Environmental impacts of public policies in Campo Grande, MS: the case of Lajeado stream environmental protection area

Figueiredo, Helder Pereira de; Constantino, Michel Ângelo; Sanches, Cristiane Camargo; Costa, Reginaldo Brito da

doi:10.20435/1984-042X-2016-v.17-n.4(13)

Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Brasil
SciELO.org - Rede SciELO
Blog SciELO em Perspectiva

Abrir menu

Brasil

Interações (Campo Grande)

Español English

Abrir menu

Brasil

Español English

Interações (Campo Grande)

Submissão de manuscritos
Sobre o periódico
Corpo Editorial
Instruções aos autores
Contato

sumário « anterior atual seguinte »

Resumo (Inglês)
Resumo (Português)
Resumo (fr)
Resumo (Espanhol)

Texto (Inglês)

Download PDF (Inglês)

Compartilhe

Compartilhe
E-mail
Facebook
Twitter
Google+
LinkedIn
Reddit
StambleUpon
CiteULike
Mendeley

Sumário

Compartilhe
E-mail
Facebook
Twitter
Google+
LinkedIn
Reddit
StambleUpon
CiteULike
Mendeley

Resumo (Inglês)
Resumo (Português)
Resumo (fr)
Resumo (Espanhol)

Texto (Inglês)

Download PDF (Inglês)

Artigos • Interações (Campo Grande) 17 (4) • Oct-Dec 2016 • https://doi.org/10.20435/1984-042X-2016-v.17-n.4(13) copy

Environmental impacts of public policies in Campo Grande, MS: the case of Lajeado stream environmental protection area

Impactos das políticas públicas ambientais em Campo Grande, MS: o caso da área de proteção ambiental do córrego Lajeado

Impacts des politiques publiques de l'environnement en Campo Grande, MS: le cas de Lajeado volet zone de protection de l'environnement

Impactos de las políticas públicas del medio ambiente em Campo Grande, MS: el caso del área de protección ambiental de Lajeado corriente

Authorship SCIMAGO INSTITUTIONS RANKINGS

Abstract:

The post-agenda 2015 of the United Nations has focused on the environment based on the definition of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). This study aims to analyse which were the positive and negative externalities generated by public policies in the environmental scope between 2000 and 2015 in the Environmental Protection Area (EPA) of the Lageado area in Campo Grande, MS, from photographic records, satellite images and direct survey with beneficiaries.

Key words:
EPA; public perception; sustainability; inefficiency government

Authorship

Helder Pereira de Figueiredo

Instituto de Perícias Científicas, Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brasil.Instituto de Perícias CientíficasBrasilCampo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul, BrasilInstituto de Perícias Científicas, Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brasil.

Michel Ângelo Constantino

Universidade Católica Dom Bosco, Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brasil.Universidade Católica Dom BoscoBrazilCampo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul, BrazilUniversidade Católica Dom Bosco, Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brasil.

Cristiane Camargo Sanches

Reginaldo Brito da Costa

Sobre os autores:

Helder Pereira de Figueiredo: Perito Judicial e Criminal - Engenheiro Civil, Engenheiro de Segurança do Trabalho, Advogado, Contador e Biólogo. Mestre em Biotecnologia (Genética de Populações). Doutor em Ciências Ambientais e Sustentabilidade Agropecuária. E-mail:hpfigueiredo@ipcms.com.br

Michel Ângelo Constantino: Pesquisador e Professor na Universidade Católica Dom Bosco (UCDB), Programa de Mestrado e Doutorado em Ciências Ambientais e Sustentabilidade Agropecuária; Programa de Mestrado em Desenvolvimento Local. E-mail:michel@ucdb.br

Cristiane Camargo Sanches: Médica Veterinária. Doutora em Ciência Animal. E-mail:cristianesanches@hotmail.com

Reginaldo Brito da Costa: Professor da Universidade Católica Dom Bosco (UCDB), Programa de Mestrado e Doutorado em Ciências Ambientais e Sustentabilidade Agropecuária; Programa de Mestrado em Desenvolvimento Local. E-mail:reg.brito.costa@gmail.com

SCIMAGO INSTITUTIONS RANKINGS

Figures

Figures (15)

Thumbnail

Figure 1
Picture on November 20, 2008.

Thumbnail

Figure 2
Picture on November 13, 2015, in the same location (at the point of coordinates UTM 756,061 x 7,732,935)

Thumbnail

Figure 3
Picture on November 20, 2008

Thumbnail

Figure 4
Picture on November 14, 2015, in the same location, at the point of coordinates UTM 755,293 x 7.734.581

Thumbnail

Figure 5
Picture on november 20, 2008

Thumbnail

Figure 6
Picture on November 13, 2015, in the same location, at the points of coordinates UTM 759,257 x 7,732,393

Thumbnail

Figure 7
Vegetation Index Map on December 18, 2008 Recorded image from TM/Landsat-5 sensor, covering the spectral bands 3, 4 and 5 in orbit/point 225/74.

Thumbnail

Figure 8
Vegetation Index Map on august 16, 2015. Recorded image from OLI/ Landsat-8 sensor, covering the spectral bands 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 in orbit/point 225/74.

Thumbnail

Figure 9
Map of Soil Use on December 18, 2008. Recorded image from TM/Landsat-5 sensor, covering the spectral bands 3, 4 and 5 in orbit/point 225/74.

Thumbnail

Figure 10
Map of Soil Use on August 16, 2015. Recorded image from OLI/Landsat-8 sensor covering the specral bands 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 in orbit/point 225/74.

Thumbnail

Graphic 1
Perception about the SNUC contribution to the preservation and restoration of diversity.

Thumbnail

Graphic 2
SNUC is not enough for the environment to be protected because of insufficient supervision by environmental agencies.

Thumbnail

Graphic 3
Perception of the item "a" of article 9 of Law 6902/1981 to establish rules to limit or prohibit the operation of industries that affect water resources within EPA.

Thumbnail

Graphic 4
The Lajeado EPA purpose of restoring, protecting and conserving the springs formed by the Lajeado Stream Basin which supply the city.

Thumbnail

Graphic 5
Inefficiency due to lack of SEMADUR supervision agents

Figure 1 Picture on November 20, 2008.

Source: Manegement Plan. Type of liability: silting of watercourse/ silting and vegetation burial of PPA. Generated cause: service activity

Figure 2 Picture on November 13, 2015, in the same location (at the point of coordinates UTM 756,061 x 7,732,935)

Source: Research data. The liability continues as well as its deterioration by activity or generated cause of services.

Figure 3 Picture on November 20, 2008

Source: Management Plan Type of liability: contamination by effluents and residues / release of sewage in spring area/ watercourses. Generated cause: urban occupation.

Figure 4 Picture on November 14, 2015, in the same location, at the point of coordinates UTM 755,293 x 7.734.581

Source: Research data.

Figure 5 Picture on november 20, 2008

Source: Manegement Plan The type of liability is the sheet erosion and in grooves, where there is a not recovered support unit. Generated cause: existing building site.

Figure 6 Picture on November 13, 2015, in the same location, at the points of coordinates UTM 759,257 x 7,732,393

Source: Research data.

Figure 7 Vegetation Index Map on December 18, 2008 Recorded image from TM/Landsat-5 sensor, covering the spectral bands 3, 4 and 5 in orbit/point 225/74.

Source: FOLHES (2015)FOLHES, Marcelo Theophilo. Resultados do mapeamento de uso e cobertura da terra para os territórios das Áreas de Proteção Ambiental dos Mananciais do Córrego Lajeado (APA do Lajeado). Campo Grande, MS: IbiGeo - Geociência Aplicada, 2015. 7p..

Figure 8 Vegetation Index Map on august 16, 2015. Recorded image from OLI/ Landsat-8 sensor, covering the spectral bands 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 in orbit/point 225/74.

Figure 9 Map of Soil Use on December 18, 2008. Recorded image from TM/Landsat-5 sensor, covering the spectral bands 3, 4 and 5 in orbit/point 225/74.

Figure 10 Map of Soil Use on August 16, 2015. Recorded image from OLI/Landsat-8 sensor covering the specral bands 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 in orbit/point 225/74.

Source: FOLHES (2015)PREFEITURA MUNICIPAL DE CAMPO GRANDE (PMCG); ÁGUAS GUARIROBA S.A. Plano de Manejo da Área de Proteção Ambiental dos Mananciais do Córrego Lajeado-APA do Lajeado. Campo Grande, MS: PMCG, 2012..

Graphic 1 Perception about the SNUC contribution to the preservation and restoration of diversity.

Source: Research data

Graphic 2 SNUC is not enough for the environment to be protected because of insufficient supervision by environmental agencies.

Source: research data.

Graphic 3 Perception of the item "a" of article 9 of Law 6902/1981 to establish rules to limit or prohibit the operation of industries that affect water resources within EPA.

Source: Research data.

Graphic 4 The Lajeado EPA purpose of restoring, protecting and conserving the springs formed by the Lajeado Stream Basin which supply the city.

Source: Research data.

Graphic 5 Inefficiency due to lack of SEMADUR supervision agents

Source: Research data.

How to cite

copy

Universidade Católica Dom Bosco Av. Tamandaré, 6000 - Jd. Seminário, 79117-900 Campo Grande- MS - Brasil, Tel./Fax: (55 67) 3312-3373/3377 - Campo Grande - MS - Brazil
E-mail: suzantoniazzo@ucdb.br

Acompanhe os números deste periódico no seu leitor de RSS

Versão para download de PDF

PDF

Inglês

Versões e tradução automática

Versão original do texto

English

Tradução automática

Google Translator
Microsoft Translator

Como citar

RIS

BIBTEX

Outros formatos de citação e exportação:

SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online
Rua Dr. Diogo de Faria, 1087 – 9º andar – Vila Clementino 04037-003 São Paulo/SP - Brasil
E-mail: scielo@scielo.org

Leia a Declaração de Acesso Aberto

Métricas

Environmental impacts of public policies in Campo Grande, MS: the case of Lajeado stream environmental protection area

PlumX

Mensagem

[1] Helder Pereira de Figueiredo: Perito Judicial e Criminal - Engenheiro Civil, Engenheiro de Segurança do Trabalho, Advogado, Contador e Biólogo. Mestre em Biotecnologia (Genética de Populações). Doutor em Ciências Ambientais e Sustentabilidade Agropecuária. E-mail:hpfigueiredo@ipcms.com.br