Abstract
The electoral courts have an objective of social pacification; as it is about safeguarding the legitimacy of a certain form of socio-political organization. In this sense, its responsibility is to comply with the principle of transparency and publicity as a form of accountability and necessary link with those who use its services. For this reason, and given the political interest that their activities, it is desirable to establish minimum parameters regarding the form of communication between electoral judges and citizens, which it involves in their analysis. the search for balance between judicial ethics, transparency, right to information, accountability, and freedom of expression. This balance is achieved under the assumptions of discourse, pondering, and argumentation; previous structures that make it possible to justify the exceptionality of the judicial secretariat as a general rule in the communication process before the existence of a final judgment. Given this, the proposed utilitarian budget trilogy serves as a tool to determine the limits of the electoral judge in the communication of their draft sentences, before their collegiate discussion.
Keywords:
Right to information; political rights; freedom of expression; jurisdictional weighting; electoral jurisdiction