Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Mitos da didática das ciências acerca dos motivos para incluir a Natureza da Ciência no ensino das ciências

Science Education myths about the reasons to include the Nature of Science in science teaching

Resumos

Em certas situações, a Didática das Ciências transmite como mitos algumas crenças que não estão suficientemente sustentadas pela investigação que ela própria produz. Este artigo mostra dois desses mitos relacionados com os motivos que se costumam apontar para incluir a Natureza da Ciência no ensino das ciências, como sejam a suposta relação entre a prática docente e as crenças sobre a Natureza da Ciência, e a crença de que a sua compreensão é um fator chave na hora de tomar melhores decisões cívicas em questões tecnocientíficas de interesse social. A análise que se apresenta realizou-se mediante a revisão de diversos resultados de investigações procedentes da própria Didática das Ciências e também da Psicologia das Decisões. A conclusão aponta para considerar que outros fatores influenciam mais, tornando muito menos lineares essas hipotéticas relações do que alguns especialistas pensam e mais complexa a problemática abordada.

Natureza da Ciência; Didática das Ciências; ensino das ciências; prática docente; decisões tecnocientíficas


In some situations Science Education transmits as myths various beliefs as myths that are not enough sustained by the research in its own domain. This paper shows two of these myths related to the reasons usually pointed in orderfor includinge the Nature of Science in science teaching:, such as the supposed relationship between the educational practice and the beliefs about the Nature of Science, and also the belief that its understanding of the Nature of Science is a key factor in when making better civicdecisions as citizens in technical socioscientific oscientific issues. with social interest The analysis was carried out by means of athe review of several results from the own Science Education Research, and also from the Psychology of Decisions. The conclusion seems to be clear: other factors are of a greater influence, making those hypothetical relations much less linear than some experts wcould think, and making the questions much more complex. the presented question.

Nature of Science; Science Education; science teaching; educational practice; technoscientific decisions


Mitos da didática das ciências acerca dos motivos para incluir a Natureza da Ciência no ensino das ciências

Science Education myths about the reasons to include the Nature of Science in science teaching

Acevedo, J. A.I; Vázquez, A.II; Paixão, M. F.III; Acevedo, P.IV; Oliva J. M.V; Manassero, M. A.VI

IInspetor de Educação. Consejería de Educación de la Junta de Andalucía. Delegación Provincial de Huelva-España. E-mail: ja_acevedo@vodafone.es

IIInspetor de Educação e Professor Associado. Universidad de las Islas Baleares-España. E-mail: avazquez@dgadmedu.caib.es

IIIProfessora Coordenadora. Escola Superior de Educação, Instituto Politécnico de Castelo Branco-Portugal. E-mail: fatimapaixao@ese.ipcb.pt

IVColaboradora de Investigação. Universidad de Sevilla-España. E-mail: pi_acevedo@yahoo.es

VProfessor Catedrático de Física e Química do Ensino Secundário. Centro de Profesorado de Cádiz-España. E-mail: jmoliva@cepcadiz.com

VIProfessora Catedrática. Universidad de las Islas Baleares-España. E-mail: ma.manassero@uib.es

RESUMO

Em certas situações, a Didática das Ciências transmite como mitos algumas crenças que não estão suficientemente sustentadas pela investigação que ela própria produz. Este artigo mostra dois desses mitos relacionados com os motivos que se costumam apontar para incluir a Natureza da Ciência no ensino das ciências, como sejam a suposta relação entre a prática docente e as crenças sobre a Natureza da Ciência, e a crença de que a sua compreensão é um fator chave na hora de tomar melhores decisões cívicas em questões tecnocientíficas de interesse social. A análise que se apresenta realizou-se mediante a revisão de diversos resultados de investigações procedentes da própria Didática das Ciências e também da Psicologia das Decisões. A conclusão aponta para considerar que outros fatores influenciam mais, tornando muito menos lineares essas hipotéticas relações do que alguns especialistas pensam e mais complexa a problemática abordada.

Unitermos: Natureza da Ciência; Didática das Ciências; ensino das ciências; prática docente; decisões tecnocientíficas.

ABSTRACT

In some situations Science Education transmits as myths various beliefs as myths that are not enough sustained by the research in its own domain. This paper shows two of these myths related to the reasons usually pointed in orderfor includinge the Nature of Science in science teaching:, such as the supposed relationship between the educational practice and the beliefs about the Nature of Science, and also the belief that its understanding of the Nature of Science is a key factor in when making better civicdecisions as citizens in technical socioscientific oscientific issues. with social interest The analysis was carried out by means of athe review of several results from the own Science Education Research, and also from the Psychology of Decisions. The conclusion seems to be clear: other factors are of a greater influence, making those hypothetical relations much less linear than some experts wcould think, and making the questions much more complex. the presented question.

Keywords: Nature of Science; Science Education; science teaching; educational practice; technoscientific decisions.

Texto completo disponível apenas em PDF.

Full text available only in PDF format.

  • AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF SCIENCE. Science for all americans New York: Oxford University Press, 1989.
  • ______. Benchmarks for science literacy: a project 2061 report. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993.
  • ABD-EL-KHALICK, F. Embedding nature of science instruction in preservice elementary science: abandoning scientism, but... Journal of Science Teacher Education, Toledo, v. 12, n. 3, p. 215-233, 2001.
  • ______. The influence of a philosophy of science course on preservice secondary science teachers' views of nature of science. In: ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR THE EDUCATION OF TEACHERS IN SCIENCE, 2002, Pensacola. Proceedings Pensacola: AETS, 2002. Disponível em: http://www.ed.psu.edu/CI/Journals/2002aets/f7_abd_el_khalick.rtf Acesso em 7 jul. 2005.
  • ABD-EL-KHALICK, F.; BELL, R. L.; LEDERMAN, N. G. The nature of science and instructional practice: making the unnatural natural. Science Education, New York, v. 82, n. 4, p. 417-436, 1998.
  • ABD-EL-KHALICK, F.; BOUJAOUDE, S. An exploratory study of the knowledge base for science teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, New York, v. 34, n. 7, p. 673-699, 1997.
  • ABD-EL-KHALICK, F.; LEDERMAN, N. G. Improving science teachers' conceptions of nature of science: a critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education, London, v. 22, n. 7, p. 665-701, 2000a.
  • ______. The influence of history of science course on students' views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, New York, v. 37, n. 10, p. 1057-1095, 2000b.
  • ACEVEDO DÍAZ, J. A. Los futuros profesores de enseñanza secundaria ante la sociología y la epistemología de las ciencias. Revista Interuniversitaria de Formación del Profesorado, Zaragoza, v. 19, p. 111-125, 1994. Disponível em: http://www.campus-oei.org/salactsi/acevedo8.htm Acesso em 7 jul. 2005.
  • ______. Cambiando la práctica docente en la enseñanza de las ciencias a través de CTS. Sala de Lecturas CTS+I de la OEI 2001. Disponível em: http://www.campus-oei.org/salactsi/acevedo2.htm Acesso em 7 jul. 2005.
  • ACEVEDO DÍAZ, J. A. La formación del profesorado de enseñanza secundaria y la educación CTS. Una cuestión problemática. Revista Interuniversitaria de Formación del Profesorado, Zaragoza, v. 26, p. 131-144, 1996b. Disponível em: http://www.campus-oei.org/salactsi/acevedo9.htm Acesso em 7 jul. 2005.
  • ______. ¿Publicar o patentar? Hacia una ciencia cada vez más ligada a la tecnología. Revista Española de Física, Madrid, v. 11, n. 2, p. 8-11, 1997. Disponível em: http://www.campus-oei.org/salactsi/acevedo4.htm Acesso em 7 jul. 2005.
  • ______. Reflexiones sobre las finalidades de la enseñanza de las ciencias: educación científica para la ciudadanía. Revista Eureka sobre Enseñanza y Divulgación de las Ciencias, Cádiz, v. 1, n. 1, p. 3-16, 2004. Disponível em: http://www.apac-eureka.org/revista/Larevista.htm Acesso em 7 jul. 2005.
  • ACEVEDO DÍAZ, J. A.; VÁZQUEZ ALONSO, A.; MANASSERO MAS, M. A. El movimiento Ciencia, tecnología y sociedad y la enseñanza de las ciencias. Sala de Lecturas CTS+I de la OEI, 2002. Disponível em: http://www.campus-oei.org/salactsi/acevedo13.htm>. Acesso em 7 jul. 2005.
  • ACEVEDO DÍAZ, J. A.; ACEVEDO ROMERO, P. Proyectos y materiales curriculares para la educación CTS: enfoques, estructuras, contenidos y ejemplos. Bordón, Madrid, v. 54, n.1, p. 5-18, 2002. Disponível em: http://www.campus-oei.org/salactsi/acevedo19.htm Acesso em 7 jul. 2005.
  • ADÚRIZ-BRAVO, A. Integración de la epistemología en la formación del profesorado de ciencias 2001. 622 f. Tesis (Doctoral en Ciencias Sociales) - Departament de Didàctica de les Matemàtiques i de les Ciències Experimentals, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, 2001.
  • AKERSON, L.; ABD-EL-KHALICK, F.; LEDERMAN, N. G. Influence of a reflective explicit activity-based approach on elementary teachers' conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, New York, v. 37, n. 4, p. 295-317, 2000.
  • ALTERS, B.J. Whose nature of science? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, New York, v. 34, n. 1, p. 39-55, 1997.
  • BARTHOLOMEW, H.; OSBORNE, J.; RATCLIFFE, M. Teaching pupils 'ideas-about-science': case studies from the classroom. In: ANNUAL MEETING OF THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH IN SCIENCE TEACHING, 2002, New Orleans. Paper New Orleans: [s.n], 2002. Disponível em: http://www.york.ac.uk/depts/educ/projs/NARST2002_P3 Acesso em 7 jul. 2005.
  • BELL, R. L. Understanding of the nature of science and decision making on science and technology based issues. Dissertation Abstract International, v. 60, p. 3310, 1999.
  • BELL, R. L.; LEDERMAN, N. G. Understandings of the nature of science and decision making on science and technology based issues. Science Education, New York, v. 87, n. 3, p. 352-377, 2003
  • BELL, R. L.; LEDERMAN, N. G.; ABD-EL-KHALICK, F. Implicit versus explicit nature of science instruction: an explicit response to Palmquist and Finley. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, New York, v. 35, n. 9, p. 1057-1061, 1998.
  • BELL, R. L.; LEDERMAN, N. G.; ABD-EL-KHALICK, F. Developing and acting upon one's conception of the nature of science: a follow-up study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, New York, v. 37, n. 6, p. 563-581, 2000.
  • BYBEE, R. W. Achieving scientific literacy: from purposes to practices. Portsmouth: Heinemann, 1997.
  • CAAMAÑO, A. La comprensión de la naturaleza de la ciencia: un objetivo de la enseñanza de las ciencias en la ESO. Alambique, v. 8, n. 43-51, 1996.
  • CANAVARRO, J. M. O que se pensa sobre a ciência Coimbra: Quarteto, 2000.
  • CARVAJAL, E.; GÓMEZ-VILLARTA, M. R. Concepciones y representaciones de los maestros de secundaria y bachillerato sobre la naturaleza, el aprendizaje y la enseñanza de las ciencias. Revista Mexicana de Investigación Educativa, Tlalpan, v. 7, n. 16, p. 577-602, 2002.
  • SPAIN. Decreto 106/1992, de 9 de junio, por el que se establecen las enseñanzas correspondientes a la educación secundaria obligatoria en Andalucía. Boletín Oficial de la Junta de Andalucía, Sevilla, 56, 1992.
  • ______. Decreto 148/2002, de 14 de mayo, por el que se modifica el Decreto 106/1992, de 9 de junio, por el que se establecen las enseñanzas correspondientes a la educación secundaria obligatoria en Andalucía. Boletín Oficial de la Junta de Andalucía, Sevilla, 75, 2002.
  • DEPARTMENT FOR EDUCATION AND EMPLOYMENT. Science in the National Curriculum London: HMSO, 1999.
  • DÉSAUTELS, J.; LAROCHELLE, M. Educación científica: el regreso del ciudadano y de la ciudadana. Enseñanza de las Ciencias, Barcelona, v. 21, n. 1, p. 3-20, 2003.
  • DRIVER, R. et al. Young people's images of science Buckingham: Open University Press, 1996.
  • DUFFY, L. Team decision making and technology. In: CASTELLAN Jr., N. J. (Ed.). Individual and group decision making: current issues. Hillsdale: LEA, 1993. p. 247-266.
  • DUSCHL, R. A.; WRIGHT, E. A case study of high school teachers' decision making models for planning and teaching science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, New York, v. 26, n. 6, p. 467-501, 1989.
  • ECHEVERRÍA, J. La revolución tecnocientífica. Madrid: FCE, 2003.
  • EFLIN, J. T.; GLENNAN, S.; REISCH, R. The nature of science: a perspective from the philosophy of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, New York, v. 36, n. 1, p. 107-116, 1999.
  • FELSKE, D. D.; CHIAPPETTA, E.; KEMPER, J. A historical examination of the nature of science and its consensus in benchmarks and standards. In: ANNUAL MEETING OF THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH IN SCIENCE TEACHING, 2001, Saint Louis. Paper Saint Louis: [s.n.], 2001.
  • FERNÁNDEZ-MONTORO, I. Análisis de las concepciones docentes sobre la actividad científica: una propuesta de transformación. 2000. Tesis (Doctoral) - Departamento de Didáctica de las Ciencias Experimentales y Sociales, Universitat de València, València, 2000.
  • FLEMING, R.W. Adolescent reasoning in socio-scientific issues, part I: social cognition. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, New York, v. 23, n. 8, p. 677-687, 1986a.
  • ______. Adolescent reasoning in socio-scientific issues, part II: non-social cognition. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, New York, v. 23, n. 8, p. 689-698, 1986b.
  • GESS-NEWSOME, J.; LEDERMAN, N. G. Examining pedagogical content knowledge: the construct and its implications for science education. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press, 1999.
  • GROSS, P.; LEVITT, N. Higher superstition: the academic left and its quarrels with science. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press, 1994.
  • HODSON, D. Hacia un enfoque más crítico del trabajo de laboratorio. Enseñanza de las Ciencias, Barcelona, v. 12, n. 3, p. 299-313, 1994.
  • IRWIN, A. R. Historical case studies: teaching the nature of science in context. Science Education, New York, v. 84, n. 1, p. 5-26, 2000.
  • JANIS, I. L. Crucial decision making New York: The Free Press, 1989.
  • KHISHFE, R.; ABD-EL-KHALICK, F. Influence of explicit reflective versus implicit inquiry-oriented instruction on sixth graders' views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, New York, v. 39, n. 7, p. 551-581, 2002.
  • KOLSTØ, S.D. Consensus projects: teaching science for citizenship. International Journal of Science Education, London, v. 22, n. 6, p. 645-664, 2000.
  • ______. Scientific literacy for citizenship: tools for dealing with the science dimension of controversial socioscientific issues. Science Education, New York, v. 85, n. 3, p. 291-310, 2001.
  • KOLSTØ, S. D. et al. Science student' critical assessment of scientific information related to socioscientific controversies. In: ANNUAL MEETING OF THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH IN SCIENCE TEACHING, 2004, Vancouver. Paper Disponível em: http://www.uib.no/people/pprsk/Dankert/Handouts/Handouts Acesso em 7 jul. 2005.
  • KOLSTØ, S. D.; MESTAD, I. Learning about the nature of scientific knowledge: the imitating science project. In: CONFERENCE OF THE EUROPEAN SCIENCE EDUCATION RESEARCH ASSOCIATION (ESERA), 4, 2003, Noordwijkerhout. Research and the Quality of Science Education Disponível em: resumo http://www1.phys.uu.nl/esera2003/program.shtml, texto completo http://www.uib.no/people/pprsk/Dankert/Handouts/Handouts Acesso em 7 jul. 2005.
  • LEDERMAN, N. G. Students' and teachers' conceptions of the nature of science: a review of the research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, New York, v. 29, n. 4, p. 331-359, 1992.
  • ______. Teachers' understanding of the nature of science: factors that facilitate or impede the relationship. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, New York, v. 36, n. 8, p. 916-929, 1999.
  • LEDERMAN, N. G.; MCCOMAS, W. F.; MATTHEWS, M. R. (Ed.). Science & Education, Dordrecht, v. 7, n. 6, p. 507-509, 1998.
  • LEDERMAN, N. G.; ZEIDLER, D. Science teachers' conceptions of the nature of science: do they really influence teaching behavior? Science Education, New York, v. 71, n. 5, p. 721-734, 1987.
  • LEÓN, O. G. Análisis de decisiones. Madrid: McGraw-Hill, 1994.
  • LIN, H. S.; CHEN, C. C. Promoting preservice chemistry teachers' understanding about the nature of science through history. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, New York, v. 39, n. 9, p. 773-792, 2002.
  • MANASSERO, M. A., VÁZQUEZ, A.; ACEVEDO, J. A. Evidences for consensus on the nature of science issues. In: JANIUK, R. M.; SAMONEK-MICIUK, E. (Ed.). Science and technology education for a diverse world: dilemmas, needs and partnerships. Lublin: Marie Curie-Sklodowska University Press, 2004. p. 167-168.
  • MARTÍN-GORDILLO, M. Metáforas y simulaciones: alternativas para la didáctica y la enseñanza de las ciencias. Revista Electrónica de Enseñanza de las Ciencias, v. 2, 2003. Disponível em: http://www.saum.uvigo.es/reec/ Acesso em 7 jul. 2005.
  • MARTÍN-GORDILLO, M.; OSORIO, C. Educar para participar en ciencia y tecnología. Un proyecto para la difusión de la cultura científica. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación, v. 32, p. 165-210, 2003. Disponível em: http://www.campus-oei.org/revista/rie32a08.PDF Acesso em 7 jul. 2005.
  • MARTÍN-GORDILLO, M.; OSORIO, C.; LÓPEZ-CEREZO, J. A. La educación en valores a través de CTS. In: FORO IBEROAMERICANO SOBRE EDUCACIÓN EN VALORES, 2000, Madrid. La educación en valores en Iberoamérica. Madrid: OEI, 2001. p. 119-161. Disponível em: www.campus-oei.org/salactsi/mgordillo.htm Acesso em 7 jul. 2005.
  • MATKINS, J. J. et al. Impacts of contextual and explicit instruction on preservice elementary teachers understandings of the nature of science. In: ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR THE EDUCATION OF TEACHERS IN SCIENCE, 2002, Pensacola. Proceedings Pensacola: AETS, 2002. p. 456-481. Disponível em: http://www.ed.psu.edu/CI/Journals/2002aets/s2_matkins_bell_irving_m.rtf Acesso em 7 jul. 2005.
  • MATTHEWS, M. R. In defense of modest goals when teaching about the nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, New York, v. 35, n. 2, p. 161-174, 1998a.
  • ______. The nature of science and science teaching. In: FRASER, B. J.; TOBIN, K. G. (Ed.). International handbook of science education Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1998b. p. 981-999.
  • MCCOMAS, W. F., CLOUGH, M. P.; ALMAZROA, H. The role and character of the nature of science in science education. In: McCOMAS, W. F. (Ed.). The nature of science in science education: rationales and strategies. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1998. p. 3-39.
  • McCOMAS, W. F.; OLSON, J. K. The nature of science in international science education standards documents. In: McCOMAS, W. F. (Ed.). The nature of science in science education: rationales and strategies. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1998. p. 41-52.
  • MELLADO, V. Concepciones y prácticas de aula de profesores de ciencias, en formación inicial de primaria y secundaria. Enseñanza de las Ciencias, Barcelona, v. 14, n. 3, p. 289-302, 1997.
  • MELLADO, V. Preservice teachers' classroom practice and their conceptions of the nature of science. Science & Education, Dordrecht, v. 6, n. 4, p. 331-354, 1997.
  • MELLADO, V. Preservice teachers' classroom practice and their conceptions of the nature of science. In: FRASER, B. J.; TOBIN, K. G. (Ed.). International handbook of science education Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1998. p. 1093-1110.
  • ______. The classroom practice of preservice teachers and their conceptions of teaching and learning science. Science Education, New York, v. 82, n. 2, p. 197-214, 1998.
  • NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL. National science education standards Washington: National Academic Press, 1996.
  • OSBORNE, J. et al. What 'ideas-about-science' should be taught in school science?: a Delphi study of the expert community. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, New York, v. 40, n. 7, p. 692-720, 2003.
  • ______. What should we teach about science: a Delphi study, evidence-based practice in science education (EPSE) report, school of education. London: King's College, 2001. Disponível em: http://www.york.ac.uk/depts/educ/projs/DelphiReport Acesso em 7 jul. 2005.
  • PEDRETTI, E. Decision making and STS education: exploring scientific knowledge and social responsibility in schools and science centers through an issues-based approach. School Science and Mathematics, Menasha, v. 99, p. 174-181, 1999.
  • REID, D. J.; HODSON, D. Ciencia para todos en secundaria Traducção de M. J. Martín-Díaz e L. A. García-Lucía. Madrid: Narcea, 1993.
  • RUDOLPH, J. L. Portraying epistemology: school science in historical context. Science Education, New York, v. 87, n. 1, p. 64-79, 2003.
  • SADLER, T. D. Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: the influence of morality and content knowledge. 2003. Tesis (Doctoral) - University of South Florida, Tampa, 2003.
  • SADLER, T. D.; CHAMBERS, W. F.; ZEIDLER, D. Student conceptualizations of the nature of science in response to a socioscientific issue. International Journal of Science Education, London, v. 26, n. 4, p. 387-409, 2004.
  • SADLER, T. D.; ZEIDLER, D. The morality of socioscientific issues: construal and resolution of genetic engineering dilemmas. Science Education, New York, v. 88, n. 1, p. 4-27, 2004.
  • SCHWARTZ, R. S.; LEDERMAN, N. G. "It's the nature of the beast": the influence of knowledge and intentions on learning and teaching nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, New York, v. 39, n. 3, p. 205-236, 2002.
  • SCHWARTZ, R. et al. Explicit/reflective instructional attention to nature of science and scientific inquiry: impact on student learning. In: ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR THE EDUCATION OF TEACHERS IN SCIENCE, 2002, Pensacola. Proceedings Pensacola: AETS, 2002. p. 646-667. Disponível em: http://www.ed.psu.edu/CI/Journals/2002aets/f5_schwartz_lederman_k.rtf Acesso em 7 jul. 2005.
  • SHULMAN, L. Those who understand: knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, Washington, v. 15, n. 2, p. 4-14, 1986.
  • SHULMAN, L. Knowledge and teaching: foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, Cambridge, v. 57, p. 1-22, 1987.
  • SMITH, M. U. et al. How great is the disagreement about the nature of science?: a response to alters. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, New York, v. 34, n. 10, p. 1101-1104, 1997.
  • SOKAL, A.; BRICMONT, J. Intellectual impostures: postmodern philosophers' abuse of science. London: Profile, 1998.
  • ______. Imposturas intelectuales. Traducção de J.C. Guix Vilaplana. Barcelona: Paidós, 1999.
  • SPECTOR, B.; STRONG, P.; LAPORTA, T. Teaching the nature of science as an element of science, technology and society. In: McCOMAS, W. F. (Ed). The nature of science in science education: rationales and strategies. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1998. p. 267-276.
  • TSAI, C. C. Nested epistemologies: science teachers' beliefs of teaching, learning and science. International Journal of Science Education, London, v. 24, n. 8, p. 771-783, 2002.
  • VÁZQUEZ, A.; ACEVEDO, J. A.; MANASSERO, M. A. Consensos sobre la naturaleza de la ciencia: evidencias e implicaciones para su enseñanza. In: Revista Iberoamericana de Educación, Madrid, 2004. Disponible em: http://www.campus-oei.org/revista/deloslectores/702Vazquez.PDF Acesso em 7 jul. 2005.
  • VÁZQUEZ, A. et al. Cuatro paradigmas básicos sobre la naturaleza de la ciencia. Argumentos de Razón Técnica, Sevilla, v. 4, p. 135-176, 2001. Disponible em: http://www.campus-oei.org/salactsi/acevedo20.htm Acesso em 7 jul. 2005.
  • ______. Hacia un consenso sobre la naturaleza de la ciencia en la enseñanza de las ciencias. In: MARTINS, I. P.; PAIXÃO, F.; VIEIRA, R. (Org.). Perspectivas ciência-tecnologia-sociedade na inovação da educação em ciência. Aveiro: Universidade de Aveiro, 2004. p. 129-132.
  • WAKS, L. J. Las relaciones escuela-comunidad y su influencia en la educación en valores en CTS. In: ALONSO, A.; AYESTARÁN, I.; URSÚA, N. (Ed.). Para comprender ciencia, tecnología y sociedad. Estella: EVD, 1996. p. 35-47.
  • WOLPERT, L. The Unnatural Nature of Science. London: Faber & Faber, 1992.
  • ______. La naturaleza no natural de la ciencia. Madrid: Acento Editorial, 1994.
  • ZEIDLER, D. L.; SADLER, T. D.; SIMMONS, M. L. Morality and socioscientific issues in science education: current research and practice. In: CONFERENCE OF THE EUROPEAN SCIENCE EDUCATION RESEARCH ASSOCIATION (ESERA), 4, 2003. Noordwijkrhout. Research and the quality of science education Disponível em: http://www1.phys.uu.nl/esera2003/program.shtml Acesso em 7 jul. 2005.
  • ZEIDLER, D. L.; SCHAFER, L. E. Identifying meditating factors of moral reasoning in science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, New York, v. 21, n. 1, p. 1-15, 1984.
  • ZEIDLER, D. L. et al. Tangled up in views: beliefs in the nature of science and responses to socioscientific dilemmas. Science Education, New York, v. 86, n. 3, p. 343-367, 2002.
  • ZOLLER, U. Critical and system thinking, problem solving and decision making in STES (Science-Technology-Environment-Society) education. In: GROSS, M. G. et al. (Ed.). Working together to educate about the environment Troy: NAEE/CEA, 1989. p. 371-377.

Datas de Publicação

  • Publicação nesta coleção
    23 Jun 2009
  • Data do Fascículo
    Abr 2005
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Educação para a Ciência, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Ciências, campus de Bauru. Av. Engenheiro Luiz Edmundo Carrijo Coube, 14-01, Campus Universitário - Vargem Limpa CEP 17033-360 Bauru - SP/ Brasil , Tel./Fax: (55 14) 3103 6177 - Bauru - SP - Brazil
E-mail: revista@fc.unesp.br