Desarrollo, validación y certificación internacional de un portal de salud para personas con discapacidad

Cintra, Michel Marcossi; Faleiros, Fabiana; Corbo, Letícia Noelle; Okano, Larissa Miyuki; Vedana, Kelly Graziani Giacchero; Dessotte, Carina Aparecida Marosti; Kaeppler, Christoph

Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Brasil

Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem

Español English

Brasil

Español English

sumário « anterior atual seguinte »

Sumário

ORIGINAL ARTICLE • Rev. Bras. Enferm. 75 (Suppl 2) • 2022 • https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2021-0082 copiar

Desarrollo, validación y certificación internacional de un portal de salud para personas con discapacidad

Autoría SCIMAGO INSTITUTIONS RANKINGS

RESUMEN

Objetivos:

desarrollar, validar con especialistas y certificar internacionalmente un portal virtual de salud, el D+Informação.

Métodos:

estudio metodológico cuantitativo. La validación del Portal fue hecha por 22 jueces especialistas en las áreas de salud y de la informática utilizando el Índice de Validez de Contenido y el test de Gwet. La certificación internacional siguió los principios del HONcode^® para garantizar la confianza de las informaciones.

Resultados:

el Portal fue validado por los jueces de salud y de la informática obteniendo Índice de Validez de Contenido mínimo en más de 75% de los tópicos, además la evaluación de concordancia general, 0,253; evaluación de contenido, 0,193; y evaluación de la interface, 0,230. Todos presentaron el valor de Gwet con p ≤ 0,001.

Conclusiones:

el Portal D+Informação fue desarrollado, validado, certificado internacionalmente y está hospedado en la siguiente dirección electrónica: https://demaisinformacao.con.br

Descriptores:
Redes de Comunicación de Computadores; Acceso a la Información; Información de Salud al Consumidor; Personas con Discapacidad; Inclusión Digital

Criteria	CVI health judges	CVI computer science judges	Overall CVI	% agreement
1. Interface favors participation.	1.00	0.89	0.95	95.45
2. Presentation of content favors participation.	0.92	0.89	0.91	90.91
3. Figures and pictures help in understanding the theme of the Portal.	0.84	1.00	0.91	90.91
4. The Portal is indicated as an educational tool.	0.92	0.78	0.86	86.36
5. The limitations of the Portal do not exceed its usefulness.	1.00	0.89	0.95	95.45
6. The name of the Portal (D+Informação) is suitable.	0.77	0.67	0.68	68.18
7. I recommend the Portal.	1.00	1.00	1.00	100.00

Criteria for content evaluation	CVI	% agreement
1. The goals of the Portal are clearly defined.	0.84	84.62
2. The Portal is consistent with the objectives to which it is proposed.	0.92	92.30
3. The content of the Portal is updated.	0.84	84.62
4. The content of the Portal presents logical organization.	0.84	84.62
5. The content is consistent with the target audience.	0.92	92.30
6. The information is clear and concise.	0.84	84.62
7. The texts are easy to read.	0.92	92.30
8. The presentation of figures and photos is relevant to the information included in the texts.	0.84	84.62
9. The grammar is used correctly.	0.92	92.30
10. The terms are used correctly.	1.00	100
11. The presentation of the content captivates the attention of users.	0.77	76.92
12. The Portal stimulates user participation.	0.69	69.23
13. The Portal allows learning through the exchange of experiences between users.	0.77	76.92
14. The Portal stimulates mutual support.	0.84	84.62

Criteria	CVI	% agreement
1. Menu pages have titles and headers.	1.00	100
2. Menu panels have logical grouping criteria.	1.00	100
3. Menu option names are concise.	0.89	88.89
4. Menu structure decreases steps for selection.	0.89	88.89
5. Use of abbreviations is minimized in menus.	0.89	88.89
6. Icons are readable.	1.00	100
7. Icons are distinct and always have the same meaning.	1.00	100
8. Icons are economical from the point of view of space on the screens.	0.89	88.89
9. Grammar is used correctly.	0.89	88.89
9. User controls system navigation.	1.00	100
10. User can interrupt and resume a dialog.	0.89	88.89
11. User moves in the system quickly.	0.89	88.89
12. Error message phrases are concise and objective.	0.89	88.89
13. Data to be read is presented continuously.	1.00	100
14. It adopts meaningful and familiar codes to users.	0.67	66.67
15. Meanings of colors are respected in the codes.	0.78	77.78
16. Presentation of texts and style features is appropriate.	1.00	100
17. Visual codes associate different categories of data scattered across screens.	0.89	88.89
18. Items selected for change, update, or trigger are highlighted.	0.89	88.89
19. Any change in the situation of control objects is visually presented in a clear way to the user.	0.89	88.89
20. Controls and commands are visually different from the information presented on the screens.	0.89	88.89
21. Screens present only the data and information indispensable for the user in his task.	0.89	88.89
22. Informational density of windows/screens is reduced.	0.89	88.89
23. Design does not overload the memory.	0.89	88.89
24. Presentation space is diagrammed into small functional zones.	0.89	88.89
25. Arrangement of interaction objects in a dialog box follows logical order.	0.89	88.89
26. The links work properly.	1.00	100
27. System optimization is suitable for different bandwidths.	0.67	66.67
28. System works correctly in different browsers.	0.67	66.67

Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem SGA Norte Quadra 603 Conj. "B" - Av. L2 Norte 70830-102 Brasília, DF, Brasil, Tel.: (55 61) 3226-0653, Fax: (55 61) 3225-4473 - Brasília - DF - Brazil
E-mail: reben@abennacional.org.br

Acompanhe os números deste periódico no seu leitor de RSS

[1] Corresponding author: Fabiana Faleiros E-mail: fabifaleiros@eerp.usp.br