Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Outcomes from intracerebral hemorrhage among patients pre-treated with statins

Prognóstico da hemorragia intracerebral em pacientes previamente tratados com estatinas

Abstracts

OBJECTIVE: 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors, or statins, have been associated with improved clinical outcomes after ischemic stroke and subarachnoid hemorrhage, but with an increased risk of incidental spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). We investigated whether the statin use before ICH, was associated with functional independence, 90 days after treatment. METHOD: We analyzed 124 consecutive ICH patients with 90-day outcome data who were enrolled in a prospective cohort study between 2006 and 2009. Eighty-three patients were included in this study. Among ICH survivors, univariate Cox regression models and Kaplan-Meier plots were used to determine subject characteristics that were associated with an increased risk of recurrence. Statin usage was determined through interviewing the patient at the time of ICH and confirmed by reviewing their medical records. Independent status was defined as Glasgow Outcome Scale grades 4 or 5. RESULTS: Statins were used by 20 out of 83 patients (24%) before ICH onset. There was no effect from pre-ICH statin use on functional independence rates (28% versus 29%, P=0.84) or mortality (46% versus 45%, P=0.93). CONCLUSION: Pre-ICH statin use is not associated with changes to ICH functional outcome or mortality.

cerebral hemorrhage; hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA reductase inhibitors


OBJETIVO: Inibidores da 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzima A (HMG-CoA) redutase, ou estatinas, têm sido associados com melhora do prognóstico após eventos encefálicos isquêmicos e hemorragia subaracnóidea, mas com um aumento do risco de evento encefálico hemorrágico (AVEh). Nós investigamos se o uso de estatinas prévio ao sangramento é associado com independência funcional em 90 dias. MÉTODO: Analisamos 124 pacientes consecutivos com AVEh com 90 dias de seguimento, selecionando 83 para um estudo coorte prospectivo entre 2006 e 2009. O uso de estatinas foi determinado pela entrevista ao paciente no momento da entrada ao hospital e complementado pela revisão do prontuário. Foi definido como independência funcional um GOS (Glasgow Outcome Scale) 4 ou 5. RESULTADOS: Estatinas eram usadas por 20/83 (24%) antes do AVEh. Não houve efeito benéfico do uso prévio ao AVEh de estatinas nas taxas de independência funcional (28% versus 29%, P=0,84) ou mortalidade (46% versus 45%, P=0,93). CONCLUSÃO: O uso de estatina pré-AVEh não é associado com melhora do prognóstico funcional ou taxa de mortalidade.

hemorragia cerebral; inibidores de hidroximetilglutaril-CoA redutases


ARTICLE

Outcomes from intracerebral hemorrhage among patients pre-treated with statins

Prognóstico da hemorragia intracerebral em pacientes previamente tratados com estatinas

Flávio Ramalho RomeroI; Eduardo de Freitas BertoliniII; Vanessa Nogueira VelosoIII; Leandro VenturiniIV; Eberval G. FigueiredoV

INeurosurgeon at Hospital Ipiranga - SUS, Hospital São Camilo, São Paulo SP, Brazil, and Hospital São Luiz, São Paulo SP, Brazil. Postgraduate Student in Neurosurgery Division, University of São Paulo, São Paulo SP, Brazil, Neurosurgery Service, Hospital Ipiranga - SUS, São Paulo SP, Brazil

IINeurosurgeon at Hospital Ipiranga - SUS, Neurosurgery Service, Hospital Ipiranga - SUS, São Paulo SP, Brazil

IIIResident in Internal Medicine at Hospital Ipiranga - SUS, Neurosurgery Service, Hospital Ipiranga - SUS, São Paulo SP, Brazil

IVHead of Neurosurgery Division, Hospital Ipiranga - SUS, Neurosurgery Service, Hospital Ipiranga - SUS, São Paulo SP, Brazil

VHead of Neurovascular Group, Neurosurgery Division, Hospital das Clínicas, School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo SP, Brazil, Neurosurgery Service, Hospital Ipiranga - SUS, São Paulo SP, Brazil

Correspondence Correspondence: Flávio Ramalho Romero Rua Pascoal Vita 366 / 94 05445-000 São Paulo SP - Brazil E-mail: frromero@ig.com.br, romeroncr@gmail.com

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors, or statins, have been associated with improved clinical outcomes after ischemic stroke and subarachnoid hemorrhage, but with an increased risk of incidental spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). We investigated whether the statin use before ICH, was associated with functional independence, 90 days after treatment.

METHOD: We analyzed 124 consecutive ICH patients with 90-day outcome data who were enrolled in a prospective cohort study between 2006 and 2009. Eighty-three patients were included in this study. Among ICH survivors, univariate Cox regression models and Kaplan-Meier plots were used to determine subject characteristics that were associated with an increased risk of recurrence. Statin usage was determined through interviewing the patient at the time of ICH and confirmed by reviewing their medical records. Independent status was defined as Glasgow Outcome Scale grades 4 or 5.

RESULTS: Statins were used by 20 out of 83 patients (24%) before ICH onset. There was no effect from pre-ICH statin use on functional independence rates (28% versus 29%, P=0.84) or mortality (46% versus 45%, P=0.93).

CONCLUSION: Pre-ICH statin use is not associated with changes to ICH functional outcome or mortality.

Key words: cerebral hemorrhage, hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA reductase inhibitors.

RESUMO

OBJETIVO: Inibidores da 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzima A (HMG-CoA) redutase, ou estatinas, têm sido associados com melhora do prognóstico após eventos encefálicos isquêmicos e hemorragia subaracnóidea, mas com um aumento do risco de evento encefálico hemorrágico (AVEh). Nós investigamos se o uso de estatinas prévio ao sangramento é associado com independência funcional em 90 dias.

MÉTODO: Analisamos 124 pacientes consecutivos com AVEh com 90 dias de seguimento, selecionando 83 para um estudo coorte prospectivo entre 2006 e 2009. O uso de estatinas foi determinado pela entrevista ao paciente no momento da entrada ao hospital e complementado pela revisão do prontuário. Foi definido como independência funcional um GOS (Glasgow Outcome Scale) 4 ou 5.

RESULTADOS: Estatinas eram usadas por 20/83 (24%) antes do AVEh. Não houve efeito benéfico do uso prévio ao AVEh de estatinas nas taxas de independência funcional (28% versus 29%, P=0,84) ou mortalidade (46% versus 45%, P=0,93).

CONCLUSÃO: O uso de estatina pré-AVEh não é associado com melhora do prognóstico funcional ou taxa de mortalidade.

Palavras-chave: hemorragia cerebral, inibidores de hidroximetilglutaril-CoA redutases.

Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) causes first-time stroke in 10% to 15% of such patients, with a 30-day mortality rate of 35% to 52%; half of the deaths occur in the first two days1-3. In one population study on 1041 cases of ICH, 50% had a deep location, 35% were lobar, 10% were cerebellar and 6% were in the brain stem4. The mortality rate one year after ICH varies according to the location of the ICH: 51% for deep hemorrhage, 57% for lobar, 42% for cerebellar and 65% for brain stem5. Out of the estimated 67,000 patients who had an ICH in the United States during 2002, only 20% are expected to be functionally independent six months later3.

3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors, or statins, have other effects in addition to decreasing cholesterol synthesis6. Statin-treated animals have better outcomes in experimental models for ischemic stroke7 and intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH)8,9. Human studies suggest that statins are associated with better outcomes after ischemic stroke10 and subarachnoid hemorrhage11.

In contrast, it is not known whether pre-ICH statin use confers better outcomes among patients with ICH. Some of the pleiotropic effects of statins, such as decreased platelet aggregation12 and decreased thrombogenesis13, may promote hematoma expansion or increase the risk of recurrent hemorrhage.

Therefore, we investigated whether prior use of statin would improve the outcome among patients with ICH.

METHOD

We retrospectively analyzed data from an ongoing single-center prospective longitudinal cohort study on primary ICH. All patients with a baseline admission CT scan and determination of functional status at 90 days were eligible. Clinical information, including medication use and dosage, was abstracted from the medical records and supplemented by interview. ICH volume and location were determined by means of computer-assisted segmentation. This study was approved by the local ethics committee.

There were 124 consecutive admissions with symptom onset between January 1, 2006 and December 31, 2010. Baseline CT scan was not performed or was missing in 8/124 (0.6%), and other data were missing in 5/124 (0.4%), leaving 111 subjects with complete baseline information. Death within 30 days occurred in 28/111, thus leaving 83/111 30-day survivors. Therefore, 90-day Glasgow outcome scale (GOS) was determined for a total of 83/124 potential subjects (67%).

Independent status was defined as GOS 4 or 5. Logistic regression models were constructed to determine whether pre-ICH statin use was associated with independent status or mortality. Age and Glasgow coma score (GCS) score were categorized according to cutoff points that were established in univariate analysis, as follows: [1] age: <69, 70 to 79 and >80, [2] GCS: 3 to 10, 11 to 14 and 15.

Among the ICH survivors, univariate Cox regression models and Kaplan-Meier plots were used to determine subject characteristics that were associated with an increased risk of recurrence. Post-ICH statin use was analyzed as a time-dependent variable because some subjects started or discontinued statins during the follow-up period. Post-ICH statin use and any variables associated with ICH recurrence (P<0.20) were entered into a multivariable Cox regression model, followed by backward elimination of nonsignificant variables (P>0.05). Statistical analyses were performed using SAS version 9.1.3.

RESULTS

Were statin users 20/83 (24%) patients before the ICH. There was no effect from pre-ICH statin use on the functional independence rates (32% versus 36%, P=0.79) or mortality (41% versus 47%, P=0.82). Medical comorbidities and warfarin use were more common in statin users. The multivariable-adjusted odds ratio for independent status in pre-ICH statin users was 1.03 (95% CI: 0.71 to 2.21, P=0.71).

Pre-ICH statin use was not associated with independent status or mortality (Table). We considered whether the effect of statin use might vary according to outcome definition or patient subgroups. There was no difference in 30-day or 90-day survival in pre-ICH statin users (data not shown). Because statin withdrawal may worsen stroke outcome14,15, we performed additional analyses after subtracting subjects among whom statins were discontinued (n=12) or adding subjects among whom statins were started (n=15). However, the sample did not have enough power to allow definitive conclusions.

DISCUSSION

The initial experimental evidence generated from animals appeared in a couple of studies in 2004. In one of them, atorvastatin was administered orally beginning 24 h after ICH and was continued daily for one week. With a low dose of 2 mg/kg, a significant reduction in neurological deficit two to four weeks after the ICH was observed, while a higher dose of 8 mg/kg did not improve functional outcome or reduce the brain damage14.

Supported by these studies, initial attempts to evaluate the effect on humans were made. In a retrospective study performed at Johns Hopkins Hospital, the effect of statin administered prior to ICH was assessed among 125 consecutive ICH patients. The authors found that patients with prior statin use had less perifocal edema than did those without prior statin use. The multivariate analysis showed a significant correlation between prior statin use and reduction of early absolute edema volume15. The same group demonstrated that prior use of statins was associated with lower mortality at 30 days.

We did not detect any difference in outcomes among patients taking statins before ICH, even after adjustment for medical comorbidities. In contrast, treatment with statins improved sensorimotor recovery in two animal models for ICH8,9. However, there may be biological differences between animals and humans regarding the type of injury that occurs after ICH. In contrast to the animal studies, our subjects were taking various types and doses of statins. A recent study suggested that statins are associated with decreased 30-day mortality but not with improved functional outcome16,17. In our study, pre-ICH statin use had no effect on 30-day mortality. It is unclear whether the different results occurred because of the play of chance, or because of differences in the populations studied.

The main limitation of our study is that statin use was not randomly assigned, and therefore associations between statins and either ICH outcomes or recurrent ICH may be confounded with other factors that are associated with statin use, even though we adjusted for recognized confounders using regression models.

Our analysis of the dose-response effect of statins on ICH outcomes uses the simplistic assumption that maximum dose strengths are equipotent across different drugs.

These data come from a not-so-large series of consecutive ICH cases with functional outcome data and prospective follow-up and therefore provide a best estimate of the effect of statins on ICH outcomes in the absence of large trials. FitzMaurice calculated that a trial of statins to improve 90-day outcome should include 1026 subjects (randomized 1:1 to treat with statin or placebo), for it to get 90% power to detect an OR >1.24, for independent status in the statin arm18.

It is too early to come to any conclusion. In addition, because of the small sample size of the present study, and because the underlying prospective study does not define the statins that were used, no definitive conclusion can be drawn until a comprehensive, double blind, prospective study is performed.

Received 12 July 2010

Received in final form 4 January 2011

Received in final form 11 January 2011

CORRECTIONS

Dear Editors,

Ref. Article: Romero FR, Bertolini E, Velozo VN, Venturini L, Figueiredo EG. Outcomes from intracerebral hemorrhage among patients pre-treated with statins. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 2011;69:452-454.

Some similar points have been observed between our paper and other by FitzMaurice et al. Effect of Statins on Intracerebral Hemorrhage Outcome and Recurrence. Stroke 2008; 39:2151-2154. These points are not coincidental but resulted from mistakes when the documents were selected and sent to the editor. So, instead of selecting my own results, I sent a file with graphic and words containing the data from the table of the Fitz Maurice's paper from which I intended to compare my data and present my results. Consequentely, my data have not been published but just the Fitz Maurice's results have been displayed as they were mine. I take the total responsibility about this oversight. The Department of Neurology, the Division of Neurosurgery and the Post Graduation program of the University of São Paulo and their personnel have no responsibility for this inaccuracy, as this article was designed and developed in other institution.

I would like to convey my regrets and apologies about this inopportune misunderstanding. Should I had been more meticulous in my revision of the documents before sending them and when I received the proofs, it would have not occurred. The Stroke paper was the initial inspiration for my work and it was actually used as reference that I now would like to include. I present a new table displaying my actual data and revision of the text to replace that that was portrayed before.

Replace Table 1 for the following:

In the sentence:

"We calculated that a trial of statins to improve ...

Change to:

FitzMaurice calculated that a trial of statins to improve 90-day outcome should include 1026 subjects (randomized 1:1 to treat with statin or placebo), for it to get 90% power to detect an OR >1.24, for independent status in the statin arm18.

In the sentence:

"Statins were used ...

Change to:

Were statin users 20/83 (24%) patients before the ICH. There was no effect from pre-ICH statin use on the functional independence rates (32% versus 36%, P=0.79) or mortality (41% versus 47%, P=0.82). Medical comorbidities and warfarin use were more common in statin users. The multivariable-adjusted odds ratio for independent status in pre-ICH statin users was 1.03 (95% CI: 0.71 to 2.21, P=0.71).

Include a new reference:

18. FitzMaurice E, Wendell L, Snider R, et al. Effect of Statins on Intracerebral Hemorrhage Outcome and Recurrence. Stroke 2008; 39:2151-2154.

Best regards,

Flávio Ramalho Romero

  • 1. Broderick JP, Brott T, Tomsick T, Miller R, Huster G. Intracerebral hemorrhage more than twice as common as subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Neurosurg 1993;78:188-191.
  • 2. Anderson CS, Chakera TM, Stewart-Wynne EG, Jamrozik KD. Spectrum of primary intracerebral haemorrhage in Perth, Western Australia, 1989-90: Incidence and outcome. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1994;57:936-940.
  • 3. Counsell C, Boonyakarnkul S, Dennis M, et al. Primary intracerebral haemorrhage in the Oxfordshire Community Stroke Project, 2: prognosis. Cerebrovasc Dis 1995;5:26-34.
  • 4. Flaherty ML, Woo D, Haverbusch M, et al. Racial variations in location and risk of intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke 2005;36:934-937.
  • 5. Flaherty ML, Haverbusch M, Sekar P, et al. Long-term mortality after intracerebral hemorrhage. Neurology 2006; 66:1182-1186.
  • 6. Sacco RL, Liao JK. Drug insight: statins and stroke. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med 2005;2:576-584.
  • 7. Endres M, Laufs U, Huang Z, et al. Stroke protection by 3-hydroxy-3- methylglutaryl (HMG)-CoA reductase inhibitors mediated by endothelial nitric oxide synthase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1998;95:8880-8885.
  • 8. Jung KH, Chu K, Jeong SW, et al. HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor, atorvastatin, promotes sensorimotor recovery, suppressing acute inflammatory reaction after experimental intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke 2004;35:1744-1749.
  • 9. Seyfried D, Han Y, Lu D, Chen J, Bydon A, Chopp M. Improvement in neurological outcome after administration of atorvastatin following experimental intracerebral hemorrhage in rats. J Neurosurg 2004;101:104-107.
  • 10. Marti-Fabregas J, Gomis M, Arboix A, Aleu A, et al. Favorable outcome of ischemic stroke in patients pretreated with statins. Stroke 2004;35: 1117-1121.
  • 11. Tseng MY, Hutchinson PJ, Czosnyka M, Richards H, Pickard JD, Kirkpatrick PJ. Effects of acute pravastatin treatment on intensity of rescue therapy, length of inpatient stay, and 6-month outcome in patients after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke 2007;38:1545-1550.
  • 12. Yokoyama S, Ikeda H, Haramaki N, Yasukawa H, Katoh A, Imaizumi T. HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor protects against in vivo arterial thrombosis by augmenting platelet-derived nitric oxide release in rats. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 2005;45:375-381.
  • 13. Asahi M, Huang Z, Thomas S, et al. Protective effects of statins involving both eNOS and tPA in focal cerebral ischemia. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2005;25:722-729.
  • 14. Seyfried D, Han Y, Lu D, Chen J, Bydon A, Chopp M. Improvement in neurological outcome after administration of atorvastatin following experimental intracerebral hemorrhage in rats. J Neurosurg 2004;101:104-107.
  • 15. Naval NS, Abdelhak TA, Urrunaga N, Zeballos P, Mirski MA, Carhuapoma JR. An association of prior statin use with decreased perihematomal edema. Neurocrit Care 2008 8:13-18.
  • 16. McGirt MJ, Ambrossi GLG, Huang J, Tamargo RJ. Simvastatin for the prevention of symptomatic cerebral vasospasm following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a single-institution prospective cohort study Neurosurg 2009;110:968-974.
  • 17. Blanco M, Nombela F, Castellanos M, et al. Statin treatment withdrawal in ischemic stroke: a controlled randomized study. Neurology 2007;69: 904-910.
  • 18. FitzMaurice E, Wendell L, Snider R, et al. Effect of Statins on Intracerebral Hemorrhage Outcome and Recurrence. Stroke 2008; 39:2151-2154.
  • Correspondence:
    Flávio Ramalho Romero
    Rua Pascoal Vita 366 / 94
    05445-000 São Paulo SP - Brazil
    E-mail:
  • Publication Dates

    • Publication in this collection
      19 July 2012
    • Date of issue
      June 2011

    History

    • Accepted
      11 Jan 2011
    • Reviewed
      04 Jan 2011
    • Received
      12 July 2010
    Academia Brasileira de Neurologia - ABNEURO R. Vergueiro, 1353 sl.1404 - Ed. Top Towers Offices Torre Norte, 04101-000 São Paulo SP Brazil, Tel.: +55 11 5084-9463 | +55 11 5083-3876 - São Paulo - SP - Brazil
    E-mail: revista.arquivos@abneuro.org