Influence of pH, bleaching agents, and acid etching on surface wear of bovine enamel

ABSTRACT

Development of new materials for tooth bleaching justifies the need for studies to evaluate the changes in the enamel surface caused by different bleaching protocols.

Objective

The aim of this study was to evaluate the bovine dental enamel wear in function of different bleaching gel protocols, acid etching and pH variation.

Material and Methods

Sixty fragments of bovine teeth were cut, obtaining a control and test areas. In the test area, one half received etching followed by a bleaching gel application, and the other half, only the bleaching gel. The fragments were randomly divided into six groups (n=10), each one received one bleaching session with five hydrogen peroxide gel applications of 8 min, activated with hybrid light, diode laser/blue LED (HL) or diode laser/violet LED (VHL) (experimental): Control (C); 35% Total Blanc Office (TBO35HL); 35% Lase Peroxide Sensy (LPS35HL); 25% Lase Peroxide Sensy II (LPS25HL); 15% Lase Peroxide Lite (LPL15HL); and 10% hydrogen peroxide (experimental) (EXP10VHL). pH values were determined by a pHmeter at the initial and final time periods. Specimens were stored, subjected to simulated brushing cycles, and the superficial wear was determined (μm). ANOVA and Tukey´s tests were applied (α=0.05).

Results

The pH showed a slight decrease, except for Group LPL15HL. Group LPS25HL showed the highest degree of wear, with and without etching.

Conclusion

There was a decrease from the initial to the final pH. Different bleaching gels were able to increase the surface wear values after simulated brushing. Acid etching before bleaching increased surface wear values in all groups.

Tooth bleaching; Dental acid etching; Hydrogen-ion concentration; Tooth wear

INTRODUCTION

Among the techniques to reestablish the good aesthetics for discolored vital teeth, vital tooth bleaching is a more conservative and less invasive alternative than direct and indirect conventional restoration techniques and has been well accepted among patients because they consider it a safe and effective technique²². The effectiveness of dental bleaching is influenced by several factors, such as the bleaching system used, bleaching agent concentration, application time and the application of light^1,16,26.

Light sources can be used to optimize the bleaching procedure in an attempt to increase the rates of peroxide dissociation and reduce the bleaching session^2,7,16. Analyzing the bovine enamel wear caused by different bleaching techniques, the use of a light source did not influence the tooth enamel wear because similar results were obtained with and without light sources^13,23. In addition to the above-mentioned factors, the pH of the bleaching agents¹⁹ and acid etching before treatment^6,12,16,25 are also factors that can directly influence the whitening process. At the present, manufacturers have shown concern about the acidity of bleaching gels because a pH below the critical point (pH 5.5 to 6.5)²¹ may result in the dissolution of enamel, microhardness alterations¹⁴, increased sensitivity, increased enamel wear and surface roughness^13,23.

In an endeavor to control demineralization, which is able to increase the penetration of the bleaching gel and, consequently, tooth bleaching¹⁶, the acid etching technique can be used before the bleaching procedure⁶. This technique works by producing changes in the enamel surface in two distinct ways. First, the acid removes the surface layer and, consequently, the plaque and acquired film are removed and, second, the remaining enamel with a more porous surface layer is also removed²⁰. A greater ability for peroxide penetration was obtained when the previous acid etching was performed with a light source⁶. An increasing number of tooth-bleaching products are commercially available with different compositions and concentrations¹¹, and nowadays, there is a trend towards decreasing the gels’ concentration values and diversifying their formulations^1,3,23,24. The development of these new materials justifies the need for studies to evaluate the changes in the enamel surface caused by different bleaching protocols.

Thus, the aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the bovine dental enamel wear in function of different bleaching gel protocols, the acid etching and pH variation.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This is an in vitro study, and the experimental design for pH analisys was divided into two study factors: bleaching agent [in five levels: bleaching agents based on hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂), two at 35%, one at 25%, one at 15%, and one at 10%] and time periods (at two levels: before and after bleaching). Wear analysis consisted of one study factor: treatment [in 11 levels: Control (did not receive the acid etching and bleaching gel), and two at H₂O₂ 35%, one at 25%, one at 15%, and one at 10%, with or without acid etching]. Different light sources employed were not classified as study factors because different bleaching treatments use different light sources following the protocol indicated by the manufacturer. The control group and five experimental groups are described in Figure 1.

Figure 1
Materials and equipment used in this study

Material

The materials and equipments used for this study are outlined in Figure 1.

Methods

Specimen preparation

A total of 60 bovine mandibular central incisors were chosen for the study. They were cut into rectangular shapes and embedded in slow-setting acrylic resin blocks (15x5x4 mm). A flat enamel surface was produced by wet polishing with 320, 400, 600 and 1200-grit silicon carbide abrasive papers. To control the individual variation in the enamel surface characteristics among the tested teeth, each specimen was divided into two halves, providing a control area and a test area^13,18,23. The test area was further divided, with one-half receiving 37% phosphoric acid (Alpha Etch; Nova DFL Indústria e Comércio S.A., Rio de Janeiro, Brazil) for 30 seconds followed by the bleaching gel protocols, and the other half receiving only the bleaching gel protocols (Figure 3).

Figure 3
Division of the specimen, demonstrating the test (with and without acid conditioning) and control area

Bleaching procedure

The specimens were randomly divided into six groups (n=10) described in Figure 2.

Figure 2
Groups and bleaching protocols used

Measurement of pH levels of bleaching gels

To analyze the pH levels of the bleaching gels, a portable pHmeter with a digital display (Model 1001 Sentron, Sentron, WA, USA) was used. This device has an electrode of small dimensions, compatible with the size of the specimen. It could make a readout with an accuracy of 0.01 in a few seconds and with minimal waste of bleaching gel. Before beginning each group of readouts, the pHmeter was calibrated with double standard substances (pH 4.0 and 7.0). The initial and final pH levels of the bleaching gels were obtained from the average of readings for each of the five applications of the bleaching gel to the tooth surface. The first readout was taken 30 seconds after the contact between the bleaching gel and the bovine enamel, and, the second readout, 30 seconds after the end of the time used, with activation with a hybrid light source²³.

Brushing abrasion

All test areas, of the 60 studied specimens (divided into six groups), were subjected to simulated tooth brushing. The tooth-brushing machine remained in a controlled temperature of 37±2°C with soft nylon bristles (Colgate Classic CLEAN, Colgate Palmolive Industrial Ltda., Osasco, SP, Brazil), applying a load of 300 grams on the samples. Slurry was prepared by mixing 2:1 of deionized water and Colgate MFP (Colgate Palmolive, Osasco, SP, Brazil) dentifrice by weight immediately before testing. One hundred thousand brushing strokes were performed for each specimen and the bristles were changed at the half-cycle point. After testing, the specimens were rinsed under running water and cleaned in a sonic device (Cristófoli Biosafety Equipment Ltda., Londrina, PR, Brazil) in deionized water for 10 minutes, and then stored in fresh deionized water (37±2°C)^13,15,18,23.

Wear determination

Wear was quantified by means of a roughness meter (Hommelwerke GmbH ref. #240851, Schwenningen, Germany) connected to a PC with a specific software program to provide the profiles of the surfaces tested. For each segment of the specimen, six measurements were carried out at random, three readouts were performed on each portion (with or without acid etching) and the mean wear value was calculated (Figure 3). These profilometric traces were taken from the reference surface (protected area) on one side to the opposite one, crossing the surface exposed to the experimental procedures. Thus, the wear readout was performed by the surface profile, measuring the distance in micrometers between the graph midline, corresponding to the specimen plane line (intact area) and the deepest valley corresponding to the ground area^8,13,18,23.

Statistical analysis

For correlation analyses between pH and wear, the Pearson correlation test was used. For pH analysis, two-way repeated measures ANOVA followed by the Tukey`s test were used. For wear, one-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey’s test were performed. The level of significance of 5% was adopted.

RESULTS

There was no correlation between pH and wear. When analyzing the pH values (Table 1), a statistically significant decrease between the initial and final pH was noted, except in the 15% Lase Peroxide Lite activated with hybrid light group. The lowest values were found in the 35% hydrogen peroxide Groups activated with hybrid light at the end of the bleaching agent application. The group that showed more alkaline was the experimental 10% hydrogen peroxide Group with nitrogen-doped titanium oxide nanoparticles, activated with violet hybrid light, which had a lower concentration of hydrogen peroxide for both the initial and final measurements.

Table 1
Means and standard deviation of the initial and final pH values of the study groups

Groups	Time of measurement	Mean ± Standard Deviation*
TBO35HL	Initial Final	6.42±0.27A 6.01±0.11B
LPS35HL	Initial Final	7.08±0.25C 6.11±0.11B
LPS25HL	Initial Final	7.12±0.05C 6.42±0.08A
LPL15HL	Initial Final	7.59±0.08D 7.47±0.07D
EXP10VHL	Initial Final	9.23±0.05E 8.99±0.07F

• *Different capital letters indicate a statistically significant difference between lines, at the level of 5% calculated by the Tukey´s method

The one-way ANOVA test for evaluating the surface wear showed statistically significant differences between the tested groups (p<0.05). Next, the Tukey’s test was applied for the values obtained (Table 2). All groups, except the 35% Total Blanc Office Group, had a statistically significant increase when acid etching was previously performed. The lowest wear value was found in control group (Group C), which did not undergo the acid etching and dental bleaching, and the 25% Lase Peroxide Sensy II Group (LPS25HL) with prior acid etching showed the highest wear value. The Group LPS25HL without acid etching showed similar results (p<0.05) to the other groups where the etching was done (Figure 4).

Table 2
Means (µm) and standard deviation of wear of the groups studied, comparing the two treatments [bleaching (B) and acid etching + bleaching (A)] and the control group

Groups	Mean ± Standard Deviation*
C (no bleaching)	4.86±1.28A
TBO35HLB	10.47±1.58BD
TBO35HLA	12.49±1.60CDE
LPS35HLB	9.97±1.42BD
LPS35HLA	14.21±0.83C
LPS25HLB	13.85±1.71C
LPS25HLA	23.67±3.93F
LPL15HLB	9.80±1.52B
LPL15HLA	13.51±1.38CE
EXP10VHLB	11.13 ±0.82BDE
EXP10VHLA	14.70±0.40C

• *Different capital letters indicate a statistically significant difference between lines, at the level of 5% calculated by the Tukey´s method

Figure 4
Graphic of mean (µm) and standard deviation of wear of the groups (C - without etching and without bleaching - and other groups with only bleaching or acid etching prior to bleaching)

DISCUSSION

Most studies on dental bleaching investigates the morphological changes in the enamel^10,13,14,23 and the pulp damage^5,17 caused by different techniques, however, the changes caused by differences of the bleaching gels’ pH is still controversial²³. In this study when observing the results obtained by pH analysis of bleaching agents, one could conclude that there was a trend towards a decrease in the mean pH values between the initial and final time periods, except for the 15% Lase Peroxide Lite Group activated with hybrid light [diode laser/blue LED (HL) (LPL15HL)], which showed no significant differences (Table 1). Another important fact that has already been described in the literature^23,27 and corroborates with this study, is that the higher the concentration of hydrogen peroxide, the more acidic is the pH in the bleaching gels.

In this study, the EXP10VHL experimental group (gel with nitrogen-doped titanium oxide nanoparticles) activated with hybrid light [diode laser/violet LED (VHL) (experimental)], presented the highest pH values in comparison to the other groups evaluated. The HL and VHL hybrid light sources employed to activate the bleaching gels presented a minimum increase (less than 2°C) in pulp chamber temperature¹, assuring effective dental bleaching with low pulp risk⁶. The values obtained for the pH of hydrogen peroxide, regardless of the group studied, remained above the level considered critical for enamel dissolution (pH 5.5 to 6.5)²¹. However, it was noted that as the concentration of the gel diminished, its pH increased (Table 1). Therefore, the pH of these bleaching gels is unlikely to cause severe morphological changes on the surface of the enamel.

Acid conditioning prior to bleaching is a procedure still used in dental practice, however, both its efficiency and damage to the tooth structure are still not clarified. A recent study⁶ showed that there is no difference in the color analysis when acid conditioning is previously done, added to this, this study showed an increased wear due to the acid conditioning when the same bleaching gel concentration was analyzed. Only the Group TBO35HL showed no increased wear in the area with acid etching, in comparison with the area that received only the bleaching gel (Table 2). In the comparison between groups, Group LPS25HL showed the highest wear for the area with acid etching (Table 2).

Comparing the control group, which underwent brushing cycles only, with the other groups, it was observed that the control group showed significantly less wear (Table 2) than the experimental groups in the area treated with both the acid etching and bleaching gel and the area treated only with bleaching gel. Certainly, these differences in wear are due to the changes caused by the bleaching agents on the dental enamel, results already found in the literature, in which tooth-bleaching techniques led to increased surface roughness and wear if subjected to simulated tooth brushing, when compared with the control group that was only brushed^13,16,23.

Note that in this study the dental bleaching may have left the surface of the bovine enamel more susceptible to wear caused by the 100,000 simulated brushing cycles, which is in agreement with the findings in the literature, which claims that whitening makes the enamel surface more susceptible to abrasion and morphological changes^1,9,13,23,28. The adopted simulated tooth brushing (100,000 simulated brushing cycles) caused wear between 12 μm and 13 μm that is not clinically significant because other factors contribute to the loss of this structure. These cycles are equivalent, on average, to two years of brushing in vivo^4,15, a period that was adopted for being considered as a safe interval between bleaching sessions.

The analysis of this research’s results, associated with the findings of the literature, allowed the evaluation that, in general, the 25% Lase Peroxide Sensy II Group activated with hybrid light (HL) (diode laser/blue LED) presented the highest wear values, causing greater aggression to the tooth structure. The acid etching was more severe in all groups, except for the 35% Total Blanc Office (HL) Group. Although a direct correlation was not found with the results of wear, it was observed that the lower the bleaching gel concentration, the more alkaline it tended to be.

Acid etching prior to bleaching can be indicated in clinical situations where there is difficulty in obtaining satisfactory results after attempts by conventional whitening techniques, especially in patients with a high degree of pigmentation, seeking a greater penetration of the gel to the enamel. However, few studies evaluate this procedure and its consequences, thus justifying the objective of this study, which, despite being an in vitro study, seeks to answer questions that may assist in the clinical practice of the procedure. The results of this study show that etching with 37% phosphoric acid can lead to increased enamel wear, and should not be used as a routine procedure, only when necessary in an attempt to avoid more invasive procedures such as cavity preparation and production of indirect restorations.

However, further studies related to the effects of acid etching, pH, and different concentrations of bleaching gels used in office are required to extrapolate the results to the clinical context.

CONCLUSIONS

Within the limitations of this in vitro study, the following conclusions can be drawn:

There was a trend towards a decrease in the initial pH at the end, except in the Lase Peroxide Lite 15% Group. There was no direct correlation between the values of pH and surface wear.

Different bleaching gels are able to increase the surface wear values after simulated brushing, mainly in the Lase Peroxide Sensy 25% Group.

Acid etching before bleaching increased the surface wear values in all groups.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors thank the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) for the financial support (Process No. 134354/2011-7).

REFERENCES

• ¹
  - Andreatta LM, Soares AF, Bombonatti JF, Furuse AY, Mondelli RF. Influence of whitening gel and light source on pulp chamber temperature. RSBO. 2015;12(2):185-90.
• ²
  - Bortolatto J, Pretel H, Neto C, Andrade M, Moncada G, Oliveira Junior O. Effects of LED-laser hybrid light on bleaching effectiveness and tooth sensitivity: a randomized clinical study. Laser Phys Lett. 2013;10(8):1-6.
• ³
  - Bortolatto JF, Pretel H, Floros MC, Luizzi AC, Dantas AA, Fernandez E, et al. Low concentration H2O2/TiO_N in office bleaching: a randomized clinical trial. J Dent Res. 2014;93(7 Suppl):66S-71S.
• ⁴
  - Buchalla W, Attin T, Hellwig E. Brushing abrasion of luting cements under neutral and acidic conditions. Oper Dent. 2000;25(6):482-7.
• ⁵
  - Cartagena AF, Parreiras SO, Loguercio AD, Reis A, Campanha NH. In-office bleaching effects on the pulp flow and tooth sensitivity - case series. Braz Oral Res. [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2015 Oct 27]; 29(1):1-6. Available from: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242015000100223&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=en
  » http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242015000100223&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=en
• ⁶
  - Costa RC, Soares D, Santos PD, Cintra L, Briso A. Effect of different light sources and enamel preconditioning on color change, H2O2 penetration, and cytotoxicity in bleached teeth. Oper Dent. [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2015 Oct 27]. Available from: http://www.jopdentonline.org/doi/pdf/10.2341/14-364-L
  » http://www.jopdentonline.org/doi/pdf/10.2341/14-364-L
• ⁷
  - D'Arce MB, Lima DA, Aguiar FH, Ambrosano GM, Munin E, Lovadino JR. Evaluation of ultrasound and light sources as bleaching catalysts - an in vitro study. Eur J Esthet Dent. 2012;7(2):176-84.
• ⁸
  - Honório HM, Rios D, Abdo RC, Machado MA. Effect of different prophylaxis methods on sound and demineralized enamel. J Appl Oral Sci. 2006;14(2):117-23.
• ⁹
  - Josey AL, Meyers IA, Romaniuk K, Symons AL. The effect of a vital bleaching technique on enamel surface morphology and the bonding of composite resin to enamel. J Oral Rehabil. 1996;23(4):244-50.
• ¹⁰
  - Klarić E, Marcius M, Ristić M, Sever I, Prskalo K, Tarle Z. Surface changes of enamel and dentin after two different bleaching procedures. Acta Clin Croat. 2013;52(4):419-29.
• ¹¹
  - Majeed A, Farooq I, Grobler SR, Moola MH. In vitro evaluation of variances between real and declared concentration of hydrogen peroxide in various tooth-whitening products. Acta Odontol Scand. 2015:73(5):387-90.
• ¹²
  - Matis BA, Cochran MA, Franco M, Al-Ammar W, Eckert GJ, Stropes M. Eight in-office tooth whitening systems evaluated in vivo: a pilot study. Oper Dent. 2007;32(4):322-7.
• ¹³
  - Mondelli RF, Azevedo JF, Francisconi PA, Ishikiriama SK, Mondelli J. Wear and surface roughness of bovine enamel submitted to bleaching. Eur J Esthet Dent. 2009;4(4):396-403.
• ¹⁴
  - Mondelli RF, Garrido Gabriel TR, Piola Rizzante FA, Magalhães AC, Soares Bombonatti JF, Ishikiriama SK. Do different bleaching protocols affect the enamel microhardness? Eur J Dent. 2015;9(1):25-30.
• ¹⁵
  - Mondelli RF, Wang L, Garcia FC, Prakki A, Mondelli J, Franco EB, et al. Evaluation of weight loss and surface roughness of compomers after simulated toothbrushing abrasion test. J Appl Oral Sci. 2005;13(2):131-5.
• ¹⁶
  - Mondelli RF, Almeida CM, Toledo FL, Freitas CA, Ishikiriama SK. Pulped teeth in-office dental bleaching with and without previous enamel acid etching: clinical case report. Rev Dental Press Estét. 2009;6(2):42-51.
• ¹⁷
  - Pintado-Palomino K, Peitl Filho O, Zanotto ED, Tirapelli C. A clinical, randomized, controlled study on the use of desensitizing agents during tooth bleaching. J Dent. 2015;43(9):1099-105.
• ¹⁸
  - Prakki A, Cilli R, Mondelli RF, Kalachandra S. In vitro wear, surface roughness and hardness of propanal-containing and diacetyl-containing novel composites and copolymers based on bis-GMA analogs. Dent Mater. 2008;24(3):410-7.
• ¹⁹
  - Sa Y, Chen D, Liu Y, Wen W, Xu M, Jiang T, et al. Effects of two in-office bleaching agents with different pH values on enamel surface structure and color: an in situvs in vitro study. J Dent. 2012;40(Suppl 1):e26-34.
• ²⁰
  - Silverstone LM. Fissure sealants. Laboratory studies. Caries Res. 1974;8(1):2-26.
• ²¹
  - Sulieman M, Addy M, Macdonald E, Rees JS. A safety study in vitro for the effects of an in-office bleaching system on the integrity of enamel and dentine. J Dent. 2004;32(7):581-90.
• ²²
  - Sun L, Liang S, Sa Y, Wang Z, Ma X, Jiang T, et al. Surface alteration of human tooth enamel subjected to acidic and neutral 30% hydrogen peroxide. J Dent. 2011;39(10):686-92.
• ²³
  - Trentino AC, Soares AF, Duarte MA, Ishikiriama SK, Mondelli RF. Evaluation of pH levels and surface roughness after bleaching and abrasion tests of eight commercial products. Photomed Laser Surg. 2015;33(7):372-7.
• ²⁴
  - Vano M, Derchi G, Barone A, Genovesi A, Covani U. Tooth bleaching with hydrogen peroxide and nano-hydroxyapatite: a 9-month follow-up randomized clinical trial. Int J Dent Hyg. 2015;13(4):301-7.
• ²⁵
  - Walton RE, O'Dell NL, Myers DL, Lake FT, Shimp RG. External bleaching of tetracycline stained teeth in dogs. J Endod. 1982;8(12):536-42.
• ²⁶
  - Wang W, Zhu Y, Li J, Liao S, Ai H. Efficacy of cold light bleaching using different bleaching times and their effects on human enamel. Dent Mater J. 2013;32(5):761-6.
• ²⁷
  - Weiger R, Kuhn A, Löst C. Effect of various types of sodium perborate on the pH of bleaching agents. J Endod. 1993;19(5):239-41.
• ²⁸
  - Worschech CC, Rodrigues JA, Martins LR, Ambrosano GM. In vitro evaluation of human dental enamel surface roughness bleached with 35% carbamide peroxide and submitted to abrasive dentifrice brushing. Pesqui Odontol Bras. 2003;17(4):342-8.

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  Jan-Feb 2016

History

• Received
  15 June 2015
• Reviewed
  28 Sept 2015
• Accepted
  29 Sept 2015