We present a systematic and critical analysis about the possible application of interpretative and additive decision-making techniques in emergency measures of abstract constitutional judicial review. To reach this goal, we inspect the main characteristics of such procedural techniques and the peculiarities of its application in the main actions of the brazilian constitutional jurisdiction. After that, we evaluate the compatibility of such summaries decisions with the peculiarities of the interpretative and additive control techniques. Finally, we present a case study, in which the practical effects of our thoughts are tested.
Judicial review; emergency measures; interpretative and addictive decision-making techniques