Assessment of properties of ultra-high performance cementitious composites with glass powder waste

Soares, Silvete Mari; Freitas, Taís Oliveira Gonçalves; Oliveira Júnior, Adalberto; Ferreira, Fernanda Giannotti da Silva; Salvador Filho, José Américo Alves

doi:10.1590/S1983-41952022000600012

Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Brasil

Revista IBRACON de Estruturas e Materiais

Español English

Brasil

Español English

sumário « anterior atual seguinte »

Sumário

ORIGINAL ARTICLE • Rev. IBRACON Estrut. Mater. 15 (6) • 2022 • https://doi.org/10.1590/S1983-41952022000600012 copy

Assessment of properties of ultra-high performance cementitious composites with glass powder waste

Avaliação das propriedades de compósitos cimentícios de ultra-alto desempenho com resíduos de pó de vidro

Authorship SCIMAGO INSTITUTIONS RANKINGS

Abstract

Novel developments on concrete technology such as high and ultra-high-performance concrete (HPC and UHPC) are notorious by its high consumption of Portland cement. Supplementary cementitious materials have been used as partial replacement of Portland cement aiming to minimizing clinker content, optimizing the use of binders, reducing CO2 emissions, and increasing durability. Waste glass powder could be an alternative due to its silica-rich nature and wide availability. This work aims to assess the influence Portland cement substitution by finely ground waste glass powder in contents of 10%, 20%, 30% and 50% on physical and mechanical behavior of ultra-high-performance cementitious composites (UHPCC). Results indicates the use of glass powder as substitution up to 50% of Portland cement does not significantly affect the analyzed properties at 28 days.

Keywords:
cementitious composite; ultra-high performance; glass powder

Physical properties	Portland cement	Silica fume	Glass powder	Quartz sand
Specific gravity (g/cm³)	3.16 a	2.25 ^a	2.55 ^a	2.56 b
Specific surface (m²/kg) ^* * NBR 16372 [20]. ** Maximum size determined by laser granulometry, except in quartz sand which was determined by NBR 17054 [22]. a NBR 16605 [19]; b NBR 16916 [21]	665	247	393	-
Water absorption (%)	-	-	-	0.64 ^b
Maximum dimension (mm)**	0.03	0.023	0.075	1.2

Components	Portland cement (%)	Silica fume (%)	Glass powder (%)
Silica oxide ( ${S i O}_{2}$ )	23.00	94.10	74.00
Ferric oxide ( ${F e}_{2} O_{3}$ )	2.49	< 0.5	0.42
Aluminum oxide ( ${A l}_{2} O_{3}$ )	4.31	< 0.2	3.70
Calcium oxide ( $C a O$ )	61.40	< 0.2	9.10
Sulfuric anhydride ( ${S O}_{3}$ )	2.97	-	-
Strontium Oxide ( $S_{R} O$ )	0.27	< 0.2	0.04
Thorium Oxide ( ${T h O}_{2}$ )	< 0.01	< 0.01	< 0.01
Potassium oxide ( $K_{2} O$ )	0.96	1.28	0.56
Sodium oxide ( ${N a}_{2} O$ )	-	-	11.00
Uranium Oxide ( $U_{3} O_{2}$ )	< 0.01	< 0.01	< 0.01
Phosphorus oxide ( $P_{2} O_{5}$ )	0.52	-	-
Chloride ( ${C l}^{-}$ )	0.12	-	-
Magnesium oxide ( $M g O$ )	-	-	0.74
Loss on ignition	4.05	3.60	0.58

Group	Consumption of materials (kg/m³)							Consistency (mm)
Group	Cement	Silica fume	Glass powder	Quartz sand	Water^* * Corrected water value for 46% solids of superplasticizer. SP(1) = superplasticizer; SR(2) = shrinkage reducer.	SP⁽1⁾	SR⁽2⁾	Consistency (mm)
REF	1000	80	-	1074	181.28	24.3	10.8	379.5
VD10	900	80	81	1074	181.28	24.3	10.8	377.0
VD20	800	80	161	1074	181.28	24.3	10.8	375.5
VD30	700	80	242	1074	181.28	24.3	10.8	381.5
VD50	500	80	403	1074	181.28	24.3	10.8	382.5

Properties	UHPCC
Properties	REF	VD10	VD20	VD30	VD50
Compressive strength (MPa)	116.0	119.0	114.0	111.0	88.0
Statistically different from REF?	-	No	No	No	Yes
Tensile strength (MPa)	11.08	10.94	11.03	10.07	9.82
Statistically different from REF?	-	No	No	No	No
Static modulus of elasticity (GPa)	43.09	45.51	41.67	42.94	41.51
Statistically different from REF?	-	No	No	No	No
Dynamic modulus of elasticity (GPa)	53.31	52.15	52.10	52.37	49.75
Statistically different from REF?	-	Yes	Yes	No	Yes
Capillary water absorption at 72h (g/cm²)	0.079	0.077	0.092	0.091	0.088
Statistically different from REF?	-	No	No	No	No

Groups / Researchers	Cement Consumption (kg/m³)	SCM Consumption (kg/m³)			Compressive strength at 28 days (MPa)	Energy efficiency of binders (kg/m³MPa⁻¹)	Cement energy efficiency (kg/m³MPa⁻¹)
Groups / Researchers	Cement Consumption (kg/m³)	Silica Fume	Fly Ash	Glass Powder	Compressive strength at 28 days (MPa)	Energy efficiency of binders (kg/m³MPa⁻¹)	Cement energy efficiency (kg/m³MPa⁻¹)
REF	1000	80	-	0	106.81	10.11	10.11
VD10	900	80	-	81	98.58	10.76	9.13
VD20	800	80	-	161	121.69	8.55	6.57
VD30	700	80	-	242	110.70	6.3	9.20
VD50	500	80	-	403	105.86	9.29	4.72
Pelisser et al. [⁴⁷47 F. Pelisser, A. Vieira, and A. M. Bernardin, "Efficient self-compacting concrete with low cement consumption," J. Clean. Prod., vol. 175, pp. 324–332, 2018, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.084. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017... ]	472	-	52	-	67.2	7.8	7.02
Corinaldesi and Moriconi [⁴⁸48 V. Corinaldesi and G. Moriconi, "The role of industrial by-products in self-compacting concrete," Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 25, no. 8, pp. 3181–3186, 2011, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.03.001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.... ]	440	-	100	-	45.0	12.0	9.78
Li et al. [⁴⁹49 P. P. Li, Q. L. Yu, H. J. H. Brouwers, and W. Chen, "Conceptual design and performance evaluation of two-stage ultra-low binder ultra-high performance concrete," Cement Concr. Res., vol. 125, pp. 105858, 2019, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2019.105858. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.20... ]	625.7	41.7	-	-	113.0	5.9	5.5
	426.1	28.4	-	-	116.2	3.9	3.7
	341.5	22.8	-	-	121.1	3.0	2.8

IBRACON - Instituto Brasileiro do Concreto Instituto Brasileiro do Concreto (IBRACON), Av. Queiroz Filho, nº 1700 sala 407/408 Torre D, Villa Lobos Office Park, CEP 05319-000, São Paulo, SP - Brasil, Tel. (55 11) 3735-0202, Fax: (55 11) 3733-2190 - São Paulo - SP - Brazil
E-mail: arlene@ibracon.org.br

Acompanhe os números deste periódico no seu leitor de RSS

[1] Corresponding author: Silvete Mari Soares. E-mail: silvetemari@ifsp.edu.br