Acessibilidade / Reportar erro
This erratum corrects:

Erratum

In the paper “Homogeneous zones of vegetation index for characterizing variability and site-specific management in vineyards”, with DOI number: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-992X-2019-0243, published in the journal Scientia Agricola v.78, n.4, e20190243, 2021, on page 7:

The correct unit of net photosynthesis (A) is μmol CO2 m-2 s-1, instead of μmol H2O m-2 s-1

Where it shows:

Table 4 Mean values (± standard error of the mean) and results of analysis of variance of the transpiration rate (E), stomatal conductance (gs), and net photosynthesis (A) of ‘Chardonnay’ vines of each zone of normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) of the 2018 growing season in areas 1 and 2 of the vineyard.
NDVI Zone E g s A
––––––––––––––––––––––––mol H2O m−2 S−1––––––––––––––––––––––– μmol H2O m−2 S-1
Area 1 - 105 dap - 10h00
High 0.009 ± 3.8 × 10−4 0.44 ± 0.02 22.0 ± 0.5
Low 0.008 ± 1.8 × 10−4 0.40 ± 0.01 20.5 ± 0.8
p 0.056ǂ ǂ and * significant difference at the 10 % and 5 % levels, respectively, as determined by the F test. 0.116 0.115
Area 1 - 105 dap - 13h00
High 0.009 ± 3.0 × 10−4 0.39 ± 0.02 20.6 ± 0.5
Low 0.009 ± 5.1 × 10−4 0.36 ± 0.03 18.6 ± 0.6
p 0.455 0.419 0.039* ǂ and * significant difference at the 10 % and 5 % levels, respectively, as determined by the F test.
Area 1 - 126 dap - 10h00
High 0.007 ± 2.4 × 10−4 0.42 ± 0.02 20.6 ± 0.5
Low 0.006 ± 3.5 × 10−4 0.33 ± 0.03 17.6 ± 0.8
p 0.039* ǂ and * significant difference at the 10 % and 5 % levels, respectively, as determined by the F test. 0.033* ǂ and * significant difference at the 10 % and 5 % levels, respectively, as determined by the F test. 0.017* ǂ and * significant difference at the 10 % and 5 % levels, respectively, as determined by the F test.
Area 1 - 126 dap - 13h00
High 0.008 ± 4.7 × 10−4 0.36 ± 0.03 19.5 ± 0.4
Low 0.007 ± 2.9 × 10−4 0.32 ± 0.02 17.8 ± 0.5
p 0.180 0.246 0.026* ǂ and * significant difference at the 10 % and 5 % levels, respectively, as determined by the F test.
Area 2 - 105 dap - 10h00
High 0.009 ± 4.4 × 10−4 0.38 ± 0.02 20.9 ± 0.7
Low 0.009 ± 4.9 × 10−4 0.38 ± 0.02 20.7 ± 0.6
p 0.921 0.830 0.852
Area 2 - 105 dap - 13h00
High 0.010 ± 4.4 × 10−4 0.36 ± 0.02 20.4 ± 0.7
Low 0.010 ± 6.5 × 10−4 0.35 ± 0.03 20.5 ± 0.6
p 0.979 0.864 0.925
Area 2 - 126 dap - 10h00
High 0.007 ± 4.2 × 10−4 0.37 ± 0.03 20.5 ± 0.4
Low 0.007 ± 1.1 × 10−4 0.37 ± 0.01 20.7 ± 0.5
p 0.693 0.964 0.794
Area 2 - 126 dap - 13h00
High 0.009 ± 3.6 × 10−4 0.36 ± 0.02 18.9 ± 0.3
Low 0.008 ± 4.1 × 10−4 0.32 ± 0.02 18.9 ± 0.6
p 0.197 0.262 0.914
  • ǂ and *

    significant difference at the 10 % and 5 % levels, respectively, as determined by the F test.
  • It should be:

    Table 4 Mean values (± standard error of the mean) and results of analysis of variance of the transpiration rate (E), stomatal conductance (gs), and net photosynthesis (A) of ‘Chardonnay’ vines of each zone of normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) of the 2018 growing season in areas 1 and 2 of the vineyard.
    NDVI Zone E g s A
    ––––––––––––––––––––––––mol H2O m−2 S−1––––––––––––––––––––––– μmol CO2 m−2 S−1
    Area 1 - 105 dap - 10h00
    High 0.009 ± 3.8 × 10−4 0.44 ± 0.02 22.0 ± 0.5
    Low 0.008 ± 1.8 × 10−4 0.40 ± 0.01 20.5 ± 0.8
    p 0.056ǂ ǂ and * significant difference at the 10 % and 5 % levels, respectively, as determined by the F test. 0.116 0.115
    Area 1 - 105 dap - 13h00
    High 0.009 ± 3.0 × 10−4 0.39 ± 0.02 20.6 ± 0.5
    Low 0.009 ± 5.1 × 10−4 0.36 ± 0.03 18.6 ± 0.6
    p 0.455 0.419 0.039* ǂ and * significant difference at the 10 % and 5 % levels, respectively, as determined by the F test.
    Area 1 - 126 dap - 10h00
    High 0.007 ± 2.4 × 10−4 0.42 ± 0.02 20.6 ± 0.5
    Low 0.006 ± 3.5 × 10−4 0.33 ± 0.03 17.6 ± 0.8
    p 0.039* ǂ and * significant difference at the 10 % and 5 % levels, respectively, as determined by the F test. 0.033* ǂ and * significant difference at the 10 % and 5 % levels, respectively, as determined by the F test. 0.017* ǂ and * significant difference at the 10 % and 5 % levels, respectively, as determined by the F test.
    Area 1 - 126 dap - 13h00
    High 0.008 ± 4.7 × 10−4 0.36 ± 0.03 19.5 ± 0.4
    Low 0.007 ± 2.9 × 10−4 0.32 ± 0.02 17.8 ± 0.5
    p 0.180 0.246 0.026* ǂ and * significant difference at the 10 % and 5 % levels, respectively, as determined by the F test.
    Area 2 - 105 dap - 10h00
    High 0.009 ± 4.4 × 10−4 0.38 ± 0.02 20.9 ± 0.7
    Low 0.009 ± 4.9 × 10−4 0.38 ± 0.02 20.7 ± 0.6
    p 0.921 0.830 0.852
    Area 2 - 105 dap - 13h00
    High 0.010 ± 4.4 × 10−4 0.36 ± 0.02 20.4 ± 0.7
    Low 0.010 ± 6.5 × 10−4 0.35 ± 0.03 20.5 ± 0.6
    p 0.979 0.864 0.925
    Area 2 - 126 dap - 10h00
    High 0.007 ± 4.2 × 10−4 0.37 ± 0.03 20.5 ± 0.4
    Low 0.007 ± 1.1 × 10−4 0.37 ± 0.01 20.7 ± 0.5
    p 0.693 0.964 0.794
    Area 2 - 126 dap - 13h00
    High 0.009 ± 3.6 × 10−4 0.36 ± 0.02 18.9 ± 0.3
    Low 0.008 ± 4.1 × 10−4 0.32 ± 0.02 18.9 ± 0.6
    p 0.197 0.262 0.914
  • ǂ and *

    significant difference at the 10 % and 5 % levels, respectively, as determined by the F test.
  • Publication Dates

    • Publication in this collection
      24 Aug 2020
    • Date of issue
      2021
    Escola Superior de Agricultura "Luiz de Queiroz" USP/ESALQ - Scientia Agricola, Av. Pádua Dias, 11, 13418-900 Piracicaba SP Brazil, Phone: +55 19 3429-4401 / 3429-4486 - Piracicaba - SP - Brazil
    E-mail: scientia@usp.br