Agronomic performance of canola hybrids in Campos das Vertentes - MG

Pimentel, Guilherme Vieira; Martins, Inara Alves; Santiago, Alexsandro Carvalho; Costa, Natália; Silva, Rodrigo Nogueira; Moreira, Silvino Guimarães

doi:10.1590/0034-737X2024710021

Guilherme Vieira Pimentel ^** Corresponding author: guilherme.pimentel@ufla.br

Universidade Federal de Lavras, Escola de Ciências Agrárias de Lavras, Departamento de Agricultura, Lavras, MG, Brazil. guilherme.pimentel@ufla.br; inaraalves.ia@gmail.com; alexsandrocarvalho14@gmail.com; rodrigo.silva24@estudante.ufla.br; nataliacrocga.sd@gmail.com; silvinomoreira@ufla.br

http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9849-6427

Inara Alves Martins

Universidade Federal de Lavras, Escola de Ciências Agrárias de Lavras, Departamento de Agricultura, Lavras, MG, Brazil. guilherme.pimentel@ufla.br; inaraalves.ia@gmail.com; alexsandrocarvalho14@gmail.com; rodrigo.silva24@estudante.ufla.br; nataliacrocga.sd@gmail.com; silvinomoreira@ufla.br

http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7997-5633

Alexsandro Carvalho Santiago

Universidade Federal de Lavras, Escola de Ciências Agrárias de Lavras, Departamento de Agricultura, Lavras, MG, Brazil. guilherme.pimentel@ufla.br; inaraalves.ia@gmail.com; alexsandrocarvalho14@gmail.com; rodrigo.silva24@estudante.ufla.br; nataliacrocga.sd@gmail.com; silvinomoreira@ufla.br

http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7116-5302

Natália Costa

Universidade Federal de Lavras, Escola de Ciências Agrárias de Lavras, Departamento de Agricultura, Lavras, MG, Brazil. guilherme.pimentel@ufla.br; inaraalves.ia@gmail.com; alexsandrocarvalho14@gmail.com; rodrigo.silva24@estudante.ufla.br; nataliacrocga.sd@gmail.com; silvinomoreira@ufla.br

http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3864-1551

Rodrigo Nogueira Silva

Universidade Federal de Lavras, Escola de Ciências Agrárias de Lavras, Departamento de Agricultura, Lavras, MG, Brazil. guilherme.pimentel@ufla.br; inaraalves.ia@gmail.com; alexsandrocarvalho14@gmail.com; rodrigo.silva24@estudante.ufla.br; nataliacrocga.sd@gmail.com; silvinomoreira@ufla.br

http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0472-7285

Silvino Guimarães Moreira

Universidade Federal de Lavras, Escola de Ciências Agrárias de Lavras, Departamento de Agricultura, Lavras, MG, Brazil. guilherme.pimentel@ufla.br; inaraalves.ia@gmail.com; alexsandrocarvalho14@gmail.com; rodrigo.silva24@estudante.ufla.br; nataliacrocga.sd@gmail.com; silvinomoreira@ufla.br

http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3631-0305

* Corresponding author: guilherme.pimentel@ufla.br

The authors declare there is no conflict of interest in the execution and publication of this study.

SV	DF	Total cycle	DEF	Height	NSP	NSS	Grain yield	Oil content	Oil yield
		–––––––––– F calculated––––––––––
Hybrids (H)	5	15.73 ^** ns, , * not significant, significant at p ≤ 0.05, and significant at p ≤ 0.01 by the F test, respectively.	9.35 ^** ns, , * not significant, significant at p ≤ 0.05, and significant at p ≤ 0.01 by the F test, respectively.	1.97 ^ns 1 Averages followed by the same lowercase letter vertically and uppercase letter horizontally do not differ from each other according to the Scott-Knott test at 5%. CV: coefficient of variation.	5.76 ^** ns, , * not significant, significant at p ≤ 0.05, and significant at p ≤ 0.01 by the F test, respectively.	8.58 ^** ns, , * not significant, significant at p ≤ 0.05, and significant at p ≤ 0.01 by the F test, respectively.	6.24 ^** ns, , * not significant, significant at p ≤ 0.05, and significant at p ≤ 0.01 by the F test, respectively.	31.67 ^** ns, , * not significant, significant at p ≤ 0.05, and significant at p ≤ 0.01 by the F test, respectively.	14.33 ^** ns, , * not significant, significant at p ≤ 0.05, and significant at p ≤ 0.01 by the F test, respectively.
Sowing dates (D)	5	89.96 ^** ns, , * not significant, significant at p ≤ 0.05, and significant at p ≤ 0.01 by the F test, respectively.	77.69 ^** ns, , * not significant, significant at p ≤ 0.05, and significant at p ≤ 0.01 by the F test, respectively.	24.56 ^** ns, , * not significant, significant at p ≤ 0.05, and significant at p ≤ 0.01 by the F test, respectively.	194.26 ^** ns, , * not significant, significant at p ≤ 0.05, and significant at p ≤ 0.01 by the F test, respectively.	11.99 ^** ns, , * not significant, significant at p ≤ 0.05, and significant at p ≤ 0.01 by the F test, respectively.	111.50 ^** ns, , * not significant, significant at p ≤ 0.05, and significant at p ≤ 0.01 by the F test, respectively.	113.00 ^** ns, , * not significant, significant at p ≤ 0.05, and significant at p ≤ 0.01 by the F test, respectively.	177.57 ^** ns, , * not significant, significant at p ≤ 0.05, and significant at p ≤ 0.01 by the F test, respectively.
H*D	25	4.27 ^** ns, , * not significant, significant at p ≤ 0.05, and significant at p ≤ 0.01 by the F test, respectively.	6.84 ^** ns, , * not significant, significant at p ≤ 0.05, and significant at p ≤ 0.01 by the F test, respectively.	1.23 ^ns 1 Averages followed by the same lowercase letter vertically and uppercase letter horizontally do not differ from each other according to the Scott-Knott test at 5%. CV: coefficient of variation.	4.47 ^** ns, , * not significant, significant at p ≤ 0.05, and significant at p ≤ 0.01 by the F test, respectively.	5.43 ^** ns, , * not significant, significant at p ≤ 0.05, and significant at p ≤ 0.01 by the F test, respectively.	7.27 ^** ns, , * not significant, significant at p ≤ 0.05, and significant at p ≤ 0.01 by the F test, respectively.	21.32 ^** ns, , * not significant, significant at p ≤ 0.05, and significant at p ≤ 0.01 by the F test, respectively.	12.29 ^** ns, , * not significant, significant at p ≤ 0.05, and significant at p ≤ 0.01 by the F test, respectively.
Block	3	0.53 ^ns 1 Averages followed by the same lowercase letter vertically and uppercase letter horizontally do not differ from each other according to the Scott-Knott test at 5%. CV: coefficient of variation.	0.53 ^ns 1 Averages followed by the same lowercase letter vertically and uppercase letter horizontally do not differ from each other according to the Scott-Knott test at 5%. CV: coefficient of variation.	1.75 ^ns 1 Averages followed by the same lowercase letter vertically and uppercase letter horizontally do not differ from each other according to the Scott-Knott test at 5%. CV: coefficient of variation.	0.27 ^ns 1 Averages followed by the same lowercase letter vertically and uppercase letter horizontally do not differ from each other according to the Scott-Knott test at 5%. CV: coefficient of variation.	3.02 ^* ns, , * not significant, significant at p ≤ 0.05, and significant at p ≤ 0.01 by the F test, respectively.	0.378 ^ns 1 Averages followed by the same lowercase letter vertically and uppercase letter horizontally do not differ from each other according to the Scott-Knott test at 5%. CV: coefficient of variation.	2.37 ^ns 1 Averages followed by the same lowercase letter vertically and uppercase letter horizontally do not differ from each other according to the Scott-Knott test at 5%. CV: coefficient of variation.	0.79 ^ns 1 Averages followed by the same lowercase letter vertically and uppercase letter horizontally do not differ from each other according to the Scott-Knott test at 5%. CV: coefficient of variation.
error	105
Total	143
CV (%)		5.41	8.19	19.82	12.79	10.16	18.48	4.28	18.09
Overall average		118.78	52.93	1.23	502.35	16.76	1300.40	25.78	341.36

Hybrid	Sowing Date (mm/dd/yy)
Hybrid	02/15/19	02/28/19	03/20/19	04/09/19	02/22/21	03/11/21	Average
ALHT B4	105 aC ¹ 1 Averages followed by the same lowercase letter vertically and uppercase letter horizontally do not differ from each other according to the Scott-Knott test at 5%. CV: coefficient of variation.	122 bB	118 aB	137 aA	120 aB	130 aA	122 a
Diamond	94 aC	100 cC	118 aB	137 aA	103 bC	101 bC	108 b
Nuola 300	100 aC	122 bB	118 aB	137 aA	120 aB	130 aA	121 a
Hyola 571 CL	100 aC	132 aA	118 aB	137 aA	120 aB	130 aA	123 a
Hyola 575 CL	101 aC	100 cC	118 aB	137 aA	120 aB	130 aA	117 a
Hyola 433	94 aC	122 bB	118 aB	137 aA	120 aB	130 aA	120 a
Average	99 D	116 C	118 C	137 A	117 C	125 B
CV (%): 5.4

Hybrid	Sowing Date (mm/dd/yy)
Hybrid	02/15/19	02/28/19	03/20/19	04/09/19	02/22/21	03/11/21	Average
ALHT B4	52 aB ¹ 1 Averages followed by the same lowercase letter vertically and uppercase letter horizontally do not differ from each other according to the Scott-Knott test at 5%. CV: coefficient of variation.	54 aA	49 aB	60 cA	50 cB	55 aA	53 b
Diamond	40 bC	40 bC	42 bC	77 aA	50 cC	55 aB	51 b
Nuola 300	56 aB	56 aB	49 aC	65 bA	68 aA	55 aB	58 a
Hyola 571 CL	53 aB	47 bC	44 bC	65 bA	53 bB	53 aB	52 b
Hyola 575 CL	53 aB	45 bC	42 bC	72 aA	55 bB	50 aB	53 b
Hyola 433	42 bB	42 bB	42 bB	58 cA	63 aA	58 aA	51 b
Average	49 C	47C	44C	66 A	56 B	54 B
CV (%): 8.2

Sowing Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
02/15/2019	02/28/2019	03/20/2019	04/09/2019	02/22/2021	03/11/2021
1.44 A¹ 1 Averages followed by the same uppercase letter horizontally do not differ from each other according to the Scott-Knott test at 5%. CV: coefficient of variation.	1.47 A	1.42 A	1.16 B	1.02 B	0.88 C
Average: 1.23C.V. (%): 19.8

Hybrid	Sowing Date (mm/dd/yy)
Hybrid	02/15/19	02/28/19	03/20/19	04/09/19	02/22/21	03/11/21	Average
ALHT B4	1407.3 aA¹ 1 Averages followed by the same lowercase letter vertically and uppercase letter horizontally do not differ from each other according to the Scott-Knott test at 5%. CV: coefficient of variation.	765.3 bB	640.7 aB	353.7 aC	191.0 aC	161.5 aC	586.5 a
Diamond	1059.3 bA	492.0 bB	590.0 aB	280.3 aC	178.0 aC	136.5 aC	456.0 b
Nuola 300	1005.5 bA	527.3 cC	735.3 aB	523.3 aC	199.0 aD	172.8 aD	527.2 a
Hyola 571 CL	954.0 bA	290.3 cC	593.7 aB	378.5 aC	149.0 aD	129.8 aD	415.8 b
Hyola 575 CL	862.0 bB	1139.3 aA	624.0 aC	378.3 aD	170.8 aE	123.5 aE	549.6 a
Hyola 433	850.5 bA	665.8 bB	572.8 aB	474.3 aB	218.0 aC	91.5 aC	478.8 b
Average	1023.1 A	646.7 B	626.1 B	398.1 C	184.3 D	135.9 D
CV (%): 12.8

Hybrid	Sowing Date (mm/dd/yy)
Hybrid	02/15/19	02/28/19	03/20/19	04/09/19	02/22/21	03/11/21	Average
ALHT B4	14.9 aA ¹ 1 Averages followed by the same lowercase letter vertically and uppercase letter horizontally do not differ from each other according to the Scott-Knott test at 5%. CV: coefficient of variation.	14.1 aA	11.9 aA	14.5 aA	15.6 dA	11.5 bA	13.7 c
Diamond	13.4 aB	17.3 aB	13.2 aB	13.9 aB	27.6 bA	11.8 bB	16.2 b
Nuola 300	19.3 aA	14.9 aB	12.5 aB	14.9 aB	17.9 cA	21.6 bA	16.8 b
Hyola 571 CL	18.1 aB	17.6 aB	15.9 aB	16.1 aB	32.8 aA	19.5 bB	18.2 a
Hyola 575 CL	13.9 aC	16.3 aC	12.2 aC	14.9 aC	20.5 cB	31.2 aA	20.1 a
Hyola 433	16.1 aA	19.3 aA	16.8 aA	12.2 aB	12.5 dB	16.8 bA	15.6 b
Average	15.9 D	16.6 C	13.7 D	14.4 C	21.1 A	18.7 B
CV (%): 10.2

Hybrid	Sowing Date (mm/dd/yy)
Hybrid	02/15/19	02/28/19	03/20/19	04/09/19	02/22/21	03/11/21	Average
ALHT B4	30.3 aB	35.7 aA	28.3 aC	24.9 aD	13.2 cE	23.3 bD	25.9 b
Diamond	22.9 bB	24.6 cB	27.9 aA	24.7 aB	11.4 cC	21.6 bB	22.2 c
Nuola 300	29.8 aA	30.8 bA	29.1 aA	27.7 aA	17.2 cB	12.5 cC	24.5 b
Hyola 571 CL	28.9 aA	30.8 bA	29.2 aA	27.4 aB	25.3 bB	25.8 aB	28.7 a
Hyola 575 CL	29.2 aA	31.9 bA	28.1 aA	25.3 aA	28.9 aA	28.5 aA	27.9 a
Hyola 433	30.3 aA	31.7 bA	28.9 aA	24.1 aB	26.8 bB	10.6 cC	24.4 b
Average	28.6 B	30.9 A	28.6 B	25.7 C	20.5 D	20.4 D
CV (%): 4.3

[1] * Corresponding author: guilherme.pimentel@ufla.br

Brasil

Brasil

Agronomic performance of canola hybrids in Campos das Vertentes - MG¹ 1 This article is part of the second author’s master dissertation. This study was financed in part by the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais – Brasil (FAPEMIG).

ABSTRACT

Brasil

Brasil

Agronomic performance of canola hybrids in Campos das Vertentes - MG1 1 This article is part of the second author’s master dissertation. This study was financed in part by the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais – Brasil (FAPEMIG).

ABSTRACT

Agronomic performance of canola hybrids in Campos das Vertentes - MG¹ 1 This article is part of the second author’s master dissertation. This study was financed in part by the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais – Brasil (FAPEMIG).