Antifungal and proteolytic activities of endophytic fungi isolated from Piper hispidum Sw

Abstract

Endophytes are being considered for use in biological control, and the enzymes they secrete might facilitate their initial colonization of internal plant tissues and direct interactions with microbial pathogens. Microbial proteases are also biotechnologically important products employed in bioremediation processes, cosmetics, and the pharmaceutical, photographic and food industries. In the present study, we evaluated antagonism and competitive interactions between 98 fungal endophytes and Alternaria alternata, Colletotrichum sp., Phyllosticta citricarpa and Moniliophthora perniciosa. We also examined the proteolytic activities of endophytes grown in liquid medium and conducted cup plate assays. The results showed that certain strains in the assemblage of P. hispidum endophytes are important sources of antifungal properties, primarily Lasiodiplodia theobromae JF766989, which reduced phytopathogen growth by approximately 54 to 65%. We detected 28 endophytes producing enzymatic halos of up to 16.40 mm in diameter. The results obtained in the present study highlight the proteolytic activity of the endophytes Phoma herbarum JF766995 and Schizophyllum commune JF766994, which presented the highest enzymatic halo diameters under at least one culture condition tested. The increased activities of certain isolates in the presence of rice or soy flour as a substrate (with halos up to 17.67 mm in diameter) suggests that these endophytes have the potential to produce enzymes using agricultural wastes.

antagonism; competitive interaction; dual culture; cup plate; protease

Introduction

Biological control through microorganisms that inhibit or antagonize plant pathogens and pests reduces or eliminates the use of chemical products. Fungal endophytes are effective antagonists (Azevedo et al., 2000) and constitute a taxonomically and metabolically diverse group of organisms that colonize internal plant tissues without causing apparent harm to the host plant (Wilson et al., 1991). Indeed, endophyte-mediated biological control has been investigated both in vivo and in vitro through screening experiments to verify the activity of endophytes against phytopathogens and pests (Andreote et al., 2009; Badalyan et al., 2002; Campanile et al., 2007; Flores et al., 2013; Mejía et al., 2008; Rocha et al., 2009; Rubini et al., 2005; Sánchez et al., 2007; Specian et al., 2012).

Endophytic and phytopathogenic fungi compete and interact within the same ecological niche through the action of hydrolytic enzymes such as proteases and chitinases, which degrade the hyphal cell walls of pathogenic microorganisms (Almeida et al., 2007; Guthrie and Castle, 2006; Sánchez et al., 2007). This enzymatic activity is closely associated with the fungus-host specificity: the fungal strains of a given species isolated from the same host plant are remarkably homogeneous with respect to enzymatic production (Leuchtmann et al., 1992; Petrini et al., 1992). To facilitate the entry of endophytes into host tissues through natural or artificial openings, hydrolytic enzymes including pectinases, cellulases and lipases are secreted (Polizeli et al., 1991).

Proteases or proteolytic enzymes have commercial importance (Rao et al., 1998), as these enzymes are used in bioremediation and waste treatment, detergents, cosmetics and leather manufacture, silk degumming, animal cell culture, contact lens cleaning, therapy and diagnosis and the pharmaceutical, photographic and food industries. In addition, proteases are considered as insecticidal agents because these enzymes are required for the complete digestion of complex insect cuticles (Anwar and Saleemuddin, 1998; Gupta et al., 2002; Harrison and Bonning, 2010; Hasan et al., 2013; Kumar and Takagi, 1999; Murthy and Naidu, 2010; Nielsen and Oxenboll, 1998).

The medicinal plant Piper hispidum Sw. (Piperaceae), commonly known as "bayuyo" (Cuba), "cordoncillo" (Mexico), "jaborandi" or "falso-jaborandi" (Brazil), harbors a diverse endophytic fungal community (Orlandelli et al., 2012a), including fungi presenting activity against human pathogenic bacteria (Orlandelli et al., 2012b). Considering the shortage of information concerning the antifungal and enzymatic activities of the endophytes from this plant, the aim of the present study was to evaluate the antagonism and competitive interactions between endophytic and phytopathogenic fungi in dual culture experiments and to detect the proteolytic activity of these endophytes using a cup plate assay and different growth substrates.

Materials and Methods

Endophytic and pathogenic fungi

A total of 98 endophytic fungi were isolated from the leaves of P. hispidum plants located in a forest remnant in southern Brazil (Orlandelli et al., 2012a) and belong to the fungal culture collection of the Laboratório de Biotecnologia Microbiana, Universidade Estadual de Maringá, Paraná, Brazil. These fungal strains were molecularly identified as Alternaria sp., Bipolaris sp., Colletotrichum sp., Colletotrichum gloeosporioides, Phyllosticta capitalensis, Lasiodiplodia theobromae, Marasmius cladophyllus, Phlebia sp., Phoma herbarum, Diaporthe sp., Schizophyllum commune and one isolate from the order Diaporthales. Molecular identification was based on sequencing of the ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 region of rDNA (GenBank accession numbers JF766988 to JF767008).

The plant pathogenic fungi Alternaria alternata, Colletotrichum sp., Phyllosticta citricarpa and Moniliophthora perniciosa were obtained from the Laboratório João Lúcio Azevedo, ESALQ, Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil.

For the experiments, all fungi were previously grown in Petri dishes containing potato dextrose agar (PDA) medium (Smith and Onions, 1983) at 28 °C under biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) for seven days.

In vitro antagonism and competitive interactions between endophytic and phytopathogenic fungi in dual culture

A modified version of the dual culture method of Campanile et al. (2007) was used. Briefly, 6-mm endophyte and phytopathogen plugs were combined in triplicate and inoculated onto PDA dishes, with a 4-cm distance between each plug. Filter paper plugs inoculated with 10 μL of fungicide Derosal plus® (with a 10⁻¹ dilution of methyl benzimidazol-2-ylcabamato + tetramethylthiuram disulfide) or fungicide Tiofanil® (with a 200 mg/mL dilution of chlorothalonil + thiophanate-methyl) were used as positive controls, and autoclaved distilled water was used as a negative control.

The antagonism index (AI) was calculated as previously described (Campanile et al., 2007) using the following formula: AI = (RM - rm)/RM × 100, where rm represents the ray of the colony toward the antagonist, and RM represents the average of the three rays of the colony in the other directions. The competitive interaction (CI) between endophytes and phytopathogens was determined according to the Badalyan rating scale (Badalyan et al., 2002), which considers three main types of interactions (A, B and C) and four interaction sub-types (C_A1, C_B1, C_A2 and C_B2). Types A and B represented deadlock (mutual inhibition) at mycelial contact (A) or at a distance (B), whereas type C was replacement or overgrowth without initial deadlock. The intermediate interaction subtypes scored consisted of partial (C_A1) or complete (C_A2) replacement after initial deadlock with mycelial contact and partial (C_B1) or complete (C_B2) replacement after initial deadlock at a distance.

Conditions for protease production and cup plate assay

The endophytic fungi were grown as previously described (Sena et al., 2006) in liquid inducer medium (IM) containing powdered skim milk (Nestlé®) as the inducer substrate to stimulate protease secretion. The cultivation conditions were adapted from Sena et al. (2006), and the endophytes were also grown in IM containing two different substrates (carbon sources): rice or soy flour (5 g/L). Liquid medium incubated without fungal inoculation was used as a negative control. The cultures were incubated under stationary conditions (BOD at 28 °C for 10 days). Subsequently, the liquid medium was filtered using sterile gauze to separate the fungal mycelia.

For the cup plate assay, the filtered media were inoculated (50 μL) onto Petri dishes (9 cm) containing gelatin milk agar medium (Sena et al., 2006) with the surface perforated with cup plates (6-mm diameter). A commercial protease from Aspergillus oryzae (Sigma®) (≥ 500 U/g) was used as a positive control.

The experiment was performed in triplicate, and the dishes were incubated under BOD at 28 °C for 24 h. The enzymatic activity was evaluated as the presence of clear halos on an opalescent background and measured in millimeters (Dingle et al., 1953).

Statistical analyses

All experiments were performed using a completely randomized design (CRD) and analyzed by ANOVA (analysis of variance). The mean values were compared using the Scott-Knott test (p < 0.05) in the statistical program SISVAR 4.3 (Ferreira, 1999).

Results and Discussion

Evaluation of in vitro antagonism (AI) and competitive interaction (CI) between endophytic fungi and phytopathogens

The dual culture method has been broadly applied in antagonism studies because this analysis facilitates the in vitro screening of agents that can be used for biological control (Faria et al., 2002; Mariano, 1993). In the present study, ANOVA showed differences among the in vitro antagonistic actions, as varying degrees of phytopathogen mycelial growth inhibition were observed. The results obtained after screening all 98 P. hispidum endophytes are shown in Figure 1-A, and the types of CI observed between the endophytes and A. alternaria, Colletotrichum sp., P. citricarpa and M. perniciosa are shown in Figure 1-B. More details regarding AI and CI between the 21 molecularly identified endophytes tested and phytopathogens are shown in Table 1.

Figure 1
Antagonism index (AI) and competitive interaction (CI) between 98 P. hispidum endophytic fungi and phytopathogenic fungi in dual culture. A) AI indicates the reduction (%) in phytopathogen mycelial growth. *Means of triplicates. Different letters indicate that the AI intervals are significantly different according to the Scott-Knott test (p < 0.05). B) *Badalyan rating scale (Badalyan et al., 2002): A = deadlock with mycelial contact; B = deadlock at a distance; C_A1 = partial replacement after initial deadlock with contact; C_B1 = partial replacement after initial deadlock at a distance. **N = no competitive interaction was observed (absence of endophyte antagonism).

Table 1
Antagonism index (AI) and competitive interaction (CI) between the 21 molecularly identified endophytic fungi tested and five phytopathogenic fungi in dual culture.

Endophytic fungi/controls	Phytopathogenic fungi
	A. alternata		Colletotrichum sp.		P. citricarpa		M. perniciosa
	AI*	CI**	AI	CI	AI	CI	AI	CI
L. theobromae JF766989	64.79a	CA1	54.16a	CA1	56.07a	CA1	60.09a	CB1
Diaporthales isolate JF767007	38.69b	A	42.10b	A	51.18a	A	37.22a	A
Diaporthe sp. JF766998	37.64b	A	31.00b	A	36.89b	A	27.03a	A
Diaporthe sp. JF767000	35.33b	A	26.90c	A	30.44c	A	34.11a	A
P. herbarum JF766995	33.03c	A	21.46c	A	28.93c	B	31.56a	A
Bipolaris sp. JF767007	32.33c	A	00.00e	N***	25.58c	A	22.29a	B
Phlebia sp. JF766997	31.40c	A	27.67c	A	27.65c	A	31.36a	A
Bipolaris sp. JF767001	30.49c	A	25.25c	A	24.84c	CA1	27.01a	A
Colletotrichum sp. JF766996	30.00c	A	11.00e	A	23.41c	A	31.91a	A
C. gloesporioides JF767002	26.65c	A	21.78c	A	29.08c	B	16.12b	A
Bipolaris sp. JF766993	25.28c	B	18.49d	A	22.25c	A	24.54a	A
M. cladophyllus JF767003	22.30d	A	25.00c	A	37.00b	CA1	08.98b	A
Bipolaris sp. JF766992	21.49d	A	32.36b	A	28.91c	A	32.23a	A
Alternaria sp. JF766991	20.26d	A	25.87c	A	24.05c	A	28.14a	A
Alternaria sp. JF766990	19.63d	A	25.70c	A	19.58d	A	29.43a	B
Colletotrichum sp. JF767006	17.50d	A	13.60d	A	17.42d	A	15.85b	A
Bipolaris sp. JF767005	13.68e	A	16.40d	A	22.01c	A	25.16a	A
S. commune JF766994	13.19e	A	17.74d	CA1	11.43d	A	08.88b	CA1
Colletotrichum sp. JF767004	12.70e	A	28.18c	A	36.69b	A	17.13b	A
Colletotrichum sp. JF766999	09.00e	A	14.28d	A	10.14d	A	21.13b	A
P. capitalensis JF766988	04.07e	B	11.56e	A	10.90d	B	18.18b	B
Fungicide Derosal Plus® (C+1)	12.16e	-	23.00c	-	05.18e	-	23.01a	-
Fungicide Tiofanil® (C+2)	12.16e	-	04.00e	-	03.63e	-	12.72b	-
Distilled water (C−)	00.00e	-	00.00e	-	00.00e	-	00.00e	-

• ^*
  Means of triplicates. The mean values followed by different letters indicate that the AI intervals are significantly different according to the Scott-Knott test (p < 0.05).
• ^**
  Badalyan rating scale (et al.): A = deadlock with mycelial contact; B = deadlock at a distance; C_A1 = partial replacement after initial deadlock with contact; C_B1 = partial replacement after initial deadlock at a distance.
• ^***
  N = no competitive interaction (absence of endophyte antagonism).
• ^(C+1)Positive control (10⁻¹ in distilled water); ^(C+2)positive control (200 mg/mL in distilled water); ^(C−)negative control.

The AI values obtained for the best antagonist (L. theobromae JF766989) varied between 54.16 and 64.79%, and these results were higher than those obtained in a previous study (Campanile et al., 2007), where the best result for antagonism was 28.5%. Badalyan et al. (2002) observed that most of xylotrophic mushrooms and cereal phytopathogens present subtypes of the type C interaction. According to the scale proposed by the same authors, interaction types A and B indicate a deadlock or mutual inhibition in which neither organism overgrows in the presence of the other; in contrast, type C and associated subtype interactions indicate a replacement involving the inhibition of one organism. L. theobromae JF766989 partially overgrew (interactions C_A1 and C_B1) in the presence of all phytopathogens; however, most of the 98 P. hispidum endophytes presented deadlock interactions with mycelial contact (A).

Although these results suggest L. theobromae JF766989 as an antagonist of phytopathogenic fungi, most of the endophytes tested were more effective than fungicides for reducing the growth of the phytopathogens.

Evaluation of the proteolytic activity of endophytic fungi

Screening for new producers of novel and industrially useful enzymes is of great interest for biotechnology research (Kumar and Takagi, 1999). Proteases are physiologically necessary and have been isolated from a wide diversity of sources, such as plants, animals, and microorganisms (Rao et al., 1998). Microbial proteases have several characteristics necessary for biotechnological application and represent a large portion of the total worldwide sale of enzymes, with low production costs compared with animal or plant proteases. Moreover, microorganisms are preferred as a source of proteases due to their rapid growth, limited space requirements for cultivation and ease of genetic manipulation to generate new enzymes with desirable properties (Najafi et al., 2005; Said and Pietro, 2002).

The cup plate assay in the present study showed that 28 of the 98 endophytes (28.57%) presented proteolytic activity when grown in inducer medium. An ANOVA showed differences in the observed enzymatic halos, with means ranging from 1.33 to 16.40 mm in diameter; the highest value was observed for S. commune JF766994 (Fig. 2 and Table 2).

Figure 2
Cup plate assay: A) Schizophyllum commune enzymatic halos (16.40 mm) produced after growth in inducer medium (IM); B) S. commune halos (15.40 mm) produced after growth in IM + rice flour; C) Phoma herbarum halos (17.67 mm) produced after growth in IM + soy flour.

Table 2
Proteolytic activity of endophytic fungi grown in liquid inducer medium (IM) with and without additional substrates compared with a commercial fungal protease.

Fungi	Halos (in mm) obtained for each culture condition
	IM	IM + rice flour	IM + soy flour
S. commune JF766994	16.40Ba*	15.40Ba	15.00Ba
Endophyte G62-75	15.40B	-	-
Endophyte G23-54	15.00C	-	-
Colletotrichum sp. JF767004	14.47Ca	14.53Ba	15.00Ba
Endophyte G38-111	14.00Ca	14.27Ba	13.40Ca
Endophyte G42-108	10.20Da	14.46Ba	-
Endophyte G13-13	10.00D	-	-
L. theobromae JF766989	09.53D	-	-
Endophyte G04-24	09.47Da	09.87Ca	15.00Ba
Endophyte G17-101	08.27D	-	-
Endophyte G57-82	06.67D	-	-
Alternaria sp. JF766991	06.00D	-	-
Endophyte G04-04	06.00Da	15.00Ba	11.33Da
P. herbarum JF766995	05.67Eb	10.27Cb	17.67Ba
Endophyte G36-112	05.47Eb	14.20Ba	-
Endophyte G39-39	05.47Ea	10.33Ca	-
Bipolaris sp. JF767001	05.40E	-	-
Endophyte G07-23	05.20E	-	-
Bipolaris sp. JF767005	04.87Ea	10.00Ca	10.26Da
Endophyte G07-138	04.47E	-	-
Endophyte G01-01	03.93F	-	-
Endophyte G54-69	03.93F	-	-
Endophyte G53-83	03.67Fb	13.87Ba	05.00Eb
Colletotrichum sp. JF766999	03.60F	-	-
Endophyte G62-127	03.53Fa	07.86Da	-
Endophyte G11-11	03.47F	-	-
Endophyte G05-05	02.27Gb	07.27Db	15.00Ba
Endophyte G35-35	01.33Ga	10.00Ca	09.73Da
Positive control (C+)	23.63A	23.63A	23.63A

• ^*
  Means of triplicates. The mean values followed by upper-case letters in columns or lower-case letters in rows are not significantly different according to the Scott-Knott test (p < 0.05).
• ^(C+)Positive control: commercial protease from Aspergillus oryzae Sigma® (≥ 500 U/g) used directly in the cup plate assay.

Approximately 28.57% of the P. hispidum endophytes evaluated presented proteolytic activity under the conditions assayed. In some cases, the enzyme production was significantly higher after the medium was changed. Species of the genus Mucor are protease producers of commercial value (Alves et al., 2002), with 82% of 56 isolates belonging to 11 different species presenting proteolytic activity. Djamel et al. (2009) reported that only 10 (3.9%) of 253 Penicillium strains examined presented significant proteolytic activity, as based on the hydrolysis of milk casein (clear zones around the colony) and the mycelium colony diameter, with clear halos greater than 9 mm.

The 28 P. hispidum endophytic isolates that initially presented enzymatic activity were grown in the presence of rice or soy flour (Table 2). When rice flour was used as the substrate, 14 endophytes produced enzymatic halos, ranging from 7.27 to 15.40 mm, with the best values observed for S. commune JF766994. In addition, two unidentified isolates (G53-83 and G36-112) presented statistically superior enzymatic activity when grown on this substrate. In the presence of soy flour, positive results were obtained for 10 endophytes, with enzymatic halos ranging from 5.0 to 17.67 mm in diameter. The best result was obtained for P. herbarum JF766995, which presented statistically superior enzymatic activity when grown on this substrate; similar results were obtained for isolate G05-05.

Agro-industrial and other wastes can be used as substrates for fermentation, suggesting a cost-effective approach to enhance enzymatic production, as these substrates are cheap and abundant natural carbon sources (Blesson, 2009; Singh et al., 2012). Singh et al. (2012) showed that sugarcane bagasse, wheat bran, corncob, wheat straw and, in particular, rice bran are suitable substrates for the production of amylases and xylanases from thermophilic actinobacteria. In addition, substrates such as soy, wheat and rice bran, mango and banana peel, gelatin and fish flour have been used for the production of microbial proteases (Murthy and Naidu, 2010; Paranthaman et al., 2009; Souza et al., 2008).

Consistent with the results of the present study, Souza et al. (2008) used the cup plate assay to investigate the production of enzymes from Amazonian basidiomycetes cultivated on different substrates, obtaining enzymatic halos of up to 23.80 mm in diameter. Smaller halos (up to 18.07 mm in diameter) were obtained using a medium supplemented with protein sources, and halos of up to 19.11 and 18.64 mm in diameter were obtained on soy bran and fish flour, respectively. Paranthaman et al. (2009) verified protease production under the solid-state fermentation of Aspergillus niger using different varieties of broken rice as substrates, and the results varied between 44.7 and 67.7 U/g.

Conclusions

Endophytes constitute a novel and important new source of active substances that can be employed in different biotechnological industries. Diverse strains, even members of the same endophytic fungal species, can exhibit characteristic metabolite production with enzymatic or antifungal potential. Some positive antifungal phenotypes of endophytes might reflect competition for space or nutrients, as demonstrated through dual culture experiments. The results of the present study suggest that in the assemblage of P. hispidum endophytes, certain strains are important sources of antifungal properties, particularly L. theobromae JF766989, which reduced the growth of A. alternaria, Colletotrichum sp., P. citricarpa and M. perniciosa by approximately 54 to 65%.

Investigators in Brazil should further explore the potential to generate new enzymes from microbial sources, as this country has a continental area that includes hundreds of plant species with diverse endophytes. The results of the present study highlight the proteolytic activity of the endophytes P. herbarum JF766995 and S. commune JF766994, which presented the highest enzymatic halo diameters under at least one culture condition tested. As some isolates showed increased activity in the presence of rice or soy flour as a substrate, these endophytes have the potential to produce enzymes from agriculture wastes.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank CAPES (Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior) for the Master's scholarship awarded to Ravely Casarotti Orlandelli. The authors would also like to thank CNPq (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico) (process n. 480726/2011-6) for financial support.

References

• Almeida FBR, Cerqueira FM, Silva RN et al. (2007) Mycoparasitism studies of Trichoderma harzianum strains against Rhizoctonia solani: evaluation of coiling and hydrolytic enzyme production. Biotechnol Lett 29:1189–1193.
• Alves MH, Campos-Takaki GM, Porto ALF et al. (2002) Screening of Mucor spp. for the production of amylase, lipase, polygalacturonase and protease. Braz J Microbiol 33:325–330.
• Andreote FD, Azevedo JL, Araújo WL (2009) Assessing the diversity of bacterial communities associated with plants. Braz J Microbiol 40:417–432.
• Anwar A, Saleemuddin M (1998) Alkaline proteases: a review. Bioresour Technol 64:175–183.
• Azevedo J, Maccheroni Jr W, Pereira JO et al. (2000) Endophytic microorganisms: a review on insect control and recent advances on tropical plants. Electron J Biotechnol 3:41–65.
• Badalyan SM, Innocenti G, Garibyan NG (2002) Antagonistic activity of xylotrophic mushrooms against pathogenic fungi of cereals in dual culture. Phytopathol Mediterr 41:200–225.
• Blesson J (2009) Ecological relevance of agricultural waste as nutrient substitute for the production of alkaline protease from Bacillus amyloliquifaciens Ecol Noospherol 20:69–83.
• Campanile G, Ruscelli A, Luisi N (2007) Antagonistic activity of endophytic fungi towards Diplodia corticola assessed by in vitro and in planta tests. Eur J Plant Pathol 117:237–246.
• Dingle J, Reid WW, Solomons GL (1953) The enzymatic degradation of pectin and other polysaccharides. II. Application of the "cup-plate" assay to the estimation of enzymes. J Sci Food Agric 4:149–155.
• Djamel C, Ali T, Nelly C (2009) Acid protease production by isolated species of Penicillium Eur J Sci Res 25:469–477.
• Faria AYK, Cassetari Neto D, Albuquerque MCA (2002) Atividade antagônica in vitro de Trichoderma harzianum a patógenos de sementes de algodoeiro. Rev Agric Trop 6:59–68.
• Ferreira DF (1999) SISVAR 4.3 - Sistema de análises estatísticas. UFLA, Lavras.
• Flores AC, Pamphile JA, Sarragiotto MH et al. (2013) Production of 3-nitropropionic acid by endophytic fungus Phomopsis longicolla isolated from Trichilia elegans A. JUSS ssp. elegans and evaluation of biological activity. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 29:923–932.
• Gupta R, Beg QK, Larenz P (2002) Bacterial alkaline proteases: molecular approaches and industrial applications. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 59:15–32.
• Guthrie JL, Castle AJ (2006) Chitinase production during interaction of Trichoderma aggressivum and Agaricus bisporus Can J Microbiol 52:961–967.
• Harrison RL, Bonning BC (2010) Proteases as insecticidal agents. Toxins 2:935–953.
• Hasan S, Ahmad A, Purwar A et al. (2013) Production of extracellular enzymes in the entomopathogenic fungus Verticillium lecanii Bioinformation 9:238–242.
• Kumar CG, Takagi H (1999) Microbial alkaline proteases: from a bioindustrial viewpoint. Biotechnol Adv 17:561–594.
• Leuchtmann A, Petrini O, Petrini LE et al. (1992) Isozyme polymorphism in six endophytic Phyllosticta species. Mycol Res 96:287–294.
• Mariano RLR (1993) Métodos de seleção in vitro para controle microbiológico. Rev Anu Patol Plantas 1:369–409.
• Mejía LC, Rojas EI, Maynard Z et al. (2008) Endophytic fungi as biocontrol agents of Theobroma cacao pathogens. Biol Control 46:4–14.
• Murthy PS, Naidu M (2010) Protease production by Aspergillus oryzae in solid-state fermentation utilizing coffe by-products. World Appl Sci J 8:199–205.
• Najafi MF, Deobagkar D, Deobagkar D (2005) Potential application of protease isolated from Pseudomonas aeruginosa PD100. Electron J Biotechnol 8:197–203.
• Nielsen RI, Oxenboll K (1998) Enzymes from fungi: their technology and uses. Mycologist 12:69–71.
• Orlandelli RC, Alberto RN, Rubin Filho CJ et al. (2012a) Diversity of endophytic fungal community associated with Piper hispidum Sw. (Piperaceae) leaves. Genet Mol Res 11:1575–1585.
• Orlandelli RC, Alberto RN, Almeida TT et al. (2012b) In vitro antibacterial activity of crude extracts produced by endophytic fungi isolated from Piper hispidum Sw. J App Pharm Sci 2:137–141.
• Paranthaman R, Alagusundaram K, Indhumathi J (2009) Production of protease from rice mill wastes by Aspergillus niger in solid state fermentation. World J Agric Sci 5:308–312.
• Petrini O, Sieber TN, Toti L et al. (1992) Ecology, metabolite production and substrate utilisation in endophytic fungi. J Nat Toxins 1:185–196.
• Polizeli MLTM, Jorge JA, Terenzi HF (1991) Pectinase production by Neurospora crassa: purification and biochemical characterization of extracellular polygalacturonase activity. J Gen Microbiol 137:1815–1823.
• Rao MB, Tanksale AM, Ghatge MS et al. (1998) Molecular and biotechnological aspects of microbial proteases. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 62:597–635.
• Rocha R, Luz DE, Engels C et al. (2009) Selection of endophytic fungi from comfrey (Symphytum officinale L.) for in vitro biological control of the phytopathogen Sclerotinia Sclerotiorum (Lib.). Braz J Microbiol 40:73–78.
• Rubini MR, Silva-Ribeiro RT, Pomella AWV et al. (2005) Diversity of endophytic fungal community of cacao (Theobroma cacao L.) and biological control of Crinipellis perniciosa, causal agent of Witches' Broom Disease. Int J Biol Sci 1:24–33.
• Said S, Pietro R (2002) Enzimas de interesse industrial e biotecnológico. Editora Eventos, Rio de Janeiro.
• Sánchez V, Rebolledo O, Picaso RM et al. (2007) In vitro antagonism of Thielaviopsis paradoxa by Trichoderma longibrachiatum Mycopathologia 163:49–58.
• Sena AR, Koblitz MGB, Góes Neto A et al. (2006) Seleção de fungos do semi-árido baiano secretores de hidrolases de interesse em alimentos. Sitientibus 35:91–98.
• Singh R, Kapoor V, Kumar V (2012) Utilization of agro-industrial wastes for the simultaneous production of amylase and xylanase by thermophilic actinomycetes. Braz J Microbiol 43:1545–1552.
• Smith D, Onions AHS (1983) The preservation and maintenance of living fungi. Page Bros, Norwick.
• Souza HQ, Oliveira LA, Andrade JS (2008) Seleção de Basidiomycetes da Amazônia para produção de enzimas de interesse biotecnológico. Ciênc Tecnol Aliment 28:116–124.
• Specian V, Sarragiotto MH, Pamphile JA et al. (2012) Chemical characterization of bioactive compounds from the endophytic fungus Diaporthe helianthi isolated from Luehea divaricata Braz J Microbiol 34:1174–1182.
• Wilson AD, Clement SL, Kaiser WJ (1991) Survey and detection of endophytic fungi in Lolium germplasm by direct staining and aphid assays. Plant Dis 75:169–173.

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  Apr-Jun 2015

History

• Received
  22 Oct 2013
• Accepted
  05 Sept 2014