Accessibility / Report Error
Open menu

Português Español
(Updated: 2024/03/28)

About the journal

 

Brief Background

 

Avaliação: Revista da Avaliação da Educação Superior was created in 1996 by a group of researchers, led by professors José Dias Sobrinho and Dilvo Ristoff, as a reaction to the changes in the Institutional Assessment Program (PAIUB), proposed by the Ministry of Education at the time, with the emergence of the National Course Exam (Provão). In a Meeting in April 1996, this group proposed the creation of a magazine that would take on the leading role of institutional evaluation, not just focus on student performance. Just four months later, in July 1996, the first volume of the Avaliação: Revista da Avaliação da Educação Superior was published, with Prof. Dr. José Dias Sobrinho as editor-in-chief and Prof. Dr. Dilvo Ristoff as deputy editor. The magazine began with a quarterly periodicity to keep the debate on the institutional evaluation of higher education on the agenda. In addition to having partner institutions such as the Higher Education Institutional Assessment Network (RAIES) and UNICAMP, in 2006, it signed cooperation with the University of Sorocaba (Uniso), started to have publications in printed and electronic formats and was admitted to the collection SciELO.

As of 2017, the magazine opted to publish only in electronic format, and the partnership with RAIES was ended.

Avaliação: Revista da Avaliação da Educação Superior has been classified in Qualis-Capes in stratum A1 in the Education area since 2010, when the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (Capes) started to classify national periodicals.

From 2023 onwards, it will adopt continuous-flow publishing, allowing for more publishing agility.

Mission
Contribute to developing studies and research on higher education, especially on institutional assessment of higher education and topics related to trends and policies in higher education and science and technology.

 

 

Open Science Compliance

 

Avaliação: Revista da Avaliação da Educação Superior is committed to Open Science communication practices, aiming to improve the way research is conducted, communicated, and evaluated within the academic context. We define Open Science as an innovative approach to conducting and disseminating research, highlighting the importance of transparency and the availability of fundamental elements supporting published studies, such as data and methodologies.

Our adherence to Open Science practices involves significant changes in the editorial process. Since 2023, we have opted for the continuous publication method to speed up research publication. This initiative facilitates information dissemination and contributes to more effective scientific communication that is integrated into the global flow of information.

The guidelines for submitting manuscripts to our journal reflect these commitments. We request that all manuscripts submitted be unpublished, in printed and electronic media, and include clear and accessible references to the data, methods, and codes used, ensuring the possibility of replication and validation of results.

When submitting your manuscript to Avaliação: Revista da Avaliação da Educação Superior, the responsible author must complete and attach the Open Science Compliance Form.

These measures ensure that our journal monitors and promotes scientific communication practices and contributes significantly to the evolution of research in higher education.

 

 

Ethics in Publication

 

Avaliação: Revista da Avaliação da Educação Superior maintains a firm commitment to ethics in scientific publishing. When submitting work to our journal, authors must ensure and explicitly declare that all relevant ethical guidelines were strictly followed during the conduct of their research. This includes respecting scientific integrity, adequately reporting on funding sources, such as research agencies, and ensuring that studies involving humans or animals have been previously approved by institutional ethics committees.

The author is exclusively responsible for observing good ethical practices in research. All contributions submitted must demonstrate clarity, honesty, and transparency and reflect the highest standards of scientific integrity.

Our editorial policy is based on the following principles and guidelines:

SciELO Codes of Ethics: We follow the "Guide of Good Practices for Strengthening Ethics in Scientific Publication ", which establishes standards of ethics and integrity for academic publishing.

Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE): We adopt the “Principles of Transparency and Good Practices in Academic Publications”, recommended by COPE, as an integral part of our editorial practices.

Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ): We align our policies with the guidelines established by the DOAJ, promoting transparency and ethics in open-access publications.

Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association (OASPA): Our editorial practices reflect the principles defended by OASPA, ensuring open and ethical scientific communication.

For research carried out in virtual environments, we reference the guidelines provided by theNational Research Ethics Commission (CONEP). We encourage researchers outside Brazil to consult equivalent ethical documents in their respective countries or contactthe journal for additional guidance.

Avaliação: Revista da Avaliação da Educação Superior is dedicated to ensuring that all publications follow the highest ethical standards, contributing to integrity and respect within the academic community. We ask authors to engage in promoting responsible research and editorial practice that respects human rights, research integrity, and fundamental ethical values.

 

 

 

Focus and Scope

 

Avaliação: Revista da Avaliação da Educação Superior is a scientific publication of the University of Campinas - Unicamp and University of Sorocaba - Uniso. Practitioner of open access, focusing on disseminating studies and research in Higher Education, whose objective is to contribute to the development of studies and research on Higher Education, especially on Institutional Assessment of Higher Education and topics related to trends and policies of Higher Education. science and technology. Its policy is to catalyze and disseminate academic research produced by researchers from universities and higher education institutions in Brazil and abroad, which contribute to the development of theories and practices of institutional evaluation and general debates on higher education.

As part of its internationalization policy, the magazine adopted bilingual language (Portuguese and English or Portuguese and Spanish) in its publications (articles, interviews, and reviews) from 2023.

 

 

Digital Preservation

 

Avaliação: Revista da Avaliação da Educação Superior follows the standards defined in theSciELO Program's Digital Preservation Policy program

 

 

Indexing Sources

 

 

 

Bibliographic Journal Information

 

  • Title of the periodical:Avaliação: Revista da Avaliação da Educação Superior
  • Short title: Aval. (Campinas, Sorocaba, online)
  • Published by: University of Sorocaba (Uniso)
  • Periodicity: Annual
  • Publication mode: Continuous
  • Year of creation of the periodical: 1996
 

 

Websites and Social Media

 

 

 

Editorial Policy

 

Preprints

Avaliação: Revista da Avaliação da Educação Superior establishes that:

Any text that has been previously published, whether in full or in parts, whether in event annals, newspapers, books, or websites, will be considered an early publication and, for this reason, is not unpublished. The magazine only accepts unpublished texts.

Avaliação: Revista da Avaliação da Educação Superior accepts submissions of articles that have been deposited in advance in repositories such asSciELO Preprints,SocArXic, andZenodo. When submitting an article published in one of these repositories, information about Preprint must be indicated in theOpen Science Compliance Form and sent at the time of submission.

Peer review process

Articles sent that meet the editorial standards of Avaliação: Revista da Avaliação da Educação Superior undergo pre-evaluation by the editors, who verify the adequacy of the contributions to the magazine's thematic scope. Once approved in the pre-evaluation, contributions are forwarded to the evaluators.

All articles are evaluated by at least two referees, who may be members of the Advisory Board or ad hoc advisors. When issuing the opinion, they consider the quality of the treatment of the topic, the clarity of the writing, and the agreement with the magazine's editorial standards. Evaluators can refuse, suggest modifications, or approve the publication of the text. In the case of divergent opinions, the contribution is necessarily sent to a third reviewer.

The entire process of sending and evaluating texts is carried out through the Open Journal System (OJS), which hides the names of evaluators and authors of contributions to preserve double-blind evaluation. Opinions are confidential, and when agreeing to issue the opinion, the evaluator must certify that there is no conflict of interest with the text that will be evaluated.

Opinions serve as the basis for editorial decisions, with the editors-in-chief having the right to publish or reject submissions. After issuing opinions via the journal's specific form, the authors are notified of the editorial decision, which may be:

a) Accept
b) Request mandatory corrections
c) Reject

In the case of a request for mandatory corrections, authors have 15 days from the sending of the editorial decision to make the requested modifications. The new version of the text must be written using the Control Changes feature in Word or similar, and the author must send a Letter to the Editor in a separate file explaining how the requested changes were made and, if not made, the justification for this procedure. After sending the new version and being corrected by the authors, the editor is responsible for evaluating the requested modifications and deciding whether the article will be rejected or approved. After approval of the manuscript, it goes to standardization, review, and layout adjustments.

The standard form of evaluation adopted by Avaliação: Revista da Avaliação da Educação Superior is double-blind, in cases of preprint, it is not possible to guarantee the anonymity of the authors and, therefore, the evaluation can be single-blind or open, which are forms of peer review that the journal offers as an option for authors and reviewers:

1st) Double-blind peer review: authors and reviewers do not know each other’s identities in this modality.

2nd) Single-blind peer review: The authors reveal their identities in this modality, but the reviewers remain anonymous.

3rd) Open peer review: authors and reviewers know each other’s identities in this modality.

Authors will receive detailed opinions to ensure transparency and opportunities for improvement. On average, the period between submission and communication of the editorial decision is one to eight months, with publication occurring six to ten months after the initial submission.

We disclose the names of the section and layout editors responsible for each article, reinforcing our commitment to clarity and integrity in the academic publishing process.

Open data

Avaliação: Revista da Avaliação da Educação Superior, committed to the principles of Open Science, asks authors to share the data, codes, methods, and other materials used, resulting from the research underlying the texts of articles published by the journals. Exceptions are allowed in cases of legal and ethical issues.

The articles have free access and are accessible to researchers, students, and the general public, intending to expand the reach and impact of research. We follow the code of good practice for editors, ensuring an ethical and transparent editorial process. The journal encourages the strategic use of social networks to disseminate published manuscripts, aiming to reach a wide audience and encourage productive academic discussions. We encourage authors to detail each person's contribution in multiple-author manuscripts, promoting clarity and fairness in the attribution of credit.

The journal supports sharing research data, analysis scripts, instruments, and supplementary materials through open online repositories. Authors can use their institutions' repositories and identify relevant and certified repositories in theList of repositories for depositing research data. These practices facilitate the reproduction and verification of research results, stimulating discoveries and innovations. When applicable, authors must indicate and reference in the manuscript the availability and location of these resources and the results obtained. Furthermore, if applicable, the repository in which the data and information are found must be cited in the text following theResearch Data Citation Guide, preferably in the section on the applied methodology, included in the list of references, and the “Availability of Research Data” section.

The contributions of the section and layout editors are duly credited in the published article. In recognition and appreciation, reviewers have the option to register and validate their review activities inReviewer Credits, promoting transparency and recognition of your important work.

Fees

Avaliação: Revista da Avaliação da Educação Superior does not charge a submission fee, Article Processing Charge (APC) or publication.

Institutional support guarantees the financial sustainability of the Journal, ensuring coverage of essential expenses such as the use of originality verification tools and XML markup services, which are essential for maintaining our quality and integrity standards.

Avaliação: Revista da Avaliação da Educação Superior emphasizes that the authors are exclusively responsible for the financial responsibility for grammatical review and translation of articles into English and/or Spanish.

Ethics and Misconduct, Correction and Retraction Policy

The journal is committed to maintaining academic integrity and the quality of scientific literature and follows the guidelines below:

Guide to good practices for strengthening ethics in scientific publishing.
Guide for recording, marking and publishing Errata
Guide for registering, marking and publishing a retraction

Concerning the identification of misconduct, consisting of the practices of plagiarism, self-plagiarism, and republication of articles, as well as data falsification, Avaliação: Revista da Avaliação da Educação Superior informs that it uses plagiarism and self-plagiarism detection tools. However, if there is a failure in the misconduct detection process, and the article has already been published, the author and his co-authors become subject to editorial sanctions, such as retraction of scientific articles.

Policy on Conflict of Interest

The conflict of interest may be personal, commercial, political, academic, or financial. Conflicts of interest may occur when authors, reviewers, or editors have interests that may influence the preparation or evaluation of manuscripts. When submitting the manuscript, authors are responsible for recognizing and disclosing financial or other conflicts that may have influenced the work. If there is, even potentially, a conflict of interest, the author(s) must inform it in theConflict of Interest Form that must be completed, signed by all participants in the manuscript, and attached to the submission platform.

For more information, seeDisclosure of Financial and Non-Financial Relationships and Activities and Conflicts of Interest.

Adoption of similarity software

To guarantee the originality of the manuscript submitted to Avaliação: Revista da Avaliação da Educação Superior, we use the CopySpider tool to analyze plagiarism.

In cases where plagiarism or self-plagiarism is characterized above the permitted limits, the manuscript is returned to the author for correction.

If plagiarism is identified after publication, the Editorial Committee analyzes the fact. If the misconduct is confirmed, the article will be immediately withdrawn, and appropriate measures will be applied to the authors.

Gender and Sex Issues

The editorial team of Avaliação: Revista da Avaliação da Educação Superior, in addition to the authors who publish in the journal, must always observe the guidelines on Sex and Gender Equity in Research (Sex and Gender Equity in Research – SAGER). The SAGER guidelines comprise a set of guidelines that guide the reporting of information about sex and gender in study design, data analysis, and results and interpretation of findings. Furthermore, Avaliação: Revista da Avaliação da Educação Superior observes the gender equity policy in the formation of its editorial board.

Ethics Committee

Avaliação: Revista da Avaliação da Educação Superior follows strict editorial ethics standards. We do not accept plagiarism or any other unethical behavior. Authors must ensure the originality of the work and that it is not under consideration in another journal. All studies involving human subjects must include corresponding ethical approval. Our commitment is to maintain academic integrity and transparency in all publications.

Authors must attach a statement of approval from the institution's ethics committee responsible for approving the research. Copyright Regarding the policy related to copyright, Avaliação: Revista da Avaliação da Educação Superior follows the recommendations of the SciELO Criteria, item 5.2.10.1.2. Author's rights—copyright.

The authors of publications carried out by Avaliação: Revista da Avaliação da Educação Superior maintain the copyright of their works, licensing them under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. This license allows articles to be reused and distributed without restriction if the original work is correctly cited.

Intellectual Property and Terms of Use

Website Responsibility:

Regarding Avaliação: Revista da Avaliação da Educação Superior reserves the right to make normative, spelling, and grammatical changes to the originals to maintain the standard of the language and respect the authors' style.

Except where otherwise specified, all content of the magazine and articles published by Avaliação: Revista da Avaliação da Educação Superior are licensed under the CC-BY license.
Submitted originals will not be returned to the authors.

Author's Responsibility:

Authors are entirely responsible for the opinions expressed in their articles.

Avaliação: Revista da Avaliação da Educação Superior encourages authors to self-archive their accepted manuscripts, publishing them on personal blogs, institutional repositories, and academic and social media, as well as posting them on their social media, if the citation is included in a complete version of the magazine's website.

 

 

 

Editorial Board

 

Chief Editors

 

 

 

Associate Editors

 

 

 

National editorial board

 

 

 

International editorial board

 

 

 

Technical Team

 

  • Silmara Pereira da Silva Martins, Universidade de Sorocaba (UNISO), Sorocaba, SP, Brasil. E-mail: silmara.silva@uniso.br
 

 

Editorial production

 

  • Silmara Pereira da Silva Martins, Universidade de Sorocaba (UNISO), Sorocaba, SP, Brasil. E-mail: silmara.silva@uniso.br
  • Vilma Franzoni, Universidade de Sorocaba (UNISO), Sorocaba, SP, Brasil. E-mail: vilma.franzoni@uniso.br
 

 

Instructions to authors

 

 

Avaliação: Revista da Avaliação da Educação Superior operates exclusively through theonline submission system, using the Open Journal System – OJS, to support the management of the editorial process, from submission, evaluation, to publication of the article. The magazine does not accept text sent outside the system.

For individual authorship, the author must exclusively have a doctorate title. In the case of co-authorship, one author must be a doctor, with the others being doctoral students, masters, and/or master's students.

Each author may have only one article in progress at a time, and the publication of texts written by the same author will respect twenty-four months between publications.

The text approved for publication must undergo review and grammatical correction and be translated into a foreign language (English, Spanish, or Portuguese in the case of an international article). In the Portuguese text, the credits of the person responsible for the grammar review must appear, and in the translated text, the credits of the person responsible for the translation (name and email).

A deadline for the final delivery of the files will be added, agreed upon between the parties, to meet requests for review, grammatical correction, and translation.

IMPORTANT: The authors are responsible for the costs of grammatical review and translation of the text.

Texts must comply with the guidelines proposed by Avaliação: Revista da Avaliação da Educação Superior and be under its scope.

Types of documents accepted

The magazine accepts submissions from authors from Brazil and abroad and is currently organized into four (4) sections:

Original article

Substantive contributions on issues relevant to the journal's central theme, which present results of empirical or theoretical research or systematic and integrative critical review of scientific and academic production in the area of interest. Articles submitted for Avaliação: Revista da Avaliação da Educação Superior must be unpublished in printed or electronic media, and simultaneous submission to other journals is not permitted.

Editorial

Section intended for publishing text prepared by the editors of the Avaliação: Revista da Avaliação da Educação Superior.

Interview

This is an unpublished interview with a researcher in Higher Education who presents a relevant contribution to the educational field. Graduate students may submit manuscripts to this section.

Review

Manuscript that presents a critical reading of works relevant to the area of higher education, of books that have been published recently, up to 24 months (last 2 years). Graduate students may submit manuscripts to this section.

Avaliação: Revista da Avaliação da Educação Superior accepts submissions of articles, interviews, and reviews in Portuguese, Spanish, and English, which will be published in their original language.

Authors' Contribution

Avaliação: Revista da Avaliação da Educação Superior requests a description of each author's contributions; they must indicate their participation at the end of the article, informing their contribution to the conception, development, and analysis of the data presented.

The magazine suggests using the CREDiT taxonomy structurehttps://casrai.org/credit/

It is worth noting that it is the responsibility of the submission author to identify and include all co-authors who effectively collaborated in writing the article.

Manuscript Preparation

When submitting the manuscript, the author responsible for the submission must inform, in the designated fields in thearticle submission system, the following data for all authors: Full name, Orcid, institutional affiliation, e-mail, and mini CV informing the degree. Submissions with incomplete data will be rejected immediately.

Article Submission Format

The file must be submitted using thejournal template, following its guidelines and meeting the requirements stipulated in the guidelines for authors, being by the scope of the Avaliação: Revista da Avaliação da Educação Superior and following the guidelines below.

Title in Portuguese, English, and Spanish.

Portuguese: At the top of the page, only the first letter is capitalized, centered, and in bold, Segoe UI font, size 12.

The titles in English and Spanish precede the language summaries, which are centered, without bold, in Segoe UI font, size 10.

Abstract in Portuguese, English, and Spanish.

must be clear, easily readable, 100 to 250 words.

Keywords in Portuguese, English, and Spanish.

up to 3, which makes it possible to identify the content of the article; presented in lowercase letters; except First Names; Scientific Names; Acronyms; separated from each other by semicolons; ended with a full stop.

The metadata, including the title, abstract, and keywords, must have Portuguese, English, and Spanish versions.

DO NOT IDENTIFY AUTHORITY IN THE PAPER. Correctly fill in the authorship information in the system. Insert your full Name, email, country, Lattes URL, Orcid URL, institution, and Summary of biography, indicating title, city, and State.

When submitting the article, all authors must be entered into the system in the field designated for authorship. Submissions with incomplete data will be rejected immediately.


Digital Assets

Tables, figures, illustrations, maps, diagrams, and other digital assets in the document must be inserted in the body of the text, presented by the updated Brazilian Association of Technical Standards (ABNT). They must be identified with the respective title and source (mandatory) and caption (if any). Tables must always be in editable format and never in images. Check examples in themagazine Template.

Citations and References

QUOTES: textual transcription of part of the consulted author's work must follow the updated ABNT NBR 10520 standards.

Direct quotations of up to three lines must be inserted in the standardized text using double quotation marks, without italics; Single quotation marks are used to indicate a quote within another quote. Choose one of the examples and standardize it throughout the text:

Direct quote

According to Barros (1991, p. 62), “Interpretar significa buscar o sentido mais explicativo dos resultados da pesquisa.”

or

According to the author, “Interpretar significa buscar o sentido mais explicativo dos resultados da pesquisa” (Barros, 1991, p. 62).

Indirect quote

According to Lima (1990), function can suggest something related to the activity or task.

or

The function can be the idea of something related to the activity or task (Lima, 1990).

A letter after the date will identify different titles by the same author published in the same year. Ex.: (Silva, 2015a), (Silva, 2015b). If there are two publications by the same author, the citation must be as follows: (Dias Sobrinho, 2009, 2015).

Quote with more than 4 lines: retreat paragraph with 4cm, font size 10, justified, spacing first 12cm, then 18cm; single line spacing. Examples:

According to the author:

It could be said that depending on the resources available by the group to meet the needs expressed and/or felt, to a greater or lesser extent in relation to the stimulation of the environment in which the family is located, a process of reestablishment can more easily develop. of the internal social order or a spontaneous rationalization is instituted (Barros, 1991, p. 22).

According to Barros (1991, p. 22):

It could be said that depending on the resources available by the group to meet the needs expressed and/or felt, to a greater or lesser extent in relation to the stimulation of the environment in which the family is located, a process of reestablishment can more easily develop. of the internal social order or a spontaneous rationalization is instituted.

Before submitting the article, check that all citations are present in the list of references. Citations must be made in the article's language. In the case of books in other languages, the author must translate and indicate in the reference (our translation).

References: single list to present the documents cited throughout the work, in alphabetical order. Present following the updated ABNT NBR 6023 standards. Use Segoe UI font, single space, size 12, aligned to the left, spacing before/after 12pt.

PAY ATTENTION TO THE MANDATORY INFORMATION:

List only authors cited in the article.

Use of italics for the expressions: e-book; online; In (indicates part of the work); et al. (to indicate more than 4 authors [optional]).

Indicate the electronic address of online publications (journals, periodical articles, e-books, events, etc.), with an access date that does not exceed the article submission date.

Examples:

Book

AGUIAR, M.; ARAÚJO, C. H. Bolsa-escola: educação para enfrentar a pobreza. Brasília: UNESCO, 2002.

BAZZO, W. A.; PEREIRA, L. T. do V. Introdução à engenharia: conceitos, ferramentas e comportamentos. 2. ed. Florianópolis: UFSC, 2010.

Quatro ou mais autores: Indicar apenas o primeiro autor, e acrescentar a expressão et al. (no decorrer do texto padronizar o uso da expressão et al.).

BROWN, S. et al. Administração da produção e operações: um enfoque estratégico na manufatura e nos serviços. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier, 2006.

Autoria desconhecida: obra sem indicação de autoria, a entrada é feita pelo próprio título destacado por letras maiúsculas na primeira palavra.

BRITISH pharmacopoeia 2010. London: The Stationery Office, 2010. v. 1.
DICIONÁRIO de especialidades farmacêuticas: DEF 2010/11. Rio de Janeiro: Publicações Científicas, 2010.
 
Book chapter

MORAES, A. A. de A. Histórias de leitura em narrativas de professoras. In: SILVA, L. L. M. (org.). Entre leitores: alunos, professores. Campinas: Komedi, 2001. p. 165-235.
UNESCO. Repensar as políticas culturais: criatividade para o desenvolvimento 2018; relatório global da Convenção de 2005. Brasília: UNESCO, 2018. E-book. Disponível em: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000266025. Acesso em: 01 fev. 2024.

Dissertation or Thesis

STRIEDER, C. C. Educação beneditina e escolar: o lugar do passado no presente. 2022. Tese (Doutorado em Educação) – Universidade de Sorocaba, Sorocaba, 2022. Disponível em: https://uniso.br/mestrado-doutorado/educacao/teses/2022/cristiane-correa.pdf. Acesso em: 01 fev. 2024.

Article in a periodical publication (for online articles it is essential to add the place of publication after the name of the magazine, followed by volume, number, page, month and year, and the website's email address)

CARVALHO, R. R. da S.; OLIVEIRA, J. F. de. Expansão e qualidade da educação superior: um balanço das metas 12, 13 e 14 do Plano Nacional de Educação - PNE 2014-2024. Avaliação: Revista da Avaliação da Educação Superior, Campinas; Sorocaba, v. 27, n. 2, p. 227-247, jul. 2022. Disponível em: https://www.scielo.br/j/aval/a/rxNDLXGXR8H53YDzgrwZvGk/?format=pdf&lang=pt. Acesso em: 01 fev. 2024.

Publication in Annals of scientific events

LOPES, L. J.; ROCHA, M. de P. P.; BERGAMASCHI, C. de C. Prescrição inapropriada para pacientes psiquiátricos em um hospital público. In: MOSTRA DE ATIVIDADES ACADÊMICAS, 2., 2016, Sorocaba. Anais [...]. Sorocaba: Uniso, 2016. p. 155–160. Tema: Inovação e transversalidade. Disponível em: https://uniso.br/assets/docs/publicacoes/publicacoes-eventos/anais-da-maac/edicoes/anais-maac-II.pdf. Acesso em: 01 fev. 2024.

Events

ENCONTRO NACIONAL DE ENSINO DE BIOLOGIA, 7.; ENCONTRO REGIONAL DE ENSINO DE BIOLOGIA DA REGIONAL 6 – NORTE, 1., 2018. Belém, PA. Anais [...]. Belém, PA: UFPA, 2018. Tema: O que a vida tem a ensinar ao Ensino de Biologia? Disponível em: https://sbenbio.org.br/wp-content/uploads/anais/anais_vii_enebio_norte_completo_2018.pdf. Acesso em: 01 fev. 2024.

Articles in newspapers and magazines

RODRIGUES, A. Pelos lados e para o alto, SP cresce 60% em área construída em 25 anos. Folha de S.Paulo, São Paulo, ano 99, n. 33.025, 3 set. 2019. Disponível em:

https://www1.folha.uol.com.br/cotidiano/2019/09/pelos-lados-e-para-o-alto-sp-cresce-60-em-area-construida-em-25-anos.shtml. Acesso em: 01 fev. 2024.

Supplementary Documents

When submitting the manuscript, you must send the following supplementary documents (completed; PDF format):

Open Science compliance form
Declaration of Conflict of Interest

Term of approval from the ethics committee, when necessary.

Financing Statement

In case of financial support, insert a statement at the end of the article. Provide the name of the funding agency in full, followed by the grant and/or contract number, along with explanations about the role of these sources.

If the research was not funded by a specific project grant, the following information must be included:

This research did not receive a specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or non-profit sectors.”

Acknowledgments

If necessary, include the collaboration of people, groups, or institutions that deserve recognition but do not have justification for their inclusion as authors.

Contact

University of Sorocaba (UNISO)
Rodovia Raposo Tavares KM 92,5 – CEP: 18023-000
Sorocaba – SP - Brasil.
Telefone: (15) 2101 7018
Email: revistaavaliacao@uniso.br

 

 

Publicação da Rede de Avaliação Institucional da Educação Superior (RAIES), da Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) e da Universidade de Sorocaba (UNISO). Rodovia Raposo Tavares, km. 92,5, CEP 18023-000 Sorocaba - São Paulo, Fone: (55 15) 2101-7016 , Fax : (55 15) 2101-7112 - Sorocaba - SP - Brazil
E-mail: revistaavaliacao@uniso.br
Stay informed of issues for this journal through your RSS reader
Open menu

Brazil