Basic information
Jornal Brasileiro de Psiquiatria The Jornal Brasileiro de Psiquiatria is the official journal of the Institute of Psychiatry of the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (IPUB/UFRJ), published quarterly for more than 70 years.
|
Indexation
|
Intellectual property
All content of the journal, except where identified, is licensed under a Creative Commons attribution-type BY. |
Editors-in-Chief
|
Associate Editors
|
Junior Editors
|
Editorial Board
|
Editorial Support Services
|
Scope and Editorial Policy
The Journal of Psychiatry of Brazil (JBP) is a peer-reviewed, open-access journal and the official publication of the Institute of Psychiatry of the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (IPUB/UFRJ), published in a continuous flow for more than 70 years.
Acceptance will be based on originality, significance, and scientific contribution. JBP does not charge an Article Processing Charge (APC) for texts submitted for evaluation, review, publication, distribution or download. Publication is completely free and open access. |
Research on Human and Experimental Subjects
All studies involving human subjects or human tissue must follow the Declaration of Helsinki (https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-helsinki-ethical-principles-for-medical-research-involving-human-subjects/) and must have been approved by the local institutional review board. Thus, in the "Methods" section, authors must identify the approval and ethics committee of the institution that reviewed the study. In addition, authors must describe the methods employed to evaluate the volunteers' capacity to understand and provide informed consent to participate in the study, as well as describe the strategies used in the study to ensure participant protection. |
Ethical Considerations and Research Integrity
The JBP considers ethical integrity to be the cornerstone of scientific research and human care, and therefore supports the recommendations for conducting and publishing research from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), the Council of Science Editors (CSE), and the World Association of Medical Editors (WAME).
Authors should disclose the use of generative AI and AI-assisted technologies in the writing process by adding a statement at the end of the main manuscript file, before the References section. The statement should be placed in a new section titled "Statement of generative AI and AI-assisted technologies in the writing process". Statement: During the preparation of this paper, the author(s) used [NAME OF TOOL/SERVICE] for the purpose of [REASON]. After using this tool/service, the author(s) have reviewed and edited the content as necessary and take full responsibility for the content of the publication. This statement does not apply to the use of basic tools for grammar checking, spell checking, references, and so on. If there is nothing to disclose, it is not necessary to add a statement. Originality and Copyright Statement: Authors retain copyright of the article and agree to grant JBP a license to publish, with the condition that authorship is properly credited and that the original article is properly cited. By submitting the manuscript, authors declare that the work is original and contains no fabrication, fraud, or plagiarism; does not violate any third-party copyright or proprietary rights; is not under consideration for publication in another journal; and has not been published previously. In addition, authors must ensure that each meets the authorship requirements as recommended by the ICMJE (see Manuscript Preparation section) and understand that if the paper or part of it is flawed or fraudulent, each author shares responsibility. |
Conflict of Interest Statement
Authors must describe any conflicts of interest that may exist in relation to the research or publication of the article. Failure to declare any existing conflicts of interest constitutes a form of misconduct in research. Conflicts of interest can be financial or non-financial in nature. All authors must fill out the ICMJE declaration form for disclosure of potential conflicts of interest. This document includes a section for declaring conflicts of interest based on the recommendations of the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals - http://www.icmje.org/conflicts-of-interest/. The completed form should be submitted along with the manuscript. |
Use of Inclusive Language
Inclusive language is an increasingly discussed topic in today's society. It is a form of communication that seeks to include and represent all people, regardless of their gender identity, race, ethnicity, sexual orientation, among other aspects. |
Manuscript Category
JBP strongly encourages authors to ensure that their manuscripts meet the quality standards established by the guidelines for health research production - Enhancing the Quality and Transparency of Health Research Network (EQUATOR) (https://www.equator-network.org/). EQUATOR is a directory that provides guidelines aimed at improving the reliability of published health research literature, promoting transparent and accurate reporting.
Checklist: Maximum number of words and references according to article category:
|
Manuscript Preparation
The manuscript should be submitted in Word format (.doc or .docx). The text should be typed on A4 paper, using Times New Roman font, size 12, with margins of 3 cm and 2 cm, left to right, using a line spacing of 1.5 and justified alignment to the left.
JBP requests that the manuscript be submitted in separate files as follows:
Manuscripts should follow the recommendations of the Equator Network guidelines - (https://www.equator-network.org/). The body of the text should not contain any information such as the authors' names or affiliations. It should be structured as follows: Original Articles, Reviews, Special Articles, and Brief Reports: Introduction, Methods, Results, Discussion, Conclusions, Individual Contributions, Conflicts of Interest, Acknowledgments and References. Case Reports: Introduction, Case Report or Series of Cases (with subdivisions: Patient Information, Clinical Findings, Diagnosis, Intervention and Assessment, and Outcomes), Discussion, Conclusion, Individual Contributions, Conflicts of Interest, Acknowledgments and References. Letters to the Editor and Editorials: The contents can be structured into sections at the author's discretion. Introduction: It should include a brief review of all literature directly related to the subject in question. Additionally, it should describe the objectives of the study. Methods: It should report the study design and describe in detail the methods employed in a way that allows other authors to replicate it. Results: They should be described logically, sequentially, and succinctly, occasionally using the aid of tables and figures. Discussion: The discussion should be limited to highlighting the study's conclusions, considering the similarities and differences between its results and those of other authors, the implications of its results, the limitations of the study, and future perspectives. Conclusions: The authors should specify, preferably in a short and concise paragraph, only the conclusions that can be supported by the study's data, as well as their clinical importance (without excessive generalizations). References: They should follow the Vancouver style (Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals: Writing and Editing for Medical Publication), arranged according to their citation in the text. The references should be identified in the text with Arabic numerals, superscripts, and enclosed in square brackets, following the order of citation in the text. Examples of references are available on the following website: http://www.nlm.nih.gov/bsd/uniform_requirements.html Units and Measures: They should be presented simply and concisely using the International System of Units (SI). Figures and Tables: Figures and Tables should not be sent in separate files. The tables should not contain data already cited in the text. They should be open on the sides and with a completely white background. Each table should have a descriptive title, and if numerical measurements are provided, the units should be included in the column header. If the manuscript is accepted, the authors may be asked to provide the source files for the figures. All figures should be cited in the manuscript in consecutive order. Only images in TIFF or JPEG formats will be accepted, with a minimum resolution according to the type of image, both for black and white images and for color images: 1200 dpi for simple black and white graphics, 300 dpi for black and white photographs, and 600 dpi for color photographs. Supplementary Materials: Supplementary materials are additional parts of a manuscript, such as audio files, videos, or data sets that may be of interest to readers. Authors can submit the supplementary material file along with their manuscript in the submission process. A section titled Supplementary Material should be included before the reference list with a concise description for each supplementary material file. The supplementary materials are not modified by the JBP editorial team. The authors are responsible for providing the final files of the supplementary material that will be published along with the article. |
Submission Process
Manuscripts must be submitted and filled out online through the ScholarOne system - https://mc04.manuscriptcentral.com/jbpsiq-scielo accompanied by:
|
Peer Review Process
JBP adopts the Single Anonymous process. After receiving the manuscript through ScholarOne, the editors will judge whether it will be reviewed by anonymous reviewers. The decision will be based on the publication focus, originality, and relevance of the manuscript to the field. Next, the manuscript will be sent to at least two anonymous and independent reviewers (who are not necessarily those suggested by the authors). The JBP editors strive to maintain a fast publication process. Usually, the period between submission and acceptance of the manuscript is about three months. The authors will receive an email from the editors with their final decision and a copy of the reviewers' comments. In case the manuscript review is indicated, the authors must submit a final text with the necessary changes (responding to each item raised by the reviewers), following the editors' instructions. The authors must reproduce the item raised by the reviewer immediately before each of their responses. Sending only the responses separate from the items raised by the reviewers may identify the manuscript evaluation process. This entire process can be tracked by the authors through ScholarOne |
Preprints
JBP accepts manuscripts that have been previously deposited in a non-commercial preprint server, provided they have not been submitted for peer review in another journal simultaneously. A preprint consists of a complete version of the scientific article that has not yet been peer-reviewed. Preprints operate independently of the journal, and publishing a preprint does not affect the peer-review process.
Preprint Review Process JBP adopts the Single Anonymous process for preprints, in which reviewers are known to the preprint authors, but not the other way around. This helps to ensure that preprints submitted to the journal are critically and impartially evaluated before their possible publication in JBP. JBP, whenever necessary, will request detailed information from preprint authors about the methodology used in the research, results obtained, and conclusions reached, so that reviewers can assess the quality of the work appropriately. JBP may also request from authors information about peer review that the preprint has already received in another repository, if applicable, to help reviewers assess the quality of the work more fully. |
Proofs
The corresponding author will receive a proof, in text file (doc and docx), with the comments and changes made by the technical reading team. The deadline for proof revision is four days. If there are still doubts in this proof, the editorial team will contact you to review it until a final version of the text is reached. |