Korogiannou et al., 20223131 Korogiannou M, Sarafidis P, Theodorakopoulou MP, Alexandrou ME, Xagas E, Argyris A, et al. Sex differences in ambulatory blood pressure levels, control, and phenotypes of hypertension in kidney transplant recipients. J Hypertens. 2022;40(2):356-63. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0000000000003019. PubMed PMID: 34581304. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0000000000...
|
136 men and 69 women |
Similar office PBP and DBP between genders, but the daytime ABPM was significantly worse in me (prevalence and control). No difference in nighttime B P. |
Korogiannou et al., 20213232 Korogiannou M, Sarafidis P, Theodorakopoulou MP, Alexandrou ME, Xagas E, Boletis IN, et al. Diagnostic performance of office versus ambulatory blood pressure in kidney transplant recipients. Am J Nephrol. 2021;52(7):548-58. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000517358. PubMed PMID: 34311458. http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000517358...
|
205 |
ABPM showed a high prevalence of office HBP (around 90%), MAH and low rates of blood pressor control, in addition to 6.7% of de WCH and 39.5% of MHA (cutoff of 140/90 mmHg) and 5.9% of de WCH and 31.7% of MHA (cutoff of 130/80 mmHg). Low diagnostic BP performance in the office. |
Nguyen et al., 20213333 Nguyen MN, Skov K, Pedersen BB, Buus NH. Unattended automated office blood pressure in living donor kidney transplant recipients. Blood Press. 2021;30(6):386-94. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08037051.2021.1991778. PubMed PMID: 34664539. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08037051.2021....
|
57 |
Daytime ABPM comparable to the standardized measure, automated and alone with AP BP with a 20% incorrect classification rate. |
Gluskin et al., 20193434 Gluskin E, Tzukert K, Mor-Yosef Levi I, Gotsman O, Sagiv I, Abel R, et al. Ambulatory monitoring unmasks hypertension among kidney transplant patients: single center experience and review of the literature. BMC Nephrol. 2019;20(1):284. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12882-019-1442-7. PubMed PMID: 31351470. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12882-019-144...
|
76 |
Non dipping pattern in 73% of the patients. |
Mallamaci et al., 20182525 Mallamaci F, D’Arrigo G, Tripepi R, Leonardis D, Porto G, Testa A, et al. Office, standardized and 24-h ambulatory blood pressure and renal function loss in renal transplant patients. J Hypertens. 2018;36(1):119-25. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0000000000001530. PubMed PMID: 28858982. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0000000000...
|
260 |
In 37% of the visits there were disagreements which would cause wrong decision making in 1/3 of the patients. |
Kendirlinan et al., 20163535 Kendirlinan Demirkol O, Oruc M, Ikitimur B, Ozcan S, Gulcicek S, Soylu H, et al. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and echocardiographic findings in renal transplant recipients. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2016;18(8):766-71. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jch.12755. PubMed PMID: 26689296. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jch.12755...
|
87 |
MAH in 16.1% and WCH in 24.1%, high rate of patients with mild nighttime dipping (67.8%). LVH in 21.8% of the patients. |
Ahmed et al., 20153636 Ahmed J, Ozorio V, Farrant M, van der Merwe W. Ambulatory vs office blood pressure monitoring in renal transplant recipients. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2015;17(1):46-50. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jch.12448. PubMed PMID: 25440573. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jch.12448...
|
98 |
ABPM discrepancy in 61% of the patients, 58% due to MAH, of which 33% were caused by nocturnal isolated AH, with 42% of conduct change. |
Kayrak et al., 20143737 Kayrak M, Gul EE, Kaya C, Solak Y, Turkmen K, Yazici R, et al. Masked hypertension in renal transplant recipients. Blood Press. 2014;23(1):47-53. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/08037051.2013.796688. PubMed PMID: 23721572. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/08037051.2013....
|
11 3 |
MAH in 39% of the transplanted patients, with a > prevalence among those from deceased donors (40% vs. 19%). |
Fresnedo et al., 20122323 Fernandez Fresnedo G, Franco Esteve A, Gómez Huertas E, Cabello Chaves V, Díz Gómez JM, Osorio Moratalla JM, et al. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in kidney transplant patients: RETENAL study. Transplant Proc. 2012 Nov;44(9):2601-2. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2012.09.037. PubMed PMID: 23146468. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed...
|
868 |
36.5% of the recipients had their BP controlled (mean 24 hours < 130/85 mmHg), 65% were considered WCH phenotype. |
Ibernon et al., 20123838 Ibernon M, Moreso F, Sarrias X, Sarrias M, Grinyó JM, Fernandez-Real JM, et al. Reverse dipper pattern of blood pressure at 3 months is associated with inflammation and outcome after renal transplantation. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2012;27(5):2089-95. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfr587. PubMed PMID: 22015441. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfr587...
|
126 |
n=65 patients had non dipping e pattern and 39 lost the graft. |
Wen, 20123939 Wen KC, Gourishankar S. Evaluating the utility of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in kidney transplant recipients. Clin Transplant. 2012;26(5):E465-70. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ctr.12009. PubMed PMID: 23061756. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ctr.12009...
|
244 |
Office measures overestimate the values obtained in the 24h and in daytime BP (p < 0.001), which shows the high prevalence of WCH. |
Agena et al., 20114040 Agena F, Prado ES, Souza PS, Silva GV, Lemos FBC, Mion D Jr, et al. Home blood pressure (BP) monitoring in kidney transplant recipients is more adequate to monitor BP than office BP. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2011;26(11):3745-9. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfr143. PubMed PMID: 21441398. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfr143...
|
183 |
Results obtained in the HMBP were closer to those from ABPM than the office measures. |