UROLOGICAL SURVEY
Female urology
Effective treatment for mixed urinary incontinence with a pubovaginal sling
Chou EC, Flisser AJ, Panagopoulos G, Blaivas JG
Department of Urology, School of Medicine, China Medical College and China Medical College Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
J Urol. 2003; 170 (2 Pt 1): 494-7
PURPOSE: We assessed the results of autologous fascia pubovaginal sling (PVS) in women with mixed incontinence using a validated outcome score and identified risk factors for failure.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 131 women who received a PVS for sphincteric incontinence (SUI) confirmed by history, physical examination and/or videourodynamic study (VUDS) were identified from a database during the accrual dates 1995 to 2001. Patients with a urethral diverticulum, neoplasm or urinary fistula were excluded. Patients with SUI who also complained of urinary urge incontinence (UUI) and/or had detrusor instability that reproduced incontinence symptoms during VUDS were diagnosed with mixed incontinence (MUI). Patients completed a urological questionnaire, 24-hour voiding diary, pad test, VUDS and cystoscopy preoperatively. The diagnosis of SUI and UUI was further confirmed by physician interview. In patients with MUI detrusor overactivity was classified according to urodynamic criteria. At least 1 year postoperatively the validated Urinary Incontinence Outcome Score (UIOS) was calculated from a 24-hour diary, pad test and questionnaire, and outcomes in patients with SUI and those with MUI were compared. The study was powered a priori to detect a 20% difference in outcome score. Cured patients (UIOS 0) were compared with those who were not cured (UIOS 1 or greater) and univariate analysis was applied to identify the correlates of failed PVS.
RESULTS: Of the 131 patients evaluated 33 with a diverticulum or fistula were excluded and 98 underwent PVS. Patient age was 45 to 84 years (median 66). Followup was 1 to 7 years (median 3). A total of 46 patients (48.5%) had simple SUI and 52 (51.5%) had MUI. Two patients were lost to followup (2%) and the procedure was presumed to have failed. There were no differences in age, hormone status, previous surgery or pelvic organ prolapse between patients with SUI and MUI. The cure/improved rate was 97% in 44 SUI cases and 93% in 47 MUI cases, which was a nonsignificant difference (p = 0.33). Analysis of the MUI group showed that patients who were cured and not cured had similar age, parity, urethral angle, bladder capacity, leak point pressure and pad tests. Patients with MUI who were cured had a higher number of voids in 24 hours on preoperative voiding diary (12 vs 8, p = 0.01), while those who were improved or in whom treatment failed had a greater number of urgency (5.6 vs 4.1, p < 0.05) and UUI (5.1 vs 3.0, p < 0.01) episodes. Univariate analysis of MUI cases showed that an increasing number of preoperative urgency and urge incontinence episodes correlated directly with PVS failure (r = 0.33, p = 0.038 and r = 0.35, p = 0.048, respectively). In contrast, an increasing number of voids correlated with successful PVS (r = 0.4, p = 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Women with SUI and concurrent urge incontinence or detrusor instability have a successful PVS outcome at a rate comparable to that in women with simple SUI, in contrast to our previous findings. Increasing episodes of urgency and urge incontinence on the preoperative voiding diary correlated directly with surgical failure, while voiding frequently was associated with cure.
Editorial Comment
The authors review 131 patients who underwent an autologous rectus fascial pubovaginal sling performed by the same surgeon. Pre-operatively, the patients completed a urologic questionnaire, 24 hour voiding diary, pad test, video urodynamics and cystoscopy. One year postoperatively the patients completed a 24 hour voiding diary, pad test, questionnaire and physical examination with a full bladder. In addition, they completed a validated urinary incontinence outcome score (UIOS) (1). The treatment outcome in patients with the preoperative diagnosis of stress urinary incontinence was compared to the outcome in patients with preoperatively diagnosed mixed urinary incontinence.
This is a very elegant and well written paper. It offers multiple points to ponder for those surgeons treating urinary incontinence. The data the paper presents is very fair, unbiased and clear. The use of the Urinary Incontinence Outcome Score draws very firm lines between what is considered a cure, improved, and a failure (1). I use this outcome score as well when analyzing data and urge the reader to consider using it in his practice. One of the true highlights of this paper is in the discussion section, especially reviewing the outcome data presented and pondering whether a selection bias may have been found in the authors of this paper in view of their impressive previous research into this population group. The caveats they extend to the reader for the use of a pubovaginal sling with mixed urinary incontinence should be strongly reviewed and considered.
Reference
1. Groutz A, Blaivas JG, Rosenthal JE: A simplified urinary incontinence score for the evaluation and treatment outcomes. Neurourol Urodynam. 2000; 19: 127-35.
Dr. Steven P. Petrou
Associate Professor of Urology
Mayo Medical School
Jacksonville, Florida, USA
Preoperative urodynamic evaluation may predict voiding dysfunction in women undergoing pubovaginal sling
Miller EA, Amundsen CL, Toh KL, Flynn BJ, Webster GD
Department of Urology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
J Urol 2003; 169: 2234-7
PURPOSE: We determine which urodynamic parameters can best predict postoperative voiding dysfunction following pubovaginal sling surgery.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The records of 98 consecutive women who had undergone pubovaginal sling surgery with allograft fascia lata between July 1998 and July 2000 were reviewed. Urodynamic and follow-up data were sufficient for evaluation for 73 patients. Urodynamic and clinical parameters were correlated with urinary retention, time to return of efficient voiding and development of post-operative urgency symptoms.
RESULTS: Average time to return of efficient voiding was 3.92 days (median 3). Of 21 women who voided without a detrusor contraction, urinary retention developed in 4 (23%) versus 0 of 48 who voided with detrusor contraction (p = 0.007). Urinary retention was defined as the need to perform even occasional self-catheterization. All 4 women with urinary retention had a detrusor pressure of greater than 12 cm H20 (0 in 3, 4 in 1). None of the women with a detrusor pressure of greater than 12 cm H2O had urinary retention (p = 0.047). The presence of Valsalva voiding in women without detrusor contraction did not affect the incidence of urinary retention (11.1%) compared to those who did not demonstrate Valsalva voiding (5.1%) (p = 0.603). Peak flow rate, detrusor instability on preoperative urodynamics and post-void residual urine volume were not associated with postoperative urinary retention. Finally, post-void residual urine volume predicted delayed return to normal voiding (p = 0.001). There were no other urodynamic parameters that were significantly associated with urinary retention, delayed return to normal voiding or postoperative urgency symptoms including peak flow rate, capacity or compliance.
CONCLUSIONS: Women who void without or with a weak detrusor contraction are most likely to have urinary retention postoperatively. Therefore, we conclude that preoperative urodynamic evaluation may be used to counsel women regarding the risk of urinary retention following the pubovaginal sling procedure.
Editorial Comment
The authors review the urodynamic parameters and follow-up data on 73 patients who had undergone pubovaginal sling with allograft fascia lata. They characterized post-operative dysfunctional voiding patterns as urinary retention, delayed return to normal voiding and de novo urgency. The urodynamic patterns analyzed to define post-operative dysfunctional voiding patterns included detrusor voiding pressure at maximum flow rate, detrusor instability, peak flow rate, post-void residual, cystometric bladder capacity and bladder compliance. Out of the 73 post-operative women reviewed, 4 women were in urinary retention and 9 different women took greater than 7 days to resume their post-operative voiding. The 4 women in urinary retention all voided without a detrusor contraction. One of those women voided with Valsalva maneuvers while the other three in urinary retention voided without a Valsalva maneuver. Of the 7 women who were noted to void by Valsalva maneuver, one had a delayed return to efficient voiding. Three patients developed de novo urgency and one of the three had detrusor instability on pre-operative urodynamics while two did not.
This paper is quite notable with regard to emphasizing the importance of pre-operative urodynamic evaluation prior to an anti-incontinence procedure and to commenting on the post-operative voiding function of Valsalva voiders. Many times with a physical examination and history consistent with stress urinary incontinence, surgeons will question the need to put patients through a urodynamic testing. The value of a urodynamic testing denoted by this article would include characterizing the woman's voiding pattern with regards to the use of a detrusor contraction or not, in addition to documenting detrusor instability. Preparation for potential post-operative difficulties is of immeasurable value in the field of voiding dysfunction. However, as stated by this paper, most women who void without a detrusor contraction will not have urinary retention after an anti-incontinence operation such as a sling. Perhaps these patients do normally void with a detrusor contraction but that the urodynamic study was unable to identify or characterize same thus obscuring the true voiding difficulties of patients who void without a detrusor contraction and who undergo a suburethral sling.
Dr. Steven P. Petrou
Associate Professor of Urology
Mayo Medical School
Jacksonville, Florida, USA
Publication Dates
-
Publication in this collection
12 Mar 2004 -
Date of issue
Aug 2003
