Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Editorial Comment: Urologic surgery laparoscopic access: vascular complications

In the video by Branco et al. (11. Branco AW. R Urologic Surgery Laparoscopic Access: Vascular Complications. Int Braz J Urol. 2016; 42: Ahead of Print.) two vascular injuries are shown. The video is very illustrative on how injuries are recognized and more important the way they are repaired. A quick intraoperative diagnosis of the injury and an appropiate management was performed by the surgeons.

Altough uncommon, an important percentage of injuries in laparoscopic procedures occur during the abdominal access using needles or trocars. In a recent Cochrane Systematic Review, no difference was found between direct trocar over Veress needle entry in terms of injuries (22. Ahmad G, Gent D, Henderson D, O’Flynn H, Phillips K, Watson A. Laparoscopic entry techniques. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;8:CD006583.). Complications can be minimized, but they can never be avoided. We have to know how to solve them when present. And as the authors mention in the abstract, you should never hesitate on converting to open surgery when necessary.

Jose Jaime Correa, MD
Department of Urologic Oncology
Hospital Pablo Tobon Uribe
Medellin, Colombia
E-mail: jocorreao@uces.edu.co

REFERENCES

  • 1
    Branco AW. R Urologic Surgery Laparoscopic Access: Vascular Complications. Int Braz J Urol. 2016; 42: Ahead of Print.
  • 2
    Ahmad G, Gent D, Henderson D, O’Flynn H, Phillips K, Watson A. Laparoscopic entry techniques. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;8:CD006583.

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    Jan-Feb 2017
Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia Rua Bambina, 153, 22251-050 Rio de Janeiro RJ Brazil, Tel. +55 21 2539-6787, Fax: +55 21 2246-4088 - Rio de Janeiro - RJ - Brazil
E-mail: brazjurol@brazjurol.com.br