Abstract
Objective:
To understand how physician’s subjectivity is expressed while attending to victims of sexual violence at emergencies.
Methodology:
Qualitative research, a collective case design with an ethnographic approach, via the elaboration of a field journal, two institutional itineraries, 12 in-depth interviews to leaders and doctors and one workshop.
Results:
There were four moments identified on victim’s itinerary at emergencies services, in each moment emerged subjectivity’s expressions, that could be organized on forms of subjectivity and their mechanisms within. If the physicians embodied the modern medicine, a subfield of medicine, into their habitus, their practices tend toward the revictimization of their patients. In the other hand, if doctors do not embody such practices and assume a critical posture about it, they tend toward a comprehensive care.
Discussion:
The non-recognition of such practices leads to the impossibility of exercising health citizenship, its mechanisms are a result of socialization processes from sociohistorical constructs that are reinforced by hegemonic medical model and the medical field., generating tension between practical logics of physicians and the needs of the victims. However, a fracture of this model is observed as a possibility of transformation toward comprehensive care.
Keywords:
Sexual Violence; Gender, Subjectivity; Right to Health; Medical Education