Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

A simple spectrophotometric method for the determination of methyldopa using p-chloranil in the presence of hydrogen peroxide

Um método espectrofotométrico simples para a determinação de metildopa usando p-cloranil na presença de peróxido de hidrogênio

Abstracts

A simple, rapid and sensitive spectrophotometric method has been developed for the determination of methyldopa in pharmaceutical formulations. The method is based on the reaction between tetrachloro-p-benzoquinone (p-chloranil) and methyldopa, accelerated by hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), producing a violet-red compound (λmax = 535 nm) at ambient temperature (25.0 ± 0.2 ºC). Experimental design methodologies were used to optimize the measurement conditions. Beer's law is obeyed in a concentration range from 2.10 x 10-4 to 2.48 x 10-3 mol L-1 (r = 0.9997). The limit of detection was 7.55 x 10-6 mol L-1 and the limit of quantification was 2.52 x 10-5 mol L-1. The intraday precision and interday precision were studied for 10 replicate analyses of 1.59 x 10-3 mol L-1 methyldopa solution and the respective coefficients of variation were 0.7 and 1.1 %. The proposed method was successfully applied to the determination of methyldopa in commercial brands of pharmaceuticals. No interferences were observed from the common excipients in the formulations. The results obtained by the proposed method were favorably compared with those given by the Brazilian Pharmacopoeia procedure at 95 % confidence level.

spectrophotometry; p-chloranil; hydrogen peroxide; methyldopa; pharmaceutical formulations


Este trabalho descreve um método espectrofotométrico simples, rápido e sensível para a determinação de metildopa em formulações farmacêuticas. O método é baseado na reação entre tetracloro-p-benzoquinona (p-cloranil) e metildopa, a qual é acelerada por peróxido de hidrogênio (H2O2), produzindo um composto vermelho-violeta (λmax = 535 nm) à temperatura ambiente (25,0 ± 0,2 ºC). As melhores condições para a reação foram obtidas por planejamento experimental. A lei de Beer é obedecida em um intervalo de concentração de 2,10 x 10-4 to 2,48 x 10-3 mol L-1 (r = 0,9997). O limite de detecção determinado foi de 7,55 x 10-6 mol L-1 e o limite de quantificação foi de 2,52 x 10-5 mol L-1. A precisão intradia e interdia do método proposto foram determinadas pela análise em decuplicata (n=10) de uma solução de metildopa 1,59 x 10-3 mol L-1 e apresentaram coeficientes de variação de 0,7 e 1,1%, respectivamente. O método proposto foi aplicado com sucesso na determinação de metildopa em diferentes marcas de medicamentos. Os resultados obtidos pelo método proposto estiveram em boa concordância com aqueles obtidos pelo método da Farmacopéia Brasileira em um nível de confiança de 95%.

espectrofotometria; p-cloranil; peróxido de hidrogênio; metildopa; formulações farmacêuticas


A simple spectrophotometric method for the determination of methyldopa using p-chloranil in the presence of hydrogen peroxide

Um método espectrofotométrico simples para a determinação de metildopa usando p-cloranil na presença de peróxido de hidrogênio

M. A. Gotardo; L. S. Lima; R. Sequinel; J. L. Rufino; L. Pezza; H. R. Pezza* * hrpezza@iq.unesp.br

São Paulo State University - UNESP, Chemistry Institute of Araraquara, P.O. Box 355, 14801-970, Araraquara, SP, Brazil

ABSTRACT

A simple, rapid and sensitive spectrophotometric method has been developed for the determination of methyldopa in pharmaceutical formulations. The method is based on the reaction between tetrachloro-p-benzoquinone (p-chloranil) and methyldopa, accelerated by hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), producing a violet-red compound (λmax = 535 nm) at ambient temperature (25.0 ± 0.2 ºC). Experimental design methodologies were used to optimize the measurement conditions. Beer's law is obeyed in a concentration range from 2.10 x 10-4 to 2.48 x 10-3 mol L-1 (r = 0.9997). The limit of detection was 7.55 x 10-6 mol L-1 and the limit of quantification was 2.52 x 10-5 mol L-1. The intraday precision and interday precision were studied for 10 replicate analyses of 1.59 x 10-3 mol L-1 methyldopa solution and the respective coefficients of variation were 0.7 and 1.1 %. The proposed method was successfully applied to the determination of methyldopa in commercial brands of pharmaceuticals. No interferences were observed from the common excipients in the formulations. The results obtained by the proposed method were favorably compared with those given by the Brazilian Pharmacopoeia procedure at 95 % confidence level.

Keywords: spectrophotometry; p-chloranil; hydrogen peroxide; methyldopa; pharmaceutical formulations.

RESUMO

Este trabalho descreve um método espectrofotométrico simples, rápido e sensível para a determinação de metildopa em formulações farmacêuticas. O método é baseado na reação entre tetracloro-p-benzoquinona (p-cloranil) e metildopa, a qual é acelerada por peróxido de hidrogênio (H2O2), produzindo um composto vermelho-violeta (λmax = 535 nm) à temperatura ambiente (25,0 ± 0,2 ºC). As melhores condições para a reação foram obtidas por planejamento experimental. A lei de Beer é obedecida em um intervalo de concentração de 2,10 x 10-4 to 2,48 x 10-3 mol L-1 (r = 0,9997). O limite de detecção determinado foi de 7,55 x 10-6 mol L-1 e o limite de quantificação foi de 2,52 x 10-5 mol L-1. A precisão intradia e interdia do método proposto foram determinadas pela análise em decuplicata (n=10) de uma solução de metildopa 1,59 x 10-3 mol L-1 e apresentaram coeficientes de variação de 0,7 e 1,1%, respectivamente. O método proposto foi aplicado com sucesso na determinação de metildopa em diferentes marcas de medicamentos. Os resultados obtidos pelo método proposto estiveram em boa concordância com aqueles obtidos pelo método da Farmacopéia Brasileira em um nível de confiança de 95%.

Palavras-chave: espectrofotometria; p-cloranil; peróxido de hidrogênio; metildopa; formulações farmacêuticas.

Introduction

Methyldopa (α-methyl-3, 4-dihydroxyphenylalanine), whose structure is shown in Figure 1, is a cathecolamine derivative widely used in the control of moderate and severe arterial hypertension. Methyldopa is considered a pro-drug since it acts mainly due to its metabolism in the central nervous system to α-methylnorepinephrine, a α2-adrenergic agonist [1].


Several methods have been proposed to quantify methyldopa in pharmaceutical formulations, including high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with UV detection [2-5], potentiometry [6], differential pulse polarography [7], titrimetry [8], UV [9,10] and visible spectrophotometry [11-20] and flow injection analysis (FIA) [21-24]. However, many of these methods are time-consuming and/or require expensive equipment.

Molecular absorption spectrophotometry is by far the instrumental technique of choice in industrial laboratories, owing mainly to its simplicity, often demanding low-cost equipment and lending itself to easy automation of trace analysis procedures. As already mentioned, a number of UV/visible spectrophotometric methods for methyldopa determination have been reported. The visible spectrophotometric method recommended by the Brazilian Pharmacopeia for methyldopa tablets is based on the reaction with ferrous tartarate at pH 8.5 [11]. Other visible spectrophotometric methods involve the employment of diverse chromogenic reagents such as N-bromosuccinimide and isoniazid [12], barbituric acid [13], sodium nitroprusside in the presence of hydroxylamine hydrochloride [12], periodate in acidic medium [14], diazotized sulphanilamide in the presence of molybdate ions in acidic medium [15], p-dimethylaminocinnamaldehyde [16], vanillin in alkaline medium [17], cerium (IV) nitrate [18], ferric chloride in acidic medium [19], iron(III) in the presence of 1,10-phenanthroline and 2,2'-bipyridyl [20]. The methods by FIA with spectrophotometric detection involve the use of p-toluidine and sodium periodate [21], metaperiodate [22], p-aminophenol in alkaline medium [23] and ammonium molybdate [24] as chromogenic reagents. Nevertheless, most of the aforementioned methods present some limitations and drawbacks such as low selectivity [9], long waiting time for the color development [17,18], or heating step [9,13,18,22]. Still, there is in the literature a spectrophotometric method for the determination of methyldopa in pharmaceutical formulations using p-chloranil [10]. However, this method that is based on UV absorption (358 nm) shows problems related to low selectivity and requires a tedious heating step (30 minutes).

According to above considerations, the need for a simple, fast, low-cost, and selective method for determination of methyldopa seems clear. The method described in this paper is based on the reaction between methyldopa and tetrachloro-p-benzoquinone (p-chloranil), accelerated by hydrogen peroxide, yielding a violet-red compound (λmax = 535 nm) at ambient temperature (25.0 ± 0.2°C). This work proposes the employment of H2O2 as a good strategy to accelerate the previously mentioned reaction. In this case, the heating step is not required. In addition, the reaction conditions were studied by experimental design approaches in order to optimize the analytical response.

The analytical results obtained by applying the proposed method are trustworthy when compared with those given by Brazilian Pharmacopeia standard procedure.

Experimental

Apparatus

The absorbance measurements for the proposed method and for the standard method were performed using a portable UV/VIS spectrophotometer (USB 4000 model – Ocean Optics); with wavelength range work 200 – 850 nm and equipped with a cell of 10 mm path length. Software OOI Base 32 (Ocean Optics) was used for acquisition and storage of the spectral data.

Materials

Pharmaceutical formulations (tablets) of four commercial brands were analyzed. These tablets were purchased from local drugstores and all were tested prior to the listed expiration date. All studied pharmaceuticals were package labeled to contain 250 mg of methyldopa per tablet.

The excipients used in the interference study were of pharmaceutical grade.

Reagents and solutions

All reagents and solvents employed were of analytical grade. Acetone, methanol (Mallinckrodt, Xalostoc, Mexico) were used. p-Choranil (Sigma, St Louis, E.U.A.) was used to prepare a 4.07 x 10-2 mol L-1 (1.0%, w/v) solution in acetone. A 4.55 mol L-1 hydrogen peroxide solution was prepared by appropriate dilution of H2O2 30% (w/w) (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) in methanol and standardized by permanganometric titration, according to the procedure described in the literature [25]. A stock standard solution of methyldopa (Henrifarma – São Paulo, Brazil, purity grade > 99.8%) in methanol was prepared at 1.68 x 10-2 mol L-1 and working solutions were prepared by convenient dilutions with methanol. All solutions were daily prepared.

Preparation of the analytical curve

Aliquots from the methyldopa stock solution (1.68 x 10-2 mol L-1) were transferred into 5.00 mL volumetric flasks in order to obtain an analytical curve in the concentration range from 2.10 x 10-4 to 2.48 x 10-3 mol L-1. After that, 770 µL of p-chloranil solution (4.07 x 10-2 mol L-1) and 85 µL of H2O2 (4.55 mol L-1) were added. The final volume was completed to 5.00 mL with methanol. The absorbance measurements were carried out at 535 nm against reagents blank. The analytical curve was obtained by plotting absorbance values versus methyldopa concentration in mol L-1.

Analysis of pharmaceutical formulations (tablets)

Twenty tablets of each commercial pharmaceutical brand to be studied were weighed and finely powdered. A portion of this powder, equivalent to c.a. 100 mg of methyldopa, was accurately weighed. The sample was shaking with methanol in a magnetic mixer for 10 min and transferred into a 25 mL volumetric flask and the volume completed with methanol. The solution was filtered in Whatman 41 filter paper and an aliquot from this filtered solution was analyzed according to the procedure described in the preparation of the analytical curve.

Results and discussion

p-Chloranil has been used as chromogenic reagent for the determination of several drugs, such as fluoxetine and sertraline [26,27], paroxetine[27], salbutamol [28], nortriptyline [29], tranquillizers and antidepressants [30], trimetazidine dihydrochloride [31], b-adrenergic blockers [32], dicyclomine hydrochloride [33], omeprazole [34], isoprenaline and methyldopa [10]. These methods are based on the interaction between electrons donors (drugs) and p-chloranil, which acts as an electron acceptor producing intensely colored charge transfer complexes (Scheme 1) [35].


p-Chloranil has been also used to detect methyldopa in pharmaceutical formulations on thin-layer [36]. As aforementioned, a spectrophotometric method for the determination of methyldopa using p-chloranil as chromogenic reagent [10] shows problems related with the low selectivity, requires a tedious heating step (30 minutes) and involve various manipulation steps.

In order to develop a simple procedure, the proposed method used the reaction between methyldopa and p-chloranil, which was markedly accelerated in the presence of H2O2. This reaction produced a colored compound at ambient temperature (25.0 ± 0.2°C) and the absorbance measurements were carried out at 535 nm.

Figure 2 shows the absorption spectrum of the product of the reaction between methyldopa and p-chloranil in the presence of H2O2. As it can be noted (Figure 2), the spectrum exhibits large bands, which are characteristic of charge transfer complexes [35]. It should be also observed in Figure 2 that the spectrum exhibits a maximum absorption band at 535 nm and another at 535 nm.


The study of the optical stability reveals that the colored complex is stable at least 60 min at 435 nm. It is important to emphasizes that in the absence of H2O2 the reaction was extremely slow and the product was not stable.

To the best of our knowledge, there is a single spectrophotometric method for the determination of saccharin using p-cloranil described in the literature that also used H2O2 as accelerator agent [37]. So, our results corroborate with those already described for analysis of saccharin, suggesting that reactions involving p-chloranil and electrons donors could be accelerated by using of H2O2.

Experimental design

In order to investigate the best conditions for the reaction between p-chloranil and methyldopa in the presence of H2O2 an experimental design using central composite design was employed.

Central composite design allowed studying simultaneously the two factors that could have an important effect on the reaction. The factors of interest were p-chloranil and H2O2 concentration. To study these factors, aliquots were taken of the 4.07 x 10-2 mol L-1 p-chloranil solution and 4.55 mol L-1 H2O2 solution, respectively. Table 1 shows the equivalent matrix of the central composite design as well as the absorbance data. The experiment corresponding to the central point was carried out in four replicates. All experiments were carried out with solution of methyldopa set at 1.59 x 10-3 mol L-1.

The absorbance values obtained experimentally from central composite design were represented by a three-dimensional graph that is known as response surface (Figure 3). The experimental data were fitted to the response surface in order to obtain the optimum reaction conditions.


The quadratic regression model is given by:

where, Z is the response factor corresponding to the absorbance value. The factors x and y are the p-chloranil volume and H2O2 volume, respectively. The coefficient value of x2 factor as well as the coefficients of the interactions of the factors were very small and for this reason they were not shown.

It can be observed by the surface shape (Figure 3) that the optimal region was found and that the maximum responses were achieved with 770 µL of p-chloranil solution and 85 µL of H2O2.

Analytical characteristics

The proposed analytical method was validated by evaluating linear dynamic range, precision, limit of detection (LOD), and limit of quantification(LOQ). Under the described experimental conditions Beer's law is obeyed in the concentration range from 2.10 x 10-4 to 2.48 x 10-3 mol L-1 (50 - 590 mg mL-1), with a correlation coefficient of 0.9997. The absorbance values for this concentration range were adjusted by the equation: A = -0.0401 + 364.315 x C, where C is the concentration of methyldopa in mol L-1 and the angular coefficient value corresponds to the molar absorptivity (ε), that is 3.64 x 102 L mol-1 cm-1.

Assay of precision was defined by determining intraday and interday precision, expressed as relative standard deviation (RSD). The interday variation was evaluated over 3 days. The intraday and interday precision were studied for 10 replicate analyses of 1.59 x 10-3 mol L-1 methyldopa solution. The coefficients of variation were 0.7 and 1.1% respectively, indicating that the proposed method has high repeatability.

In order to investigate the presence of matrix effects on the proposed method, a recovery study was carried out. In this study, 2.52 x 10-4; 5.04 x 10-4; 7.55 x 10-4 and 1.00 x 10-3 mol L-1 of methyldopa reference solutions were added in three representative pharmaceuticals (samples A,B and C). Recovery mean values for all samples (n=3) ranged from 97.8 - 102.7% indicating the absence of significant matrix effects on the measurements. The LOD (3.SDblank/ slope of analytical curve) and LOQ (10.SDblank/ slope) were 7.55 x 10-6 and 2.52 x 10-5 mol L-1, respectively [38].

Study of interferences

Since the aim of this study was to determine methyldopa in pharmaceuticals, the effects of the most commonly used excipients were carefully examined. The excipients studied were starch, talc, magnesium stearate, tartaric acid, polyethyleneglycol, polypropyleneglycol, cellulose, ethylcellulose, hydroxypropylmethylcellulose, lactose, silicon dioxide and sodic croscarmelose. For this study, solutions containing methyldopa and each of the excipients taken separately in concentrations equal or 10 times greater than that of methyldopa were shaking with methanol in a magnetic mixer for 10 minute, diluted, filtered when necessary, and analyzed under the same conditions described in the preparation of analytical curve.

The effect of each excipient was considered interference when the absorbance signal showed an error equal or more than 3% in the determination of the drug. The percentage of methyldopa found in these solutions ranged of 97.4 to 103.1 %, with variation coefficients values less than 3% for three replicates, indicating that no interferences were observed under the studied conditions.

Analytical application

The applicability of the proposed method for determination of methyldopa in commercial dosage were statistically [39] compared with those obtained by the Brazilian Pharmacopoeia procedure [11] and are summarized in Table 2. In all cases, the calculated F and t values did not exceed the theoretical values, indicating that there is no significant difference between the performance of the two methods as regard accuracy (t-test) and precision (F-test).

Conclusions

The proposed spectrophotometric method, which is simple, rapid and inexpensive provide gain of sensitivity without the need of additional step as extraction or heating. The method does not involve stringent reaction conditions and gives precise and accurate results. Its usefulness for methyldopa determination in pharmaceutical formulations was demonstrated, suggesting its use as an attractive alternative to many other previously reported methods for analysis of methyldopa.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Capes, CNPq and FAPESP foundations (Brazil) for financial support.

Received May 14 2008

Accepted July 18 2008

  • [1] B.B. Hoffman, in: J.G. Hardman, L.E. Limbird, A. Goodman-Gilman (Eds.), As Bases Farmacológicas da Terapêutica, McGraw-Hill, Rio de Janeiro, 2003, pp. 163.
  • [2] R.M.V. Camanas, J.M.S. Mallols, J.R.T. Lapasio, G. Ramis-Ramos, Analyst 120 (2005) 1767.
  • [3] M. Zecevic, L. Zivanovic, S.K. Agatonovic, D. Minic, J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 24 (2001) 1019.
  • [4] S. Ting, J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem. 66 (1983) 1436.
  • [5] S. Ting, J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem. 67 (1984) 1118.
  • [6] S.S. Badawy, Y.M. Issa, A.S. Tag-Eldin, Electroanalysis 8 (1996) 1060.
  • [7] J. Ballantine, A.D. Woolfson, Int. J. Pharmaceutics 3 (1979) 239.
  • [8] V.N. Pathak, M.S.R. Shukla, I.C. Shukla, Analyst 107 (1982) 1086.
  • [9] A.A.M. Wahbi, H. Abdine, M. Korany, M.H. Abdel-hay, J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem. 61 (1978) 1113.
  • [10] M.A. Korany, A.M. Wahbi, Analyst 104 (1979) 146.
  • [11] Farmacopéia Brasileira, fourth ed., Atheneu, São Paulo, 1996, pp. 47.1.
  • [12] P. Nagaraja, K.C.S. Murthy, K.S. Rangappa, N.M.M. Gowda, Talanta 46 (1998) 39.
  • [13] T. Aman, I.U. Khan, N. Aslam, I. Ahmad, Anal. Lett. 31 (1998) 1007.
  • [14] A. Afkhami, H.A. Khatami, J. Anal. Chem. 58 (2003) 135.
  • [15] P. Nagaraja, R.A. Vasantha, K.R. Sunitha, J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 25 (2001) 417.
  • [16] M.I. Walash, A. Abou-Ouf, F.B. Salem, J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem. 68 (1985) 91.
  • [17] F.B. Salem, Anal. Lett. 18 (1985) 1063.
  • [18] M.I.H. Helaleh, N. Rahman, A.N. Nafisur, S.M. Eyad, Anal. Sci. 13 (1997) 1007.
  • [19] L. Zivanovic, M. Vasiljevic, S. Agatonovic, D. Radulovic, Boll. Chim. Farm. 130 (1991) 162.
  • [20] B.S. Nagaralli, J. Seetharamappa, M.B. Melwanki, K.C. Ramesh, J. Keshavayya, J. AOAC Int. 85 (2002) 1288.
  • [21] L.K. Abdulrahman, A.M. Al-Abachi, M.H. Al-Qaissy, Anal. Chim. Acta 535 (2005) 331.
  • [22] J.J.B. Nevado, J.M.L. Gallego, P.B. Laguna, Fresenius J. Anal. Chem. 353 (1995) 221.
  • [23] M. Tubino, A. Rodrigues Jr., M.M.D.C. Vila, J. Flow Injection Anal. 21 (2004) 132.
  • [24] P.R.S. Ribeiro, J.A. Gomes Neto, L. Pezza, H.R. Pezza, Talanta 67 (2005) 240.
  • [25] O.A. Ohlweiler, Química Analítica Quantitativa, Livros Técnicos e Científicos, Rio de Janeiro, 1982.
  • [26] L.I. Bebawy, N.M. El-Kousy, J.K. Suddik, M. Shokry, J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 21 (1999) 133.
  • [27] I.A. Darwish, J. AOAC Int. 88 (2005) 38.
  • [28] R.S. Bakry, O.A. Razak, A.F.M. El-Walily, S.F. Belal, J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 14 (1996) 357.
  • [29] F.M.A. Attia, Farmaco 55 (2000) 659.
  • [30] E.A. Ibrahim, A.S. Issa, M.A.A. Salam, M.S. Mahrous, Talanta 30 (1983) 531.
  • [31] I.A. Darwish, Anal. Chim. Acta 551 (2005) 222.
  • [32] H. Salem, J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 29 (2002) 527.
  • [33] L.I. Bebawy, Y.M. Issa, K.M.A. Moneim, J. AOAC Int. 86 (2003) 1.
  • [34] N.M. El-Kousy, L.I. Bebawy, J. AOAC Int. 82 (1999) 599.
  • [35] R. Foster, Organic Charge-Transfer Complexes, Academic Press, London, 1968.
  • [36] M.U. Adikwu, U. Ajali, G.B. Okide, U.E. Odoh, Boll. Chim. Farm. 141 (2002) 315.
  • [37] P.L. Weinert, H.R. Pezza, J.E. Oliveira, L. Pezza, J. Agric. Food Chem. 52 (2004) 7788.
  • [38] G.L. Long, J.D. Winefordner, Anal. Chem. 55 (1983) 712A.
  • [39] J. C. Miller, J. N. Miller, Statistics for Analytical Chemistry, second ed., Ellis Horwood Limited, London, 1992.
  • *
  • Publication Dates

    • Publication in this collection
      28 Oct 2008
    • Date of issue
      2008

    History

    • Accepted
      18 July 2008
    • Received
      14 May 2008
    Fundação Editora da Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho - UNESP Instituto de Química / UNESP, 14801-970 Araraquara SP Brazil, Tel.: +55 16 3301-9636/3301-9631 - São Paulo - SP - Brazil
    E-mail: ecletica@iq.unesp.br