Discussion on bullying at work intensified in Europe in the late 20th Century, after studies carried out by Heinz Leyman, in Sweden, and by Marie-France Hirigoyen, in France. They were focused on conceptualizing bullying at work, identifying its causes, usual occurrence patterns, and its effects on workers' health. However, the debates have not converged on determinant factors of bullying at work, and doubt still remains over its real causes and the right way to confront it. In this essay, which empirical basis was derived from previous studies on security guards, we critically discuss the perspectives traditionally adopted when bullying at work is analyzed, and the most common proposals in facing it. We also point to their limitations, when bullying at work is explained essentially as an event of a moral and psychological nature. Opposed to these common proposals, we suggest adopting approaches which are grounded on work, and which evidence the perversity of the current management patterns.
bullying at work; work psychology; workplace conflict; mental health and work; activity ergonomics