Abstract
Purpose:
This article aims to examine whether political uncertainty affects the accounting choices of firms’ managers in the sense of practicing earnings management through discretionary accruals.
Originality/value:
The research is original for providing evidence on the direction of earnings management practice following periods of political uncertainty and considering emerging countries in Latin America. The study helps signal to capital market agents in those countries the impact of political uncertainty on the quality of accounting aggregates.
Design/methodology/approach:
The final sample comprised 352 firms (3,005 observations-year), considering the period 1998-2018. Political uncertainty was a proxy for the countries’ presidential election years. At the same time, earnings management was captured by discretionary accruals estimated according to the Jones’ model (1991) modified by Dechow et al. (2012). Multiple linear regression with estimation by System Generalized Method of Moments (Sys-GMM) guided the tests.
Findings:
It was found that presidential election periods are associated with managers’ decisions to increase earnings by positive discretionary accruals, allowing us to infer that political uncertainty impacts managers’ accounting choices regarding earnings management. The results proved to be robust to different test alternatives. The findings have practical implications for agents who use accounting information as an informational signal in their decisions, whether from the perspective of investors (current shareholders or potential shareholders) or the perspective of other stakeholders associated with the firm (employees, suppliers etc.).
Keywords:
political uncertainty; earnings management; discretionary accruals; presidential elections; quality of accounting information