Human fusariosis: An emerging infection that is difficult to treat

Abstract

Fusarium spp. has been associated with a broad spectrum of emerging infections collectively termed fusariosis. This review includes articles published between 2005 and 2018 that describe the characteristics, clinical management, incidence, and emergence of these fungal infections. Fusarium solani and F. oxysporum are globally distributed and represent the most common complexes. Few therapeutic options exist due to intrinsic resistance, especially for the treatment of invasive fusariosis. Therefore, the use of drug combinations could be an important alternative for systemic antifungal resistance. Increase in the number of case reports on invasive fusariosis between 2005 and 2018 is evidence of the emergence of this fungal infection.

Keywords:
Fusarium spp; Emerging fungal infection; Human fusariosis

INTRODUCTION

Fusariosis is an infection that affects plants, animals, and humans, and is caused by various fungi of the genus Fusarium^1,2. Fusarium spp. is responsible for significant economic losses in the agricultural field worldwide³due to difficulties in management of diseases caused by this species⁴. Similarly, in the medical field, different Fusarium species have been related to local or invasive infections in both immunodepressed and immunocompetent individuals^5,6,7.

However, infections are difficult to treat because of the lack of consensus regarding treatment protocols for fusariosis in humans caused by multi-drug resistant isolates^2,8,9. In addition, it is possible that environmental isolates from Fusarium spp. acquire resistance due to previous exposure to fungicides that were used in the agricultural fields^10,11, and these isolates may disseminate and consequently infect humans^12,13. Perhaps this process of infection may be avoided by implementing public control policies regarding the sale and use of fungicides.

As such, the aim of this study is to review the literature to demonstrate the characteristics, clinical management, incidence, and emergence of fungal infections caused by Fusarium species. The lack of attention on these cases by public health institutions and the insufficient research on the development of novel antifungal agents as therapeutic options emphasize the need to address the main factors involved in fusariosis, such as clinical forms, treatment, and lack of epidemiological control. To address this problem, articles published between 2005 and 2018 were analyzed, and 23 publications were obtained that included important conclusions regarding this proposition (Table 1).

TABLE 1:
Timeline of fusariosis: publication basis for the review study and conclusions of the last 15 years.

Authors	Year	Journal	Main conclusions
Nucci and Anaissie	2007	Clinical Microbiology Reviews	Infections by the Fusarium species are superficial in healthy patients, and these patients
			tend to respond well to therapy. Disseminated fusariosis affects the
			immunocompromised host and is often fatal.
Katiyar and Edlind	2009	Antimicrobials Agents and	Genetic mutations in Fks sequences result in decreased sensitivity of the Fusarium sp.,
		Chemotherapy	rendering it difficult to treat human fusariosis.
Romani	2011	Nature Reviews Immunology	When the infective structures of Fusarium spp. reach the mucous membranes, the
			innate cellular immune response of the host is activated, which includes dendritic cells,
			macrophages, monocytes, neutrophils, and soluble mediators of the complement system.
Guarro et al.	2013	European Journal of Clinical	Fusariosis is related to high mortality. Recovery from neutropenia remains the most important determinant of outcomes in such patients.
		Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
Nucci et al.	2014	Clinical Microbiology and	Significant improvement in the results of invasive fusariosis in the last decade with
		Infection	changes in therapeutic practices, involving a decrease in the use of amphotericin B and
			increase in the use of voriconazole and combination therapy.
Spolti et al.	2014	Plant Disease	Epidemic of fusariosis in plants can be harmful to humans and animal health, since the
			ingestion of cereals contaminated with mycotoxins can cause serious food poisoning.
van Diepeningen et al.	2014	Current Clinical Microbiology Reports	The use of molecular techniques is recommended to identify Fusarium species that cause infections.
Varon et al.	2014	The Journal of Infection	Skin lesions may be considered entry points for Fusarium spp. Infections, especially in
			individuals that exhibit risk factors, such as high-risk hematological patients.
Price et al.	2015	Pest Management Science	Fusarium sp. exhibits mechanisms that contribute to the acquisition of resistance to
			even the most diverse antifungal agents. These mechanisms include changes in the
			amino acid sequence, overexpression of the CYP51 gene, and overexpression of
			genes that encode efflux pumps.
van Diepeningen et al.	2015a	Current Fungal Infection	Different Fusarium species have been associated with local or invasive infections in both
		Report	immunosuppressed and immunocompetent individuals.
van Diepeningen et al.	2015b	Mycoses	Members of the F. solani complex are the most common and virulent, followed by F.
			oxysporum, F. fujikuroi, and F. moniliforme.
Al-Hatmi et al.	2016a	Emerging Microbes & Infections	Treatment given for Fusarium infections varies according to the site of infection.
Al-Hatmi et al.	2016b	The Journal of Antimicrobial	In vitro combined use of natamycin and voriconazole was found to be synergistic
		Chemotherapy	against most Fusarium strains, thereby significantly reducing the concentrations
			required to inhibit fungal growth.
Dalhoff	2016	Journal of Global Antimicrobial	Fusariosis is difficult to treat and the use of antimycotics in agriculture and horticulture
		Resistance	facilitates the acquisition of antifungal resistance.
Espinel-Ingroff et al.	2016	Antimicrobial Agents and	A cutoff point for minimum inhibitory concentration values for various Fusarium species
		Chemotherapy	was proposed based on laboratory results.
Ribas et al.	2016	Brazilian Journal of	Environmental isolates of Fusarium spp. could acquire resistance due to previous
		Microbiology	exposure to fungicides that are used agriculturally in the field.
Al-Hatmi et al.	2017	Journal of Fungi	No standardization is established regarding MIC cut points for Fusarium, which renders
			it difficult to classify the susceptibility profile of isolates.
Batista et al.	2017	Chemistry Select	New chemical molecules exhibited low MICs (high potency) against Fusarium spp. and
			reduced toxicity with promising applicability in the biological and industrial fields.
Fuentefria et al.	2017	Letters in Applied	Combination therapy have been an important alternative for combating Fusarium species
		Microbiology	.
Kolar et al.	2017	Investigative Ophthalmology &	Dectin-1 and TLR2 play an important role in the regulation of F. solani-induced AMP
		Visual Science	expression in corneal epithelial cells, facilitating the eradication of fungal pathogens.
Al-Hatmi et al.	2018	International Journal of	New identification tools for Fusarium spp. to aid in selecting the most appropriate treatment
		Antimicrobial Agents	.
Bashir et al.	2018	Environmental Science and	Evaluated various concentrations of fungicides used to combat fusariosis in plant. The
		Pollution Research	use of carbendazim significantly reduced the incidence of disease by 49.7% after 40
			days of application.
Homa et al.	2018	Frontiers in Microbiology	F. falciforme was the most prevalent species of FSSC in South India. Susceptibility and
			virulence of clinical and environmental isolates were similar.

EMERGENCE OF PATHOGENIC FUSARIUM SPECIES

Fusarium species exhibit global distribution, and it is believed that approximately ten complexes are related to human pathogens, including F. solani, F. oxysporum, F. fujikuroi, F. incarnatum-equiseti, F. clamydosporum, F. dimerum, F. sambucinum, F. concolor, and F. lateritium^5,14. Among these complexes, members of the F. solani complex are the most common and virulent (comprising approximately 40-60% of infections), followed by F. oxysporum (~20%), F. fujikuroi and F. moniliforme (~10%)^5,14,15.

Despite global distribution, endemic regions are tropical and subtropical in nature^7,16. Although fusariosis is associated with specific climatic conditions, environmental and clinical isolates have been reported to cause infections outside previously established borders¹⁴. This fungus has efficient mechanisms of dispersion, and its conidia reach considerable distances⁹. Moreover, genetic similarities between clinical isolates and environmental isolates of the same species may be related to infections in patients by Fusarium spp. in the environment¹⁶.

CLINICAL ASPECTS OF FUSARIOSIS

Fusarium species cause a wide spectrum of infections in humans, ranging from superficial and locally invasive to disseminated, with the most prevalent infections being onychomycosis, skin infections, and keratitis¹⁵.

Invasive infections can be widespread involving the skin, brain, bloodstream, lungs, eyes, and bones^14,17,18. Patients with severe and prolonged neutropenia, especially those with hematological malignancies, are most susceptible to prevalent infections^9,18.

In their epidemiological study, Garnica and Nucci described the worldwide incidence of Fusarium spp. as the main non-dermatophyte filamentous fungus that causes onychomycosis¹⁹. These infections are presented as subungual distal and total dystrophic infections that are often associated with paronychia and characterized by purulent periungual inflammation. The most commonly involved complexes are F. oxysporum and F. solani²⁰. Treatment is difficult and prolonged, usually lasting more than 4 or 6 months, even with the use of topical and systemic antifungal agents²¹.

Keratitis is one of the most common infections caused by Fusarium spp. and primarily develops from trauma to the eye, contact lens wear, and use of corticosteroids^9,19,22. Trauma is the key predisposing factor and occurs in 40-60 % of patients¹⁹.

Skin infections are the result of dissemination of the fungus primarily in immunocompromised patients¹⁴. The most common pattern of disseminated disease is the combination of multiple painful erythematous papules or nodules, commonly with central necrosis. Such occurrences spread throughout the body and continuously release fungal cells, thereby resulting in a positive blood culture, and often pulmonary involvement, with or without involvement at other sites^9,17.

The airways represent the main gateway to infection, followed by the skin at the site of the tissue or onychomycosis, contact lens wear, and possibly mucous membranes^9,18,22. Prior to initiating immunosuppressive therapy- given the severity associated with disseminated fusariosis- signs of the presence of skin or nail infections should be carefully investigated, as they comprise the focus of fungal dissemination and are often neglected upon initial physical examinations^5,9,22.

IMMUNE RESPONSE AGAINST FUSARIOSIS

The immune system impedes the establishment of invasive infections by various species of fungi as high mortality is seen in immunosuppressed individuals²³. However, in terms of the emerging pathogenic species of the genus Fusarium, the lymphocyte response via Th2 may facilitate the invasiveness of this disease and explain the self-limiting difficulty related to its complex mycosis²⁴.

When the infective structures of Fusarium spp. reach the mucous membranes, the innate cellular immune response of the host is activated, which includes dendritic cells, macrophages, monocytes, neutrophils, and soluble mediators of the complement system²⁵. These responses are initiated by pattern recognition receptors (PRRs), which recognize a series of common and constant molecular patterns that are present in nearly all microorganisms, denominated as pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs). The activation of PRRs plays a dual role: it initiates processes of the innate immune system, such as phagocytosis, and establishes a link between innate and adaptive immunity via MHC type I and type II expressions²⁵_.

The most important PAMPs in filamentous fungi are mannan, β-glucan, and chitin. The primary soluble PRR is pentraxin-3, whereas cellular PRRs are lectins, Toll-like-receptors, and NOD receptors. Fusarium species are recognized by type 2 Toll-like-receptors, which are generated in response to the production of anti-inflammatory cytokines (IL4 and IL10), and thus promote an adaptive immune system response that is mediated by Th2 lymphocytes^26,27. Thus, invasive Fusarium infections stimulate a Th2-type lymphocyte response, in which anti-inflammatory cytokines are produced, thereby leading to an inadequate response by the host to the infection and high morbidity and mortality²⁸.

Despite their minor importance, various humoral factors also participate in the innate response, as the complement is activated by their associated classical and alternating pathways²⁵. However, the predisposing factors of invasive mycoses relate to the dysfunction of the immune system of phagocytosis, rather than defects in humoral immunity. More knowledge on humoral immunity activity in response to fungal infections is required, although some studies have attempted to demonstrate a specific marker of invasive diseases caused by Fusarium spp.²⁹.

ANTIFUNGAL RESISTANCE AND THERAPEUTIC OPTIONS

Fusarium spp. exhibit intrinsic resistance to echinocandins². Moreover, some isolates exhibit resistance to azoles that are associated with a third analogue of the CYP51 gene³⁰. On the other hand, the intrinsic resistance of echinocandins is linked to the Y639 region of the FKS1 gene, which is responsible for encoding the catalytic subunit of β-1-3 glucan synthase³¹. These fungi also exhibit mechanisms that contribute to acquiring resistance to most diverse antifungal agents, such as changes in amino acid sequences, overexpression of the CYP51 gene, and overexpression of genes that encode efflux pumps³².

Minimal inhibitory concentrations and minimum effective concentrations have not been established for Fusarium species²⁰. To present this missing knowledge, Espinel-Ingroff⁸ defined the epidemiological breakpoints for amphotericin B, posaconazole, and itraconazole in relation to the main Fusarium species that cause fusariosis. In this scenario, a few options exist to combat this infection, and the frequently used antifungal agents include natamycin, amphotericin B, voriconazole, and posaconazole⁵. Therefore, depending on the clinical case, amphotericin B and voriconazole are the drugs of choice^9,33. In vitro and in vivo tests also reveal natamycin and voriconazole as drugs of choice to treat keratitis induced by Fusarium spp.²

In the case of resistance, the use of combinations of drugs may be an important alternative to combat various Fusarium species, increase the efficacy and spectrum of action of antifungal agents, and lower drug dosage and thus reduce toxic side effects^34,35. Moreover, in vitro drug combinations have demonstrated the ability to control fungal biofilms in other fungal species³⁶, and studies focused on Fusarium sp. remain scarce. Combinations of antifungal and non-antifungal agents have also been tested in vitro and the results are promising, especially in fusariosis, as a strong association with the inflammatory response has been found^37,38. Despite promising results in an in vitro context, the use of combinations requires clinical studies to verify its effectiveness in vivo. A few reports have been conducted on treating patients with fusariosis using more than one drug. Tortorano et al. (2014) have reported an association between the use of lipid-based amphotericin B and voriconazole, as well as the use of up to three antifungals in the same patient³³.

Factors that contribute to the severity of fusariosis include increased incidence of multidrug resistance to Fusarium spp.³⁹ and the lack of research relating to the development of new therapeutic options for treatment. In general, these infections progress with a severe prognosis, especially in terms of ophthalmology, in which cases of fungal keratitis led to negative outcomes, such as loss of vision, in affected individuals. Currently, isavuconazole, characterized as a second generation triazole antifungal, is being studied as an alternative for its potential treatment of fungal diseases in patients with hematological diseases⁴⁰.

FUNGICIDES AND RESISTANCE IN PHYTOPATHOGENIC FUSARIUM SPECIES

Fungicides are specific substances that are used in the agricultural field to combat and prevent fungal diseases. Waste from the use of these substances is considered a pollutant with potential risk to the human body, as well as more commonly to the environment⁴¹. Demethylation inhibitors are abundantly used in the agricultural field. Moreover, demethylation inhibitors change the fungal population after multiple applications, thus requiring the application of new fungicides. A substitute used is triazole, and its time of permanence in the soil depends on the concentration used and generally ranges from 67 days to more than 1688 days, with a trend of accumulation based on the frequency of use⁴².

A risk factor that may be associated with fungicides in the environment is the development of microbial resistance⁴ similar to that associated with the overuse of antifungals in humans³⁰. Azoles are the most commonly used of all groups for both pest control and treatment of human infections. Therefore, the potential development of resistance to this specific class is of increasing concern⁴. Some benefits of the azole class include low cost and high efficacy, thereby rendering it the first-choice antifungal for use as a fungicide agent in crops since the 1970s³².

Proper fungicide management in agricultural fields is a current demand in terms of the economics related to agricultural practices, as well as in terms of negative environmental impact⁴³.

INCIDENCE OF HUMAN FUSARIOSIS

Cutaneous lesions have been observed due to the spread of fungi in patients with hematological diseases. In Brazil, from 2007 to 2009, invasive fusariosis was proved to be the most frequent or probable invasive fungal disease, with 23 episodes among 937 patients with hematologic diseases¹⁹. Based on the information discussed thus far, a bibliographical search was conducted on the PubMed and Science Direct platforms using the term "fusariosis in human," including case reports published between 2005 and 2018. In this review, we included data from articles published only in 2005 and 2018, comprising 14 publications, with the aim to observe possible changes in both the etiology of infections and treatment (Table 2). The factors for inclusion of the case reports involve the presence of relevant information on etiological agents, predisposing factors, and treatments. The exclusion factor was defined as the lack of any required information, as previously cited.

TABLE 2:
The symptoms of patients, treatments, etiological agents, and risk factors for patients described in articles published in 2005 and 2018.

Author	Year	Symptoms of Patients	Treatment	Etiological Agent	Risk Factors
Hayashida et al.45	2018	Erythematous nodules	Amphotericin B and	F. solani	Acute myeloid leukemia
			voriconazole
Simon et al.46	2018	Pain and decreased vision	Amphotericin B and voriconazole	F. dimerum	Acute myeloid leukemia
Boral at al.47	2018	Blurred vision	Voriconazole	F. solani	Ocular trauma
Combalia et al.48	2018	Lesions on the	Complete excision of	F. solani	Diabetes mellitus
		eyebrow	the lesions		Kidney transplant
					Immunosuppress treatment
Okada et al.49	2018	Lesions forming an	Liposomal	F. solani	Neutropenia
		ulcer	amphotericin B		Varicella zoster virus
Puapatanakul et al.50	2018	Peritonitis and septicemia	Amphotericin B	Fusarium spp.	Diabetes mellitus Hypertension
					End-stage kidney disease
Borges et al.51	2018	Lesion	Amphotericin B and	F. solani	Acute myeloid leukemia
			itraconazole		Neutropenia
Arnoni et al.52	2018	Nodules on the chest	Amphotericin B and voriconazole	F. oxysporum	Acute lymphocytic leukemia
Kumari et al.53	2018	Lesions with pus discharge	Itraconazole	F. solani	HIV positive
Yoshida et al.54	2018	Blurred vision	Amphotericin B and voriconazole	F. solani	Acute myeloid leukemia
Rizzello et al.55	2018	Pain on eye	Amphotericin B and voriconazole	F. solani	Acute lymphoblastic leukemia
					Neutropenia
Anandi et al.56	2005	Breast abscess	Ketoconazole	F. solani	Diabetes mellitus
Gardner et al.57	2005	Pruritic plaque on forearm	Amphotericin B and voriconazole	F. solani	Neutropenia
Karam et al.58	2005	Cutaneous nodules	Voriconazole	F. moniliforme	Myeloblastic leukemia

We observed that F. solani prevails as the etiological agent of fusariosis. The treatment also did not change over the years, indicating that amphotericin B, voriconazole, and posaconazole are prophylactic agents and treatment options for fusariosis⁴⁴. The clinical forms of the disease in the case reports focused more on infections that present cutaneous lesions, which is characterized by the spread of the disease in patients with hematological dysfunctions.

The increased incidence of fusariosis from 2005 to 2018 can be observed in Figure 1 (A-B), which graphically shows the increase in the number of articles published on the PubMed and Science Direct platforms in this time period.

FIGURE 1
(A): Case reports of fusariosis published on the Pubmed Plataform between 2005 and 2018. (B): Case reports of fusariosis published on the Science Direct platform between 2005 and 2018

CONCLUSION

The efficient mechanisms of the dispersion of Fusarium spp. have led to the global distribution of clinical and environmental isolates. F. solani and F. oxysporum are the most common complexes. Infections in humans range from superficial to disseminated, and patients with hematological malignancies are the most susceptible. Dissemination of the fungus is seen mainly in immunocompromised patients because of the ease of infection related to the portal of entry of the fungus in the host, such as via the airways or the rupture of tissues and mucous membranes.

Invasive Fusarium infections stimulate an inadequate response by the host towards the infection, which accounts for the high mortality caused by this fungus. As such, biofilm formation renders treatment more difficult. Fusarium spp. exhibit intrinsic resistance to echinocandins, and some isolates exhibit resistance to azoles. In this scenario, the drugs of choice are amphotericin B and voriconazole, and drug combinations are an important means to combat multi-drug resistance. Just as the determination of the minimum inhibitory concentration provides an overview on in vitro resistance, it can also be considered strong evidence for selecting an antifungal treatment. Low investment by the pharmaceutical industry towards developing drugs to combat these infections was observed.

Risk factors of individuals contribute to the occurrence of new cases and F. solani continues to be the main etiological agent of fusariosis. Treatment also has not changed over the years, because of the lack of research in the development of new therapeutic options for the treatment of this infection. The increased incidence of fusariosis, as reported in the articles published between 2005 to 2018, is evidence of the emergence of this fungus.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors thank the Brazilian agencies Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES), Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), and Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul (FAPERGS - EDITAL 04/2016 - PRONUPEQ 2016) for their financial support and research fellowships.

REFERENCES

• ¹
  Gomes LB, Ward TJ, Badiale-Furlong E, Del Ponte EM. Species composition, toxigenic potential and pathogenicity of Fusarium graminearum species complex isolates from southern Brazilian rice. Plant Pathol. 2014;64(4):980-7.
• ²
  Al-Hatmi AMS, Bonifaz A, Ranques S, de Hoog GS, Verweij PE, Meis JF. Current antifungal treatment of Fusariosis. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2018;51(3):326-32.
• ³
  Spolti P, Del Ponte EM, Dong Y, Cummings JA, Bergstrom GC. Triazole sensitivity in a contemporary population of Fusarium graminearum from New York wheat and competitiveness of a tebuconazole-resistant isolate. Plant Dis. 2014;98(5): 607-13.
• ⁴
  Dalhoff A. Does the use of antifungal agents in agriculture and food foster polyene resistance development? A reason for concern. J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2018;13:40-8.
• ⁵
  Guarro J. Fusariosis, a complex infection caused by a high diversity of fungal species refractory to treatment. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2013;32(12):1491-1500.
• ⁶
  Dabas Y, Bakhshi S, Xess I. Fatal cases of bloodstream infection by Fusarium solani and review of published literature. Mycopathologia. 2016;181(3-4):291-6.
• ⁷
  Van Diepeningen AD, Brankovics B, Iltes J, Van Der Lee TA, Waalwijk C. Diagnosis of Fusarium infections: approaches to identification by the clinical mycology laboratory. Curr Fungal Infect Rep. 2015;9(3):135-43.
• ⁸
  Espinel-Ingroff A, Colombo AL, Cordoba S, et al. International evaluation of MIC distributions and epidemiological cutoff value (ECV) definitions for Fusarium species identified by molecular methods for the CLSI broth microdilution method. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016;60(2):1079-84.
• ⁹
  Taj-Aldeen SJ. Reduced multidrug susceptibility profile is a common feature of opportunistic Fusarium species: Fusarium multi-drug resistant pattern. J Fungi. 2017;3(2):18.
• ¹⁰
  Deising HB, Reimann S, Pascholati SF. Mechanisms and significance of fungicide resistance. Braz J Microbiol. 2008;39(2):286-95.
• ¹¹
  Ribas ADR, Spolti P, Del Ponte EM, Donato KZ, Schrekker H, Fuentefria AM. Is the emergence of fungal resistance to medical triazoles related to their use in the agroecosystems? A mini review. Braz J Microbiol . 2016;47(4):793-9.
• ¹²
  Zhang N, O’Donnell K, Sutton SA, et al. Members of the Fusarium solani species complex that cause infections in both humans and plants are common in the environment. J Clin Microbiol. 2006;44(6):2186-90.
• ¹³
  Anaissie EJ, Kuchar RT, Rex JH, et al. Fusariosis associated with pathogenic Fusarium species colonization of a hospital water system: a new paradigm for the epidemiology of opportunistic mold infections. Clin Infect Dis. 2001;33(11):1871-8.
• ¹⁴
  Van Diepeningen AD, Al-Hatmi ABMS, Brankovics B, de Hoog GS. Taxonomy and clinical spectra of Fusarium species: where do we stand in 2014? Curr Clin Microbiol Rep. 2014;1(1-2):10-8.
• ¹⁵
  Van Diepeningen AD, Feng P, Ahmed S, Sudhadham M, Bunyaratavej S, de Hoog GS. Spectrum of Fusarium infections in tropical dermatology evidenced by multilocus sequencing typing diagnostics. Mycoses. 2015;58(1):48-57. (b)
• ¹⁶
  Al-Hatmi AMS, Hagen F, Menkenm SBJ, Meis JF, de Hoog GS. Global molecular epidemiology and genetic diversity of Fusarium, a significant emerging group of human opportunists from 1958 to 2015. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2016;5(12):e124.
• ¹⁷
  Garcia RR, Min Z, Narasimhan S, Bhanot N. Fusarium brain abscess: case report and literature review. Mycoses. 2015;58(1):22-6.
• ¹⁸
  Douglas AP, Chen SCA, Slavin MA. Emerging infections caused by non-Aspergillus filamentous fungi. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2016;22(8):670-80.
• ¹⁹
  Garnica M and Nucci M. Epidemiology of fusariosis. Curr Fungal Infect Rep . 2013;7:301-5.
• ²⁰
  Al-Hatmi AMS, Curfs-Breuker I, de Hoog GS, Meis JF, Verweij PE. Antifungal susceptibility testing of Fusarium: a pratical approach. J Fungi . 2017;3(2):1-14.
• ²¹
  Varon AG, Nouer AS, Barreiros G, et al. Superficial skin lesions positive for Fusarium are associated with subsequent development of invasive fusariosis. J Infect. 2014;68(1):85-9.
• ²²
  Nucci F, Nouér AS, Capone D, Anaissie E, Nucci M. Fusariosis. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2015;36(5):706-14.
• ²³
  Neofytos D, Horn D, Anaissie E, et al. Epidemiology and outcome of invasive fungal infection in adult hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients: analysis of multicenter prospective antifungal therapy (PATH) alliance registry. Clin Infect Dis . 2009;48(3):265-73.
• ²⁴
  Nucci M, Anaissie E. Fusarium infections in immunocompromised patients. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2007;20(4):695-704.
• ²⁵
  Romani L. Immunity to fungal infections. Nat Rev Immunol. 2011;11:275-88.
• ²⁶
  Leal SMJ, Pearlman E. The role of cytokines and pathogen recognition molecules in fungal keratitis - Insights from human disease and animal models. Cytokine. 2012;58(1):107-11.
• ²⁷
  Kolar SS, Baidouri H, Mcdermott AM. Role of pattern recognition receptors in the modulation of antimicrobial peptide expression in the corneal epithelial innate response to F. solani Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2017;58(5):2463-72.
• ²⁸
  Nucci M, Marr KA, Vehreschild MJ, et al. Improvement in the outcome of invasive fusariosis in the last decade. Clin Microbiol Infect . 2014;20(6):580-5.
• ²⁹
  Shoham S, Levitz SM. The immune response to fungal infections. Br J Haematol. 2005;129(5):569-82.
• ³⁰
  Homa M, Galgóczy L, Manikandan P, et al. South Indian isolates of the Fusarium solani species complex from clinical and environmental samples: identification, antifungal ausceptibilities, and virulence. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:1-14.
• ³¹
  Katiyar SK, Edlind TD. Role for Fks1 in the intrinsic echinocandin resistance of Fusarium solani as evidenced by hybrid expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Antimicrob Agents Chemother . 2009;53(5):1772-8.
• ³²
  Price CL, Parker JE, Warrilow AGS, Kelly DE, Kelly SL. Azole fungicides - understanding resistance mechanisms in agricultural fungal pathogens. Pest Manag Sci. 2015;71(8):1054-8.
• ³³
  Tortorano AM, Prigitano A, Esposto MC, Arsic Arsenijevic V, Kolarovic J, Ivanovic D, et al. European Confederation of Medical Mycology (ECMM) epidemiological survey on invasive infections due to Fusarium species in Europe. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis . 2014;33:1623-30.
• ³⁴
  Spader TB, Venturini TP, Rossato L, et al. Synergysm of voriconazole or itraconazole with other antifungal agents against species of Fusarium Rev Iberoam Micol. 2013;30(3):200-4.
• ³⁵
  Fuentefria AM, Pippi B, Dalla Lana DF, Donato KK, de Andrade SF. Antifungals discovery: an insight into new strategies to combat antifungal resistance. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2017;66(1):2-13.
• ³⁶
  Xia J, Qian F, Xu W, Zhang Z, Wei X. In vitro inhibitory effects of farnesol and interactions between farnesol and antifungals against biofilms of Candida albicans resistant strains. Biofouling. 2017;33(4):283-93.
• ³⁷
  Al-Hatmi AMS, Meletiadis J, Curfs-Breuker I, Bonifaz A, Meis JF, de Hoog GS. In vitro combinations of natamycin with voriconazole, itraconazole and micafungin against clinical Fusarium strains causing keratitis. J Antimicrob Chemoth. 2016;71(4):953-5.
• ³⁸
  Venturini TP, Rossato L, Chassot F, et al. In vitro synergistic combinations of pentamidine, polymyxin B, tigecycline and tobramycin with antifungal agents against Fusarium spp. J Med Microbiol. 2016;65(8):770-4.
• ³⁹
  Batista BG, Dalla Lana DF, Silveira GP, et al. Allylic selenocyanates as new agents to combat Fusarium species involved with human infections. Chemistry Select. 2017;2(35):11926-32.
• ⁴⁰
  Clinical Trials. Fungal Prophylaxis With Isavuconazole for Patients Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant (HCT). [updated 2020 March 25]. Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/
  » https://clinicaltrials.gov/
• ⁴¹
  Chen ZF, Ying GG. Occurrence, fate and ecological risk of five typical azole fungicides as therapeutic and personal care products in the environment: A review. Environ Int. 2015;84:142-53.
• ⁴²
  Sulowicz S, Cycón M, Piotrowska-Seget Z. Non-target impact of fungicide tetraconazole on microbial communities in soil with different agricultural management. Ecotoxicology. 2016;25(6):1047-60.
• ⁴³
  Bashir MR, Atiq M, Sajid M, et al. Antifungal exploitation of fungicides against Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. capsici causing Fusarium wilt of chilli pepper in Pakistan. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018;25(7):6796-801.
• ⁴⁴
  Herkert PF, Al-Hatmi MAS, Salvador GLO, Muro MD, Pinheiro RL, Nucci M, Queiroz-Telles F, de Hoog GS, Meis JF. Molecular characterization and antifungal susceptibility of clinical Fusarium species from Brazil. Front. Microbiol. 2019;10:1-11.
• ⁴⁵
  Hayashida MZ, Seque CA, Enokihara MMSS, Porro AM. Disseminated fusariosis with cutaneous involvement in hematologic malignancies: report of six cases with high mortality rate. An Bras Dermatol. 2018;93(5):726-9.
• ⁴⁶
  Simon L, Gastaud L, Martiano D, Bailleux C, Hasseine L, Gari-Toussaint M. First endogenous fungal endophthalmitis due to Fusarium dimerum: A severe eye infection contracted during induction chemotherapy for acute leukemia. J Mycol Med. 2018;28:403-6.
• ⁴⁷
  Boral H, van Diepeningen A, Erdem E, Yagmur M, de Hoog GS, Ilkit M, Meis JF, Al-Hatmi AMS. Mycotic keratitis caused by Fusarium solani sensu stricto (FSSC5): A Case Series. Mycopathol. 2018;183:835-40.
• ⁴⁸
  Combalia A, Glavedoni P, Pigem R, Mascaró Jr JM. Ultrasound assessment of a subcutaneous eumycetoma of the eyebrow in a immunocompromised patient. Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2018;109(9):836-8.
• ⁴⁹
  Okada K, Endo T, Hashimoto D, Saga T, Ara T, Ogasawara R, et al. Disseminated fusariosis emerged from prolonged local genital infection after cord blood transplantation. J Infect Chemother. 2018;24(8):660-3.
• ⁵⁰
  Puapatanakula P, Lumlertgula N, Thongborc N, Mahamongkholsawatd J, Kanjanabucha T. Intracatheter antifungal lock leading to detrimental complications. Med Mycol Case Rep. 2018;22:58-60.
• ⁵¹
  Borges DP, Santos AWA, Magalhaes SMM, Sidrim JJ, Rocha MFG, Cordeiro RA, et al. Fusarium solani infection as an initial manifestation of AML transformation in myelodysplastic syndrome: A case report. Micol Pathol. 2018;28(2):390-2.
• ⁵²
  Arnoni MV, Paula CR, Auler ME, Simões CCN, Nakano S, Walderez Szeszs MW, et al. Infections Caused by Fusarium species in pediatric cancer patients and review of published literature. Mycopathol. 2018;183:941-9.
• ⁵³
  Kumari I, Singh SK, Chauhan RK, Kaushal SK. Disseminated cutaneous fusariosis in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patient and dramatic response with oral itraconazole. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2018;84(3):362-8.
• ⁵⁴
  Yoshida M, Kiyota N, Maruyama K, Kunikata H, Toyokawa M, Hagiwara S, et al. Endogenous Fusarium endophthalmitis during treatment for acute myeloid leukemia, successfully treated with 25-gauge vitrectomy and antifungal medications. Mycopathol. 2018;183:451-7.
• ⁵⁵
  Rizzello I, Castagnetti F, Toschi PG, Bertaccini P, Primavera L, Paolucci M, et al. Successful treatment of bilateral endogenous Fusarium solani endophthalmitis in a patient with acute lymphocytic leukaemia. Mycoses. 2018;61:53-60.
• ⁵⁶
  Anandi V, Vishwanathan P, Sasikala S, Rangarajan M, Subramaniyan CS, Chidambaram N. Fusarium solani breast abscesso. Indian J Med Microbiol . 2005;23(3):198-9.
• ⁵⁷
  Gardner JM, Nelson MM, Heffernan MP. Chronic cutaneous fusariosis. Arch Dermatol. 2005;141(6):794-5.
• ⁵⁸
  Karam A, Eveillard JR, Ianoto JC, Quinio D, Le Flohic AM, Le Roy JP, Misery L, Berthou C. Disseminated cutaneous and visceral fusariosis in an aplastic patient: an unusual digestive entry. Ann Dermatol Venereol. 2005;132(3):255-8.

• Financial Support: Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES), Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), and Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul.

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  01 June 2020
• Date of issue
  2020

History

• Received
  21 Feb 2020
• Accepted
  14 Apr 2020