Comparison of cefoxitin disk diffusion test and mecA gene PCR results for methicillin resistance detection in Staphylococcus intermedius group isolates from canine origin in Brazil

SHORT COMMUNICATION

Comparison of cefoxitin disk diffusion test and mecA gene PCR results for methicillin resistance detection in Staphylococcus intermedius group isolates from canine origin in Brazil

Bruno Penna; Renata F Rabello; Walter Lilenbaum

Laboratorio de Bacteriologia Veterinaria, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niteroi, RJ, Brazil

^{Send correspondence to}

ABSTRACT

The study evaluated cefoxitin disk diffusion tests breakpoints and their correlation to mecA gene PCR results for detecting Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus intermedius Group (MRSP) isolates from dogs in Brazil. Agreement using proposed breakpoint (resistant < 30 mm) was encouraging. The current study reinforces that an epidemiological breakpoint can be established to predict presence of MRSP.

Key words: methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus intermedius group, cefoxitin, disk diffusion test.

Staphylococcus intermedius Group has been recognized as an opportunistic pathogen in many kinds of animals, especially in dogs and cats (van Duijkeren et al., 2011a). Since its first description it has been shown to be the species of the Staphylococcus intermedius group (SIG) that predominantly colonizes dogs, also representing a leading cause of canine topic infections (Penna et al., 2010; Perreten et al., 2010). Some recent reports indicated that S. intermedius Group could occasionally cause infections and colonize human (Paul et al., 2011; Stegmann et al., 2010; van Duijkeren et al., 2011b), suggesting that S. intermedius Group is a zoonotic pathogen and public health issue.

More recently methicillin resistant S. intermedius Group (MRSP) has been reported as the predominant coagulase-positive methicillin resistant staphylococci in dogs, what poses a therapeutic challenge due to the limited treatment options (Bryan et al., 2012). Methicillin resistance of Staphylococcus intermedius Group has been detected by disk diffusion test (DDT) employing oxacillin disk (Papich, 2010). However, mecA gene detection by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is the most accurate methods for prediction of methicillin resistance in staphylococci (CLSI, 2012).

Cefoxitin disk diffusion susceptibility testing is being widely used for Staphylococcus aureus and coagulasenegative staphylococci (CNS) isolated from human beings, with better results than oxacillin disk (CLSI, 2012). Unlike similar testing with oxacillin, cefoxitin disk diffusion testing does not require additional supplementation of media or altered incubation conditions (Skov et al., 2003). Zones of growth inhibition may also be more clearly demarcated and easier to interpret (Bemis et al., 2012). Despite this, the using of cefoxitin disk has not been validated for screening methicillin resistance in coagulase-positive staphylococci isolates other than S. aureus from animal origin. In that direction, attempts to interpret results from isolates of animal origin using the standards determined for S. aureus were not successful, and a breakpoint of 30 mm in cefoxitin DDT for S. intermedius Group of canine origin have been proposed (Bemis et al., 2012). Nevertheless, the authors state that additional testing with S. intermedius Group isolates from different geographic regions is needed. Therefore, the purpose of the present study was to evaluate cefoxitin disk diffusion tests breakpoints and their correlation to mecA gene PCR results for methicillin resistance detection in S. intermedius Group isolates from canine origin in Brazil.

A total of 83 isolates of S. intermedius Group from unmedicated dogs with external otitis (OE, 52 isolates) and healthy dogs (HD, 31 isolates) were studied. A sterile cotton swab was used to collect samples of ear exudates. From the healthy animals swab was taken from one anterior nostril. The cotton swabs were inoculated in Brain Heart Infusion broth (Difco, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) and incubated at 37 ºC. Only one sample from each dog was studied, even in the cases of dogs with otitis externa if both ears presented with clinical signs.

Dogs with otitis extrena included had to present with clinical signs in at least one ear. Signs of otitis externa included local pain, pruritus, erythema, ear discharge and desquamation. Ears were screened with cytological for evidence of cocci and subsequent pure cultures of staphylococci-like bacteria as seen on Gram stain of cultured colonies were included. The included healthy dogs with no history of any infection related symptoms at the time of the evaluation and no history for at least one month prior to sampling.

All isolates were were classified according to reference methods as previously described (Penna et al., 2010). Isolates in pure culture were identified on the basis of colony morphology, Gram staining, pigment production, haemolysis on 5% bovine blood agar and biochemical reactions, including catalase activity test, resistance to Bacitracin 0.04 U, acid production in Hugh-Leifson's OF base medium, tube coagulase test, acetoin production, urease, novobiocin resistance, deoxyribonuclease test, ornithine and arginine utilization and aerobic fermentation of sucrose, D-mannose, D-cellobiose, D-xylose, L-arabinose, raffinose, D-trehalose, maltose and D-mannitol.

All the S. intermedius Group isolates were tested for susceptibility to cefoxitin (30 µg) by the agar disc diffusion method on Mueller Hinton Agar (Difco) (CLSI, 2012). A PCR targeting the mecA gene was employed to confirm the resistance to methicillin (Zhang et al., 2005).

The mecA gene was detected in 14 (17.3%) isolates, both from dogs with OE (17.3%) and HD (16.1%). Zone diameters obtained in DDT with cefoxitin disk were analyzed to the 83 samples and compared to the established breakpoints to CNS and S. aureus (Table 1). The cefoxitin growth inhibition zone diameters were distributed in a bimodal fashion (Figure 1). Also, to each zone diameter sensitivity and specificity were calculated using a ROC curve.

Sensitivity and specificity of the zone diameter breakpoint criteria set were 100% when a breakpoint of 30 mm was adopted for predicting methicillin resistance. With that breakpoint, results of DDT using cefoxitin disk agreed 100% with mecA gene detection (kappa statistic; κ = 1.000).

Studies conducted in the USA, the cefoxitin DDT using interpretive criteria recommended for human isolates of CNS (breakpoint of 24 mm) (CLSI, 2012) generated unacceptably high levels of major errors (resistant isolates called susceptible) and low agreement with mecA gene detection by PCR (Bemis et al., 2009; Schissler et al., 2009) Similar results were observed in the present study. If those criteria were applied, the same major errors would occur, and nine of the 14 S. intermedius Group isolates would be erroneously categorized as susceptible; hence the sensitivity of DDT would only reach 36%, with a low concordance to molecular test (k = 0.479), although specificity would still be 100%. When standards for S. aureus of human origin are employed (breakpoint of 21 mm) (CLSI, 2012), concordance was even lower (k = 0.113), and sensitivity of cefoxitin DDT was 7%, since only one isolate was categorized as resistant.

The major errors that have been reported and also observed in the present study clearly demonstrate that suggested standards must be revised for the adequate phenotypical detection of S. intermedius Group of canine origin. Conversely, the overall strong agreement between cefoxitin DDT using the proposed breakpoint (resistant < 30 mm) and mecA gene detection by PCR is encouraging.

Establishment of S. intermedius Group specific cefoxitin DDT interpretive criteria is an achievable goal. PCR may not be available for all laboratories around the globe, and also presents greater costs. Therefore, reliable standardization of DDT, including the breakpoints, are essential for interlaboratory comparisons and additional understanding on methicillin resistance of S. intermedius Group isolates from canine origin in different geographic regions.

This research was supported by the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (Capes) and Faperj (E-26/110.095/2009). The authors wish to thank Dr. Marcia Giambiagi de Marval, Dr Beatriz Meurer Moreira, Dr Miliane Moreira.

Submitted: December 20, 2012

Approved: September 9, 2013.

All the content of the journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons License CC BY-NC.

• Bemis DA, Jones RD, Frank LA, Kania SA (2009) Evaluation of susceptibility test breakpoints used to predict mecA-mediated resistance in Staphylococcus pseudintermedius isolated from dogs. J Vet Diagn Invest 21:53-58.
• Bemis DA, Jones RD, Videla R, Kania SA (2012) Evaluation of cefoxitin disk diffusion breakpoint for detection of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus pseudintermedius isolates from dogs. J Vet Diagn Invest 24:964-967.
• Bryan J, Frank LA, Rohrbach BW, Burgette LJ, Cain CL, Bemis DA (2012) Treatment outcome of dogs with meticillinresistant and meticillin-susceptible Staphylococcus pseudintermedius pyoderma. Vet Dermatol 23:361-365
• Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (2012) Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk Susceptibility Test; Approved Standard M02-A11. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA.
• Papich MG (2010) Proposed changes to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute interpretive criteria for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius isolated from dogs. J Vet Diagn Invest 22:160.
• Paul NC, Moodley A, Ghibaudo G, Guardabassi L (2011) Carriage of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius in Small Animal Veterinarians: Indirect Evidence of Zoonotic Transmission. Zoon Pub Health 58:533-539.
• Penna B, Varges R, Medeiros L, Martins GM, Martins RR, Lilenbaum W (2010) Species distribution and antimicrobial susceptibility of staphylococci isolated from canine otitis externa. Vet Dermatol 21:292-296.
• Perreten V, Kadlec K, Schwarz S, Grönlund Andersson U, Finn M, Greko C, Moodley A, Kania SA, Frank LA, Bemis DA, Franco A, Iurescia M, Battisti A, Duim B, Wagenaar JA, van Duijkeren E, Weese JS, Fitzgerald JR, Rossano A, Guardabassi L (2010) Clonal spread of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius in Europe and North America: an international multicentre study. J Antimicrob Chemother 65:1145-1154.
• Schissler JR, Hillier A, Daniels JB, Cole LK, Gebreyes WA (2009) Evaluation of Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute interpretive criteria for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius isolates from dogs. J Vet Diagn Invest 21:684-688.
• Skov R, Smyth R, Clausen M, Larsen AR, Frimodt-Møller N, Olsson-Liljequist B, Kahlmeter G (2003) Evaluation of a cefoxitin 30 microg disc on Iso-Sensitest agar for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus J Antimicrob Chemother 52:204-207.
• Stegmann R, Burnens A, Maranta CA, Perreten V (2010) Human infection associated with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius ST71. J Antimicrob Chemother 65:2047-2048.
• van Duijkeren E, Catry B, Greko C, Moreno MA, Pomba MC, Pyörälä S, Ruzauskas M, Sanders P, Threlfall EJ, Torren-Edo J, Törneke K, Scientific Advisory Group on Antimicrobials (SAGAM) (2011a) Review on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius. J Antimicrob Chemother 66:2705-2714.
• van Duijkeren E, Kamphuis M, van der Mije IC, Laarhoven LM, Duim B, Wagenaar JA, Houwers DJ (2011b) Transmission of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius between infected dogs and cats and contact pets, humans and the environment in households and veterinary clinics. Vet Microbiol 150:338-343.
• Zhang K, McClure JA, Elsayed S, Louie T, Conly JM (2005) Novel multiplex PCR assay for characterization and concomitant subtyping of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec types I to V in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus J Clin Microbiol 43:5026-5033.

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  29 May 2014
• Date of issue
  2014

History

• Received
  20 Dec 2012
• Accepted
  09 Sept 2013