Biochemical, physiological, and growth evaluation of different chickpea genotypes under varying salinity regimes

Gul, J.; Ullah, M.

doi:10.1590/1519-6984.268350

J. Gul

Shaheed Benazir Bhutto University, Department of Biotechnology, Dir Upper, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan

http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6784-1416

M. Ullah ^**e-mail: drmidrarullah@gmail.com

Shaheed Benazir Bhutto University, Department of Biotechnology, Dir Upper, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan

http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9506-3327

*e-mail: drmidrarullah@gmail.com

Figures (5)
Tables (2)

Thumbnail

Figure 1
Effect of salinity stress on SL (a) and RL (b) of chickpea genotypes: salinity levels=S0: 0 mM NaCl, S1: 50 mM NaCl, S2:100 mM NaCl, S3: 150 mM NaCl. Genotypes= KK-2, Bhakkar-2011, Bittle-98, Punjab-2008, CM-98. Data labels represnts the level of significance for multiple comparison between all combination of treatments @ 0.05 probability level. Error bar shows standard error.

Thumbnail

Figure 2
Effect of salinity stress yield (a), and R:S (b) of chickpea genotypes: salinity levels=S0: 0 mM NaCl, S1: 50 mM NaCl, S2:100 mM NaCl, S3: 150 mM NaCl. Genotypes= KK-2, Bhakkar-2011, Bittle-98, Punjab-2008, CM-98. Data labels represnts the level of significance for multiple comparison between all combination of treatments @ 0.05 probability level. Error bar shows standard error.

Thumbnail

Figure 3
Effect of salinity stress on proline content (a), lipid peroxidation (b) and H₂O₂ (c) of chickpea genotypes: salinity levels=S0: 0 mM NaCl, S1: 50 mM NaCl, S2:100 mM NaCl, S3: 150 mM NaCl. Genotypes= KK-2, Bhakkar-2011, Bittle-98, Punjab-2008, CM-98. Data labels represnts the level of significance for multiple comparison between all combination of treatments @ 0.05 probability level. Error bar shows standard error.

Thumbnail

Figure 4
Effect of salinity stress on crude protein content (a), Reducing sugars (b) and total carbohydrates (c) of chickpea genotypes: salinity levels=S0: 0 mM NaCl, S1: 50 mM NaCl, S2:100 mM NaCl, S3: 150 mM NaCl. Genotypes= KK-2, Bhakkar-2011, Bittle-98, Punjab-2008, CM-98. Data labels represnts the level of significance for multiple comparison between all combination of treatments @ 0.05 probability level. Error bar shows standard error.

Thumbnail

Figure 5
Effect of salinity stress on stomatal conductance (a), and transpiration rate (b) of chickpea genotypes: salinity levels=S0: 0 mM NaCl, S1: 50 mM NaCl, S2:100 mM NaCl, S3: 150 mM NaCl. Genotypes= KK-2, Bhakkar-2011, Bittle-98, Punjab-2008, CM-98. Error bar shows standard error.

Thumbnail

Table 1
Effect of different salinity levels on leaf N, P, K⁺, Na⁺ and K⁺/Na⁺ of chickpea genotypes.

Thumbnail

Table 2
Relationship between growth, yield, physiological and biochemical parameters of chickpea.

Genotype	Salinity Level	N	P	K⁺	Na+	K⁺/Na⁺
Genotype	Salinity Level	mg kg^-1 DW mg kg^-1 DW mg kg^-1 DW			mg kg^-1 DW	----
KK-2	S₀	27.30 ± 0.32 a	2.47 ± 0.01 a	38.5 ± 1.42 a	16.25±0.70 de	2.37±0.02 b-d
	S₁	25.43 ± 0.24 b	2.38 ± 0.02 b-d	35.4 ± 1.23 bc	19.55±0.50 b-d	1.82±0.10 d-h
	S₂	22.63 ± 1.10 de	2.28 ± 0.01 de	33.2 ± 0.50 cd	21.78±1.23 a-c	1.54±0.10 e-i
	S₃	19.70 ± 0.06 gh	2.12 ± 0.02 g-i	29.9 ± 0.70 gh	24.88±1.42 a	1.21±0.04 hi
Bhakkar-2011	S₀	26.80 ± 0.55 ab	2.45 ± 0.01 ab	36.8 ± 0.78 ab	15.65±0.81 de	2.36±0.10 b-d
	S₁	23.53 ± 0.76 d	2.24 ± 0.07 e	32.7 ± 1.11 de	15.72±0.58 de	2.09±0.13 d-f
	S₂	23.47 ± 0.38 d	2.37 ± 0.02 b-d	29.4 ± 0.58 gh	19.05±1.11 b-d	1.55±0.10 e-i
	S₃	20.10 ± 0.31 fg	2.25 ± 0.02 e	29.3 ± 0.81 gh	23.15±0.78 ab	1.27±0.04 g-i
Bittle-98	S₀	18.30 ± 0.42 h	2.15 ± 0.05 f-h	30.2 ± 1.10 e-g	13.52±0.38 e-g	2.23±0.06 de
	S₁	16.63 ± 0.52 i	2.00 ± 0.03 j	24.5 ± 1.35 jk	10.65±0.60 f-i	2.32±0.23 c-e
	S₂	15.07 ± 0.58 i	1.87 ± 0.04 k	19.1 ± 1.0 m	10.85±1.35 f-i	1.85±0.36 d-h
	S₃	13.37 ± 0.42 j	1.84 ± 0.04 k	15.5 ± 0.38 n	16.55±1.10 de	0.94±0.05 i
Punjab-2008	S₀	25.30 ± 0.25 bc	2.35 ± 0.02 bc	30.7 ± 0.52 e-g	9.82±0.49 g-i	3.15±0.21 b
	S₁	23.80 ± 0.29 cd	2.24 ± 0.04 ef	26.7 ± 0.73 ij	13.05±0.83 e-h	2.06±0.08 d-g
	S₂	21.70 ± 0.64 ef	2.20 ± 0.04 e-g	26.7 ± 0.83 ij	13.08±0.73 e-h	2.05±0.05 d-g
	S₃	18.63 ± 0.15 gh	2.11 ±0.04 hi	23.5 ± 0.49 kl	17.05±0.52 d-e	1.38±0.07 f-i
CM-98	S₀	23.70 ± 1.05 cd	2.24 ± 0.01 ef	32.4 ± 0.69 d-f	7.92±0.41 i	4.12±0.27 a
	S₁	19.50 ± 0.72 gh	2.08 ± 0.04 h-j	28.0 ± 0.45 hi	9.12±0.64 hi	3.11±0.22 bc
	S₂	19.13 ± 0.82 gh	2.06 ± 0.02 h-j	22.8 ± 0.64 kl	14.38±0.45 ef	1.58±0.05 d-i
	S₃	16.60 ± 0.60 i	2.04 ± 0.02 ij	21.6 ± 0.41 l	18.75±0.69 cd	1.15±0.05 hi

V	N	P	K⁺	Pr	LP	H₂O₂	Prot	S	StC	T	Y	Car	SL	RL	R:S	K⁺/Na⁺	Na⁺
N	1
P	0.91	1
K⁺	0.86	0.86	1
Pr	-0.09	-0.07	-0.17	1
LP	-0.12	-0.06	-0.10	0.80	1
H₂O₂	0.39	0.40	0.20	0.59	0.59	1
Prot	-0.11	0.01	-0.09	0.76	0.84	0.58	1
S	0.28	0.40	0.36	0.52	0.57	0.50	0.64	1
StC	0.86	0.83	0.89	-0.34	-0.24	0.23	-0.24	0.16	1
T	0.72	0.76	0.78	-0.40	-0.30	0.19	-0.26	0.12	0.85	1
Y	0.52	0.56	0.37	0.12	0.10	0.63	0.18	0.29	0.50	0.47	1
Car	0.12	0.22	0.16	0.73	0.83	0.62	0.79	0.69	0.00	-0.07	0.34	1
SL	0.54	0.48	0.40	-0.05	-0.07	0.50	-0.08	0.07	0.52	0.53	0.43	0.03	1
RL	0.76	0.70	0.68	-0.40	-0.35	0.17	-0.37	0.04	0.81	0.79	0.52	-0.13	0.62	1
R:S	0.62	0.58	0.61	-0.47	-0.38	-0.09	-0.40	0.01	0.69	0.68	0.37	-0.16	0.16	0.87
K⁺/Na⁺	0.42	0.31	0.42	-0.64	-0.59	-0.17	-0.63	-0.28	0.55	0.50	0.04	-0.47	0.48	0.66	0.51	1
Na⁺	0.04	0.16	0.15	0.70	0.70	0.34	0.73	0.60	-0.10	-0.17	0.10	0.73	-0.25	-0.36	-0.28	-0.76	1

[1] *e-mail: drmidrarullah@gmail.com

Brasil

Brasil

Biochemical, physiological, and growth evaluation of different chickpea genotypes under varying salinity regimes

Avaliação bioquímica, fisiológica e de crescimento de diferentes genótipos de grão-de-bico sob vários regimes de salinidade

Abstract