EFFECT OF COPAIBA OIL IN INTESTINAL MUCOSA OF RATS SUBMITTED TO HYPOVOLEMIC SHOCK

ABSTRACT

Background:

Hypovolemic shock is a common disease in polytrauma patients and may develop ischemia in various organs, increasing morbidity and mortality. The bowel is usually most affected by this condition.

Aim:

To evaluate the effects of copaiba oil on the intestinal mucosa’s injury of rats submitted to hypovolemic shock.

Method:

Fifteen rats were divided into three groups: sham - simulated surgery; ischemia - animals submitted to hypovolemic shock; and copaiba - animals submitted to hypovolemic shock previously treated with copaiba oil. Mean blood pressure, arterial blood gas after shock induction, degree of intestinal lesion and villus length were evaluated.

Results:

The sham presented the lowest values of lactate and PaCO₂ and the highest values of mean arterial pressure, pH and bicarbonate in relation to the other groups. The degree of mesenteric lesion was zero in the sham group; 3.00±1.00 in the ischemia group; and 3.00±0.71 in the copaiba group. The villus length was 173.60±8.42 in the sham, 142.77±8.33 in the ischemia and 143.01±9.57 in the copaiba group. There was a significant difference between the sham and the other groups (p<0.05); however, there not significant difference between groups Ischemia and copaiba.

Conclusion:

Administration of copaiba oil did not reduce the intestinal mucosa lesion of rats after hypovolemic shock.

HEADINGS:
Mesenteric vascular disease; Small intestine; Medicinal plants; Rats

RESUMO

Racional:

O choque hipovolêmico é situação comum em pacientes politraumatizados, podendo acarretar isquemia de vários órgãos, aumentando a morbimortalidade. O intestino é geralmente um dos órgãos mais afetados por essa condição.

Objetivo:

Avaliar os efeitos do óleo de copaíba na lesão da mucosa intestinal de ratos submetidos ao choque hipovolêmico.

Métodos:

Quinze ratos foram distribuídos em três grupos: Sham - operação simulada; isquemia - submissão ao choque hipovolêmico; e copaíba - submissão ao choque hipovolêmico previamente tratados com óleo de copaíba. A pressão arterial média, a gasometria arterial após a indução do choque, o grau da lesão intestinal e o tamanho das vilosidades foram avaliados.

Resultados:

O grupo sham apresentou os menores valores de lactato e PaCO₂ e os maiores valores de pressão arterial média, pH e bicarbonato em relação aos demais grupos. O grau de lesão mesentérica foi de zero no sham; 3,0±1,00 no grupo isquemia; e 3,0±0,71 no da copaíba. O comprimento dos vilos foi de 173,60±8,42 no grupo sham, 142,77±8,33 no da isquemia e 143,01±9,57 no da copaíba. Houve diferença significante entre o grupo sham e os demais grupos (p<0.05); contudo, não houve diferença estatística entre os grupos submetidos ao choque hipovolêmico.

Conclusão:

A administração do óleo de copaíba não reduziu a lesão da mucosa intestinal de ratos submetidos ao choque hipovolêmico.

DESCRITORES:
Doença vascular intestinal; Intestino delgado; Plantas medicinais; Ratos

INTRODUCTION

Trauma is one of the leading causes of death in the world, especially in young adults¹². Several are the mechanisms that lead to severe organ dysfunctions¹⁶, and hypovolemic shock is one of the most common. It causes ischemia of several organs, especially kidneys and splanchnic territory^3,15.

The bowel is sensitive to ischemia because of its high metabolic activity¹⁹; resulting in worsening of wound healing after anastomoses^5.7, increased fistulas tax, and difficulty in adequate nutrients’ absorption, causing malnutrition, anemia and diarrhea. It is one of the main sources of bacteria causing sepsis, which happens with the breakdown of the intestinal barrier allowing wide bacterial translocation¹⁷.

Several alternatives were evaluated aiming to reduce ischemic injury in the intestinal mucosa. For this, hypertonic saline solutions¹³ and hydrocortisone²³ were used during volume resuscitation; medications such as pentoxifylline¹⁸ and N-acetyl-cysteine¹; probiotics²²; and enteral nutritional therapy¹⁴. However, these methods had dubious or unhelpful effects.

Copaiba oil originates from the sap of copaifera trees (family Fabaceae) and presents proven actions^6,24,25 as anti-inflammatory, healing and antioxidant. This oil was tested on colitis induced²⁰ by acetic acid in rats and had a positive anti-inflammatory effect. In addition, in a study evaluating the effects of it on abdominal sepsis by cecal ligation and puncture¹⁷, there was an increase in overall survival with a lower degree of lung injury and lower levels of oxidative stress.

Thus, this study aims to evaluated the effects of copaiba oil on the intestinal mucosa of rats submitted to hypovolemic shock.

METHODS

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee for the Use of Animals of the State University of Pará - UEPA, protocol 11/11. Fifteen male Wistar rats (Rattus norvegicus) obtained from the Animal Colony of the Experimental Surgery Laboratory of UEPA were used. They weighed 200-250 g and were kept in a controlled environment with food and water ad libitum.

The animals were randomly assigned into three study groups (n=5): 1) sham group (SG): same surgical procedure as in remaining groups was performed, but no hypovolemic shock was induced; 2) ischemic group (CG): animals submitted to hypovolemic shock; 3) copaiba group (CG): animals submitted to hypovolemic shock previously treated with copaiba oil.

The CG animals received copaiba oil (Copaifera officinalis) by gavage at the dose of 0.63 ml/kg once daily for seven days²⁷ prior to the induction of hypovolemic shock. The spectrophotometric analysis of the oil is described in Table 1. The SG and IG animals received 0.9% saline in the same proportions as copaiba oil.

TABLE 1
Composition of copaiba (Copaifera officinalis) oil used

Constituents	%
Limonene	0,24
α-copaene	0,10
7-epi-sesquithujene	0,25
cyperene	0,42
cis-α-bergamotene	0,15
β-caryophyllene	10,00
trans-α-bergamotene	18,32
epi-β-santalene	0,05
α-humulene	3,02
γ-curcumene	0,24
mw=204	2,01
α-zingiberene	0,21
β-bisabolene	52,03
(Z)-α-bisabolene	2,90
β-sesquiphelandrene	2,31
mw=204	3,98
(E)-γ-bisabolene	0,20
caryophyllene alcohol	0,05
caryophyllene oxide	0,33
β-atlantol	0,12
epi-β-bisabolol	0,21
epi-α-bisabolol	0,53

All surgical procedures were performed under anesthesia (ketamine - 70 mg/kg and xylazine - 10 mg/kg, intraperitoneally). Once the anesthetic plane was confirmed, a median cervicotomy and dissection of the right region were performed until identification and isolation of the right common carotid artery under magnification of videomicrosurgery system². The artery catheterization was performed with a 24º G jelco, previously heparinized; then 30% of the volume of the animal was drained (based on the formula: “total volume (ml)=animal weight (grams) x0.06”)²⁶ using a glass syringe lasting 10 min, thus inducing hypovolemic shock. After the collection of blood, the heparinized jelco was kept for a new blood collector.

The animals were kept in a warm environment at 36º C and resuscitated volumetrically with 0.9% saline at a dose of 10 ml/kg subcutaneously. Fifty minutes after the shock induction, the mean arterial pressure was measured and 0.1 ml of blood was collected for arterial blood gas analysis²³ through the fixed jelco in the right common carotid artery. After collection, was performed the ligation of in both artery stumps with 4-0 silk, and the skin was sutured with 5-0 nylon.

After this procedure, the animals were followed for 72 h. At the end of this period, euthanasia was performed by intraperitoneal injection of high dose xylazine. Immediately after, a 2 cm ileum sample distant 3 cm from the cecum valve was harvested. This fragment was fixed in 10% buffered formaldehyde, and underwent histological processing; the slides were stained with hematoxylin-eosin and examined under light microscopy to determine the degree of injury based on the scale of Chiu et al⁷ and villous length measurements were done by measuring ten well-oriented villous⁵ (cut across its length) in each of the animals.

Statistical analysis

BioEstat^® software 5.4 (Belém, PA, Brazil) was used to perform statistical analysis. ANOVA test was used to compare villous length and gasometrical parameters; Kruskal-Wallis test, to compare the histopathological results. A value of p<0.05 was used for significance of the comparisons between the three groups.

RESULTS

During the procedure and follow-up no animal died or resuscitation maneuvers were performed. The mean of arterial pressure was 75.00±1.20 mmHg on SG, 42.20±2.68 mmHg on IG and 42.60±1.67 mmHg on CG. There was a significant difference between SG than IG and CG (p<0.01).

In relation to the gasometric analysis (Table 2), the SG presented the lowest values of lactate and PaCO₂ and the highest values of pH and bicarbonate in relation to the IG and CG groups (p<0.05). There was no significant difference between the IG and CG groups.

TABLE 2
Mean and standard deviation of gasometric parameters according the groups

Parameter	Sham*	Ischemia	Copaiba
pH	7.39±0.02	7.08±0.06	7.11±0.04
PaCO2	54.00±3.80	65.20±3.70	63.60±4.77
HCO3	25.80±1.48	16.40±3.57	16.20±2.28
Lactate	1.42±0.44	7.20±1.64	7.60±0.54

• p<0,05 sham vs. other groups (ANOVA)

The mean score of intestinal injury is demonstrated on Table 3. Sham group showed a normal mucosa, and there was significant difference between this group to all others who underwent hypovolemic shock; among the Ischemic and copaiba groups there was no significant difference (p>0.05). In relation to the villous length (Table 3), there was difference between the sham group and the others groups (p<0.05); however, there was no difference between the ischemic and copaiba groups (p>0.05).

TABLE 3
Mean and standard deviation of intestinal injury score and villous length according the groups

Parameter	Sham	Ischemia	Copaiba
Intestinal injury	0.00±0.00*	3.00±1.00	3.00±0.71
Villous length	173.60±8.42**	142.77±8.33	143.01±9.57

• * p<0,05 sham vs. other groups (ANOVA); **p<0,05 sham vs. other groups (Kruskal-Wallis)

DISCUSSION

The use of medicinal plants is a practice that has been stimulated by the World Health Organization and the current guidelines of the Unified Health System, given the difficulty of the population in the acquisition of medicines; however, there is the possibility of recognition of new active principles that can be added to the current therapeutic arsenal. However, there are few scientific reports that support the use of most medicinal plants, and little is known about their possible side effects^{6,20,24,25,27}.

Copaiba oil has several proven scientific effects such as healing, antibiotic, anti-inflammatory and antioxidant ^{6,17,20,24,25,27}. The ischemia and reperfusion syndrome were tested in vascular occlusion in experimental models in renal⁴, hepatic⁹, skin¹⁰ and mesenteric ischemia²¹, and in all scenarios presented lower cellular damage, mainly due to the high levels of β-caryophyllene.

In the present study, based on the evaluated parameters, the copaiba oil had no beneficial effect, since it had similar results in the groups where it was used. Seven-day prophylaxis using it has shown in several earlier studies better healing^{6,20,24,25,27} and protection against ischemic injuries^4,9,10,21; however, none evaluated the action of the oil in a hypovolemic shock model.

The mean arterial pressure in both groups submitted to hypovolemia was the same, as initially predicted, due to the low influence of treatment on the general volemia of the animal. However, there was no change in the gasometric profile and intestinal histological lesion, in contrast to that found in most studies evaluating copaiba oil in ischemia and reperfusion of specific organs. Comelli Junior⁸ also did not identify alteration in the healing of intestinal anastomoses in rats treated with copaiba oil.

The high degree of systemic inflammation caused by hypovolemic shock must have been one of the factors that influenced the result, reducing to almost imperceptible levels the improvement caused by copaiba oil. The use of high doses (200-400 mg/kg)¹¹ might have better effects.

It is important to note that the negative result of this research does not indicate a failure. The acquisition of knowledge with null results helps other researchers not to repeat the same method, and the publication of these results is valid because it saves time and funding, and also causes modifications that can lead to positive results with another study design.

CONCLUSION

Administration of copaiba oil did not reduce the intestinal mucosa lesion of rats after hypovolemic shock.

REFERENCES

• ¹
  Azeredo MA, Azeredo LA, Eleutherio EC, Schanaider A. Propofol and N-acetylcysteine attenuate oxidative stress induced by intestinal ischemia/reperfusion in rats: protein carbonyl detection by immunoblotting. Acta Cir Bras. 2008; 23(5): 425-8. Doi: 10.1590/S0102-86502008000500006.
  » https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-86502008000500006
• ²
  Barros RSM, Brito MV, Leal RA, Teixeira RK, Sabbá MF, Yamaki VN, Lemos MV. A Low-Cost High-Definition Video System for Microsurgical Hindlimb Replantation in Rats. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2017 Mar; 33(3): 158-62. Doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1593767.
  » https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1593767
• ³
  Bordoni PHC, Santos DMMD, Teixeira JS, Bordoni LS. Deaths from abdominal trauma: analysis of 1888 forensic autopsies. Rev Col Bras Cir. 2017 Nov; 44(6): 582-95. Doi: 10.1590/0100-69912017006006.
  » https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-69912017006006
• ⁴
  Brito MVH, Moreira RJ, Tavares MLC, Carballo MCS, Carneiro TX, dos Santos AAS. Copaiba oil effect on urea and creatinine serum levels in rats submitted to kidneyischemia and reperfusion syndrome. Acta Cir. Bras. 2005 May; 20(3): 243-6. PMID: 16033184.
• ⁵
  Brito MVH, Yasojima EY, Machado AA, Silveira MPPR, Teixeira RKC, Yamaki VN, Costa FLS. Different protocols of postconditioning does not attenuate mesenteric ischemia-reperfusion injury after short-term reperfusion. Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2017 Jan; 30(1): 27-9 DO: 10.1590/0102-6720201700010008.
  » https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-6720201700010008
• ⁶
  Castro Ghizoni CV, Arssufi Ames AP, Lameira OA, Bersani Amado CA, Sá Nakanishi AB, Bracht L, Marçal Natali MR, Peralta RM, Bracht A, Comar JF. Anti-Inflammatory and Antioxidant Actions of Copaiba Oil Are Related to Liver Cell Modifications in Arthritic Rats. J Cell Biochem. 2017 Oct;118(10):3409-3423. Doi: 10.1002/jcb.25998.
  » https://doi.org/10.1002/jcb.25998
• ⁷
  Chiu CT, Scott HJ, Gurd FN. Intestinal mucosal lesion in low-flow states: II. The protective effect of intraluminal glucose as energy substrate. Arch Surg 1970; 101:484-8.
• ⁸
  Comelli Júnior E, Skinovski J, Sigwalt MF, Branco AB, Luz SR, Baulé Cde P. Rupture point analysis of intestinal anastomotic healing in rats under the action of pure Copaíba (Copaifera Iangsdorfii) oil. Acta Cir Bras. 2010 Aug;25(4):362-7. PMID: 20676496
• ⁹
  de Araújo Júnior FA, Braz MN, da Rocha Neto OG, Costa FD, Brito MV. Copaiba oil effect on aminotransferases of rats with hepatic ischemia and reperfusion with and without ischemic preconditioning. Acta Cir Bras. 2005 Jan; 20(1): 93-9. PMID: 15810470.
• ¹⁰
  de Lima Silva JJ, Guimarães SB, da Silveira ER, de Vasconcelos PR, Lima GG, Torres SM, de Vasconcelos RC. Effects of Copaifera langsdorffii Desf. on ischemia-reperfusion of randomized skin flaps in rats. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2009 Jan; 33(1): 104-9. Doi: 10.1007/s00266-008-9263-2.
  » https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-008-9263-2
• ¹¹
  Furtado RA, Bernardes CT, da Silva MN, Zoccal KF, Faccioli LH, Bastos JK. Antiedematogenic Evaluation of Copaifera langsdorffii Leaves Hydroethanolic Extract and Its Major Compounds. Biomed Res Int. 2015; 2015: 913152. DOI: 10.1155/2015/913152
  » https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/913152
• ¹²
  GBD 2017 Causes of Death Collaborators. Global, regional, and national age-sex-specific mortality for 282 causes of death in 195 countries and territories, 1980-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. 2018 Nov; 392(10159): 1736-88. Doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32203-7.
  » https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32203-7.
• ¹³
  Gonzalez EA, Kozar RA, Suliburk JW, Weisbrodt NW, Mercer DW, Moore FA. Conventional dose hypertonic saline provides optimal gut protection and limits remote organ injury after gut ischemia reperfusion. J Trauma. 2006 Jul; 61(1): 66-73. Doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000224190.65542.e2.
  » https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ta.0000224190.65542.e2
• ¹⁴
  Grossie VB Jr, Weisbrodt NW, Moore FA, Moody F. Ischemia/reperfusion-induced disruption of rat small intestine transit is reversed by total enteral nutrition. Nutrition. 2001 Nov;17(11):939-43. PMID: 11744345
• ¹⁵
  Haines RW, Lin SP, Hewson R, Kirwan CJ, Torrance HD, O'Dwyer MJ, West A, Brohi K, Pearse RM, Zolfaghari P, Prowle JR. Acute Kidney Injury in Trauma Patients Admitted to Critical Care: Development and Validation of a Diagnostic Prediction Model. Sci Rep. 2018 Feb; 8(1): 3665. Doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-21929-2.
  » https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-21929-2
• ¹⁶
  Ke J, Wu W, Lin N, Yang W, Cai Z, Wu W, Chen D, Wang Y. A novel method for multiple bowel injuries: a pilot canine experiment. World J Emerg Surg. 2017 Sep;12: 44. Doi: 10.1186/s13017-017-0155-0.
  » https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-017-0155-0
• ¹⁷
  Lopes LN, Santos FA, Oliveira LC, Percário S, Barros CA, Brito MV. Copaiba oil effect on induced fecal peritonitis in rats. Acta Cir Bras. 2015 Aug; 30(8): 568-73. Doi: 10.1590/S0102-865020150080000008.
  » https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-865020150080000008
• ¹⁸
  Marques GMN, Rasslan R, Belon AR, Carvalho JG, Felice Neto R, Rasslan S, Utiyama EM, Monteiro EFS. Pentoxifylline associated to hypertonic saline solution attenuates inflammatory process and apoptosis after intestinal ischemia/reperfusion in rats. Acta Cir. Bras. 2014 Nov; 29(11): 735-41. Doi: 10.1590/S0102-86502014001800007.
  » https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-86502014001800007
• ¹⁹
  Okada M, Falcão LFR, Ferez D, Martins JL, Errante PR, Rodrigues FSM, Caricati-Neto A, Marinho M, Fenelon G, Oliveira-Júnior IS. Effect of atenolol pre-treatment in heart damage in a model of intestinal ischemia-reperfusion. Acta Cir Bras. 2017 Nov; 32(11): 964-72. Doi: 10.1590/s0102-865020170110000008.
  » https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-865020170110000008
• ²⁰
  Paiva LA, Gurgel LA, Campos AR, Silveira ER, Rao VS. Attenuation of ischemia/reperfusion-induced intestinal injury by oleo-resin from Copaifera langsdorffii in rats. Life Sci. 2004 Sep; 75(16): 1979-87. Doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2004.05.011
  » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lfs.2004.05.011
• ²¹
  Paiva LA, Gurgel LA, De Sousa ET, Silveira ER, Silva RM, Santos FA, Rao VS. Protective effect of Copaifera langsdorffii oleo-resin against acetic acid-induced colitis in rats. J Ethnopharmacol. 2004 Jul;93(1):51-6. Doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2004.03.028.
  » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2004.03.028
• ²²
  Salim SY, Young PY, Lukowski CM, Madsen KL, Sis B, Churchill TA, Khadaroo RG. VSL#3 probiotics provide protection against acute intestinal ischaemia/reperfusion injury. Benef Microbes. 2013 Dec; 4(4): 357-65. Doi: 10.3920/BM2013.0026.
  » https://doi.org/10.3920/BM2013.0026
• ²³
  Tavares MLC, Monteiro AM, Feijó DH, Mainardi CR, Ribeiro Junior RFG, Dias DV, Brito MVH. Hydrocortisone in low doses has a protective effect on hemorrhagic shock in rats. PRMJ. 2017 Jan; 1(1): e08. Doi: 10.4322/prmj.2017.008.
  » https://doi.org/10.4322/prmj.2017.008
• ²⁴
  Teixeira FB, de Brito Silva R, Lameira OA, Webber LP, D'Almeida Couto RS, Martins MD, Lima RR. Copaiba oil-resin (Copaifera reticulata Ducke) modulates the inflammation in a model of injury to rats' tongues. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2017 Jun; 17(1): 313. Doi: 10.1186/s12906-017-1820-2.
  » https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-017-1820-2
• ²⁵
  Wagner VP, Webber LP, Ortiz L, Rados PV, Meurer L, Lameira OA, Lima RR, Martins MD. Effects of Copaiba Oil Topical Administration on Oral Wound Healing. Phytother Res. 2017 Aug;31(8):1283-1288. DOI: 10.1002/ptr.5845.
  » https://doi.org/10.1002/ptr.5845
• ²⁶
  Yale CE, Torhorst JB. Critical bleeding and plasma volumes of the adult germfree rat. Lab Anim Science 1972; 22:497-502.
• ²⁷
  Yasojima EY, Teixeira RKC, Houat AP, Costa FLS, Silveira EL, Brito MHV, Lopes Filho GJ. Effect of copaiba oil on correction of abdominal wall defect treated with the use of polypropylene/polyglecaprone mesh. Acta Cir. Bras. 2013 Feb; 28(2): 131-5. Doi: 10.1590/S0102-86502013000200008.
  » https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-86502013000200008

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  21 Oct 2019
• Date of issue
  2019

History

• Received
  07 Feb 2019
• Accepted
  16 May 2019