Population structure of the seahorse Hippocampus reidi in two Brazilian estuaries

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate and compare seasonal variations of Hippocampus reidi population structures in two Brazilian coastal areas. Samples were collected from the rocky shores of Urca and Duas Irmãs Island by freediving along fixed transects. All seahorses observed in the study were recorded, measured, and identified by sex and reproductive stage. Seahorse behavior and fish depth were also registered. All individuals were photo-identified to estimate recapture rates. Holdfast used by seahorses was also recorded. Results showed low densities at both sites; sex ratio and juvenile/adult proportion did not appear to vary with season. The seahorse height differed between the two areas but did not vary with season nor sex. Seahorses in both sites were found in shallow waters (i.e. up to 4 meters), and the depth did not vary by season nor sex. Males were more frequently recaptured than females in both areas. All seahorses were reproductively active year-round, peaking at rainy periods in both areas. The seahorses were more often recorded while resting and seemed to anchor on seaweed. Though in different bays, seahorse population structure and seasonality appeared similar. These data provide useful baseline data for future population assessments.

Descriptors:
Habitats; Hippocampus Reidi; Population structure; Seasonality

INTRODUCTION

Estuaries provide many ecological functions for inhabiting organisms such as nurseries, refuges, foraging sources, migration areas, and reproduction sites (Gibson, 1994; Koutsikopoulos et al., 1989; Miller, et al., 1985; Vasconcelos et al., 2011). These ecological functions are extremely important, mainly to estuarine fish, as some species rely on these environments throughout their whole life cycle.

Teleost fish in temperate estuaries, where environmental variation is broader and more seasonal, generally show seasonal patterns of growth, reproduction, abundance, and density (Blaber, 2000; Elliott and Hemingway, 2002). Consequently, fish species can adapt to reach desirable reproduction and recruitment conditions, with adjustments in populations such as density, sex ratio, juvenile abundance, residence time, and height class curve. Although water parameters may drive biological responses, biotic trends may also play an important role for the species (Power, 2000; Power et al., 2000, 2002; Power and Attrill, 2002, 2003). Food and habitat availability, competition, and predation can also be important to explain and predict the temporal and spatial patterns of estuarine organisms (Ogburn-Matthews and Allen, 1993; Lankford and Targett, 1994; Barry et al., 1996). The relationship between the biota distribution with biotic and abiotic factors in estuaries have received considerable attention (Akin et al., 2005; Kotta et al., 2015; Conroy et al., 2017; Newcomer et al., 2018; Grimaldo et al., 2020). These studies focused on fish population and community patterns in this ecosystem and are one of the most dominant groups (Blaber and Blaber, 1980; Marshall and Elliott, 1998; Whitfield, 1999; Akin et al., 2005; Grimaldo et al., 2020).

Seahorses are coastal fish which inhabit shallow water in tropical and temperate areas (Lourie et al., 1999). Of the 46 seahorse species worldwide, seven are found in estuaries (Correia et al., 2018; Correia et al., 2015; Lourie et al., 1999; Harasti et al., 2012), of which Hippocampus capensis is exclusively estuarine (Claassens et al., 2020). Species of temperate estuaries, such as Hippocampus guttulatus, have an intense response to seasonal variation of environmental conditions, particularly temperature (Correia et al., 2018), as do Hippocampus reidi in tropical estuaries, reproducing mostly in the dry windy season (Mai and Velasco, 2012). In Brazil, three species are commonly found in ecosystems near rocky reefs, mangroves, and coral reefs (Rosa et al., 2007; Freret-Meurer and Andreata, 2008; Mai and Rosa, 2009; Freret-Meurer et al., 2018a, b). The longsnout seahorse Hippocampus reidi Ginsburg, 1933 is the most common along the Brazilian coast and is currently rated Vulnerable in the Brazilian red list of the Brazilian Ministry of Environment (ICMBIO, 2018) and Near Threatened globally (Oliveira and Pollom, 2017).

Tracking and understanding seahorse population structure dynamics, especially in regional estuaries, is extremely important. This can help evaluate the effect of environmental changes on population and even help develop regional conservation estuary policy. These organisms generally exhibit patchy distribution, low mobility, and small home ranges (Foster and Vincent 2004; Caldwell and Vincent 2012), leaving their populations vulnerable to decline or even eradication.

There are some studies on H. reidi populations in Brazil (Dias and Rosa, 2003; Rosa et al., 2005; Rosa et al., 2007; Mai and Velasco, 2012; Aylesworth et al., 2015; Freret-Meurer et al., 2018a, b). These focused on the environment and certain aspects of population structure. However, none of them hypothesized on seasonal population variation, extremely important in estuaries due to their dynamics.

The present work seeks to investigate the effect of seasonal estuarine trends (salinity and temperature) on the longsnout seahorse H. reidi population structure in two estuaries in the state of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. We expected to find (1) similar overall water physical and chemical factors in these two areas; (2) a difference in environmental conditions in accordance with dry and rainy seasons; and (3) similar habitats and seasonal structures among seahorse populations.

METHODS

This study was conducted with the permission of the Chico Mendes Institute for Biodiversity Conservation (ICMBio) (permit number 44409-3). Data collection was conducted at two coastal rocky shore locations in Rio de Janeiro: Urca beach (U) (22°56’33” S - 43°09’27” W), located on the west side of Guanabara Bay, and Duas Irmãs island (DI), located in Sepetiba Bay (22°56’38” S, 43°57’46” W; Figure 1). The two factors that helped determine these locations were the presence of H. reidi and water visibility, crucial for data accuracy.

Figure 1
Location of the two surveyed sites for Hippocampus reidi during 2018-2019 in Rio de Janeiro coastal bays - a) Guanabara bay (Urca beach) and b) Sepetiba bay (Duas Irmãs island).

Urca beach is located in Guanabara Bay, which has an area of 380km² (Kjerfve et al., 1997). The bay is 84% shallow water (up to 10 m in depth), though some areas reach 40 m in depth, as recorded by the central channel (Figueiredo et al., 2014). Mean rainfall during the rainy and dry seasons varies between 3 mm - 85 mm and 80 mm - 110mm, respectively (INMET, 1992). Urca beach is at the entrance channel of the bay and is considered a tourist site. It has a rocky reef composed of a diverse range of holdfast (Sola and Paiva, 2001). Seahorse populations had previously been recorded at the site.

Duas Irmas island is Sepetiba bay, which has a surface area of approximately 305 km² and depth ranging between 8.6 meters and 30 meters (Fonseca, 1978). Annual rainfall values range between 1,000mm and 2,100 mm (Barbieri and Kronemberger 1994). The two beaches are surrounded by rocky shores. Like Urca Beach, it is also a tourist site. Duas Irmãs island was chosen due to previous bibliographic research about local benthic characteristics, which led us to believe that it could offer seahorse habitats as it is surrounded by rocky reefs with seaweed, bryozoans, and porifera (Széchy et al., 2005).

Local seahorse population was monitored monthly through snorkeling between February 2018 and January 2019. During dives, four fixed 20 m x 4 m (total of 320 m²) transects were conducted, for an effective search time of 90 minutes per dive along the rocky shores (Freret-Meurer et al., 2018a). Maximum survey site depth was 4 cm in both areas. A total of 96 transects were performed, and 36 diving hours were spent on surveys.

Temperature and salinity were measured monthly with a mercury thermometer and a refractometer, respectively, on the water surface. Monthly cumulative rainfall data were drawn from the National Institute of Meteorology (INMET) to categorize seasons into rainy (October to March) and dry (April to September) periods for further seasonal analyses.

Seahorse individuals were counted during transects for abundance and density estimates. Further, seahorse sex was determined by the presence of brood pouches (males) or their absence (females) (Lourie, Vincent and Hall, 1999).

All seahorses were photographed using a Nikon AW300 for individual identification and further recapture analysis (Freret-Meurer et al., 2013), using I3S Classic version 4.02 software. The Constancy Index (CI) (adapted from Dajoz, 1983) was calculated to categorize as follows for each recaptured individual: rare (CI < 25%), visitors (25% < CI < 50%), and constant (CI > 50%) (Freret-Meurer and Andreata, 2008). A Jolly-Seber stochastic model for open populations (Jolly, 1965; Seber, 1982) was used to estimate population size, assuming the same capture probability for marked and unmarked animals. The model formula was computed using MS Excel.

Height and depth of occurrence were also measured underwater. Seahorse height was measured as a straight line from the coronet top to the prehensile tail end (Lourie, 2003). Individuals with a brood pouch and cloaca smaller than 56 mm were considered juveniles (Freret-Meurer et al., 2018a).

We used the scan method to assess seahorse behavior (Altmann, 1974), which was addressed upon seahorse discovery. Behavior was classified as Foraging, Swimming, Courting, and Resting (Freret-Meurer et al., 2018b). To establish breeding peaks, the reproductive stage was determined according to Lourie (2003), where for males: 0 = just given birth, pouch flabby; 1 = pouch empty, pouch flat; 2 = pregnant, pouch rounded; 3 = about to give birth, pouch extremely rounded and shiny, and for females: 0 = eggs just given away, belly sunken; 1 = no mature eggs, belly flat; 2 = bearing mature eggs, belly slightly raised; 3 = hydrated eggs, belly distended.

We recorded the holdfasts where seahorses were anchored. Holdfasts were identified in the field, but samples were collected and taken to the laboratory for further analysis when identification difficulties were encountered, according to Brusca et al. (2018), Muricy and Hajdu (2006), and Joly (1967). The holdfasts were classified at the species levels or higher taxonomic groups. The allochthonous holdfast was classified as a holdfast from other ecosystems and artificial as anthropogenic holdfasts.

The differences in sex ratio and the juvenile/adult proportion between seasons for each area were analyzed using the Chi-Squared test. Seasonal variations of seahorse height and depth of occurrence were checked by paired Student’s T-test in GraphPad InStat 3.0, and a Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to confirm normal distribution for heights and anchorage depth. Student’s tests were also used to calculate the difference between sex among these two measurements. In addition, the frequency of occurrence (FO) was calculated to infer the association with the holdfast, and a Shannon-diversity index was used to evaluate the holdfast association diversity.

Two-way permutational analysis of variance (PERMANOVA; Anderson, 2005) was applied to test for density differences, precipitation, temperature, and salinity between beaches (Urca Beach and Duas Irmãs Island) and periods (dry and rainy) using CANOCO 5.0 software. A mixed model was used to deal with spatial pseudoreplication (Anderson et al., 2008), where the rainy and dry periods were used as fixed and orthogonal factors and sampling period as a random factor. The Bray-Curtis distance was used in PERMANOVA, and data was permuted 9,999 times per analysis.

RESULTS

Precipitation was significantly higher at Urca Beach than at Duas Irmãs (F = 18.236, p = 0.0004), even when comparing the rainy and dry seasons at both sites (F = 24.1049, p = 0.0001). However, there was no significant interaction between these factors (F = 0.558, p = 0.476). For both sites, temperature was significantly higher during the rainy season (F = 4.134, p = 0.027), and salinity was higher during the dry season (F = 5.067, p = 0.038), with no significant difference between beaches (F = 1.468, p = 0.275; F = 1.892, p = 0.179, respectively) or interaction between beach and period (F = 1.164, p = 0.332; F = 0.286, p = 0.591, respectively) (Figure 2).

Figure 2
Boxplots season (dry and rainy seasons) values of: A. monthly cumulative precipitation in mm; B. water temperature in ºC; and C. salinity in psu. Rhombus represent season mean values and circles represent mean area values. Black dots are outliers.

A total of 66 seahorses were found at Urca Beach and 52 at Duas Irmãs Island, resulting in an average monthly abundance of 6 ± 1 individuals/month and 4 ± 2 individuals/month respectively. The mean seahorse density was higher at Urca Beach than at Duas Irmãs Island (Table 1 and Figure 3).

Figure 3
Mean density (ind.m^-2) and standard deviation of the seahorses H. reidi at Urca beach and Duas Irmãs island from February 2018 to January 2019.

Table 1
Results of Hippocampus reidi abundance (n total of individuals), density (ind.m^-2; mean ± SD), height (mm; mean ± SD) and depth (m; mean ± SD) at Urca beach and Duas Irmãs island. F=female, M=male, J=juveniles, D=dry and R=rainy.

Area	Urca beach								Duas Irmãs island
	Abund. (n)		Density (ind.m-2)		Height (mm)		Depth of occurrence (m)		Abund. (n)		Density (ind.m-2)		Height (mm)		Depth of occurrence (m)
Period	D	R	D	R	D	R	D	R	D	R	D	R	D	R	D	R
F	17	12	0.009 ± 0.007	0.006 ± 0.006	104.9 ± 20.7	82.4 ± 24.6	0.92 ± 0.32	1.16 ± 0.18	11	10	0.005 ± 0.002	0.005 ± 0.002	89 ± 17.77	87.8 ± 17.8	1.34 ± 0.47	0.86 ± 0.21
M	16	14	0.008 ± 0.002	0.007 ± 0.005	121.3 ± 12.7	122.4 ± 19.9	0.87 ± 0.28	1.17 ± 0.24	15	14	0.007 ± 0.003	0.007 ± 0.004	96.27 ± 10.60	92.6 ± 18.6	1.23 ± 0.55	0.93 ± 0.32
J	3	4	0.002 ± 0.003	0.002 ± 0.002	47.3 ± 1.5	50.7 ± 4.1	0.57 ± 0.06	1.12 ± 0.47	1	1	0.0005 ± 0.001	0.0005 ± 0.001	52	40	1.6	0.6
Total	36	30	0.02 ± 0.01	0.02 ± 0.002	96.9 ± 33.2	107.4 ± 25.8	0.86 ± 0.30	1.16 ± 0.24	27	25	0.01 ± 0.003	0.01 ± 0.01	91.7 ± 16.1	88.6 ± 20.4	1.29 ± 0.50	0.89 ± 0.28

Sex ratio at Urca Beach was 1:1 (Figure 4a), and adult/juvenile proportion was 8:1 (Figure 5a). At Duas Irmãs Island, sex ratio was 3:2 (Figure 4b), and 50 adults were recorded for two juveniles; 25:1 (Figure 5b). There was no significant difference in sex ratio between seasons at either area when analyzed separately (χ2_urca =0.02, p = 0.8; χ2_{Duas irmãs} = 0.0, p =1.0), nor for juvenile/adult proportion (χ2_urca =0.06, p = 0.7; χ2_{Duas irmãs} = 0.0, p =1.0). The sex ratio and juvenile/adult proportion did not differ in either area (χ2 =0.3, p = 0.6; χ2 = 1.0, p =0.3, respectively).

Figure 4
H. reidi sex ratio (%) (female x male) at at Duas Irmãs island and Urca beach.

Figure 5
Hippocampus reidi proportion of juveniles and adults (%) at Duas Irmãs island and Urca beach.

At both sites, males were more frequently re-sighted than females. At Urca Beach, re-sights were 7% for females and 17% for males. At Duas Irmãs Island, results were 24% for females, 31% for males, and 50% for juveniles. Annual re-sight rates were 11% at Urca Beach and 29% at Duas Irmãs Island. One female was re-sighted six times at Urca Beach, while one male was re-sighted five times at Duas Irmãs Island. The other individuals were re-sighted less than four times in each area. Per the Constancy Index, individuals from Urca Beach were considered rare (n=4) and visitors (n=3). Those from Duas Irmãs Island were deemed rare (n=11) and visitors (n=3). There were no resident seahorses in either area.

The Jolly-Seber model suggested a possible population of 236 individuals at Urca Beach and 140 at Duas Irmãs Island.

No seasonal difference was noted for seahorse height at either area (t_Urca = 1.64, p = 0.11; t_{Duas irmãs} = 0.48, p = 0.63) (Table 1, Figure 6a and 6b). However, at Urca Beach males were larger than females (t= 4.84, p= 0.001), in contrast with Duas Irmãs Island (t=1.33, p= 0.19). Individuals from Urca Beach were significantly larger than at Duas Irmãs Island (t = 2.65, p= 0.009).

Figure 6
Length classes (mm) of the seahorses H. reidi according to rainy and dry seasons (a) and length class (mm) on Urca beach (b); Length classes (mm) of the seahorses H. reidi according to rainy and dry seasons (c) and length class (mm) on Duas Irmãs island (d).

Seahorse depths differed between periods at both sites (t_Urca = 3.54, p = 0.001; t_{Duas irmãs} = 2.90, p = 0.005), with greater depth recorded during rainy periods at Urca Beach and dry period at Duas Irmãs Island (Table 1). Depth showed a different pattern by sex and study site. Both females and males were found significantly deeper during the rainy season at Urca Beach (t= 2.6, p= 0.02; t= 2.0, p= 0.08, respectively), while only females showed a significant difference between periods (t = 2.3, p= 0.04) at Duas Irmãs Island, where males recorded t = 1.5 and p= 0.1. Despite the difference between periods, there was no significant difference in depth of occurrence between male and females in either area (t_Urca = 0.06, p = 0.90; t_{Duas irmãs} = 0.20, p = 0.90) (Table1). The mean depths were 1.52 m ± 0.02 m and 2.27 m ± 0.04 m at Urca Beach and Duas Irmãs Island, respectively.

Most seahorses were found in stages 0, 2, and 3, representing reproductive activity year-round, peaking during rainy periods in both areas. Both populations exhibited different behaviors, such as courting, swimming, foraging, and resting. Courting and swimming were observed only at Urca Beach (5%, 2% respectively). Foraging was observed in only 2% of seahorses, and the most observed behavior were resting (>90%) in both areas.

Seahorses at Urca Beach were associated with the ascidian Styela plicata (Lesueur, 1823) and seaweed Codium sp. (Stackhouse, 1797) (FO = 13%), but juveniles were only found anchored to turf seaweed and the bryozoa Amathia verticillata (Lamouroux, 1812). Seahorses were most frequently detected anchored to seaweed, Ascidiacea, and allochthonous holdfast (plant branch) (Figure 7a).

Figure 7
Number of H. reidi anchored on holdfast taxonomic group at Urca beach (a) and Duas Irmãs island (b). Gray - juveniles; Black - males and White - females.

On the other hand, seahorses from Duas Irmas Island were frequently anchored to the cnidarian Carijoa riisei (Duchassaing and Michelotti, 1860) (FO = 48%) and to the turf seaweed (FO = 19%). However, juveniles were only recorded on C. riisei and on seaweed Acanthophora sp. (J.V.Lamouroux, 1813). Cnidaria and seaweed were the two taxonomic groups most used at Duas Irmãs Island. Urca Beach had a higher holdfast association diversity (H’ = 2.38) than Duas Irmãs Island (H’=1.52) (Figure 7b). The holdfast species where seahorses were found are listed in the Supplementary Materials (Table S1 and Table S2).

DISCUSSION

This study highlights a pattern in the population structure of both seahorse populations associated with rocky reefs in different bays within Rio de Janeiro State, suggesting stability in the year-round population structure predictions. In fact, the stability of population parameters of fish tends to disagree with the well-marked dry and rainy seasons (Castillo-Rivera, 2013, Qin et al., 2017), as observed in the present study. Both study sites were characterized by low precipitation, low temperature, and high salinity during the dry season, as well as high precipitation, high temperature, and lower salinity during the rainy season.

Estuarine fish tend to be broadly tolerant to physical and chemical factors of water, especially temperature and salinity, as documented by various authors (Allen and Horn, 1975; Hoff and Ibara, 1977; Weinstein, Weiss and Walters, 1980; Loneragan et al., 1987; Peterson and Ross, 1991; Marshall and Elliot, 1998; Araujo, Bailey and Williams, 1999). These serve as prime environmental factors which directly and indirectly affect species association patterns in these ecosystems (Horn and Allen, 1978; Monaco, Lowery and Emmett, 1992; Emmett et al., 2000). Similarly reported in the study of Hippocampus mohnickey, which seasonal variations in temperature drives migrations in and out of the estuary (Qin et al., 2017).

In our study, neither salinity nor temperature differed statistically between areas, which could explain the similar pattern in the seahorse population structure. However, they did vary between seasons, which could influence migration and changes in population structure. Still, no significant changes were recorded in our study, corroborating Schwarz et al. (2021) and Mai and Velasco (2012), who studied H. reidi in an estuary in northeastern Brazil. In addition, rainfall plays an important role in estuaries (Mendoza et al., 2002), as does mediating fish abundance seasonality, where higher abundances were often recorded during rainy periods (Castillo- Rivera, 2013). In the present study, seahorse abundance and density did not appear to be affected by rainfall. The same was noted for salinity and temperature variations. A possible explanation is that H. reidi occurs in a variety of environments along the Brazilian coast, including mangroves (Mai and Velasco, 2012), open water rocky shores (Freret-Meurer and Oliveira, 2012; Freret-Meurer et al., 2018b), and hypersaline areas (Rosa et al., 2007). In addition, according to Tseng et al. (2020), high temperatures (>30°C) had a direct effect on the survival of this seahorse species, and they can survive within a salinity range of 15-34 g/kg, suggesting high tolerance to physical and chemical water factors.

The long-snout seahorse exhibited low density and patchy distribution, a pattern similar to other species (Foster and Vincent, 2004, Rosa et al., 2007, Siqueira et al., 2017, Freret-Meurer et al., 2018a). The density of longsnout seahorse H. reidi varied along the Brazilian coast between 0.0023 to 0.066 fish/m² (Rosa et al., 2007), lower than recorded in the present study. However, though low density is a group characteristic of seahorse populations, some studies have reported higher densities, such as Freret-Meurer et al., 2018a (0.21 ± 0.11 ind. m^-2) and Schwarz et al., 2021 (0 to 0.32 fish/ m2). Low densities are often found for several other seahorse species, such as Hippocampus hippocampus in Ria Formosa lagoon and on Chalkidiki Peninsula (ranging between 0.05 ind.m^-2 and 0.015 ind.m^-2), in the North Aegean Sea (Correia et al., 2015; Correia et al., 2020). Mean densities of 0.0089 m^-2 are observed for Hippocampus capensis in South Africa (Bell et al., 2003).

In addition to density, another population attribute analyzed was sex ratio, which was found not to change seasonally. Our finding corroborated other studies, such as for H. comes in the Philippines (Perante et al., 2002) and H. reidi in Rio de Janeiro (Freret-Meurer et al., 2018a). Seasonal changes in this attribute have been reported for Hippocampus zostera (Strawn, 1958) and Hippocampus abdominalis (Martin-Smith and Vincent, 2005), suggesting that sex ratios can vary according to seahorse species. It is also important to consider that females tend to have wider home ranges (Freret-Meurer and Andreata, 2008), which could explain the skew for larger male recapture rates in this study.

The adult proportion was greater than juveniles in this study, with no seasonal variation. The absence of seasonality was expected due to the year-round reproduction of the species (Freret-Meurer et al., 2018a). Low juvenile proportions in relation to adults were also documented for the same and other seahorse species, such as H. guttulatus (Correia et al., 2015), H. capensis (Lockyear et al., 2006), and H. reidi (Freret-Meurer et al., 2018).

The H. reidi height was consistent with the range generally found for the species (Lourie et al., 2004; Rosa et al., 2007; Aylesworth et al., 2015; Freret-Meurer et al., 2018a), but diverged between beaches; seahorses were larget at Urca Beach than at Duas Irmãs Island. The seahorse H. reidi height can vary along the Brazilian coast, such as in the Northeast (Rosa et al., 2007; Silveira, 2011) and on coastal rocky reefs from Rio de Janeiro (Freret-Meurer et al., 2018b), where the species is larger than observed in our study.

In the present study, H. reidi occurred in shallow areas, most likely due to the maximum depth of 4 meters recorded at the surveyed rocky shores. The longsnout seahorse has been found at 10 cm (Rosa et al., 2002) and 55 m (Vari, 1982). Further, it may appear in different setting types between sites, as reported by Freret-Meurer et al. (2018a), who found H. reidi in shallow waters (1.2m) and in an estuary rocky reef with maximum depth of 3m. This is in contrast with Oliveira and Freret-Meurer (2012), who reported larger abundances in deeper waters (5 m) in Arraial do Cabo, where the rocky bottom depth was 9 m; the occurrence depth of seahorses may also be related to the depth of the rocky shore. In addition to the results found in this study, shallow waters could provide better refuge and shelter (Wallace and Van Der Elst, 1975; Blaber, 1985) from possible predators that are more commonly found in deeper waters (Whitfield and Blaber, 1978).

Seahorse depth of occurrence differed between periods in both areas. This could be due to holdfast availability, which changes between periods at Duas Irmãs Island (Amado Filho et al., 2003) and Urca Beach (Breves-Ramos et al., 2005). There is evidence that holdfast availability and seahorse depth of occurrence could be correlated, as seen for H. whitei which aggregate in seagrass beds in shallow areas (Manning et al., 2018). Manning et al. (2018) also suggest that this correlation could offer spatial differences in feeding and reproductive opportunities.

The seahorses exhibited reproductive stages throughout the year with peaks during rainy periods, suggesting these populations are capable of reproducing all year. Our findings contrast with certain temperate species such as H. guttulatus and H. hippocampus, which tend to reproduce during the summer, responding to environmental conditions (Correia et al., 2018); this suggests H. reidi tolerance to water physical and chemical variables. Other behaviors were also observed, mainly resting, which is characteristic of Syngnathidae (Lourie, Vincent and Hall, 1999; Freret-Meurer, Andreata and Alves, 2012). This behavior is characterized by the seahorse anchored with their bodies close to the holdfast, as also described for H. capensis (Bell et al., 2003) and H. abdominalis (Martin-Smith and Vincent, 2005).

Commonly noted holdfasts to which H. reidi often anchor include seaweed, which agrees with similar studies for the species (Dias and Rosa, 2003; Rosa et al., 2005, 2007; Aylesworth et al., 2015). In addition, seahorses have also been found in allochthonous and artificial holdfasts, as observed in other studies (Dias and Rosa, 2003; Curtis et al., 2004; Rosa et al., 2007; Clynick, 2007; Correia et al., 2015; Simpson et al., 2019; Claassens and Harasti, 2020; Simpson et al., 2020a, 2020b). The use of artificial holdfasts suggests they may adapt to coastal changes (Clynick, 2007), or that H. reidi choose these holdfasts for a behavior not fully understood.

Urca Beach exhibited a higher diversity of anchorage points, but also a higher seahorse abundance, which could have influenced the results. Urca Beach is also generally calm and protected from wave exposure, whereas Duas Irmãs Island is more exposed and experiences higher hydrodynamic conditions during certain periods. This could influence the occurrence of certain holdfasts. In both sites, seahorses were frequently found on different seaweed species, suggesting that future approaches applying morphofunctional groups for testing holdfast use could be of interest.

Both population sizes seemed small compared to other seahorse populations, as was reported for H. guttulatus in Thau lagoon (Riquet et al., 2019) with an estimate of 2,742 individuals. In addition, a recent study reported an estimated population of 28,763 individuals for the Knysna seahorse Hippocampus capensis in Africa (Mkare et al., 2021). The most similar data to our study was reported for Hippocampus whitei in Port Stephens, Australia, with 213 individuals (Harasti et al., 2012). Our data should be carefully considered for estimated population size due to the small study area. They represent local population data and should be used with caution as a baseline for estimated seahorse population size in both bays.

Population structures of H. reidi in both study sites resemble each other in aspects such as height, depth of occurrence, and holdfast use. Moreover, the factors analyzed do not seem related to their density nor population structure. This species is found mostly in resting behavior and during reproductive periods throughout the year, with peaks during rainy periods. The low recapture rates could indicate that these areas work as a passage area, maybe to inner bay regions. These seasonal movements had already been reported for Hippocampus mohnikei Bleeker, 1853 on the Chinese coast, moving to the inner bay during summer (Qin et al., 2017). Also supporting these facts, Faro and Bonecker (2000) recorded seahorse fryes in the innermost part of Guanabara Bay (Rio de Janeiro), indicating a possible reproduction or nursery area. Seaweed was the most used holdfast for anchorage, highlighting the significance of the phytal ecosystems for seahorses.

Our results indicate that both bays shelter a population of the longsnout seahorse H. reidi with a stable structure year-round, despite a low abundance; these require further study and protection.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank the pos-graduate course in Neotropical Biodiversity (PPGBIO-UNIRIO), Amanda Vaccani, and Gabriela Cabiró for field assistance. AAB benefited from a postdoctoral scholarship from CAPES/PNPD (23102.004667/2014-42) and CNPq/PDS (160133/2018-1).

Supplementary Materials

Table S1
Holdfast species use by seahorse Hippocampus reidi at Duas Irmãs island.

Holdfast use	Group
Acanthophora sp.	Seaweed
Amathia verticillata (Lamouroux, 1812)	Seaweed
Carijoa riisei	Cnidaria
Coralline seaweed	Seaweed
Hypena sp.	Seaweed
Plocamium sp.	Seaweed
Turf seaweed	Seaweed

Table S2
Holdfast species use by seahorse Hippocampus reidi at Urca beach.

Holdfast use	Group
Amathia verticillata (Lamouroux, 1812)	Seaweed
Botrylloides nigrum (Herdman, 1886)	Ascidiacea
Clavelina oblonga (Herdman, 1880)	Ascidiacea
Codium sp.	Seaweed
Hymeniacidon heliophila (Parker, 1910)	Porifera
Polychaeta	Polychaeta
Porifera	Porifera
Styela plicata (Lesueur, 1823)	Ascidiacea
Turf seaweed	Seaweed

REFERENCES

• AKIN, S., BUHAN, E., WINEMILLER, K. O. & YILMAZ, H. 2005. Fish assemblage structure of Koycegiz Lagoon-Estuary, Turkey: Spatial and temporal distribution patterns in relation to environmental variation. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 64(4), 671-684
• ALLEN, L. G. & HORN, M. H. 1975. Abundance, diversity and seasonality of fishes in Colorado Lagoon, Alamitos Bay, California. Estuarine and Coastal Marine Science, 3(3), 371-380.
• ALTMANN, J. 1974. Observational study of behaviour: sampling methods. Behaviour, 49, 227-267.
• AMADO FILHO, G. M., BARRETO, M. B. B. B., MARINS, B. V., FELIX, C. & REIS, R. P. 2003. Estrutura das comunidades fitobentônicas do infralitoral da Baía de Sepetiba, RJ, Brasil. Brazilian Journal of Botany, 26(3), 329-342.
• ANDERSON, M., 2005. Permutational multivariate analysis of variance: a computer program University of Auckland: New Zealand.
• ANDERSON, M., GORLEY, R. & CLARKE, K. 2008. PERMANOVA for PRIMER: Guide to Software and Statistical Methods PRIMER-E, Plymouth.
• FILHO, G. M. A., BARRETO, M. B. B. B., MARINS, B. V., FELIX, C. & REIS, R. P. 2003. Estrutura das comunidades fitobentônicas do infralitoral da Baía de Sepetiba, RJ, Brasil. Brazilian Journal of Botany, 26(3), 329-342.
• ARAÚJO, F. G., BAILEY, R. G. & WILLIAMS, W. P. 1999. Spatial and temporal variations in fish populations in the upper Thames estuary. Journal of Fish Biology, 55(4), 836-853.
• ARAÚJO, F.G., DE AZEVEDO, M.C.C., SILVA, M.A., PESSANHA, A.L.M., GOMES, L.D. & DA CRUZ-FILHO, A.G. 2002. Environmental influences on the demersal fish assemblages in the Sepetiba Bay, Brazil. Estuaries, 25, 441-50.
• AYLESWORTH, L., XAVIER, J., OLIVEIRA, T., TENORIO, G., DINIZ, A. & ROSA, I., 2015. Regional-scale patterns of habitat preference for the seahorse Hippocampus reidi in the tropical estuarine environment. Aquatic Ecology, 49(4), 499-512.
• BARBIÉRE, E.B., & KRONEMBERGER, D. 1994. Climatologia do litoral sul-sudeste do estado do Rio de Janeiro (um subsídio a analise ambiental). Cadernos de Geociências, 12, 57-74.
• BARRY, J., YOKLAVICH, M., CAILLIET, G., AMBROSE, D. & ANTRIM, B. 1996. Trophic Ecology of the dominant fishes in Elkhorn Slough, California, 1974-1980. Estuaries, 19(1),115.
• BELL, E., LOCKYEAR, J., MCPHERSON, J., DALE MARSDEN, A. & VINCENT, A. 2003. First field studies of an endangered south African seahorse, Hippocampus capensis. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 67(1), 35-46.
• BLABER, S. & BLABER, T. 1980. Factors affecting the distribution of juvenile estuarine and inshore fish. Journal of Fish Biology, 17(2), 143-162.
• BLABER, S. 1985. The ecology of fishes of estuaries and lagoons of the Indo-Pacific with particular reference to Southeast Africa. In: Yaiiez-Arancibia, A (ed.) (pp. 247-266). Fish Community Ecology in Estuaries and Coastal Lagoons: Towards an Ecosystem Integration, Mexico: UNAM Press.
• BLABER, S. 2000. Tropical Estuarine Fishes: Ecology, Exploitation and Conservation Oxford: The Blackwell.
• BREVES-RAMOS, A., LAVRADO, H. P., JUNQUEIRA, A. O. R. & SILVA, S. H. G. 2005. Succession in rocky intertidal benthic communities in areas with different pollution levels at Guanabara Bay (RJ-Brazil). Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology, 48(6), 951-965.
• BRUSCA, R., MOORE, W. & SHUSTER, S. 2018. Invertebrados, Rio de Janeiro: Guanabara Koogan.
• CASTILLO-RIVERA, M. 2013. Influence of rainfall pattern in the seasonal variation of fish abundance in a tropical estuary with restricted marine communication. Journal of Water Resource and Protection, 5(3), 311-319.
• CALDWELL, I. R., & VINCENT, A. C. J. 2012. Revisiting two sympatric European seahorse species: apparent decline in the absence of exploitation. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 22(4), 427-435.
• Chang, C.-H. Marie Mayer, Rivera-Ingraham, G., Blondeau-Bidet, E., Wu, W.-Y., Lorin-Nebel, C., Lee, T.-H.. 2021. Effects of temperature and salinity on antioxidant responses in livers of temperate (Dicentrarchus labrax) and tropical (Chanos Chanos) marine euryhaline fish. Journal of Thermal Biology, 99, 103016
• CLAASSENS, L. & HARASTI, D. 2020. Life history and population dynamics of an endangered seahorse (Hippocampus capensis) within an artificial habitat. Journal of Fish Biology, 97, 974- 986.
• CLYNICK, B. 2007. Harbour swimming nets: a novel habitat for seahorses. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 18(5), 483-492.
• CONROY, J., KANE, D., QUINLAN, E., EDWARDS, W. & CULVER, D. 2017. Abiotic and biotic controls of phytoplankton biomass dynamics in a freshwater tributary, estuary, and large lake ecosystem: Sandusky Bay (Lake Erie) chemostat. Inland Waters, 7(4), 473-492.
• CORREIA, M., CALDWELL, I., KOLDEWEY, H., ANDRADE, J. & PALMA, J. 2015. Seahorse (Hippocampinae) population fluctuations in the Ria Formosa Lagoon, south Portugal. Journal of Fish Biology, 87(3), 679-690.
• CORREIA, M., KOLDEWEY, H., ANDRADE, J., ESTEVES, E. & PALMA, J. 2018. Identifying key environmental variables of two seahorse species (Hippocampus guttulatus and Hippocampus hippocampus) in the Ria Formosa lagoon, South Portugal. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 101(9), 1357-1367.
• CORREIA, M., PAULO, D., SAMARA, E., KOULOURI, P., MENTOGIANNIS, V. & DOUNAS, C. 2020. Field studies of seahorse population density, structure and habitat use in a semi‐closed north‐eastern Mediterranean marine area (Stratoni, North Aegean Sea). Journal of Fish Biology, 97(1), 314-317.
• CURTIS, J., MOREAU, M., MARSDEN, D., BELL, E., MARTIN-SMITH, K., SAMOILYS, M. & VINCENT, A. 2004. Underwater visual census for seahorse population assessments. Project Seahorse Technical Report (N. 8, Version 1.0), Project Seahorse: University of British Columbia.
• DAJOZ, R. 1983. Ecologia geral Petrópolis: Vozes.
• DIAS, T. & ROSA, I. 2003. Habitat preferences of a seahorse species, Hippocampus reidi (Teleostei: Syngnathidae) in Brazil. Aqua Journal of Ichthyology and Aquatic Biology, 6(4), 165-176.
• ELLIOTT, M. & HEMINGWAY, K. 2002. Fishes in estuaries London: Blackwell Science.
• EMMETT, R., LLANSÓ, R., NEWTON, J., THOM, R., HORNBERGER, M., MORGAN, C., LEVINGS, C., COPPING, A., FISHMAN, P. & LLANSO, R. 2000. Geographic signatures of North American west coast estuaries. Estuaries, 23(6), 765.
• FIGUEIREDO, A. G., DE TOLEDO, M. B., CORDEIRO, R. C., GODOY, J. M. O., DA SILVA, F. T., VASCONCELOS, S. C. & DOS SANTOS, R. A. 2014. Linked variations in sediment accumulation rates and sea-level in Guanabara Bay, Brazil, over the last 6000years. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 415, 83-90.
• FONSECA, M. R. M., VIEIRA, M., CHIPE, J. A. & RIBEIRO, L. R. 1978. Qualidade de água da Baía de Sepetiba. In: Meio ambiente vários estudos II. (p. 316-334), Rio de Janeiro: FEEMA.
• FOSTER, S. & VINCENT, A. 2004. Life history and ecology of seahorses: implications for conservation and management. Journal of Fish Biology, 65(1), 1-61.
• FRERET-MEURER, N. & ANDREATA, J. 2008. Field studies of a Brazilian seahorse population, Hippocampus reidi Ginsburg, 1933. Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology, 51(4), 543-551.
• FRERET-MEURER, N. & OLIVEIRA, V. 2012. Distribuição vertical do cavalo-marinho Hippocampus reidi Ginsburg, 1933 na região de Arraial do Cabo, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil. Biotemas, 25(2).
• FRERET-MEURER, N., ANDREATA, J. & ALVES, M. 2012. Activity rate of the seahorse Hippocampus reidi Ginsburg, 1933 (Syngnathidae). Acta Ethologica, 15(2), 221-227.
• FRERET-MEURER, N., ANDREATA, J. & ALVES, M. 2013. Seahorse fingerprints: a new individual identification technique. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 96(12), 1399-1405.
• FRERET-MEURER, N., FERNÁNDEZ, T., OKADA, N. & VACCANI, A., 2018b. Population dynamics of the endangered seahorse Hippocampus reidi Ginsburg, 1933 in a tropical rocky reef habitat. Animal Biodiversity and Conservation, 41(2), 345-456.
• FRERET-MEURER, N., VACCANI, A. C., OKADA, N. & FERNÁNDEZ, T. C. 2018a. A snapshot of a high density seahorse population in a tropical rocky reef. Journal of Natural History, 52(23-24), 1571-1580.
• GIBSON, R. 1994. Impact of habitat quality and quantity on the recruitment of juvenile flatfishes. Netherlands Journal of Sea Research, 32(2), 191-206.
• GRIMALDO, L., BURNS, J., MILLER, R., KALMBACH, A., SMITH, A., HASSRICK, J. & BRENNAN, C. 2020. Forage fish larvae distribution and habitat use during contrasting years of low and high freshwater flow in the San Francisco estuary. San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science, 18(3).
• HARASTI, D., MARTIN-SMITH, K. & GLADSTONE, W. 2012. Population dynamics and life history of a geographically restricted seahorse, Hippocampus whitei. Journal of Fish Biology, 81: 1297-1314.
• HOFF, J. & IBARA, R., 1977. Factors affecting the seasonal abundance, composition and diversity of fishes in a Southeastern New England estuary. Estuarine and Coastal Marine Science, 5(5), 665-678.
• HORN, M. & ALLEN, L. 1978. A distributional analysis of California coastal marine fishes. Journal of Biogeography, 5(1), 23.
• INMET (Instituto Nacional de Meteorologia). 1992 Normais Climatológicas - 1961 a 1990. Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento.
• ICMBIO (Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade). 2018. Livro vermelho da fauna brasileira ameaçada de extinção Brasília, DF: Ministério do Meio Ambiente.
• JOLLY, G. 1965. Explicit estimates from capture-recapture data with both death and immigration-stochastic model. Biometrika, 52(1/2), 225.
• JOLY, A. 1967. Gêneros de algas marinhas da costa atlântica latino-americana São Paulo: EDUSP.
• KJERFVE, B., RIBEIRO, C. H. A., DIAS, G. T. M., FILIPPO, A. M. & QUARESMA, V. S. 1997. Oceanographic characteristics of an impacted coastal bay: Baia de Guanabara, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Continental Shelf Research, 17 (13), 1609-1643.
• KOTTA, J., OGANJAN, K., LAURINGSON, V., PÄRNOJA, M., KAASIK, A., ROHTLA, L., KOTTA, I. & ORAV-KOTTA, H. 2015. Establishing functional relationships between abiotic environment, macrophyte coverage, resource gradients and the distribution of Mytilus trossulus in a brackish non-tidal environment. PLOS ONE, 10(8), e0136949.
• KOUTSIKOPOULOS, C., DÉSAUNAY, Y., DOREL, D. & MARCHAND, J. 1989. The role of coastal areas in the life history of sole (Solea solea L.) in the Bay of Biscay. Scientia Marina, 53, 567- 575.
• LANKFORD, T. & TARGETT, T. 1994. Suitability of estuarine nursery zones for juvenile weakfish (Cynoscion regalis): effects of temperature and salinity on feeding, growth and survival. Marine Biology, 119(4), 611-620.
• LOCKYEAR, J., HECHT, T., KAISER, H. & TESKE, P. 2006. The distribution and abundance of the endangered Knysna seahorse Hippocampus capensis (Pisces: Syngnathidae) in South African estuaries. African Journal of Aquatic Science, 31(2), 275-283.
• LONERAGAN, N., POTTER, I., LENANTON, R.& CAPUTI, N. 1987. Influence of environmental variables on the fish fauna of the deeper waters of a large Australian estuary. Marine Biology, 94(4), 631-641.
• LOURIE, S. 2003. Measuring seahorses Technical report.
• LOURIE, S., FOSTER, S., COOPER, E. & VINCENT, A., 2004. A guide to the identification of seahorses. Project Seahorse and TRAFFIC North America. Washington D.C.: University of British Columbia and World Wildlife Fund.
• LOURIE, S., VINCENT, A. & HALL, H., 1999. Seahorses: an identification guide to the world`s species and their conservation London: Project Seahorse.
• MAI, A. & ROSA, I., 2009. Aspectos ecológicos do cavalo-marinho Hippocampus reidi no estuário Camurupim/Cardoso, Piauí, Brasil, fornecendo subsídios para a criação de uma Área de Proteção Integral. Biota Neotropica, 9(3), 85-91.
• MAI, A., & VELASCO, G. 2012. Population dynamics and reproduction of wild longsnout seahorse Hippocampus reidi. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 92(2), 421-427.
• MANNING, C. G., FOSTER, S. J., HARASTI, D. & VINCENT, A. C. 2018. A holistic investigation of the ecological correlates of abundance and body size for the endangered White’s seahorse Hippocampus whitei. Journal of fish biology, 93(4), 649-663.
• MANN, K. 1982. Ecology of coastal waters: A systems approach Berkeley: California Press.
• MARSHALL, S. & ELLIOTT, M., 1998. Environmental Influences on the fish assemblage of the Humber Estuary, U.K. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 46(2),175-184.
• MARTIN-SMITH, K. & VINCENT, A. 2005. Seahorse declines in the Derwent estuary, Tasmania in the absence of fishing pressure. Biological Conservation, 123(4), 533-545.
• MCHUGH, J. 1967. Estuarine nekton. In: Lauff, G. (ed.) (p. 581-620), Estuaries, AAAS.
• MENDOZA, E., CASTILLO-RIVERA, M., ZÁRATE-HERNÁNDEZ, R. & ORTIZ-BURGOS, S. 2009. Seasonal variations in the diversity, abundance, and composition of species in an estuarine fish community in the Tropical Eastern Pacific, Mexico. Ichthyological Research, 56(4), 330-339.
• MILLER, J., CROWDER, L. & MOSER, M. 1985. Migration and utilization of estuarine nurseries by juvenile fishes: an evolutionary perspective. Contributions in Marine Science, 27, 338-352.
• MKARE, T. K., JANSEN VAN VUUREN, B. & TESKE, P. R. 2021. Conservation priorities in an endangered estuarine seahorse are informed by demographic history. Scientific Report, 11, 4205.
• MONACO, M., LOWERY, T. & EMMETT, R. 1992. Assemblages of U.S. west coast estuaries based on the distribution of fishes. Journal of Biogeography, 19(3), 251.
• MURICY, G. & HAJDU, E., 2006. Porifera Brasilis: Guia de identificação das esponjas marinhas mais comuns do sudeste do Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: Museu Nacional.
• NEWCOMER, K., MARRAFFINI, M. & CHANG, A., 2018. Distribution patterns of the introduced encrusting bryozoan Conopeum chesapeakensis (Osburn 1944; Banta et al. 1995) in an estuarine environment in upper San Francisco Bay. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 504, 20-31.
• NGUYEN, B. A X. & TONG, P. H. S. 2000. The characteristics of distribution and change of the seawater temperature and salinity of Cai river estuary and northern part of Nhatrang bay in the dry and rainy seasons. Journal Collection of Marine Research Works, 14-20.
• OGBURN-MATTHEWS, M. & ALLEN, D., 1993. Interactions among some dominant estuarine nekton species. Estuaries, 16(4), 840.
• Oikawa, J., Nakamura, S., Kaneko, N., Torao, M., Koshino, Y. & Shimizu M. 2021. Effects of fasting and water temperatures during transition from freshwater to seawater on juvenile chum salmon growth and metabolism. Fisheries Science, 87, 579-588.
• OLIVEIRA, T. & POLLOM, R. 2017. Hippocampus reidi The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2017: e.T10082A17025021. Downloaded on 26 February 2021.
• PERANTE, N., PAJARO, M., MEEUWIG, J. & VINCENT, A. 2002. Biology of a seahorse species, Hippocampus comes in the central Philippines. Journal of Fish Biology, 60(4), 821-837.
• PETERSON, M. & ROSS, S. 1991. Dynamics of littoral fishes and decapods along a coastal river-estuarine gradient. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 33(5), 467-483.
• POWER, M. & ATTRILL, M. 2002. Factors affecting long-term trends in the estuarine abundance of pogge (Agonus cataphractus). Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 54(6), 941-949.
• POWER, M. & ATTRILL, M., 2003. Long-term trends in the estuarine abundance of Nilsson’s pipefish (Syngnathus rostellatus Nilsson). Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 57(1-2), 325-333.
• POWER, M. 2000. Temporal abundance patterns and growth of juvenile herring and sprat from the Thames estuary 1977-1992. Journal of Fish Biology, 56(6), 1408-1426.
• POWER, M., ATTRILL, M. & THOMAS, R. 2000. Environmental factors and interactions affecting the temporal abundance of juvenile flatfish in the Thames Estuary. Journal of Sea Research, 43(2),135-149.
• POWER, M., ATTRILL, M. & THOMAS, R. 2002. Environmental influences on the long-term fluctuations in the abundance of gadoid species during estuarine residence. Journal of Sea Research, 47(2), 185-194.
• QIN, G., ZHANG, Y., HO, A., ZHANG, Y. & LIN, Q. 2017. Seasonal distribution and reproductive strategy of seahorses. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 74.
• RIQUET, F., LIEUTARD-HAAG, C., SERLUCA, G., WOODALL, L., CLAUDE, J., LOUISY, P. & BIERNE, N. 2019. Effective population size and heterozygosity-fitness correlations in a population of the Mediterranean lagoon ecotype of long-snouted seahorse Hippocampus guttulatus. Conservation Genetics, 20, 1281-1288.
• ROSA, I., ALVES, R., BONIFÁCIO, K., MOURÃO, J., OSÓRIO, F., OLIVEIRA, T. & NOTTINGHAM, M. 2005. Fishers’ knowledge and seahorse conservation in Brazil. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, 1(1), 12.
• ROSA, I., DIAS, T. & BAUM, J., 2002. Threatened Fishes of the World: Hippocampus reidi Ginsburg, 1933 (Syngnathidae). Environmental Biology of Fishes, 64(4), 378-378.
• ROSA, I., OLIVEIRA, T., CASTRO, A., MORAES, L., XAVIER, J., NOTTINGHAM, M., DIAS, T., BRUTO-COSTA, L., ARAÚJO, M., BIROLO, A., MAI, A. & MONTEIRO-NETO, C., 2007. Population characteristics, space use and habitat associations of the seahorse Hippocampus reidi (Teleostei: Syngnathidae). Neotropical Ichthyology, 5(3), 405-414.
• SCHWARZ JUNIOR, R., FRANCO, A. C. N. P., RIBEIRO, A. S., MARTINS, M. A, SOETH, M., CARDOSO, O. R. & SPACH, H. L. Ecological and growth patterns of the longsnout seahorse Hippocampus reidi inferred by mark-recapture techniques in a tropical estuary. Biota Neotropica 21(2): e20201130.
• SEBER, G. 1965. A note on the multiple-recapture census. Biometrika, 52(1/2), 249.
• SIQUEIRA, A. C., QUIMBAYO, J. P., CANTOR, M., SILVEIRA, R. B. & DAURA-JORGE, F. G. 2017. Estimating population parameters of longsnout seahorses, Hippocampus reidi (Teleostei: Syngnathidae) through mark-recapture. Neotropical Ichthyolgy, 15(4),1-8.
• SILVEIRA, R. 2011. Registros de cavalos-marinhos (Syngnathidae: Hippocampus) ao longo da costa brasileira. Oecologia Australis, 15(2), 316-325.
• SIMPSON, M., COLEMAN, R., MORRIS, R. & HARASTI, D., 2020. Seahorse hotels: Use of artificial habitats to support populations of the endangered White’s seahorse Hippocampus whitei. Marine Environmental Research, 157, 104861.
• SIMPSON, M., MORRIS, R., HARASTI, D. & COLEMAN, R. 2019. The endangered White’s seahorse Hippocampus whitei chooses artificial over natural habitats. Journal of Fish Biology, 95(2), 555-561.
• SOLA, M. C. & PAIVA, P. C. Variação temporal da macrofauna bentônica sublitoral da praia da Urca (RJ) após a ocorrência de ressacas. Revista Brasileira de Oceanografia, 49(1/2), 137-142.
• STRAWN, K. 1958. Life history of the pigmy seahorse, Hippocampus zosterae Jordan and Gilbert, at Cedar Key, Florida. Copeia, 1958(1), 16.
• SUMNER, D. & BELAINEH, G. 2005. Evaporation, precipitation, and associated salinity changes at a humid, subtropical estuary. Estuaries, 28(6), 844-855.
• SZÉCHY, M. T. M., AMADO FILHO, G. M., CASSANO, V., PAULA, J. C., BARROS BARRETO, M. B., REIS, R. P., MARINS-ROSA, B. V. & MOREIRA, F. M. 2005. Levantamento florístico das macroalgas da baía de Sepetiba e adjacências, RJ: ponto de partida para o Programa GloBallast no Brasil. Acta Botânica Brasílica, 19, 587-596.
• TOVAR-FARO, B. C. M. & BONECKER, A. C. T. 2000. Composição das larvas de peixes no setor mais interno da Baía da Guanabara (RJ- Brasil). In: V Simpósio de Ecossistemas Brasileiros: Conservação, 73-84.
• Tseng, C.-C., Chien, J. H., Chu, T.-W., Cheng, A-C., Shiu, Ya-Li., Han, T-W., Liu, C.-H. 2020. Effects of food type, temperature and salinity on the growth performance and antioxidant status of the longsnout seahorse, Hippocampus reidi. Aquaculture Research, 52(1), 420-420.
• VARI, R. 1982. Fishes of the Western North Atlantic. Subfamily Hippocampinae, The Seahorses. Sears Foundation for Marine Research: Memoir, Yale Univ, New Haven.
• VASCONCELOS, R., REIS-SANTOS, P., COSTA, M. & CABRAL, H. 2011. Connectivity between estuaries and marine environment: Integrating metrics to assess estuarine nursery function. Ecological Indicators, 11(5), 1123-1133.
• WALLACE, J. & VAN DER ELST, R. 1975. The estuarine fishes of the East Coast of South Africa. IV. Occurrence of juveniles in estuaries. V. Ecology, estuarine dependence and status. Investigational Report, Oceanographic Research Institute, 42, 1-63.
• WEINSTEIN, M., WEISS, S. & WALTERS, M. 1980. Multiple determinants of community structure in shallow marsh habitats, Cape Fear River estuary, North Carolina, USA. Marine Biology, 58(3), 227-243.
• WHITFIELD, A. & BLABER, S. 1978. Food and feeding ecology of piscivorous fishes at Lake St Lucia, Zululand. Journal of Fish Biology, 13(6), 675-691.
• WHITFIELD, A. 1999. Ichthyofaunal Assemblages in Estuaries A South African Case study. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, 9(2), 151-186.

Edited by

Associate Editor: Margit Wilhelm

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  29 Apr 2022
• Date of issue
  2022

History

• Received
  30 Mar 2021
• Accepted
  27 Jan 2022