxacin, gentamicin and tobramycin. Surprisingly, despite of their initial susceptibility to imipenem (MIC ≤ 4 µg/mL - by the time these isolate were tested, imipenem breakpoint for susceptibility was ≤ 4 µg/mL), isolates Pa30 and Pa43 were phenotypically detected as MBL producers. Susceptibility testing determined by CLSI agar dilution confirmed resistance to amikacin, ciprofloxacin, ceftazidime and cefepime (Table). In addition, both isolates showed susceptibility to meropenem, but resistance to imipenem (MIC 8 µg/mL), level of resistance that was significantly lower than that shown by isolate 101-4704 (MIC 256 µg/mL). Pa30 and Pa43 shared the same PFGE restriction pattern, indicating their clonal origin (data not shown).

Pa30 and Pa43 isolates presented an amplicon consistent with the bla_IMP gene. Further sequencing identified the bla_IMP-16 allele in both isolates. Analysis of bla_IMP-16 genetic context revealed that both isolates carried this gene as a single cassette into the variable region of a class 1 integron. The integrase gene showed a GGG deletion between -10 and -35 boxes of P2 compared to that of isolate 101-4704, possibly inactivating this promoter in isolates Pa30 and Pa43. In contrast, Pa30 and Pa43 harboured the putative weak P_c version (TGGACA-N17-TAAGCT), which was identical to the one identified in isolate 101-4704.

Hybridization experiments revealed that bla_IMP-16 was carried by a plasmid of about 60-Kb in both Pa30 and Pa43. However, repetitive attempts to transfer pPa30 and pPa43 by transformation performed as previously described were unsuccessful, regardless of the recipient strains used, either electrocompetent E. coli TOP10 or P. aeruginosa PA01 (data not shown) (Picão et al. 2009).

Semi-quantitative RT-PCR analysis showed that transcriptional levels of bla_IMP-16 were similar in Pa30, Pa43 and 101-4704 isolates. In addition, Pa30, Pa43 and 101-4704 showed transcriptional levels of oprD comparable to that of the reference strain PA01, which might indicate normal expression of the OprD porin in these clinical isolates (Table). However, OMP analysis by sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis revealed the absence of a 49 kDa band in the protein pattern of the 101-4704 isolate, while this structure was preserved in Pa30, Pa43 and PA01 strain (data not shown), indicating possible OprD loss in the carbapenem-resistant isolate 101-4704. Analysis of ampC transcription suggested that Pa30 and Pa43 produced basal amounts of AmpC, whereas isolate 101-4704 overexpressed this cephalosporinase (Table). Regarding efflux pumps constituents, mexB, mexD and mexY transcriptional levels were higher in Pa30 than in PA01, suggesting MexAB-OprM, MexCD-OprJ and MexXY-OprM overexpression, respectively. Similarly, Pa43 showed mexD and mexY transcriptional levels significantly higher than those of PA01, but its mexB expression was near the cut-off value for overexpression. The carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa producing IMP-16, isolate 101-4704, also showed increased transcriptional levels of mexB and mexY compared to PA01, indicating that the MexAB-OprM and MexXY-OprM efflux systems were overexpressed in this strain. Nevertheless, Pa30 and Pa43 showed transcriptional levels of mexD and mexY significantly higher than those of isolate 101-4704 which, in turn, showed mexB levels much higher than those of the former isolates (Table). The magnitude of transcriptional levels differences for the analyzed genes considering an 95% CI is depicted in Figure.

DISCUSSION

In this study, we have identified two MBL-producing P. aeruginosa clinical isolates that exhibited low level of imipenem resistance but susceptibility to meropenem. PFGE analysis revealed that those isolates were genetically related to each other. However, previous report about hypersusceptible phenotype in P. aeruginosa suggested that this phenomenon is not inherent to one particular type of strain, once it has been observed among genetically unrelated clinical isolates (Wolter et al. 2009). Fortunately, the patients from whom the strains Pa30 and Pa43 were isolated were not seriously ill and showed clinical resolution of signs and symptoms after receiving ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin, respectively, for 14 days.

To date, IMP-16 production has only been identified in carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas spp clinical isolates from Brazil (Mendes et al. 2004, Marra et al. 2006, Carvalho-Assef et al. 2010, Scheffer et al. 2010). In this study, we have observed that bla_IMP-16 transcriptional level was similar among Pa30, Pa43 and 101-4704, despite of the probable impaired P2 promoter in Pa30 and Pa43. Nevertheless, bla_IMP-16 expression was not enough to confer high level of carbapenem resistance in isolates Pa30 and Pa43.

High level carbapenem resistance in strain 101-4704 could be attributed not only to IMP-16 activity, but also to the OprD loss and the concomitant overexpression of AmpC and MexAB-OprM efflux system. It has been previously observed that mutants hyperexpressing the MexCD-OprJ efflux system usually show imipenem hypersusceptibility (Masuda et al. 1996, Wolter et al. 2005). Although the mechanism involved in such phenotype is unknown, it has been proposed that it is not related to OprD loss or AmpC repression (Wolter et al. 2005). One hypothesis is that the hyperexpression of mexCD-oprJ operon may be associated with downregulation of an uncharacterized efflux system that extrudes imipenem, since the P. aeruginosa genome contains several uncharacterized efflux pumps belonging to multiple families (Angus et al. 1982, Wolter et al. 2005). It is also possible that MexCD-OprJ hyperexpression could alter the composition or architecture of the outer membrane, increasing its permeability to carbapenems (Angus et al. 1982, Wolter et al. 2005). Therefore, the hyperexpression of MexCD-OprJ might have contributed to limit levels of carbapenem resistance in the isolates Pa30 and Pa43, although further analyses are necessary to confirm this hypothesis.

MBL detection has not been routinely performed in most clinical microbiology laboratories. Consequently, the occurrence of MBL production in P. aeruginosa that remain susceptible to meropenem might be unrecognized by the clinical laboratories. It might lead to underestimation of MBL prevalence in the clinical setting. In this manner, these MBL producers might act as silent reservoirs of such resistance determinants, with ability to spread, since MBL-encoding genes are often carried by mobile genetic elements. In addition, failing in detecting MBL production among meropenem-susceptible isolates may lead to inadequate prescription of this drug and possible therapeutic failure in seriously ill patients.

In 2010, the CLSI revised the Enterobacteriaceae clinical breakpoints for carbapenems in order to overcome the problematic emergence of KPC producers that might be categorized as susceptible to these antimicrobial agents (CLSI 2010). More recently, the carbapenems clinical breakpoints for P. aeruginosa were also revised (CLSI 2012). Based on the findings reported here, although the CLSI initiative avoided the miscategorization of the MBL producers Pa30 and Pa43 as susceptible to imipenem, these isolates were still categorized as meropenem-susceptible. It might be difficult to establish the correct breakpoint that would certainly detect complex isolates like Pa30 and Pa43, or others that might appear even more susceptible to carbapenems due to other factors. Identification of carbapenemase producers could also rely upon phenotypic detection, especially in regions where MBL-producing isolates are prevalent. However, the implementation of such recommendation has been jeopardized by the lack of a consensus regarding the criterion to select isolates for screening, the method, the β-lactam substrates and the best inhibitor combinations to be employed for precise MBL phenotypic detection. Although much progress has been achieved in comprehending the mechanisms of antimicrobial resistance, it is imperative that the scientific community concentrates efforts in developing means to assess the real prevalence of carbapenemase producers. It is also very important to evaluate its clinical impact and establish whether carbapenems would be appropriate to treat infections due to carbapenemase producers that are still categorized as susceptible to these antimicrobials.

Received 8 November 2011

Accepted 20 March 2012

Financial support: Fundação Araucária (375/2006)

ACG is a researcher from CNPq (307816/2009-5).

• Angus BL, Carey AM, Caron DA, Kropinski AM, Hancock RE 1982. Outer membrane permeability in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: comparison of a wild-type with an antibiotic-supersusceptible mutant. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 21: 299-309.
• Carvalho-Assef AP, Gomes MZ, Silva AR, Werneck L, Rodrigues CA, Souza MJ, Asensi MD 2010. IMP-16 in Pseudomonas putida and Pseudomonas stutzeri: potential reservoirs of multidrug resistance. J Med Microbiol 59: 1130-1131.
• CLSI - Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute 2009. Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically. Approved Standard. Eighth informational supplement M07-A8, CLSI, Wayne, 88 pp.
• CLSI - Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute 2010. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Twentieth informational supplement M100-S20, CLSI, Wayne, 160 pp.
• CLSI - Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute 2012. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Twenty-second informational supplement M100-S22, CLSI, Wayne, 188 pp.
• Kieser T 1984. Factors affecting the isolation of CCC DNA from Streptomyces lividans and Escherichia coli Plasmid 12: 19-36.
• Lee K, Lim YS, Yong D, Yum JH, Chong Y 2003. Evaluation of the Hodge test and the imipenem-EDTA double-disk synergy test for differentiating metallo-beta-lactamase-producing isolates of Pseudomonas spp and Acinetobacter spp. J Clin Microbiol 41: 4623-4629.
• Lister PD, Wolter DJ, Hanson ND 2009. Antibacterial-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa: clinical impact and complex regulation of chromosomally encoded resistance mechanisms. Clin Microbiol Rev 22: 582-610.
• Marra AR, Pereira CA, Gales AC, Menezes LC, Cal RG, de Souza JM, Edmond MB, Faro C, Wey SB 2006. Bloodstream infections with metallo-beta-lactamase-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa: epidemiology, microbiology and clinical outcomes. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 50: 388-390.
• Martins AF, Zavascki AP, Gaspareto PB, Barth AL 2007. Dissemination of Pseudomonas aeruginosa producing SPM-1-like and IMP-1-like metallo-beta-lactamases in hospitals from southern Brazil. Infection 35: 457-460.
• Masuda N, Gotoh N, Ohya S, Nishino T 1996. Quantitative correlation between susceptibility and OprJ production in NfxB mutants of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Antimicrob Agents Chemother 40: 909-913.
• Mendes RE, Kiyota KA, Monteiro J, Castanheira M, Andrade SS, Gales AC, Pignatari ACC, Tufik S 2007. Rapid detection and identification of metallo-beta-lactamase-encoding genes by multiplex real-time PCR assay and melt curve analysis. J Clin Microbiol 45: 544-547.
• Mendes RE, Toleman MA, Ribeiro J, Sader HS, Jones RN, Walsh TR 2004. Integron carrying a novel metallo-beta-lactamase gene, bla_IMP-16, and a fused form of aminoglycoside-resistant gene aac(6')-30/aac(6')-Ib': report from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 48: 4693-4702.
• Naas T, Bogaerts P, Kostyanev T, Cuzon G, Huang TD, Ozsu S, Nordmann P, Glupczynski Y 2011. Silent spread of IMP-13-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa belonging to sequence type 621 in Belgium. J Antimicrob Chemother 66: 2178-2179.
• Pellegrino FL, Casali N, Nouer SA, Riley LW, Moreira BM 2008. A carbapenem-susceptible Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain carrying the bla(SPM) gene. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 61: 214-216.
• Picão RC, Andrade SS, Nicoletti AG, Campana EH, Moraes GC, Mendes RE, Gales AC 2008. Metallo-beta-lactamase detection: comparative evaluation of double-disk synergy versus combined disk tests for IMP-, GIM-, SIM-, SPM- or VIM-producing isolates. J Clin Microbiol 46: 2028-2037.
• Picão RC, Poirel L, Gales AC, Nordmann P 2009. Diversity of beta-lactamases produced by ceftazidime-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates causing bloodstream infections in Brazil. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 53: 3908-3913.
• Sacha P, Wieczorek P, Hauschild T, Zorawski M, Olszanska D, Tryniszewska E 2008. Metallo-beta-lactamases of Pseudomonas aeruginosa - a novel mechanism resistance to beta-lactam antibiotics. Folia Histochem Cytobiol 46: 137-142.
• Scheffer MC, Bazzo ML, Steindel M, Darini AL, Climaco E, Dalla-Costa LM 2010. Intrahospital spread of carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a university hospital in Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brazil. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 43: 367-371.
• Walsh TR 2008. Clinically significant carbapenemases: an update. Curr Opin Infect Dis 21: 367-371.
• Wolter DJ, Black JA, Lister PD, Hanson ND 2009. Multiple genotypic changes in hypersusceptible strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from cystic fibrosis patients do not always correlate with the phenotype. J Antimicrob Chemother 64: 294-300.
• Wolter DJ, Hanson ND, Lister PD 2005. AmpC and OprD are not involved in the mechanism of imipenem hypersusceptibility among Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates overexpressing the mexCD-oprJ efflux pump. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 49: 4763-4766.
• Xavier DE, Picão RC, Girardello R, Fehlberg LC, Gales AC 2010. Efflux pumps expression and its association with porin down-regulation and beta-lactamase production among Pseudomonas aeruginosa causing bloodstream infections in Brazil. BMC Microbiol 10: 217.

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  14 Sept 2012
• Date of issue
  Sept 2012

History

• Received
  08 Nov 2011
• Accepted
  20 Mar 2012