Gypsum recommendations for a typical Dystrophic Red Argisol cropped with <i>Phaseolus vulgaris</i>

Silva, Thaynara Garcez da; Nolla, Antonio; Bordin, Adriely Vechiato; Castaldo, João Henrique

doi:10.1590/0034-737X2024710014

Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Brasil

Español English

sumário « anterior atual seguinte »

Sumário

Soil and Plant Nutrition • Rev. Ceres 71 • 2024 • https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-737X2024710014 copy

Gypsum recommendations for a typical Dystrophic Red Argisol cropped with Phaseolus vulgaris¹ 1 Part of the first author’s final paper as a requirement for obtaining the title of Agronomist Engineer at the State University of Maringá.

Authorship SCIMAGO INSTITUTIONS RANKINGS

ABSTRACT

Paraná leads the Brazilian production of beans so that the cultivation system can restrain the root development of the plants. Limestone and agricultural gypsum can be alternatives to stimulate the development of roots, and it is necessary to establish criteria for their use. The objective of this work was to evaluate the development of bean plants subjected to liming and gypsum doses in a typical Dystrophic Red Argisol. The experiment was carried out in Umuarama, state of Paraná in PVC tubes (80 x 15 cm), growing Phaseolus vulgaris cultivar Pérola for 90 days. Treatments consisted of gypsum doses (0, 420, 670, 950, 1140, 1430, 3000, and 5320 kg ha^-1) combined or not with lime application, in a factorial design (8 x 2) with four replications. At the end of the cycle, the aerial part of the plants and soil samples were collected for analysis. Gypsum doses benefited bean development, especially when associated with liming, which raised pH, Ca⁺², and Mg⁺² and reduced Al⁺³ in the soil. The doses of maximum technical efficiency of gypsum were 3291 and 2991 kg ha^-1 for the treatments with and without liming, respectively, also increasing the Ca⁺² and available P concentration in the soil.

Keywords
agricultural gypsum; bean; fertilization; liming

Authorship	Methodology	Dose (kg ha^-1)
*Ribeiro et al., (1999)*Ribeiro AC, Guimarães PTG & Alvarez VH (1999) Recomendações para o uso de corretivos e fertilizantes em Minas Gerais. 5ª ed. Viçosa, Comissão de Fertilidade do Solo do Estado de Minas Gerais. 360p.	NG = 0.00034 – 0.002445x^0,5 + 0.0338886x – 0.00176366x^1,5	420
*Vitti et al., (2008)*Vitti GC, Luz PHC, Malavolta E, Dias AS & Serrano CGE (2008) Uso do gesso em sistemas de produção agrícola. Piracicaba, GAPE. 104p.	NG = 0.25 x Need for liming	670
*Sousa et al., (2005)*Sousa DMG, Lobato E & Rein TA (2005) Uso do gesso agrícola nos solos do Cerrado. Planaltina, Embrapa Cerrados. 19p.	NG = 50 x clay %	950
*Raij et al., (2022)*Raij B, Cantarella H, Quaggio JA & Furlani AMC (2022) Boletim 100: Recomendações de adubação e calagem para o estado de São Paulo. Campinas, IAC. 500p.	NG = 60 x clay %	1140
*Sousa et al., (2005)*Sousa DMG, Lobato E & Rein TA (2005) Uso do gesso agrícola nos solos do Cerrado. Planaltina, Embrapa Cerrados. 19p.	NG = 75 x clay %	1430
Caires & Guimarães (2018)Caires EF & Guimarães AM (2018) A novel phosphogypsum application recommendation method under continuous no‐till management in Brazil. Agronomy Journal, 5:1987-1995.	NG = (0,6 x t -Ca concentration, in cmol_c dm^-3) x 6.4	3000
*Vitti et al., (2008)*Vitti GC, Luz PHC, Malavolta E, Dias AS & Serrano CGE (2008) Uso do gesso em sistemas de produção agrícola. Piracicaba, GAPE. 104p.	NG = (BS2-BS1) x T (cmol_c dm^-3)/50	5320

F test	Height (cm)	Diameter (cm)	Fresh mass (g)	Dry mass (g)	Grain yeld (kg ha^-1)	1,000 grain mass (g)
Block	0.4328	0.1184	0.5981	0.2546	0.0190	0.3985
L	0.0002^* * and ns = significant and not significant at 5% probability, respectively.	0.0626^ns * and ns = significant and not significant at 5% probability, respectively.	0.0001^* * and ns = significant and not significant at 5% probability, respectively.	0.0001^* * and ns = significant and not significant at 5% probability, respectively.	0.0002^* * and ns = significant and not significant at 5% probability, respectively.	0.0002^* * and ns = significant and not significant at 5% probability, respectively.
G	0.0001^* * and ns = significant and not significant at 5% probability, respectively.	0.3075^ns * and ns = significant and not significant at 5% probability, respectively.	0.0001^* * and ns = significant and not significant at 5% probability, respectively.	0.0001^* * and ns = significant and not significant at 5% probability, respectively.	0.0003^* * and ns = significant and not significant at 5% probability, respectively.	0.0001^* * and ns = significant and not significant at 5% probability, respectively.
L x G	0.0344^ns * and ns = significant and not significant at 5% probability, respectively.	0.9982^ns * and ns = significant and not significant at 5% probability, respectively.	0.1038^ns * and ns = significant and not significant at 5% probability, respectively.	1461^ns * and ns = significant and not significant at 5% probability, respectively.	0.1752^ns * and ns = significant and not significant at 5% probability, respectively.	0.2722^ns * and ns = significant and not significant at 5% probability, respectively.
CV (%)	11.94	15.35	10.01	18.37	17.19	12.74
F test	pH (CaCl₂)	Al (cmol_c kg^-1)	P (mg kg^-1)	K (mg kg^-1)	Ca (cmol_c kg^-1)	Mg (cmol_c kg^-1)
Block	0.9230	0.4537	0.6502	0.0162	0.6801	0.7080
L	0.0001^* * and ns = significant and not significant at 5% probability, respectively.	0.0001^* * and ns = significant and not significant at 5% probability, respectively.	0.5210^ns * and ns = significant and not significant at 5% probability, respectively.	0.2088^ns * and ns = significant and not significant at 5% probability, respectively.	0.0002^* * and ns = significant and not significant at 5% probability, respectively.	0.0001^* * and ns = significant and not significant at 5% probability, respectively.
G	0.5942^ns * and ns = significant and not significant at 5% probability, respectively.	0.2591^ns * and ns = significant and not significant at 5% probability, respectively.	0.0001^* * and ns = significant and not significant at 5% probability, respectively.	0.4040^ns * and ns = significant and not significant at 5% probability, respectively.	0.0001^* * and ns = significant and not significant at 5% probability, respectively.	0.0002^* * and ns = significant and not significant at 5% probability, respectively.
L x G	0.4606^ns * and ns = significant and not significant at 5% probability, respectively.	0.2482^ns * and ns = significant and not significant at 5% probability, respectively.	0.0004^* * and ns = significant and not significant at 5% probability, respectively.	0.9884^ns * and ns = significant and not significant at 5% probability, respectively.	0.0001^* * and ns = significant and not significant at 5% probability, respectively.	0.0002^* * and ns = significant and not significant at 5% probability, respectively.
CV (%)	4.00	21.47	14.86	17.36	7.18	3.97

Variable	With liming (kg ha^-1)	Without liming (kg ha^-1)
Aerial part height	3850	3167
Stem diameter	2500	3000
Aerial part fresh mass	3450	2583
Aerial part dry mass	3500	2750
Grain yield	3443	3525
1,000 grain mass	2720	2446
Means	3291	2911

Universidade Federal de Viçosa Av. Peter Henry Rolfs, s/n, 36570-000 Viçosa, Minas Gerais Brasil, Tel./Fax: (55 31) 3612-2078 - Viçosa - MG - Brazil
E-mail: ceres@ufv.br

Acompanhe os números deste periódico no seu leitor de RSS

[1] * Corresponding author: thaynaragarceztg@gmail.com

Brasil

Brasil

Gypsum recommendations for a typical Dystrophic Red Argisol cropped with Phaseolus vulgaris1 1 Part of the first author’s final paper as a requirement for obtaining the title of Agronomist Engineer at the State University of Maringá.

ABSTRACT

Gypsum recommendations for a typical Dystrophic Red Argisol cropped with Phaseolus vulgaris¹ 1 Part of the first author’s final paper as a requirement for obtaining the title of Agronomist Engineer at the State University of Maringá.