BMP-2 and titanium particles synergistically activate osteoclast formation

Abstract

A previous study showed that BMP-2 (bone morphogenetic protein-2) and wear debris can separately support osteoclast formation induced by the receptor activator of NF-κB ligand (RANKL). However, the effect of BMP-2 on wear debris-induced osteoclast formation is unclear. In this study, we show that neither titanium particles nor BMP-2 can induce osteoclast formation in RAW 264.7 mouse leukemic monocyte macrophage cells but that BMP-2 synergizes with titanium particles to enhance osteoclast formation in the presence of RANKL, and that at a low concentration, BMP-2 has an optimal effect to stimulate the size and number of multinuclear osteoclasts, expression of osteoclast genes, and resorption area. Our data also clarify that the effects caused by the increase in BMP-2 on phosphorylated SMAD levels such as c-Fos expression increased throughout the early stages of osteoclastogenesis. BMP-2 and titanium particles stimulate the expression of p-JNK, p-P38, p-IkB, and P50 compared with the titanium group. These data suggested that BMP-2 may be a crucial factor in titanium particle-mediated osteoclast formation.

Bone morphogenetic protein; Titanium; Osteoclasts; SMAD; RANKL

Introduction

The biological response to wear particles at the bone-implant interface is considered the main cause of aseptic loosening and osteolysis (¹,²) by increasing osteoclastogenesis and bone resorption (³,⁴). Macrophages phagocytize particles and secrete proinflammatory factors such as tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), which are thought to mediate the differentiation of osteoclast precursor cells and play a fundamental role in this pathologic response (⁵,⁶). A recent study showed that bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2), a member of the superfamily of transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β) ligands, could also affect osteoclastogenesis (⁷,⁸). It seems to have a double effect on osteoclast formation. In the presence of osteoblasts, BMPs can indirectly suppress osteoclastogenesis by decreasing the receptor activator of NF-κB ligand (RANKL) released by osteoblasts (⁹,¹⁰). In the absence of osteoblasts, BMP-2 appears to directly increase osteoclast formation and survival (¹¹-¹³).

However, neither wear particles nor BMP-2 alone can induce osteoclast recruitment without RANKL, which is essential for osteoclastogenesis (¹⁴,¹⁵). RANKL is a member of the TNF superfamily and is expressed on the surface of osteoblast-lineage cells. It functions by interacting with its receptor, RANK, on osteoclast precursors through the RANK/RANKL/osteoprotegerin axis, which regulates osteoclast maturation and activation (¹⁶,¹⁷).

Mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) family members (JNK, p38, and ERK) and AP-1 (c-Fos and c-Jun) are well known to be essential to osteoclast formation, and inhibitors of these pathways have been shown to reduce osteoclast formation (¹⁸,¹⁹). At the molecular level, MAPK and c-Fos have been shown to become activated following wear debris treatment of macrophages (²⁰,²¹). NF-κB is also important in osteoclastogenesis, and wear debris can activate NF-κB in cultured macrophages (²²). A deficiency of NF-κB1 in mice protects against titanium-induced calvarial osteolysis (²³).

Although these pathways have been well established to exert multiple effects to promote osteoclast formation, the significance of BMP signaling in wear debris-induced osteoclast formation is not clear. Some reports have shown that the activity of TGF-β is not exclusive to the SMAD signaling pathway and that it can regulate other signaling pathways, such as p38, JNK, AP-1, and NFκB (²⁴-²⁷). Similar to TNF, TGF-β may synergistically potentiate the action of RANKL by such pathways. Interestingly, blocking the action of TGF-β also blocks RANKL-dependent osteoclastogenesis (²⁸). This observation implies that TGF-β may be an essential factor for osteoclast formation.

Although the application of BMPs during orthopedic procedures has been found to promote a transient increase in osteoclast numbers and osteoclastic bone resorption (¹³), the effect of BMP-2 on wear debris-induced osteoclast formation is unclear. The aims of this study were to determine the effect of BMP-2 on wear debris-induced osteoclast formation, and to determine whether the activity of BMP-2 involves the SMAD pathway and/or SMAD-independent pathway. Because osteoclasts play a key physiological and pathological role in osteoporosis, we used RAW 264.7 macrophage-like cells, which are osteoclast precursors, to perform this study (²⁹).

Material and Methods

Cultured cells and reagents

Mouse monocyte/macrophage RAW 264.7 cells (American Type Culture Collection, Cell Bank of Chinese Academy of Sciences, China) were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium with glutaMAX (Gibco Invitrogen, USA) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (Hyclone, USA) and 1% antibiotic-antimycotic (Gibco Invitrogen) in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO₂ at 37°C. RAW 264.7 cells were grown to 60-70% confluency, counted and cultured on 6-well tissue culture plates (4×10⁵ cells/well). The cells were pretreated with 30 ng/mL RANKL (R&D Systems, USA) for 1 h and stimulated with titanium particles alone, 50 ng/mL BMP-2 alone (R&D Systems), or 50 ng/mL BMP-2 and 150 µg/mL titanium particles for the indicated times. The supernatants or cells were collected for further analysis.

Titanium particles

The titanium particles, average diameter 5 μm, were kindly provided by the Zimmer Company (USA). The particles were rinsed in ethanol three times and then in PBS three times. Next, the particles were mixed with the culture medium at concentrations of 10, 50, 100, 150, and 200 µg/mL. The titanium suspensions were sonicated for 30 min before using.

Cell viability assay

The cells were plated on 96-well plates (Corning Incorporated, USA) at a density of 10⁴ cells/well. After treatment with 30 ng/mL RANKL, the cells were incubated with 150 µg/mL titanium particles alone or 50 ng/mL BMP-2 and 150 µg/mL titanium particles for 3 days. Osteoclast viability was assessed using an MTT assay (Sigma, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions.

Tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase-positive (TRAP) staining assay

For differentiation of RAW 264.7 cells into osteoclasts, the cells were seeded and cultured on 96-well plates (10⁴ cells/well). Multinucleated osteoclasts were observed at day 8. The TRAP-staining kit (Sigma) was used to evaluate TRAP expression. The TRAP(+) multinucleated cells that contained three or more nuclei were counted as osteoclasts using optical microscopy, and ImagePro Plus was used to quantify the data.

Pit resorption assay

The effects of osteoclastic modulators were tested with the 24-well Corning Osteo Assay (Corning Incorporated). The RAW 264.7 cells (approximately 5000 cells per well) were transferred to each well of a 24-well Corning Osteo Assay plate. The plates were incubated at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO₂ for 8 days with a change of medium on day 3. After 8 days, the plates were washed with 6% sodium hypochlorite to remove the cells. Individual pits or multiple pit clusters were observed using a microscope at 10× magnification.

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)

To examine TNF-α secretion, the RAW 264.7 cells were plated on 96-well plates (10⁴ cells/well) with 30 ng/mL RANKL for 1 h and then incubated for 1 day with 50 ng/mL BMP-2 alone or 50 ng/mL BMP-2 and 150 µg/mL titanium particles in the presence of 30 ng/mL RANKL for 1 day. The levels of TNF-α secreted into the cell culture supernatant were measured using ELISA kits (Shanghai Lianshuo Biological Technology, China) according to the manufacturer's instructions.

Quantitative real-time PCR

Total RNA was isolated from cells using the TRIzol reagent (Gibco Invitrogen) and quantified by NanoDrop 2000 (Thermo Scientific, USA). The RNA was reverse transcribed to cDNA with the RevertAid First-Strand cDNA synthesis kit (Fermentas, China). Quantitative real-time PCR was then performed in triplicate using the Bio-Rad iQ5 gradient real-time PCR system. All reactions were performed in a 25-μL reaction volume containing 12.5 μL SYBR Premix Ex Taq™ II (TaKaRa, Japan) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The following primer sequences were used: TRAP(forward) 5′-GCAGCCAAGGAGGACTAC-3′ and (reverse)5′-CCCACTCAGCACATAGCC-3′;NFATc1 (forward) 5′-TCTTCCGAGTTCACATCC-3′ and (reverse)5′-ACAGCACCATCTTCTTCC-3′; Cathepsin K (forward) 5′-CAGAACGGAGGCATTGAC-3′ and (reverse)5′-CGATGGACACAGAGATGG-3′;GAPDH (forward) 5′-TCAACGGCACAGTCAAGG-3′ and (reverse)5′-ACTCCACGACATACTCAGC-3′.

Western blot analysis

Whole cells were extracted in radioimmunoprecipitation assay buffer containing protease and phosphatase inhibitors (Sigma-Aldrich, USA). The protein concentration was measured with a bicinchoninic acid protein assay kit following the manufacturer's instructions. The proteins were resolved by SDS-PAGE, transferred to a polyvinylidene fluoride membrane and incubated overnight at 4°C with primary antibodies against phospho (P)-SMAD 1/5/8 (Cell Signaling, USA), SMAD 1/5/8 (Abcam, USA), NFKB1 (Cell Signaling), c-Fos (Cell Signaling), p-P38 (Cell Signaling), p-JNK and p-IkB (Anbobio, China). The same membranes were probed with anti-β-actin antibodies (Sigma) to normalize protein loading in each lane. Subsequently, the blots were washed in Tris-buffered saline with Tween (10 mM Tris-HCl, 50 mM NaCl, and 0.25% Tween-20) and incubated with the secondary antibody. Immunoreactive bands were visualized using an ECL Plus substrate (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, China).

Statistical analysis

All experiments were performed in triplicate. Significant differences were determined using one-way ANOVA with a least-significant difference test. Differences of P<0.05 were considered to be significant.

Results

Effect of titanium particles on RAW 264.7 cell differentiation

To evaluate the effects of the titanium particles on the RANKL-mediated osteoclast differentiation of RAW 264.7 cells, we cultured the cells in the presence of suboptimal levels of 30 ng/mL RANKL and titanium particles. After 1 day, we measured TNF-α protein expression, which plays a major role in activating osteoclast recruitment (⁵,⁶), and after 5 days, we measured TRAP gene expression, a hallmark of osteoclasts (³⁰). The titanium particles increased TNF-α expression in a dose-dependent manner and showed an optimum effect at a concentration of 150 µg/mL (Figure 1A). There were no significant differences in TRAP expression between the different concentrations of titanium particles and the control (Figure 1B). The TRAP stain also failed to produce any differentiated osteoclasts in each group (data not shown). This result indicated that the titanium particles failed to induce the differentiation of osteoclast precursors in the presence of RANKL.

Figure 1
Expression of TNF-α and TRAP. A, ELISA showed the protein levels of TNF-α. RAW 264.7 cells were pretreated with titanium particles at different concentrations for 1 day. Data are reported as means±SD. *P<0.05; **P<0.001; ***P<0.0001 (one-way ANOVA). B, Expression of theTRAP gene. The RAW 264.7 cells were pretreated with 30 ng/mL RANKL for 1 h and then treated with different concentrations of titanium particles for 5 days. CON: control.

Effect of BMP-2 and titanium particles on the differentiation of osteoclast precursors

BMP-2 is another cytokine that was reported recently to stimulate osteoclast differentiation (⁸). Therefore, we hypothesized that BMP-2 could affect the titanium particle-induced osteoclast formation of RAW 264.7 cells in the presence of RANKL. We used real-time PCR to examine the expression of the osteoclast marker genes NFATc1,TRAP, and Cathepsin K (³¹-³³). The cells were pretreated with RANKL (30 ng/mL) for 1 h and subsequently treated or not with 50 ng/mL BMP-2 alone, 150 µg/mL titanium particles alone, or BMP-2 and titanium for 5 days. The PCR analysis showed that neither BMP-2 nor the titanium particles can significantly enhance the expression of all these osteoclastogenesis-related genes in the presence of RANKL (Figure 2). Surprisingly, however, we found that adding BMP-2 and titanium particles together greatly enhanced the expression of the TRAP, Cathepsin K andNFATc1 genes (Figure 2). TRAP staining confirmed these results. Many large, multinucleated TRAP-positive cells were detected in the cultures treated with both BMP-2 and titanium particles. Only small, mononucleated cells were observed in the titanium particles and RANKL treatment (Figure 3).

Figure 2
BMP-2 and titanium (Ti) particles synergistically activated osteoclast formation. Gene relative expression was determined by real-time PCR; RAW 264.7 cells were cultured with suboptimal (30 ng/mL) RANKL, BMP-2 (50 ng/mL) or Ti particles (150 µg/mL) as indicated for 5 days. A, TRAP gene expression.B, NFATc1 gene expression.C, Cathepsin K gene expression. Data are reported as means±SD. *P<0.01; **P<0.0001 (one-way ANOVA).

Figure 3
TRAP staining of RAW 264.7 cells-derived osteoclasts differentiated with 30 ng/mL RANKL, 50 ng/mL BMP-2, or 150 µg/mL titanium (Ti) particles for 5 days. TRAP-positive multinucleated cells (arrows) were observed in the RANKL+Ti and RANKL+Ti+BMP. No TRAP-positive multinucleated cells were observed in control and RANKL+BMP.

To further confirm this synergy between BMP-2 and the titanium particles, we prolonged the culture time from 5 to 7 days. We treated the RAW 264.7 cells with RANKL or not and then added the titanium particles and different concentrations of BMP-2. After 7 days of culture, we performed real-time PCR to measureTRAP gene expression. We found that BMP-2 greatly enhanced osteoclast formation, with a peak at 50 ng/mL and to a lesser extent at higher concentrations. There was no expression of the TRAP gene in the absence of RANKL (Figure 4). TRAP staining showed that abundant TRAP-positive multinucleated cells appeared when the cells were treated with BMP-2 from low to high doses in the presence of RANKL (Figure 5A). No TRAP-positive multinucleated cells were observed in the absence of RANKL (data not shown). These results are quantified in Figure 5B and C, and show that BMP-2 greatly increased the number and average size of the osteoclasts in the RAW 264.7 cells to levels several-fold greater than by the stimulation with titanium particles and RANKL. In addition, the pit formation assay revealed that the bone resorptive activity of mature osteoclasts was significantly accelerated when treated with BMP-2 (Figure 5D). These data indicated that BMP-2, even at a low concentration, synergized with titanium particles and RANKL to enhance the differentiation of osteoclast precursors. BMP-2 may be a crucial factor in the titanium particle-mediated osteoclast formation.

Figure 4
Effects of BMP-2 on titanium particles-mediated osteoclast formation. Real-time PCR showed the expression of TRAP. The RAW 264.7 cells were pretreated with 150 µg/mL titanium particles and different concentrations of BMP-2 for 1 h, then treated or not with 30 ng/mL RANKL for 7 days. CON: control. Data are reported as means±SD. ***P<0.001 (one-way ANOVA).

Figure 5
TRAP staining of RAW 264.7 cells-derived osteoclast formation.A, RAW 264.7 cells were treated with 30 ng/mL RANKL and 150 µg/mL titanium particles for 1 h, then treated with BMP-2 for 7 days. Quantitative analysis showing the number of osteoclasts per well (B), the average size of the 10 largest osteoclasts in each well (C) and the pit resorption area per well (D). Data are reported as means±SD. *P<0.05; **P<0.01 ***P<0.001 (one-way ANOVA).

Effect of BMP-2 and titanium particles on cell viability

The MTT assay was used to determine whether BMP-2 and titanium particles induced the enhancement of proliferation and viability of RAW 264.7 cells. The cells treated with 50 ng/mL BMP-2 and titanium particles showed a slight, nonsignificant decrease of cell viability. However, neither BMP-2 nor the titanium particles showed any cytotoxic effects on the RAW 264.7 cells compared with the control (Figure 6). Based on these findings, we concluded that neither BMP-2 nor the titanium particles increased RAW 264.7 macrophage-like cell proliferation.

Figure 6
Neither the BMP-2 nor titanium (Ti) particles affect RAW 264.7 cell proliferation. RAW 264.7 cells (control, con) were pretreated with 30 ng/mL RANKL and 150 µg/mL Ti particles for 1 h, then treated or not with 50 ng/mL BMP-2 for 3 days. Data are reported as means±SD cell proliferation as the absorbance ratio at 490 nm.

Expression of BMP-2 signaling during osteoclast differentiation

To confirm that BMP-2 acted directly upon the osteoclast precursors, we performed Western blotting against c-Fos and p-SMAD 1/5/8. c-Fos is well known to be essential for RANKL-mediated osteoclast differentiation and to be expressed in the early stages of osteoclast formation (³⁴). Therefore, we observed it from days 2 to 5. As shown in Figure 7, the expression of c-Fos was strongly detected from days 2 to 5 when treated with BMP-2. In contrast, in the absence of BMP-2, the expression of c-Fos decreased gradually over time. During the expression of c-Fos, p-SMAD 1/5/8 was constantly expressed at high levels throughout osteoclast differentiation when treated with BMP-2, and p-SMAD 1/5/8 was only weakly detected when BMP-2 was absent (Figure 7). These results strongly indicated that BMP-2 signaling was involved in osteoclast differentiation and that BMP signal transduction may play a crucial role in the differentiation of osteoclasts.

Figure 7
Western blot showed the expression of phospho-SMAD (p-SMAD) 1/5/8 and c-Fos. RAW 264.7 cells were treated with 30 ng/mL RANKL and 150 µg/mL titanium particles for 1 h and subsequently treated or not with 50 ng/mL BMP-2 at indicated times.

Effect of titanium particles on BMP-induced SMAD phosphorylation during osteoclastogenesis

Previous reports have shown that the BMP-2/SMAD and TNF-α/NF-κB systems appear to exert antagonistic effects (³⁵). Thus, we hypothesized that the titanium particles could inhibit BMP-induced SMAD phosphorylation. As shown in Figure 8A, the RAW 264.7 cells were pretreated with BMP-2 for 1 h and then treated with or without titanium particles. BMP-2 increased p-SMAD 1/5/8 protein expression, which peaked at 12 h in both the titanium particle and nonparticle groups; there was no significant difference between the two groups. This result showed that the secretion of TNF-α induced by the titanium particles did not affect BMP-induced SMAD phosphorylation in RAW 264.7 cells (Figure 8A).

Figure 8
Titanium (Ti) particles do not affect phospho-SMAD (p-SMAD) 1/5/8 expression. BMP-2 does not affect expression of TNF-α.A, RAW 264.7 cells were treated with 30 ng/mL RANKL and 50 ng/mL BMP-2 for 1 h, then treated with or without 150 µg/mL Ti particles at indicated times. B, ELISA showed the expression of TNF-α. RAW 264.7 cells (control) were treated with 30 ng/mL RANKL and 150 µg/mL Ti particles for 1 h, then treated or not with 50 ng/mL BMP-2 for 24 h. Data are reported as means±SD. *P<0.05 (one-way ANOVA).

Secretion of TNF-α from RAW 264.7 cells treated with BMP-2 and titanium particles

Hong et al. (³⁶) reported that BMP-6 induced the expression of TNF-α of RAW 264.7 cells. To determine whether BMP-2 had the same effect, we performed ELISA to observe the expression of TNF-α. As shown in Figure 8B, although TNF-α was greatly increased in the titanium particle and titanium particle-BMP-2 groups, there was no significant difference between these two groups, demonstrating that BMP-2 did not increase TNF-α expression.

BMP-2 regulates the expression of SMAD-independent pathways in titanium particle-meditated osteoclast differentiation

We further investigated signaling pathways other than the SMAD pathways that could be activated by BMP-2. We detected the expression of p-P38, p-IkB, and p-JNK by Western blotting, and found that the RAW 264.7 cells expressed elevated levels of p-P38 and p-IkB in a time-dependent manner in the presence of BMP-2 and that the expression of these proteins was lowered without BMP-2 treatment (Figure 9A). There was no significant difference in the expression of p-JNK between the two groups. To further confirm the effect of BMP-2 on the activation of p-IkB, we evaluated the expression of P50, an NF-κB subunit. The result showed that BMP-2 increased nuclear translocation of P50 compared with the group without BMP-2 treatment (Figure 9B). These results demonstrate that BMP-2 synergized with the titanium particles in osteoclastogenesis by directly stimulating the expression of p-JNK, p-P38, p-IkB, and P50.

Figure 9
BMP-2 regulates expression of p-JNK, p-IkB, p-P38, and P50.A, RAW 264.7 cells were treated with RANKL and titanium particles for 1 h, then treated or not with BMP-2 at indicated times. p-JNK, p-IkB, and p-P38 were detected by Western blot.B, BMP-2 regulates expression of P50. RAW 264.7 cells were treated with RANKL and titanium particles for 1 h, and then treated with or without BMP-2 at indicated times.

Discussion

Not all RAW 264.7 cell lines or passages will form osteoclasts (³⁰). In this study, we confirmed that titanium particles at different concentrations could not induce osteoclast differentiation in the presence of RANKL.

Although the role of BMP-2 in promoting osteoblast differentiation has been extensively investigated, and it has been approved by the FDA as an alternative to bone grafts in long bone fractures and healing in a number of orthopedic and maxillofacial applications (³⁷), its function in particle-induced aseptic loosening and osteolysis has not yet been elucidated. Jager et al. (³⁸) showed that a local BMP-2/mesenchymal stem cell application can promote bone formation within a wear debris-induced periprosthetic osteolytic area, but there was no evidence that the BMP-2 application was solely responsible for healing the severe osteolysis. Quinn et al. (³⁹) reported that TGF-β greatly increased osteoclast formation in RAW 264.7 macrophage-like cells to levels that were several-fold greater than those attainable with maximal stimulation by RANKL or TNF-α. In this study, we demonstrated that BMP-2 was not sufficient to increase osteoclast formation. However, BMP-2 greatly enhanced titanium particle-meditated osteoclast formation in the presence of RANKL. This treatment increased the size and number of multinuclear osteoclasts, the expression of osteoclast genes (TRAP and NFATc1), and the resorption area. At a low concentration (50 ng/mL), BMP-2 appears to have an optimal effect on stimulation of osteoclast formation. However, no multinucleated cells were observed in the absence of RANKL.

Although RANKL and titanium particles could induce c-Fos expression, more c-Fos was detected in the group treated with BMP-2 and titanium particles from days 2 to 5 in the presence of RANKL. Our data also showed that BMP-2 treatment increased SMAD phosphorylation following the high expression of c-Fos throughout the early stages of osteoclastogenesis. Moreover, the phosphorylated SMAD levels were negligible in the titanium particle groups. All these findings imply that BMP-2 activated osteoclast formation by increasing c-Fos expression and that the BMP-dependent pathway was at least implicated in titanium particle-induced osteoclastogenesis.

Macrophages are well known to respond to the titanium particle challenge in two distinct ways. First, the wear debris activates proinflammatory signaling. Second, it activates MAPK cascades as well as NF-κB and other transcription factors. Both actions contribute to an increase of osteoclast recruitment. In our study, we first demonstrated that BMP-2 did not increase the expression of TNF-α, the major proinflammatory factor in inflammatory osteolysis. Then, our data showed that BMP-2 stimulated the expression of p-JNK, p-P38, and p-IkB, and the increase in p-IkB explains the progressive increase in P50. In addition to the canonical SMAD-dependent pathway, BMP has been reported to activate MAPK pathways in some systems (⁴⁰). Nakashima et al. (²²) reported that titanium particles can induce the rapid activation of MAPK family members. Our data showed that titanium particles did not affect the expression of BMP-induced SMAD phosphorylation. Although the titanium particles slightly enhanced the levels of these signaling pathways, they were insufficient to induce osteoclast formation unless BMP-2 was also added. This result suggests that BMP-2 did not increase the titanium particle-induced osteoclastogenesis by activating the expression of proinflammatory cytokines but instead acted upon downstream signaling pathways, such as p-JNK, p-P38, and p-IkB. Thus, the effect of BMP-2 in the wear debris-induced osteoclastogenesis has been underestimated.

In summary, this study suggests that synergy of BMP-2 and titanium particles enhanced osteoclast formation in the presence of RANKL by increasing the expression of p-JNK, p-P38, and p-IkB. BMP-2 may be a crucial factor in titanium particle-mediated osteoclast formation.

References

• ¹
  Jacobs JJ, Roebuck KA, Archibeck M, Hallab NJ, Glant TT. Osteolysis: basic science. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001; 393: 71-77, doi: 10.1097/00003086-200112000-00008.
  » https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-200112000-00008
• ²
  Ingham E, Fisher J. The role of macrophages in osteolysis of total joint replacement. Biomaterials 2005; 26: 1271-1286, doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.04.035.
  » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.04.035
• ³
  Haynes DR, Crotti TN, Potter AE, Loric M, Atkins GJ, Howie DW, et al. The osteoclastogenic molecules RANKL and RANK are associated with periprosthetic osteolysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2001; 83: 902-911, doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.83B6.10905.
  » https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.83B6.10905
• ⁴
  Kobayashi A, Freeman MA, Bonfield W, Kadoya Y, Yamac T, Al-Saffar N, et al. Number of polyethylene particles and osteolysis in total joint replacements. A quantitative study using a tissue-digestion method. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1997; 79: 844-848, doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.79B5.7602.
  » https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.79B5.7602
• ⁵
  Merkel KD, Erdmann JM, McHugh KP, Abu-Amer Y, Ross FP, Teitelbaum SL. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha mediates orthopedic implant osteolysis. Am J Pathol 1999; 154: 203-210, doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)65266-2.
  » https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9440(10)65266-2
• ⁶
  Maloney WJ, James RE, Smith RL. Human macrophage response to retrieved titanium alloy particles in vitro Clin Orthop Relat Res 1996; 322: 268-278.
• ⁷
  Liu F, Ventura F, Doody J, Massague J. Human type II receptor for bone morphogenic proteins (BMPs): extension of the two-kinase receptor model to the BMPs. Mol Cell Biol 1995; 15: 3479-3486.
• ⁸
  Jensen ED, Pham L, Billington CJ Jr, Espe K, Carlson AE, Westendorf JJ, et al. Bone morphogenic protein 2 directly enhances differentiation of murine osteoclast precursors. J Cell Biochem 2010; 109: 672-682.
• ⁹
  Lacey DL, Timms E, Tan HL, Kelley MJ, Dunstan CR, Burgess T, et al. Osteoprotegerin ligand is a cytokine that regulates osteoclast differentiation and activation. Cell 1998; 93: 165-176, doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81569-X.
  » https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81569-X
• ¹⁰
  Matsuo K. Cross-talk among bone cells. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 2009; 18: 292-297, doi: 10.1097/MNH.0b013e32832b75f1.
  » https://doi.org/10.1097/MNH.0b013e32832b75f1
• ¹¹
  Itoh K, Udagawa N, Katagiri T, Iemura S, Ueno N, Yasuda H, et al. Bone morphogenetic protein 2 stimulates osteoclast differentiation and survival supported by receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappaB ligand. Endocrinology 2001; 142: 3656-3662.
• ¹²
  Falany ML, Thames AM III, McDonald JM, Blair HC, McKenna MA, Moore RE, et al. Osteoclasts secrete the chemotactic cytokine mim-1. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2001; 281: 180-185, doi: 10.1006/bbrc.2001.4307.
  » https://doi.org/10.1006/bbrc.2001.4307
• ¹³
  Toth JM, Boden SD, Burkus JK, Badura JM, Peckham SM, McKay WF. Short-term osteoclastic activity induced by locally high concentrations of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 in a cancellous bone environment. Spine 2009; 34: 539-550, doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181952695.
  » https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181952695
• ¹⁴
  Troen BR. Molecular mechanisms underlying osteoclast formation and activation. Exp Gerontol 2003; 38: 605-614, doi: 10.1016/S0531-5565(03)00069-X.
  » https://doi.org/10.1016/S0531-5565(03)00069-X
• ¹⁵
  Roodman GD. Regulation of osteoclast differentiation. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2006; 1068: 100-109, doi: 10.1196/annals.1346.013.
  » https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1346.013
• ¹⁶
  Boyce BF, Yamashita T, Yao Z, Zhang Q, Li F, Xing L. Roles for NF-kappaB and c-Fos in osteoclasts. J Bone Miner Metab 2005; 23 (Suppl): 11-15, doi: 10.1007/BF03026317.
  » https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03026317
• ¹⁷
  Fuller K, Wong B, Fox S, Choi Y, Chambers TJ. TRANCE is necessary and sufficient for osteoblast-mediated activation of bone resorption in osteoclasts. J Exp Med 1998; 188: 997-1001, doi: 10.1084/jem.188.5.997.
  » https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.188.5.997
• ¹⁸
  Abbas S, Clohisy JC, Abu-Amer Y. Mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinases mediate PMMA-induction of osteoclasts. J Orthop Res 2003; 21: 1041-1048, doi: 10.1016/S0736-0266(03)00081-0.
  » https://doi.org/10.1016/S0736-0266(03)00081-0
• ¹⁹
  Grigoriadis AE, Wang ZQ, Cecchini MG, Hofstetter W, Felix R, Fleisch HA, et al. c-Fos: a key regulator of osteoclast-macrophage lineage determination and bone remodeling. Science 1994; 266: 443-448, doi: 10.1126/science.7939685.
  » https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7939685
• ²⁰
  Miyanishi K, Trindade MC, Ma T, Goodman SB, Schurman DJ, Smith RL. Periprosthetic osteolysis: induction of vascular endothelial growth factor from human monocyte/macrophages by orthopaedic biomaterial particles. J Bone Miner Res 2003; 18: 1573-1583, doi: 10.1359/jbmr.2003.18.9.1573.
  » https://doi.org/10.1359/jbmr.2003.18.9.1573
• ²¹
  Boyle WJ, Simonet WS, Lacey DL. Osteoclast differentiation and activation. Nature 2003; 423: 337-342, doi: 10.1038/nature01658.
  » https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01658
• ²²
  Nakashima Y, Sun DH, Trindade MC, Maloney WJ, Goodman SB, Schurman DJ, et al. Signaling pathways for tumor necrosis factor-alpha and interleukin-6 expression in human macrophages exposed to titanium-alloy particulate debris in vitro J Bone Joint Surg Am 1999; 81: 603-615, doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.81B1.8884.
  » https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.81B1.8884
• ²³
  Schwarz EM, Lu AP, Goater JJ, Benz EB, Kollias G, Rosier RN, et al. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha/nuclear transcription factor-kappaB signaling in periprosthetic osteolysis. J Orthop Res 2000; 18: 472-480, doi: 10.1002/jor.1100180321.
  » https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.1100180321
• ²⁴
  Liberati NT, Datto MB, Frederick JP, Shen X, Wong C, Rougier-Chapman EM, et al. Smads bind directly to the Jun family of AP-1 transcription factors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1999; 96: 4844-4849, doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.9.4844.
  » https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.9.4844
• ²⁵
  Boyce BF, Xing L, Franzoso G, Siebenlist U. Required and nonessential functions of nuclear factor-kappa B in bone cells. Bone 1999; 25: 137-139, doi: 10.1016/S8756-3282(99)00105-2.
  » https://doi.org/10.1016/S8756-3282(99)00105-2
• ²⁶
  Derynck R, Zhang YE. Smad-dependent and Smad-independent pathways in TGF-beta family signalling. Nature 2003; 425: 577-584, doi: 10.1038/nature02006.
  » https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02006
• ²⁷
  Moustakas A, Heldin CH. Non-Smad TGF-beta signals. J Cell Sci 2005; 118: 3573-3584, doi: 10.1242/jcs.02554.
  » https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.02554
• ²⁸
  Fuller K, Lean JM, Bayley KE, Wani MR, Chambers TJ. A role for TGFbeta(1) in osteoclast differentiation and survival. J Cell Sci 2000; 113 (Part 13): 2445-2453.
• ²⁹
  Valles G, Gonzalez-Melendi P, Gonzalez-Carrasco JL, Saldana L, Sanchez-Sabate E, Munuera L, et al. Differential inflammatory macrophage response to rutile and titanium particles. Biomaterials 2006; 27: 5199-5211, doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.05.045.
  » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.05.045
• ³⁰
  Halleen JM. Tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5B is a specific and sensitive marker of bone resorption. Anticancer Res 2003; 23: 1027-1029.
• ³¹
  Takayanagi H, Kim S, Koga T, Nishina H, Isshiki M, Yoshida H, et al. Induction and activation of the transcription factor NFATc1(NFAT2) integrate RANKL signaling in terminal differentiation of osteoclasts. Dev Cell 2002; 3: 889-901, doi: 10.1016/S1534-5807(02)00369-6.
  » https://doi.org/10.1016/S1534-5807(02)00369-6
• ³²
  Novack DV, Teitelbaum SL. The osteoclast: friend or foe? Annu Rev Pathol 2008; 3: 457-484, doi: 10.1146/annurev.pathmechdis.3.121806.151431.
  » https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pathmechdis.3.121806.151431
• ³³
  Hsu H, Lacey DL, Dunstan CR, Solovyev I, Colombero A, Timms E, et al. Tumor necrosis factor receptor family member RANK mediates osteoclast differentiation and activation induced by osteoprotegerin ligand. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1999; 96: 3540-3545, doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.7.3540.
  » https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.7.3540
• ³⁴
  Arai A, Mizoguchi T, Harada S, Kobayashi Y, Nakamichi Y, Yasuda H, et al. Fos plays an essential role in the upregulation of RANK expression in osteoclast precursors within the bone microenvironment. J Cell Sci 2012; 125: 2910-2917, doi: 10.1242/jcs.099986.
  » https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.099986
• ³⁵
  Yamazaki M, Fukushima H, Shin M, Katagiri T, Doi T, Takahashi T, et al. Tumor necrosis factor alpha represses bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) signaling by interfering with the DNA binding of Smads through the activation of NF-kappaB. J Biol Chem 2009; 284: 35987-35995, doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.070540.
  » https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M109.070540
• ³⁶
  Hong JH, Lee GT, Lee JH, Kwon SJ, Park SH, Kim SJ, et al. Effect of bone morphogenetic protein-6 on macrophages. Immunology 2009; 128: e442-e450, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2567.2008.02998.x.
  » https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2567.2008.02998.x
• ³⁷
  Gautschi OP, Frey SP, Zellweger R. Bone morphogenetic proteins in clinical applications. ANZ J Surg 2007; 77: 626-631, doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2007.04175.x.
  » https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1445-2197.2007.04175.x
• ³⁸
  Jager M, Emami R, Thorey F, Krauspe R. Saving implants BMP-2 application in revision total hip surgery. Int J Biomed Sci 2006; 2: 187-195.
• ³⁹
  Quinn JM, Itoh K, Udagawa N, Hausler K, Yasuda H, Shima N, et al. Transforming growth factor beta affects osteoclast differentiation via direct and indirect actions. J Bone Miner Res 2001; 16: 1787-1794, doi: 10.1359/jbmr.2001.16.10.1787.
  » https://doi.org/10.1359/jbmr.2001.16.10.1787
• ⁴⁰
  Kawabata M, Imamura T, Miyazono K. Signal transduction by bone morphogenetic proteins. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 1998; 9: 49-61, doi: 10.1016/S1359-6101(97)00036-1.
  » https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6101(97)00036-1

• First published online May 2, 2014.

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  02 May 2014
• Date of issue
  June 2014

History

• Received
  18 Jan 2013
• Accepted
  25 Nov 2013