Heterotic parameterizations of crosses between tropical and temperate lines of popcorn

Parametrizações heteróticas de cruzamentos entre linhagens tropicais e temperadas de milho pipoca

PLANT BREEDING

Heterotic parameterizations of crosses between tropical and temperate lines of popcorn

Parametrizações heteróticas de cruzamentos entre linhagens tropicais e temperadas de milho pipoca

Vanessa Quitete Ribeiro da Silva; Antonio Teixeira do Amaral Júnior^*; Leandro Simões Azeredo Gonçalves; Silvério de Paiva Freitas Júnior; Rodrigo Moreira Ribeiro

Centro de Ciências e Tecnologias Agropecuárias, Universidade Estadual do Norte Fluminense "Darcy Ribeiro", Rua Alberto Lamego , 2000, 28013-620, Campos dos Goytacazes, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

ABSTRACT

We examined the heterotic parameterizations of diallel crosses among 10 popcorn inbred lines in two different environments (municipalities of Campos dos Goytacazes and Itaocara, Rio de Janeiro State) and originating from tropical, temperate and subtropical germoplasm. Traits, including grain yield (GY), plant height (PH), ear height (EH), days to silking (FL) and popping expansion (PE), were measured. The inbred lines and the hybrids were evaluated in a randomized complete block design with three replications. The sources of genotypic variation, inbred lines and heterosis had significant effects on all traits. When the sources of heterotic variation were compared separately, estimated mean heterosis was found to be significant for all traits. When inbred lines and specific heterosis was investigated, only popping expansion was not significantly different, demonstrating that heterotic effects are favorable for developing superior hybrids. A direct relation between g_i and V_i was made clear, especially for traits that were slightly influenced by the effects of dominance. Additivity was determined to have the best effect for improving popping expansion. The hybrid combinations had positive estimates of heterosis for the GY but not for PE. The hybrids P₁ x P₃ and P₂ x P₄ had the best responses for the GY and PE. The superiority of the combination P1 x P3 shows that the addition of genomes with different edaphoclimatic adaptations is an important factor in obtaining superior hybrids.

Keywords:Zea mays L., diallel crosses, yield and popping expansion.

RESUMO

O presente trabalho teve com objetivo averiguar as parametrizações heteróticas de cruzamentos dialélicos entre dez linhagens de milho pipoca oriundas de genótipos tropicais, temperados e semi-temperados, em dois ambientes (municípios de Campos dos Goytacazes e Itaocara, Estado do Rio de Janeiro), em relação às características rendimento de grãos; altura média de planta e da inserção da primeira espiga; número médio de dias para florescimento e capacidade expansão. As linhagens e os híbridos foram avaliados em delineamento em blocos ao acaso, com três repetições. Para as fontes de variação linhagens e heterose houve significância, pelo teste F, para todas as características. No desdobramento da fonte de variação heterose, estimativas de heterose média foram significativas para todas as características. Em relação à heterose de linhagens e específica, apenas a característica capacidade de expansão não expressou diferença significativa, o que confirma que os efeitos heteróticos não são favoráveis para síntese de híbridos com superioridade. A relação direta entre g_i e V_i ficou claro, especialmente para as características pouco influenciadas pelos efeitos de dominância. O efeito gênico aditivo foi confirmado para capacidade de expansão. As combinações híbridas revelaram estimativas positivas de heterose para GY, mas não para PE. Os híbridos P₁ x P₂ e P₃ x P₄ tiveram as melhores respostas para GY e PE. A superioridade da combinação P₁ x P₃, demonstra que a adição de genomas com adaptação edafoclimáticas diferentes é importante para a obtenção de híbridos superiores.

Palavras-chave:Zea mays L., cruzamento dialélicos, produção e capacidade de expansão.

Introduction

Popcorn is quite popular in Brazil, and the crop area required for its growth has been expanding mainly due to the increased consumption of this product and of industrialized derivatives (CATAPATTI et al., 2008; FREITAS JÚNIOR et al., 2009; RANGEL et al. 2008; RINALDI et al., 2007; SCAPIM et al., 2002). However, production can be considered low with respect to the vast market potential of this crop (ARNHOLD et al., 2009).

One of the limiting factors for increasing the yield of this crop is that there are very few cultivars that have both favorable agronomic traits and high popping expansion (FREITAS JÚNIOR et al., 2009; MIRANDA et al., 2003; RINALDI et al., 2007). Currently, only four hybrids (IAC 112, IAC 125, Zélia and Jade) and three varieties (BRS ANGELA, RS 20 and UFVM2-Barão de Viçosa) are recommended and/or registered by the National System for Protection of Cultivars of the Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Supply (PACHECO et al., 2000; RANGEL et al., 2008; SAWAZAKI, 2001; SCAPIM et al., 2002, 2010; TRINDADE et al., 2010; VIEIRA et al., 2009).

Though rare, diallel studies of popcorn in Brazil have been nearly exclusively done with crosses between varieties (ANDRADE et al., 2002; FREITAS JÚNIOR et al., 2006; MIRANDA et al., 2008; RANGEL et al., 2008; SCAPIM et al., 2002, 2006; ZANETTE, 1989). Miranda et al. (2008), working with five genitors in a diallel cross with advanced generations of hybrids (IAC 112 and Zélia) and three varieties (RS 20, Branco and SAM), concluded the following: a) there is sufficient variability in Brazilian lines to allow for exploration of the non-additive effects for grain production, and b) there is little possibility of obtaining commercial varieties directly from local varieties because local varieties have poor popping expansion. Consequently, developing popcorn line hybrids can be considered a relevant strategy for crop improvement programs (MIRANDA et al., 2008; RANGEL et al., 2008; SILVA et al., 2010; VIEIRA et al., 2009).

To date, popcorn hybrids have not been evaluated in Brazil by diallel cross analysis. For hybrid production, the few existing published studies have been based on testcrosses to infer the combining capacity of lines at generations S₃, S₅ and/or S₆ (SAWAZAKI et al., 2000; SEIFERT et al., 2006; VIANA et al., 2007). For this reason, we decided to determine the heterotic parameterizations of diallel crosses between 10 inbred lines of popcorn derived from tropical, subtropical and temperate zone genotypes. Experiments were conducted in two different environments, examining five agronomic characteristics in total.

Material and methods

Ten pre-selected lines, originating from tropical, temperate and subtropical genotypes (Table 1), were crossed in a complete diallel scheme resulting in 45 F₁ hybrids. In March 2007, seeds of the inbred lines were planted with a spacing of 0.9 m between rows and 0.4 m between plants in the row to obtain the hybrids. Pollen grains for the crosses between lines were collected in brown paper bags during flowering.

In November 2007, two trials were run in the following environments: i) in the experimental fields of the Colégio Estadual 'Antônio Sarlo', in the municipality of Campos dos Goytacazes, in the northern region of Rio de Janeiro State (21º 45' south latitude, 41º 20' W longitude and 11 m altitude), and ii) in the experimental fields of PESAGRO-RIO, in the municipality of Itaocara, in the northeastern region of the state of Rio de Janeiro (21º 39' 12'' south latitude, 42º 04' 36'' W longitude and 60 m altitude), 120 km away from Campos dos Goytacazes.

In both fields, the trials were carry out in a complete block experimental design with three replications. The treatments were the 45 F₁ hybrids and the 10 genitor lines. Randomization of the treatments was done separately for the group of inbred lines and for the group of hybrids so that the hybrids and inbred lines were not in neighboring plots, avoiding competition effects. The experimental plots consisted of planted rows 10.0 m long with 0.90 m spacing between rows and 0.20 m spacing between plants.

Several agronomic traits were evaluated, including the following: i) grain yield (GY), for which ears were harvested by hand in each parcel, and the production values were corrected to a standardized humidity of 15% and transformed into kg ha^-1, ii) mean plant height (PH), in m, of the point of insertion of the flag leaf in six competitive plants within the parcel, iii) ear height (EH), in m, in the same six plants per parcel, and iv) days to silking (FL). Popping expansion (PE), in mL g^-1, was also evaluated and estimated for a sample of 30.0 g of grains that were popped in a microwave oven (Panasonic, model NN-S65B) at 1000 W for 3 min. Six replications were conducted per treatment. The grains submitted to the popping test were taken from the central-basal part of the corn ears. These samples, and the 1.0 kg standard sample, were maintained in a cool, dry storage chamber. The expansion capacity estimate was made when the standard sample reached 14% humidity.

Analysis of the diallel was done using model II of Gardner and Eberhart (1966), with adaptations proposed by Morais et al. (1991) for analyses in various environments according to the statistical model.

Where: Y_ijj' is the mean of the inbred lines if j = j' and of the cross if j '" j', in the i^th environment; e_i is the environmental effect; ev_ij and ev_ij' are the effects of the interaction environment x inbred lines, and h is the mean heterosis effect; h_i is the effect of the environment x mean heterosis; h_j and h_j' are the heterosis effects of the inbred lines; eh_ij and eh_ij' are the effects of the interaction environment x inbred lines heterosis; s_ij' is the effect of specific heterosis; and es_ijj' is the effect of the interaction environment x specific heterosis. The parameters of the model are defined by analogy to the model of Gardner and Eberhart (1966), in which for j = j', we have θ = 0 and for j '" j', θ = 1. The statistical analyses were done with the program GENES (CRUZ, 2006).

Results and discussion

The sources of variation genotype, inbred lines and heterosis had significant effects for all traits based on the F test (Table 2). With regard to the source of variation inbred lines, significant mean squares indicated that the lines did not constitute a uniform group, differing in the general combining capacity. The significant effect of heterosis demonstrates that heterosis affects the general combining capacity.

Separation of source of variation of heterosis revealed significant mean heterosis values for all of the traits, indicating that there is sufficient genetic divergence among the inbred lines that were evaluated to allow for genetic improvement. Inbred lines heterosis did not significantly affect PE, indicating that the lines were not significantly different for this trait. Among the other traits, the finding of most significance demonstrated that at least some of the genitors were different from each other in terms of mean genetic frequencies or in the degree of dispersion of these frequencies.

When specific heterosis was evaluated, it was found that only PE did not differ significantly, which demonstrates that these heterotic effects are not favorable for the synthesis of superior hybrids. This conclusion is similar to that of former studies that demonstrated the superiority of additivity for PE (DOFING et al., 1991; FREITAS JÚNIOR et al., 2006; LARISH; BREWBAKER, 1999; LYERLY, 1942; PACHECO et al., 1998; PEREIRA; AMARAL JÚNIOR, 2001; RANGEL et al., 2008; SCAPIM et al., 2006; SIMON et al., 2004; VIANA; MATTA, 2003).

However, it is important to understand that the lack of importance of heterosis for PE does not impede the ability to obtain superior hybrid combinations because if one has lines with elevated CE, due to successive expression of additivity in a series of selfings, this same additivity will help the hybrid express the mean of the estimates of PE in the genitor inbred lines.

Analysis of the sources of environmental variation, including genotype x environment, inbred lines and heterosis x environment interactions gave significant values for all traits but PE (Table 2). Alexander and Creech (1977) indicated that inheritance of PE is polygenic with little environmental influence. When heterosis was partition in mean heterosis x environments, inbred lines heterosis x environments and specific heterosis x environments, the following results were found: i) in mean heterosis x environments, only GY was significantly affected, and ii) in inbred lines heterosis x environments and specific heterosis x environments, only PE was not significantly affected.

For grain yield, the inbred lines P₃, P₅, P₂ and P₄ were the most promising per se for use due to the high values expressed for the estimate (Table 3). Despite the reduced values, the characteristics PH and EH had higher magnitudes of for the inbred lines P₄ and P₅, indicating that these lines contributed to increases in the value of this trait. On the other hand, considering the interest in the reduction of plant size and height of the first ear because of the high winds that are common in Campos dos Goytacazes and Itaocara, the line with the best performance per se was P₁. Although P₇ also resulted in negative values for both traits, they were of low magnitude (Table 3).

Inbred Lines P₄ and P₉ stood out as being exceptional for the FL trait because they gave high negative values for the estimate , which revealed potential for reducing the number of days to flowering in intrapopulational breeding programs. Six Inbred lines gave negative estimates of for PE, including the following: P₁, P₃, P₄, P₅, P₆, and P₇. Based on these results, a direct relation between and was made clear, especially for traits that were little influenced by the effects of dominance, such as PE, in which dominance contributed only 10% towards total inherent heterosis of the sum of squares of the genotypes.

We can affirm that inbred lines P₂, P₃, P₄ and P₅ were the most promising for the greatest number of traits, especially for grain yield. Nevertheless, these inbred lines did not have good values for PE, demonstrating that the best genitors for production are not the best for grain quality.

In terms of the amplitude of variation in the effects of genitors and between genitors, it can be concluded that the genitors differ when the amplitude of variation is greater than twice the standard deviation; that is, there is genetic variability between the inbred lines (SINGH; CHAUDHARY, 1985). The characteristics PH, EH and PE had differences greater than two. Characteristic GY gave the lowest value (0.0202). This leads to the idea that allelic complementations contributed more than differences between the inbred lines for heterotic expression of these characteristics.

The characteristic GY gave high positive values for mean heterosis, demonstrating the expected hybrid vigor. FL gave negative heterosis values, demonstrating the possibility of selecting for precocity (Table 4). On the other hand, the mean negative heterosis for PE indicated that genetic improvement through heterosis of these inbred lines will not be viable. Consequently, it is necessary to follow the premise of Scapim et al. (2006), who indicated that when there is a low level of heterosis predictions about the hybrid should be made based on a mean of the genitors.

In the case of GY, for which there were environmental effects both for the inbred lines and for heterosis and its components, an indication of genitors for producing hybrids based on the performance of inbred lines heterosis is a fragile strategy, especially when the participation of this effect in total heterosis is markedly inferior. This became clear when the sum of squares of the inbred lines heterosis contributed only 2.03% to the sum of squares of total heterosis. Consequently, the logical strategy for this characteristic is to choose genitors for crosses based on estimates of because it is clear that genetic divergence strongly contributes to the expression of hybrid vigor.

For PH and EH, the positive values for the estimates of mean heterosis can be explained by the higher percentage of the contribution of the sum of the genotypes to the sum of squares of total heterosis. Examining the environments together, 70.90 and 62.05%, respectively, of the sum of the squares effects of total heterosis of PH and EH contributed to the sum of squares of the genotypes. This degree of heterotic expression makes it difficult to produce hybrids with reduced ear insertion height. When we examined the number of days to flowering, the inbred lines with negative values for the estimate , including: P₂, P₃, P₄, P₆ and P₉, tended to promote precocity in the resulting hybrids.

For grain yield, the expectations for the best hybrids were based on the most highly positive estimates of , which were found in the following: P₁ x P₉, P₂ x P₉, P₃ x P₇, P₅ x P₉, and P₆ x P₇ (Table 5).

By associating the characteristics PH and EH, it was found that the most promising combinations were P₆ x P₉, P₂ x P₈, P₁ x P₇ and P₂ x P₄ because they gave high negative values for the estimate . For the characteristic FL, the combinations that gave the highest negative values for the estimate , were the following: P₆ x P₉, P₁ x P₄, P₁ x P_8, and P₇ x P₈.

Conclusion

The inbred lines did not have good values "per se" for popping expansion, demonstrating that the best genitors for production are not the best for grain yield. The hybrids P₁ x P₃ and P₂ x P₄ had the best responses for the grain yield and popping expansion.

Acknowledgements

We thank UENF for supplying a scholarship, and Faperj and CNPq for financial support for the field studies and laboratory analyses.

Received on March 11, 2010.

Accepted on May 13, 2010.

License information: This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

• ALEXANDER, D. E.; CREECH, R. G. Breeding special industrial and nutritional types. In: SPRAGUE, G. F.; FUCCILLO, D. A. (Ed.). Corn and corn improvement Madison: American Society of Agronomy, 1977. p. 363-386.
• ANDRADE, R. A.; CRUZ, C. D.; SCAPIM, C. A.; SILVÉRIO, L.; PINTO, R. J. B.; TONET, A. Análise dialélica da capacidade combinatória de variedades de milho pipoca. Acta Scientiarum. AGronomy, v. 24, n. 5, p. 1197-1204, 2002.
• ARNHOLD, E.; MORA, F.; SILVA, R. G.; GOOD-GOD, P. I. V.; SILVA, R. G. Evaluation of top-cross popcorn hybrids using mixed linear model methodology. Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research, v. 69, n. 1, p. 46-53, 2009.
• CATAPATTI, T. R.; GONÇALVES, M. C.; SILVA NETO, M. R.; SABROZA, R. Tamanho de amostra e número de repetições para avaliação de caracteres agronômicos em milho pipoca. Ciência e Agrotecnologia, v. 32, n. 3, p. 855-862, 2008.
• CRUZ, C. D. Programa genes: versão windows: aplicativo computacional em genética e estatística. Viçosa: UFV, 2006.
• DOFING, S. M.; D'CROZ-MASON, N.; THOMAS-COMPTON, M. A. Inheritance of expansion volume and yield in two popcorn x dent corn crosses. Crop Science, v. 31, n. 3, p. 715-718, 1991.
• FREITAS JÚNIOR, S. P.; AMARAL JÚNIOR, A. T.; PEREIRA, M. G.; CRUZ, C. D.; SCAPIM, C. A. Capacidade combinatória em milho-pipoca por meio de dialelo circulante. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, v. 41, n. 11, p. 1599-1607, 2006.
• FREITAS JÚNIOR, S. P. F.; AMARAL JÚNIOR, A. T.; RANGEL, R. M.; VIANA, A. P. Genetic gains in popcorn by full-sib recurrent selection. Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology, v. 9, n. 1, p. 1-7, 2009.
• GARDNER, C. O.; EBERHART, S. A. Analysis and interpretation of the variety cross diallel and related populations. Biometrics, v. 22, n. 3, p. 439-452, 1966.
• LARISH, L. B.; BREWBAKER, J. L. Diallel analyses of temperate and tropical popcorn. Maydica, v. 44, n. 1, p. 279-284, 1999.
• LYERLY, P. J. Some genetic and morphological characters affecting the popping expansion of popcorn. Journal of the American Society of Agronomy, v. 34, n. 2, p. 986-995, 1942.
• MIRANDA, G. V.; COIMBRA, R. R.; GODOY, C. L.; SOUZA, L. V.; GUIMARÃES, L. J. M.; MELO, A. V. Potencial de melhoramento e divergência genética de cultivares de milho pipoca. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, v. 38, n. 6, p. 681-688, 2003.
• MIRANDA, G. V.; SOUZA, L. V.; GALVÃO, J. C. C.; GUIMARÃES, L. J. M.; MELO, A. V.; SANTOS, I. C. Genetic variability and heterotic groups of Brazilian popcorn populations. Euphytica, v. 162, n. 3, p. 431-440, 2008.
• MORAIS, A. R.; OLIVEIRA, A. C.; GAMA, E. E. G.; SOUZA JÚNIOR, C. L. A method for combined analysis of the diallel crosses repeated in several environments. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, v. 26, n. 3, p. 371-381, 1991.
• PACHECO, C. A. P.; GAMA, E. P.; GUIMARÃES, P. E. O.; SANTOS, M. X.; FERREIRA, A. S. Estimativas de parâmetros genéticos nas populações CMS-42 e CMS-43 de milho pipoca. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, v. 33, n. 12, p. 1995-2001, 1998.
• PACHECO, C. A. P.; GAMA, E. E. G.; PARENTONI, S. N.; SANTOS, M. S.; LOPES, M. A.; FERREIRA, A. S.; FERNANDES, F. T.; GUIMARÃES, P. E. O.; CORREA, L. A.; MEIRELLES, W. F.; FELDMAN, R. O.; MAGNAVACA, R. BRS Angela: variedade de milho pipoca. Sete Lagoas: Embrapa/CNPMS, 2000. (Comunicado Técnico, n. 27).
• PEREIRA, M. G.; AMARAL JÚNIOR, A. T. Estimation of genetic components in popcorn based on the nested design. Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology, v. 1, n. 1, p. 3-10, 2001.
• RANGEL, R. M.; AMARAL JÚNIOR, A. T.; SCAPIM, C. A.; FREITAS JÚNIOR, S. P.; PEREIRA, M. G. Genetic parameters in parents and hybrids of circulant diallel in popcorn. Genetics and Molecular Research, v. 7, n. 4, p. 1020-1030, 2008.
• RINALDI, D. A.; CARPENTIERI-PÍPOLO, V.; GERAGE, A. C.; RUAS, C. F.; FONSECA JÚNIOR, N. S.; SOUZA, A.; SOUZA, S. G. H.; GARBUGLIO, D. D. Correlação entre heterose e divergência genética estimadas por cruzamentos dialélicos e marcadores RAPD em populações de milho-pipoca. Bragantia, v. 66, n. 2, p. 183-192, 2007.
• SAWAZAKI, E. A cultura do milho pipoca no Brasil. O agronômico, v. 53, n .1, p. 11-13, 2001.
• SAWAZAKI, E.; PATERNIANI, M. E. A. G. Z.; CASTRO, J. L.; GALLO, P. B.; GALVÃO, J. C. C.; SAES, L. A. Potencial de linhagens de populações locais de milho pipoca para síntese de híbridos. Bragantia, v. 59, n. 2, p. 143-151, 2000.
• SCAPIM, C. A.; PACHECO, C. A. P.; TONET, A.; BRACCINI, A. L.; PINTO, R. J. B. Análise dialélica e heterose de populações de milho-pipoca. Bragantia, v. 61, n. 3, p. 219-230, 2002.
• SCAPIM, C. A.; PINTO, R. J. B.; AMARAL JÚNIOR, A. T.; MORA, F.; DANDOLINI, T. S. Combining ability of white grain popcorn populations. Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology, v. 6, n. 2, p. 136-146, 2006.
• SCAPIM, C. A.; PACHECO, C. A. P.; AMARAL JÚNIOR, A. T.; VIEIRA, R. A.; PINTO, R. J. B.; CONRADO, T. V. Correlations among yield and popping expansion stability parameters in popcorn. Euphytica, v. 174, n. 2, p. 209-218, 2010.
• SEIFERT, A. L.; CARPENTIERI-PÍPOLO, V.; FERREIRA, J. M.; GERAGE, A. C. Análise combinatória de populações de milho pipoca em topcrosses. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, v. 41, n. 5, p. 771-778, 2006.
• SILVA, A. Q. R.; AMARAL JÚNIOR, A. T.; SCAPIM, C. A.; FREITAS JÚNIOR, S. P.; GONÇALVES, L. S. A. Inheritance for economically important traits in popcorn from distinct heterotic groups by Hayman's diallel. Cereal Research Communications, v. 38, n. 2, p. 273-285, 2010.
• SIMON, A. G.; SCAPIM, C. A.; PACHECO, C. A. P.; PINTO, R. J. B.; BRACCINI, A. L.; TONET, A. Depressão por endogamia em populações de milho-pipoca. Bragantia, v. 63, n. 1, p. 55-62, 2004.
• SINGH, R. K.; CHAUDHARY, B. D. Biometrical methods in quantitative genetic analysis New Delhi: Kalyany Publishers, 1985.
• TRINDADE, A. P.; PINTO, R. J. B.; AMARAL JÚNIOR, A. T.; MANGOLIN, C. A.; MACHADO, M. F. P. S.; SCAPIM, C. A. Genetic diversity of breeding popcorn lines determined by SSR markers. Eletronic Journal of Biotechnology, v. 13, n. 1, p. 1-9, 2010.
• VIANA, J. M. S.; MATTA, F. P. Analysis of general and specific combining abilities of popcorn populations, including selfed parents. Genetics and Molecular Biology, v. 26, n. 4, p. 465-471, 2003.
• VIANA, J. M. S.; CONDÉ, A. B. T.; ALMEIDA, R. V.; SCAPIM, C. A.; VALENTINI, L. Relative importance of per se and topcross performence in the selection of popcorn S₃ families. Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology, v. 7, n. 1, p. 74-81, 2007.
• VIEIRA, R. A.; SOUZA NETO, I. L.; BIGNOTTO, L. S.; CRUZ, C. D.; AMARAL JÚNIOR, A. T.; SCAPIM, C. A. Heterotic parametrization for economically important traits in popcorn. Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy, v. 31, n. 3, p. 411-419, 2009.
• ZANETTE, V. A. Análise da variabilidade genética em populações de milho pipoca (Zea mays L.) I. Heterose da capacidade de expansão do grão. Agronomia Sulriograndense, v. 25, n. 2, p. 173-181, 1989.

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  24 May 2011
• Date of issue
  June 2011

History

• Accepted
  13 May 2010
• Received
  11 Nov 2010