Elimination of saphenous reflux after tributary sclerotherapy: report of two cases

Abolição do refluxo de safena após escleroterapia de colaterais: relato de dois casos

Abstract

Most patients with chronic venous disease (CVD) and reflux in the saphenous vein are treated with saphenous stripping or ablation. The venous hemodynamics approach offers the possibility of treating saphenous reflux without eliminating the saphenous vein. We present 2 cases in which venous reflux was eliminated while preserving the great saphenous vein, after treatment with hemodynamic sclerotherapy using a protocol of synergic use of Dextrose and long pulse Nd YAG 1064 laser. These cases show that treating the tributaries responsible for saphenous reflux can correct hemodynamic imbalances and restore normal flow in the great saphenous vein with improvements in symptoms and esthetics. Long-term results are still uncertain.

Keywords:
saphenous vein; sclerotherapy; venous reflux; venous insufficiency

Resumo

A maioria dos pacientes com insuficiência venosa crônica e refluxo na veia safena é tratada com retirada ou ablação da safena. A hemodinâmica venosa traz a possibilidade de tratar esses pacientes sem eliminar a veia safena. Nós apresentamos dois casos de refluxo parcial de veia safena magna resolvidos com escleroterapia hemodinâmica. Usamos um protocolo de uso sinergístico de glicose 75% e Nd-YAG laser 1064. Os casos nos mostram que o tratamento das tributárias pode corrigir o refluxo da veia safena e obter melhora clínica e cosmética. Os resultados de longo prazo ainda são incertos.

Palavras-chave:
safena; escleroterapia; refluxo venoso; insuficiência venosa

INTRODUCTION

Resolution of reflux in the deep venous system after cessation of reflux in the superficial system has been common knowledge for a long time.¹ The same principle applies to different levels of the venous compartment, such as the saphenous vein. Adequate assessment and evaluation of venous reflux is a long-standing concern in the vascular community.² Despite significant advances in duplex techniques and technology, treatments have changed little over the last decades and still consist of eliminating all involved veins. Decades ago, Franceschi showed that reflux in the saphenous vein can be resolved without eliminating the vein itself, with CHIVA.³ Years later, the ASVAL technique has made a further contribution, showing that the saphenous vein can be spared.⁴ We consider that the rationale of both techniques can contribute to improved sclerotherapy results.

Modern techniques have made saphenous procedures much easier than before, resulting in increased numbers of saphenous treatments and treatment of patients at lower CEAP classes. Studies report increases in the number of saphenous vein procedures, most of them performed by “non-traditional” specialists dealing with CVD.^5,6 Baber et al. showed that physicians who do not traditionally treat chronic venous disease and high-volume providers are more likely to do endovenous therapy.⁵ A recent study showed that saphenous procedures increased by 0.83% every year from 2007 to 2017 in Belgium. The same study showed that patients with limited financial resources (preferential reimbursement) had significantly lower intervention rates than patients on the usual reimbursement system.⁷

The long-term effects of this increase in saphenous vein elimination are unclear, as clinical trials do not extend beyond 5 years.⁸ The long-term results of the novel approaches are similar to the results of the stripping.^9,10 Studies have shown that the rate of recurrence after saphenous stripping is close to 60% after 30 years.¹¹ This causes enormous patient burden and medical costs. We present 2 cases in which we eliminated saphenous reflux with hemodynamic sclerotherapy of collaterals. The total reversal of saphenous reflux makes us rethink the modern trend for saphenous destruction and its effects on recurrence and quality of life in the long run. The Research Ethics Committee approved this study (decision number 4.723.760).

CASE REPORTS

Case 1

A 64-year-old woman with chronic venous disease (CEAP class C3), and history of 2 previous venous operations on the leg. Both operations were phlebectomies and neither procedure involved treatment of the saphenous veins (our Duplex ultrasound was equal to an exam prior to the previous operation). The hemodynamic evaluation identified a 3 mm collateral at the mid-thigh transferring reflux to the 5.8 mm great saphenous vein, which presented reflux from this point to the upper leg. Distally, the saphenous vein was transferring reflux to a 3.5 mm tributary, from which point it resumed upward flow for a few centimeters, until the same collateral transferred reflux to the GSV again. We present the pre-treatment hemodynamics of this case in Figure 1 and post-treatment in Figure 2. We proposed fractionation of the collaterals according to CHIVA principles using sclerotherapy. We performed the protocol as described below. The patient returned 2 weeks and 3 months after the procedure with total improvement of symptoms and some esthetic improvement. The duplex scan showed that sclerotherapy had ablated the large collaterals. The GSV reflux had been eliminated and flow had normalized (with no reflux) after closure of the collaterals. It had also reduced in size from 0.58 mm to 0.52 mm.

Figure 1
Hemodynamic schema. Reflux in the saphenous vein distal to a collateral at the thigh, transferred to a leg collateral. The same collateral then transfers reflux back to the saphenous vein a few centimeters distally.

Figure 2
Hemodynamic schema. The saphenous vein no longer has reflux and the collaterals involved are occluded. Observe that the veins at the ankle have regressed without direct treatment.

Case 2

A 34-year-old asymptomatic woman with chronic venous disease (CEAP class C2), presenting with cosmetic complaints only. She had no history of previous treatments. Hemodynamic evaluation of the left lower extremity showed reflux at the great saphenous vein from one tributary at the knee level to another at the mid-leg (Figure 3 and Figure 4, pre-treatment and post-treatment). She had reticular veins and telangiectasias on the lateral aspect of the thigh and calf. We proposed Hemodynamic CLaCS according to the protocol described below. We performed 2 sessions in 3 months and at 4 weeks after the second session the veins had disappeared and the patient was satisfied with the cosmetic results. The duplex scan showed absence of reflux in the great saphenous vein and occlusion of the collaterals involved in the reflux.

Figure 3
Pre-treatment - Red veins represent the portions of saphenous vein and collaterals with reflux. CFV: Common femoral vein; DFV: Deep femoral vein; SFV: Superficial femoral vein; PV: Popliteal vein; FV: Fibular vein; PTV: Posterior tibial vein; LLSV: Lower limb superficial veins; SFJ: saphenofemoral junction.

Figure 4
Post-treatment - The saphenous vein has upward flow and no reflux and the collaterals have disappeared. CFV: Common femoral vein; DFV: Deep femoral vein; SFV: Superficial femoral vein; PV: Popliteal vein; FV: Fibular vein; PTV: Posterior tibial vein.

Hemodynamic CLaCS protocol

We treat CEAP class C1-C3 patients by sclerotherapy of collaterals according to CHIVA principles as previously described;^12-14 we treat higher CEAP classes or failures of sclerotherapy with saphenous-sparing operations. The authors have adapted a technique proposed by Miyake et al. to treat smaller veins.¹⁵ The procedure comprises using Nd-YAG laser 1064 shots at the collateral prior to injection of Dextrose 75% sclerosing agent to create a synergic effect. The laser causes the vein to contract, minimizing the volume of Dextrose administered. The contraction and the low volume prevent backflow to the saphenous vein, thus we only take measures to prevent it in cases in which a deep portion of the vein requires sclerotherapy. We use a spot size of 3-9 mm depending on the vein size. We have adapted the usual CLaCS protocol¹⁵ and treated veins with larger diameter with a few energy delivery changes. A 3mm spot is used for veins < 0.10 mm, a 6mm spot is used for those <2.5mm, and a 9mm spot is used for collaterals >2.5 mm. Fluency varies from 40 to 90 J/cm and the pulse range is 15-50 Msec. Local administration of cool air is used to minimize pain. After treatment of a few centimeters with the laser, we inject cold 75% dextrose into portions of the vein that remain open. Deep superficial thigh veins receive ultrasound-guided Dextrose injections and laser and dextrose in superficial parts. Both injections and laser follow the roadmap of augmented reality equipment.¹⁶ We call the procedure Hemodynamic CLaCS (Cryo Laser Cryo Sclerotherapy), in reference to the protocol of synergic use of laser and dextrose and the hemodynamic principles applied.

DISCUSSION

Technological developments have made it easier to eliminate the saphenous vein than it was in the past. There has been an increase in the number of saphenous veins treated over the last few years.^5-7,17 Long-term recurrence after endovenous saphenous treatment is uncertain and the 5-year results match the results of stripping procedures.¹⁸ Basic and clinical studies have shown that vein elimination can trigger recurrence of varicose veins.^19,20 We therefore consider that strategies to minimize saphenous elimination while improving symptoms and the cosmetic appearance of the leg are welcome.

Widespread use of duplex ultrasound has led to diagnosis of many cases of reflux that would have gone unnoticed in the past. We should remember that reflux is not a disease per se. Engelhorn et al. found that women with telangiectasias (CEAP Class C1) had saphenous vein reflux detected in 46% of their extremities.²¹ Patients with symptomatic CEAP class C0-C3 with reflux may improve with exercises, weight loss, and quality-of-life measures. Phlebotonic drugs may also play a role in managing these patients.²² We should remember that reflux per se is not a mandatory indication for any procedure and, above all, not for saphenous elimination. A recent editorial reminds us that patients can choose to do nothing and should be made aware of this.²³

When simpler treatments cannot solve the problems, another intervention may be necessary. We spare the saphenous vein in these cases using CHIVA, with good clinical hemodynamic and cosmetic results.¹² The ASVAL technique is also used in patients with a single collateral involved in saphenous reflux.⁴ In simpler cases with low CEAP, elimination of saphenous collaterals aspirating blood or causing focal venous hypertension may prevent the venous system from deteriorating. We presented cases in which we resolved saphenous reflux by sclerotherapy of collaterals.

The prevalence of telangiectasias in the general population is high and these patients may have symptoms.^24,25 Thus, treatment and ultrasound examination may help CEAP Class C0-C3 patients, if simpler non-interventional treatments fail. Patients with only aesthetic complaints may also benefit from simpler treatments that do not eliminate the saphenous vein. Many patients with esthetic-only complaints and CEAP class C1-C3 have reflux that is detected by a duplex scan. Our cases show that the reflux per se is not a sine qua non justification for saphenous ablation. Hemodynamic sclerotherapy may achieve good esthetic/clinical results.

Successful flow reversal in the saphenous vein depends on a few factors. The competence of the terminal femoral valve is important because it breaks the height of the blood column. In patients with important femoral reflux, flow may not reverse after treatment of the collaterals. Physical characteristics of the vein also play a role, since we have observed that the longer and larger the incompetent vein, the more difficult it is to correct the reflux, and the longer and larger the competent distal vein, the easier it is to reverse the flow. Direct saphenous perforators are also decisive to maintaining reflux. Successful reversal of flow in the great saphenous vein is impressive, but patients still experience improvement of symptoms with sclerotherapy even if reflux remains.¹⁴

If we consider the saphenous vein as a conduit for the flow, we should also consider that by stopping the reflux's pressure gradient, we can recover it. In this paper, we presented cases in which reflux was successfully resolved just by eliminating collaterals with Laser/Dextrose sclerotherapy. We consider that the procedure is a suitable alternative option for treating cases with low CEAP classes, but long-term results are not yet available. Using sclerotherapy with foam in the setting of hemodynamics is not new.¹⁴ However, the laser synergy contracts the vein and makes it possible to obliterate the vein with less sclerosing volume. We consider this approach to be a low-cost and low-risk alternative that makes it possible to preserve the saphenous vein in some patients.

• How to cite: Faccini FP, Sathler-Melo CC. Elimination of saphenous reflux after tributary sclerotherapy: report of two cases. J Vasc Bras. 2021;20:e20200064. https://doi.org/10.1590/1677-5449.200064
• Financial support: None.
• The study was carried out at Instituto de Cardiologia - IC-FUC, Porto Alegre, RS, and Angiovasc, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.

REFERENCES

• ¹
  Walsh JC, Bergan JJ, Beeman S, Comer TP. Femoral venous reflux abolished by greater saphenous vein stripping. Ann Vasc Surg. 1994;8(6):566-70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02017413 PMid:7865395.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02017413
• ²
  Luccas GC, Kauffman P, Lane JC. Método de avaliaçäo do estudo funcional da veia safena interna. Cir Vasc Angiol. 1985;1(3):22-8.
• ³
  Franceschi C, Zamboni P. Principles of venous hemodynamics. New York: Nova Biomedical Books; 2009.
• ⁴
  Chastanet S, Pittaluga P. Ten-year outcomes of treatment of varicose veins by Ambulatory Selective Ablation of Varices Under Local Anesthesia (ASVAL). J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2018;6(2):289. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvsv.2017.12.028
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvsv.2017.12.028
• ⁵
  Baber JT Jr, Mao J, Sedrakyan A, Connolly PH, Meltzer AJ. Impact of provider characteristics on use of endovenous ablation procedures in Medicare beneficiaries. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2019;7(2):203-9.e1. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvsv.2018.09.012 PMid:30638873.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvsv.2018.09.012
• ⁶
  Crawford JM, Gasparis A, Almeida J, et al. A review of United States endovenous ablation practice trends from the Medicare Data Utilization and Payment Database. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2019;7(4):471-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvsv.2019.01.066 PMid:31203856.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvsv.2019.01.066
• ⁷
  Guillaume GM, Meeus P, Dalcq V, van der Borght L, Vuylsteke ME, Maeseneer MG. Influence of reimbursement policies on phlebological surgical practice in Belgium between 2007 and 2017. Int Angiol. 2020;39(4):267-75. http://dx.doi.org/10.23736/S0392-9590.20.04305-9 PMid:32083430.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.23736/S0392-9590.20.04305-9
• ⁸
  Paravastu SCV, Horne M, Dodd PDF. Endovenous ablation therapy (laser or radiofrequency) or foam sclerotherapy versus conventional surgical repair for short saphenous varicose veins. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;11:CD010878. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010878.pub2 PMid:27898181.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010878.pub2
• ⁹
  Karam B, Haddad F, Ataya K, Jaafar R, Nassar H. Long-term results of Endovenous Laser Therapy (EVLT) of saphenous vein reflux: up to 9 years follow-up. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2019;58(6):e766. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2019.09.331
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2019.09.331
• ¹⁰
  Flessenkämper I, Hartmann M, Hartmann K, Stenger D, Roll S. Endovenous laser ablation with and without high ligation compared to high ligation and stripping for treatment of great saphenous varicose veins: Results of a multicentre randomised controlled trial with up to 6 years follow-up. Phlebology. 2016;31(1):23-33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0268355514555547 PMid:25342648.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0268355514555547
• ¹¹
  Fischer R, Linde N, Duff C, Jeanneret C, Chandler JG, Seeber P. Late recurrent saphenofemoral junction reflux after ligation and stripping of the greater saphenous vein. J Vasc Surg. 2001;34(2):236-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1067/mva.2001.115802 PMid:11496274.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1067/mva.2001.115802
• ¹²
  Faccini FP, Ermini S, Franceschi C. CHIVA to treat saphenous vein insufficiency in chronic venous disease: characteristics and results. J Vasc Bras. 2019;18:e20180099. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1677-5449.009918 PMid:31191629.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1677-5449.009918
• ¹³
  Franceschi C, Cappelli M, Ermini S, et al. CHIVA: hemodynamic concept, strategy and results. Int Angiol. 2016;35(1):8-30. PMid:26044838.
• ¹⁴
  Mendoza E, Cappelli M. Sclerotherapy technique in CHIVA strategy. Phlebologie. 2018;46(02):66-74.
• ¹⁵
  Miyake RK. Cryo-laser and cryo-sclerotherapy guided by augmented reality: report of 140 cases. Phlebologie. 2014;43(5):257-61. http://dx.doi.org/10.12687/phleb2218-5-2014
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.12687/phleb2218-5-2014
• ¹⁶
  Ganesh S. Depth and size limits for the visibility of veins using the veinviewer imaging system. Memphis: University of Tennessee Health Science Center; 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.21007/etd.cghs.2007.0103
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.21007/etd.cghs.2007.0103
• ¹⁷
  Lawrence PF, Gloviczki P. Appropriate care for venous disease. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2019;7(4):469-70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvsv.2019.03.005 PMid:31203855.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvsv.2019.03.005
• ¹⁸
  Nesbitt C, Bedenis R, Bhattacharya V, Stansby G. Endovenous ablation (radiofrequency and laser) and foam sclerotherapy versus open surgery for great saphenous vein varices. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;(7):CD005624. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005624.pub3 PMid:25075589.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005624.pub3
• ¹⁹
  Pfisterer L, König G, Hecker M, Korff T. Pathogenesis of varicose veins: lessons from biomechanics. Vasa. 2014;43(2):88-99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1024/0301-1526/a000335 PMid:24627315.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1024/0301-1526/a000335
• ²⁰
  Cappelli M, Molino-Lova R, Giangrandi I, Ermini S, Gianesini S. Ligation of the saphenofemoral junction tributaries as risk factor for groin recurrence. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2018;6(2):224-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvsv.2017.09.005 PMid:29290602.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvsv.2017.09.005
• ²¹
  Engelhorn CA, Engelhorn ALV, Cassou MF, Salles-Cunha S. Patterns of saphenous venous reflux in women presenting with lower extremity telangiectasias. Dermatol Surg. 2007;33(3):282-8. PMid:17338684.
• ²²
  Martinez-Zapata MJ, Vernooij RWM, Uriona Tuma SM, et al. Phlebotonics for venous insufficiency. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;4:CD003229. PMid:27048768.
• ²³
  Campbell B, Franklin IJ, Gohel M. The choice of treatments for varicose veins: a study in trade-offs. Phlebology. 2020;35(9):647-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0268355520922708 PMid:32345122.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0268355520922708
• ²⁴
  Fowkes FG, Evans CJ, Lee AJ. Prevalence and risk factors of chronic venous insufficiency. Angiology. 2001;52(1, Suppl 1):S5-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0003319701052001S02 PMid:11510598.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0003319701052001S02
• ²⁵
  Zimmet SE. Sclerotherapy treatment of telangiectasias and varicose veins. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol. 2003;6(3):116-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/S1089-2516(03)00044-1 PMid:14614695.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/S1089-2516(03)00044-1

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  11 June 2021
• Date of issue
  2021

History

• Received
  15 May 2020
• Accepted
  18 Aug 2020