Comparação Estatística das Características Anatômicas em Espécies de Ornithogalum sp.

ÖZDEMIR, A.; KOCAYIGIT, H.; YETISEN, K.; AKYOL, Y.; ÖZDEMIR, C.

doi:10.1590/S0100-83582016340300009

Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Brasil
SciELO.org - Rede SciELO
Blog SciELO em Perspectiva

Abrir menu

Brasil

Español English

Planta Daninha

Sobre o periódico
Corpo Editorial
Instruções aos autores
Contato

sumário « anterior atual seguinte »

Resumo (Inglês)
Resumo (Português)

Texto (Inglês)

Download PDF (Inglês)

Compartilhe

Compartilhe
E-mail
Facebook
Twitter
Google+
LinkedIn
Reddit
StambleUpon
CiteULike
Mendeley

Sumário

Compartilhe
E-mail
Facebook
Twitter
Google+
LinkedIn
Reddit
StambleUpon
CiteULike
Mendeley

Resumo (Inglês)
Resumo (Português)

Texto (Inglês)

Download PDF (Inglês)

ARTICLES • Planta daninha 34 (03) • Jul-Sep 2016 • https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582016340300009 copiar

Comparação Estatística das Características Anatômicas em Espécies de Ornithogalum sp.

Autoria SCIMAGO INSTITUTIONS RANKINGS

RESUMO

No presente estudo, as espécies Ornithogalum narbonense, O. montanum, O. wiedemannii, O. sigmoideum e O. lanceolatum, foram comparadas estatisticamente com relação às suas características anatômicas. Foram observadas diferenças na anatomia da raiz, caule e folhas das espécies. Estas diferenças e semelhanças foram indicadas no presente estudo. Foi observado um grande metaxilema em todas as seções da raiz, com exceção de O. lanceolatum, que possui três metaxilemas. Duas a três camadas de colênquima foram encontradas em todas as espécies. Todas as espécies mesófilas continham aerênquima.

Palavras-chave:
estatística; Ornithogalum; anatomia

Autoria

A. ÖZDEMIR

Celal Bayar University, Faculty of Art and Science, Department of Mathematics; Celal Bayar UniversityTurkeyTurkeyCelal Bayar University, Faculty of Art and Science, Department of Mathematics;

H. KOCAYIGIT

Celal Bayar University, Faculty of Art and Science, Department of Mathematics; Celal Bayar UniversityTurkeyTurkeyCelal Bayar University, Faculty of Art and Science, Department of Mathematics;

K. YETISEN

Celal Bayar University, Faculty of Art and Science, Department of Biology, 45030-Muradiye, Manisa,Turkey. <kadriyeyetisen@gmail.com>.Celal Bayar UniversityTurkeyManisa, TurkeyCelal Bayar University, Faculty of Art and Science, Department of Biology, 45030-Muradiye, Manisa,Turkey. <kadriyeyetisen@gmail.com>.

Y. AKYOL

C. ÖZDEMIR

SCIMAGO INSTITUTIONS RANKINGS

Celal Bayar University, Faculty of Art and Science, Department of Mathematics; Celal Bayar UniversityTurkeyTurkeyCelal Bayar University, Faculty of Art and Science, Department of Mathematics;

Figuras | Tabelas

Figuras (3)
Tabelas (6)

Thumbnail

Figure 1
Root cross sections; A:O. narbonense, B:O. montanum, C:O. wiedemannii, D,E: O.sigmoedeum, F:O. lanceolatum; co: cortex, en: endodermis, ep:epidermis, m:metaxylem, p:pericycle; scale bar 50 μm.

Thumbnail

Figure 2
Stem cross sections; A:O. narbonense, B:O. montanum, C,D:O. wiedemannii, E: O.sigmoedeum, F:O. lanceolatum; co: cortex, cl:collenchyma, ep:epidermis, rc:raphide crystals, vb:vascular bundle; scale bar 50 μm.

Thumbnail

Figure 3
Leaf cross sections; A:O. narbonense, B:O. montanum, C: O.sigmoedeum, D:O. lanceolatum; ab: abaxial epiderm

Thumbnail

Table 1
Anatomical measurements of the species

Thumbnail

Table 2
Pearson's correlation (Correlation) based on anatomical characters of the investigated taxa

Thumbnail

Table 3
Pearson correlation (Correlation) based on 8 anatomical characters of the leaves of the investigated taxa

Thumbnail

Table 4
Comparison anatomical features of the investigated taxa with Minitab

Thumbnail

Table 5
Comparison anatomical features of the investigated taxa with Pearson's correlation analysis

Thumbnail

Table 6
Comparison anatomical features of the investigated taxa with Minitab

Figure 1 Root cross sections; A:O. narbonense, B:O. montanum, C:O. wiedemannii, D,E: O.sigmoedeum, F:O. lanceolatum; co: cortex, en: endodermis, ep:epidermis, m:metaxylem, p:pericycle; scale bar 50 μm.

Figure 2 Stem cross sections; A:O. narbonense, B:O. montanum, C,D:O. wiedemannii, E: O.sigmoedeum, F:O. lanceolatum; co: cortex, cl:collenchyma, ep:epidermis, rc:raphide crystals, vb:vascular bundle; scale bar 50 μm.

Figure 3 Leaf cross sections; A:O. narbonense, B:O. montanum, C: O.sigmoedeum, D:O. lanceolatum; ab: abaxial epiderm

Table 1 Anatomical measurements of the species

O. narbonense	Min.-Max .	Ort±S.D	O. lanceolatum	Min.-Max.	Ort±S.D
Root			Root
Epidermis Width	20-50	35±13	Epidermis Width	38-52	47.5±6.4
Epidermis Length	15-50	30±12	Epidermis Length	30-50	42±8
Cortex (diameter)	70-23	140±62	Cortex (diameter)	30-170	100±99
Endodermis Width	18-23	21±1.8	Endodermis Width	12-22	17.8±3.7
Endodermis Length	10-15	12±1.8	Endodermis Length	7-12	10±1.7
Pericycle Width	15-18	17±1.2	Pericycle Width	15-26	21±4.6
Metaxylem ( diameter )	25-63	38±13	Metaxylem (diameter)	15-26	21±4.6
Stem			Stem
Epidermis Width	13-25	17±2.5	Epidermis Width	18-22	20±1.6
Epidermis Length	30-43	35±4.3	Epidermis Length	18-23	20.6±2
Cortex (diameter)	3-50	48±9.7	Cortex (diameter)	20-70	45±14.5
Trachea (diameter)	8-23	19±2.5	Trachea (diameter)	10-15	12±2.7
Leaf			Leaf
Abaxial epidermis Width	38-50	44±5.6	Abaxial epidermis Width	10-22	20±0.8
Abaxial epidermis Length	20-28	26±3.3	Abaxial epidermis Length	25-30	29±2.2
Palisade Length	28-40	34±4.7	Palisade Length	20-25	22.8±2.16
Adaxial epidermis Width	18-25	22±2.5	Adaxial epidermis Width	12-25	18.8± 4.5
Adaxial epidermis Length	30-38	34±2.5	Adaxial epidermis Length	12-20	16±4
O. sigmoideum	Min.-Max .	Ort±S.D	O. wiedemannii var. wiedemannii	Min.-Max.	Ort±S.D
Root			Root
Epidermis Width	15-38	24.5±9.8	Epidermis Width	10-20	15±5
Epidermis Length	20-50	32±13.8	Epidermis Length	20-40	30±10
Cortex (diameter)	10-35	25±10	Cortex (diameter)	22-10	16±6
Endodermis Width	18-23	20.6±2	Endodermis Width	5-15	9.6±5
Endodermis Length	11-18	14.6±3.5	Endodermis Length	10-18	13±3
Pericycle Width	10-18	15±3.4	Pericycle Width	15-25	20±5
Metaxylem (diameter)	35-40	38±2.1	Metaxylem (diameter)
Stem			Stem	30-38	34±3
Epidermis Width	20-35	26±6.5	Epidermis Width	25-30	26.5±2
Epidermis Length	30-40	37±4.4	Epidermis Length	28-88	72±22
Cortex (diameter)	35-110	64±31	Cortex (diameter)	25-38	33.5±5
Trachea (diameter)	15-30	23±6.7	Trachea (diameter)
Leaf			Leaf	15-23	20±5.1
Abaxial epidermis Width	25-40	32.5±6.4	Abaxial epidermis Width	15-20	17.5±2
Abaxial epidermis Length	20-25	23±2.4	Abaxial epidermis Length	63-70	66±2.8
Palisade Length	40-170	83.5±59	Palisade Length	12-25	19±4.8
Adaxial epidermis Width	13-20	16.3±3	Adaxial epidermis Width	15-22.5	17±3.2
Adaxial epidermis Length	20-27	23±2.6	Adaxial epidermis Length	10-20	15±5
O. montanum	Min.-Max .	Ort±S.D
Root	20-45	37±9.7
Epidermis Width	10-30	24±9
Epidermis Length	40-60	53±8.3
Cortex (diameter)	13-15	14±0.9
Endodermis Width	7-10	8.5±1.2
Endodermis Length	9-11	10±0.8
Pericycle Width	20-32	27±0.4
Metaxylem (diameter)
Stem	15-20	17±2.5
Epidermis Width	10-25	19±6.2
Epidermis Length	15-40	33.6±16
Cortex (diameter)	3-15	7.6±4.8
Trachea (diameter)
Leaf	10-28	20±7.5
Abaxial epidermis Width	20-40	27.5±8.6
Abaxial epidermis Length	38-15	33±3
Palisade Length	15-28	22±5
Adaxial epidermis Width	30-42	38±4.5
Adaxial epidermis Length	20-45	37±9.7

Table 2 Pearson's correlation (Correlation) based on anatomical characters of the investigated taxa

Features	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11	12	13	14	15
1	0.607
	0.278
2	0.962	0.744
	0.009**	0.150
3	0.948	0.691	0.947
	0.014	0.196	0.015*
4	0.041*	0.798	0.204	0.220
	0.948	0.106	0.742	0.722
5	0.343	0.244	-0.138	0.055	0.565
	0.572	0.692	0.825	0.930	0.320
6	0.962	0.396	0.894	0.851	0.222	0.492
	0.009**	0.510	0.041*	0.068	0.720	0.400
7	0.874	0.721	0.872	0.745	0.221	0.456	0.819
	0.053	0.169	0.054	0.149	0.721	0.441	0.090
8	0.649	0.858	0.693	0.808	0.703	0.249	0.421	0.564
	0.236	0.063	0.194	0.098	0.186	0.686	0.480	0.322
9	0.751	0.415	0.667	0.869	0.118	0.011*	0.649	0.414	0.773
	0.144	0.487	0.219	0.056	0.850	0.985	0.236	0.488	0.126
10	0.873	0.622	0.778	0.857	0.241	0.371	0.762	0.795	0.797	0.820
	0.053	0.262	0.121	0.064	0.696	0.539	0.134	0.108	0.107	0.089
11	0.975	0.542	0.917	0.856	0.045	0.517	0.970	0.927	0.525	0.620	0.847
	0.005	0.345	0.028*	0.064	0.942	0.372	0.006**	0.023*	0.363	0.264	0.070
12	0.791	0.173	0.610	0.755	0.237	0.496	0.791	0.527	0.500	0.870	0.854	0.760
	0.111	0.781	0.274	0.140	0.701	0.395	0.111	0.362	0.391	0.055	0.066	0.136
13	0.910	0.730	0.928	0.800	0.194	0.382	0.863	0.988	0.570	0.451	0.770	0.944	0.528
	0.032	0.162	0.023*	0.104	0.755	0.526	0.060	0.002**	0.316	0.446	0.128	0.016*	0.361
14	0.737	0.959	0.804	0.809	0.700	0.082	0.533	0.785	0.937	0.614	0.814	0.672	0.429	0.781
	0.155	0.010*	0.101	0.097	0.188	0.896	0.355	0.116	0.019*	0.270	0.094	0.214	0.471	0.119
15	0.932	0.848	0.976	0.953	0.385	0.066	0.811	0.873	0.825	0.707	0.843	0.874	0.600	0.910	0.913
	0.021*	0.070	0.005**	0.012*	0.522	0.915	0.096	0.053	0.085	0.182	0.073	0.053	0.285	0.032*	0.030*

* Significant at the level of 0.05. ** Significant at the level of 0.01.

Table 3 Pearson correlation (Correlation) based on 8 anatomical characters of the leaves of the investigated taxa

Characters	A	B	C	D
B	0.362
	0.140
C	0.006**	0.573
	0.979	0.013*
D	0.007**	0.483	0.749
	0.978	0.042*	0.008**
E	0.029*	0.194	0.430	0.030*
	0.910	0.441	0.075	0.906

O. narbonense (A), O. lanceolatum (B), O. sigmoideum (C), O. wiedemannii (D), O. montanum (E), O. wiedemannii (D), O. montanum (E).

Table 4 Comparison anatomical features of the investigated taxa with Minitab

Takson	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8
1	0.582
	0.303
2	0.546	0.998
	0.341	0.010**
3	0.957	0.768	0.736
	0.010**	0.130	0.156
4	0.873	0.516	0.472	0.841
	0.053	0.373	0.422	0.074
5	0.759	0.932	0.925	0.852	0.688
	0.136	0.021*	0.024*	0.067	0.199
6	-0.057	0.458	0.447	0.202	0.028	0.136
	0.927	0.438	0.450	0.744	0.965	0.827
7	0.996	0.613	0.576	0.967	0.909	0.780	-0.007
	0.020*	0.272	0.310	0.007**	0.032	0.120	0.991
8	0.865	0.547	0.537	0.787	0.619	0.778	-0.382	0.833
	0.058	0.340	0.351	0.114	0.265	0.121	0.526	0.080

Table 5 Comparison anatomical features of the investigated taxa with Pearson's correlation analysis

Taxa	C1	C2	C3	C4
C2	0.631
	0.009
C3	0.211	0.503
	0.433	0.047*
C4	0.125	0.192	0.177
	0.644	0.476	0.511
C5	0.621	0.730	0.143	0.103
	0.010*	0.001**	0.597	0.705

Table 6 Comparison anatomical features of the investigated taxa with Minitab

Como citar

copiar

Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas Departamento de Fitotecnia - DFT, Universidade Federal de Viçosa - UFV, 36570-000 - Viçosa-MG - Brasil, Tel./Fax::(+55 31) 3899-2611 - Viçosa - MG - Brazil
E-mail: rpdaninha@gmail.com

Acompanhe os números deste periódico no seu leitor de RSS

Versão para download de PDF

PDF

Inglês

Versões e tradução automática

Versão original do texto

English

Tradução automática

Google Translator
Microsoft Translator

Como citar

RIS

BIBTEX

Outros formatos de citação e exportação:

SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online
Rua Dr. Diogo de Faria, 1087 – 9º andar – Vila Clementino 04037-003 São Paulo/SP - Brasil
E-mail: scielo@scielo.org

Leia a Declaração de Acesso Aberto

Métricas

Comparação Estatística das Características Anatômicas em Espécies de Ornithogalum sp.

PlumX

Mensagem

[TFN1] * Significant at the level of 0.05. ** Significant at the level of 0.01.