Abstract:
This work presents a methodology for determining the reliability of fracture control plans for structures subjected to cyclic loads. It considers the variability of the parameters involved in the problem, such as initial flaw and crack growth curve. The probability of detection (POD) curve of the field non-destructive inspection method and the condition/environment are used as important factors for structural confidence. According to classical damage tolerance analysis (DTA), inspection intervals are based on detectable crack size and crack growth rate. However, all variables have uncertainties, which makes the final result totally stochastic. The material properties, flight loads, engineering tools and even the reliability of inspection methods are subject to uncertainties which can affect significantly the final maintenance schedule. The present methodology incorporates all the uncertainties in a simulation process, such as Monte Carlo, and establishes a relationship between the reliability of the overall maintenance program and the proposed inspection interval, forming a "cascade" chart. Due to the scatter, it also defines the confidence level of the "acceptable" risk. As an example, the damage tolerance analysis (DTA) results are presented for the upper cockpit longeron splice bolt of the BAF upgraded F-5EM. In this case, two possibilities of inspection intervals were found: one that can be characterized as remote risk, with a probability of failure (integrity nonsuccess) of 1 in 10 million, per flight hour; and other as extremely improbable, with a probability of nonsuccess of 1 in 1 billion, per flight hour, according to aviation standards. These two results are compared with the classical military airplane damage tolerance requirements.
Keywords:
Reliability; Structure integrity; Fatigue; Damage tolerance
Full text is available only in PDF.
REFERENCES
- ASM Handbook, 1992, "Failure analysis and prevention", 9. ed., Materials Park, OH, (ASM International, vol. 11), pp.15-46.
- Broek, D., 1989, "The practical use of fracture mechanics". Galena, OH. Kluwer Academic, pp. 361-390.
- Gallagher J. P., 1984, "USAF damage tolerant design handbook: Guidelines for the analysis and design of damage tolerant aircraft structures", Dayton Research Institute, Dayton, OH, pp. 1.2.5-1.2.13.
- IFI, 2005, "Análise e gerencialmento de riscos nos vôos de certificação", MPH-830, Instituto de Fomento à Indústria. Divisão de Certificação de Aviação Civil, São José dos Campos, S.P., Brasil.
- Knorr, E., 1974, "Reliability of the detection of flaws and of the determination of flaw size", AGARDograph, Quebec, Nº. 176, pp. 398-412.
- Lewis W. H. et al., 1978, "Reliability of non-destructive inspection", SA-ALC/MME. 76-6-38-1, San Antonio, TX.
- Manuel, L., 2002, "CE 384S - Structural reliability course: Class notes", Department of Civil Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.
- Mattos, D. F. V. et al., 2009, "F-5M DTA Program". Journal of Aerospace Technology and Management. Vol.1, Nº1, pp. 113-120.
- Mello Jr, A.W.S. et al., 2009, "Geração do ciclo de tensões para análise de fadiga, Software GCTAF F-5M", RENG ASA-I 04/09,IAE, São José dos Campos, S.P., Brasil.
- Provan, J. W., 2006 ,"Fracture, fatigue and mechanical reliability: An introduction to mechanical reliability", Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Victoria, Victoria, B.C.
- USAF., 1974, "Airplane damage tolerance requirements". Military Specification. Washington, DC. (MIL-A-83444).
- USAF., 1974, "Airplane strength and rigidity reliability requirements, repeated loads and fatigue". Military Specification. Washington, DC. (MIL-A-008866).
- USAF., 2005, "Aircraft structural integrity program, airplane requirements". Military Specification. Washington, DC. (MIL-STD-1530C).
Publication Dates
-
Publication in this collection
Jul-Dec 2009
History
-
Received
18 Sept 2009 -
Accepted
28 Oct 2009
