Association of Oral Health-Related Quality of Life with the Longevity of ART-Restorations in Children

Salas-Huamani, Juana Rosmeri; Sousa, Karina Guedes de; Gomes, Gabriellen Fernanda; Silva, Amanda Fernandes; Silva, Thalita Lucas Brum Moreira da; Carvalho, Fabíola Galbiatti de; Rocha, Renata Andrea Salvitti de Sá; Barbosa, Taís de Souza

doi:10.1590/pboci.2023.068

Juana Rosmeri Salas-Huamani

Conceptualization

Methodology

Investigation

critical review of intellectual content and approval of the final version to be published

Department of Stomatology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Piura Campus, Cesar Vallejo University, Piura, Peru

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1226-2070

Karina Guedes de Sousa

Conceptualization

Data Curation

Writing - Original Draft

critical review of intellectual content and approval of the final version to be published

Department of Health Sciences and Pediatric Dentistry, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3784-9537

Gabriellen Fernanda Gomes

Data Curation

critical review of intellectual content and approval of the final version to be published

Department of Health Sciences and Pediatric Dentistry, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9415-5171

Amanda Fernandes Silva

Writing - Original Draft

Writing - Review and Editing

critical review of intellectual content and approval of the final version to be published

Graduate Program in Dentistry, Dental School, Federal University of Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora, MG, Brazil

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6572-4179

Thalita Lucas Brum Moreira da Silva

Writing - Review and Editing

critical review of intellectual content and approval of the final version to be published

Graduate Program in Dentistry, Dental School, Federal University of Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora, MG, Brazil

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3324-9948

Fabíola Galbiatti de Carvalho

Writing - Review and Editing

critical review of intellectual content and approval of the final version to be published

Department of Dentistry, Federal University of Juiz de Fora, Governador Valadares, MG, Brazil

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2510-1329

Renata Andrea Salvitti de Sá Rocha

Formal Analysis

Writing - Review and Editing

critical review of intellectual content and approval of the final version to be published

Faculty of Dentistry, Federal University of Campina Grande, Patos, PB, Brazil

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9666-8173

Taís de Souza Barbosa

Conceptualization

Methodology

Formal Analysis

Writing - Original Draft

Writing - Review and Editing

critical review of intellectual content and approval of the final version to be published

Department of Social and Pediatric Dentistry, Institute of Science and Technology, São Paulo State University, São José dos Campos, SP, Brazil

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3479-7789

Correspondence: Department of Social and Pediatric Dentistry, Institute of Science and Technology, Campus of São José dos Campos, São Paulo State University, Av. Eng Francisco José Longo, 777, São José dos Campos, SP, Brazil. 12245-000. E-mail: tais.barbosa@unesp.br

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Academic Editor: Alessandro Leite Cavalcanti

Code	Criterion
0	Present, satisfactory
1	Present, small cavity margin deficiency (< 0.5 mm)
2	Present, cavity margin deficiency (≥ 0.5mm)
3	Present, restoration fracture
4	Present, tooth fracture
5	Present, overfilled on the proximal margin (≥ 0.5mm)
6	Missing, almost all or the whole restoration was lost
7	Absent, another restorative treatment was performed
8	Absent, tooth is not present
9	Unable to diagnose
C	Carious lesion in dentin present (detected by the active part of the 0.5mm CPI probe)

Outcome	Criterion
Success	Satisfactory restoration or crown, no need to intervene
	No symptoms of pulp pathology
	Exfoliated tooth
Minor Flaws	Secondary caries or new clinically detected caries lesions
	Crown features perforation
	Restoration fracture or need for adjustment
	Loss of restoration or tooth may be restored again
	Lost crown and tooth can be restored normally
	Reversible pulpitis, tooth can be treated without the need for pulpotomy or extraction
Major Flaws	Irreversible pulpitis or fistula or abscess, tooth needs pulpotomy, or extraction
	Lost restoration or crown but tooth is not able to be restored normally

Group	N	16-CPQ8-10
Group	N	Total	OS	FL	EWB	SWB
GART (N=32, 9 =50.0%)
Number
1	21	5.5 (5.3)	2.4 (1.9)	1.4 (2.0)	1.1 (2.1)	0.6 (0.9)
2 to 4	9	4.9 (4.1)	1.8 (2.0)†	1.4 (1.7)	1.1 (1.5)	0.6 (0.7)
Type
Class I	18	4.6 (4.6)	1.9 (1.8)†	1.3 (2.1)	1.0 (1.7)	0.4 (0.9)
Class II	12	6.4 (5.3)	2.7 (1.9)	1.6 (1.6)	1.3 (2.2)	0.8 (0.7)
Size
Small	15	4.4 (4.9)	2.0 (1.9)†	0.9 (2.1)*	1.1 (1.8)	0.4 (0.9)
Large	15	6.3 (4.8)	2.4 (1.9)	1.9 (1.7)*	1.2 (2.0)	0.8 (0.8)
Place
Upper arch	18	4.6 (4.5)†	1.8 (1.8)^††	1.4 (2.2)	0.9 (1.3)	0.4 (0.7)
Lower arch	12	6.5 (5.4)	2.8 (1.9)	1.3 (1.5)	1.5 (2.5)	0.9 (1.0)
GOHES+ART (N=24, 9 =58.3%)
Number
1	16	7.2 (7.8)	3.1 (2.5)	1.4 (2.3)	1.4 (2.2)	1.2 (1.9)
2 to 4	8	7.8 (6.8)	4.4 (2.1)†	1.1 (1.7)	1.1 (2.3)	1.1 (2.0)
Type
Class I	12	9.8 (7.8)	4.4 (2.5)†	1.8 (2.4)	1.9 (2.1)	1.7 (2.0)
Class II	12	5.3 (6.7)	2.8 (2.1)	0.9 (1.7)	0.8 (2.3)	0.8 (1.8)
Size
Small	10	9.1 (7.0)	4.6 (2.5)†	1.4 (1.8)	1.9 (2.1)	1.2 (1.8)
Large	14	6.4 (7.8)	2.9 (2.2)	1.3 (2.3)	1.0 (2.3)	1.2 (2.0)
Place
Upper arch	11	*10.5 (8.1)^.†**	*4.7 (2.0)^††**	1.7 (2.2)	2.4 (2.8)	1.6 (2.2)
Lower arch	13	5.0 (6.2)*	2.6 (2.4)*	1.0 (2.0)	0.5 (1.2)	0.8 (1.6)

Group	N	16-CPQ8-10
Group	N	Total	OS	FL	EWB	SWB
GART (N=32, ♀=50.0%)
ART
Well succeeded	6	5.7 (4.0)	2.8 (1.7)	1.2 (1.5)	1.3 (1.8)	0.3 (0.5)
Flawed	13	4.1 (2.8)	1.5 (1.1)^*	1.2 (1.5)	1.0 (1.2)	0.3 (0.6)
Excluded	11	6.6 (6.9)	2.6 (2.5)	1.7 (2.6)	1.2 (2.6)	1.1 (1.0)
Treatment
Success	17	6.3 (5.9)	2.7 (2.2)	1.5 (2.2)	1.2 (2.3)	0.8 (1.0)
Minor Flaw	13	4.1 (2.8)	1.5 (1.1)^*	1.2 (1.5)	1.0 (1.2)	0.3 (0.6)
Major Flaw	0	–	–	–	–	–
GOHES+ART (N=24, 9 =58.3%)
ART
Well succeeded	2	–	–	–	–	–
Flawed	20	8.3 (7.9)	3.8 (2.6)^*	1.6 (2.2)	1.7 (2.3)	1.3 (2.0)
Excluded	2	–	–	–	–	–
Treatment
Success	3	–	–	–	–	–
Minor Flaw	16	9.7 (8.3)	4.3 (2.5)^*	1.9 (2.4)	1.9 (2.5)	1.6 (2.1)
Major Flaw	5	3.2 (1.5)	2.4 (1.9)	0.4 (0.5)	0.4 (0.9)	0.0 (0.0)

Restorations Characteristics	Intervals	16-CPQ8-10
Restorations Characteristics	Intervals	Total	OS	FL	EWB	SWB
Number
2 to 4 (N=8)	1 month	-	1.4 (1.4)	-	-	-
	18 months	-	4.4 (2.1)	-	-	-
Type
Class I (N=12)	1 month	4.1 (3.9)	1.8 (1.3)	-	-	-
	18 months	9.8 (7.8)	4.4 (2.5)	-	-	-
Size
Small (N=10)	1 month	-	2.0 (1.2)	-	-	-
	18 months	-	4.6 (2.5)	-	-	-
Large (N=14)	Baseline	-	3.4 (1.8)	-	-	-
	18 months	-	2.9 (2.2)	-	-	-
Local
Upper arch (N=11)	1 month	4.5 (4.2)	2.1 (1.2)	-	-	-
	18 months	10.5 (8.1)	4.7 (2.0)	-	-	-
Lower arch (N=13)	Baseline	9.2 (5.9)	-	-	-	-
	18 months	5.0 (6.2)	-	-	-	-
Rating Restoration Criteria
ART
Flaw (N=20)	1 month	-	1.9 (1.1)	-	-	-
	18 months	-	3.8 (2.6)	-	-	-
Treatment
Minor Flaw (N=16)	1 month	-	1.8 (1.2)	-	-	-
	18 months	-	4.3 (2.5)	-	-	-

[1] Correspondence: Department of Social and Pediatric Dentistry, Institute of Science and Technology, Campus of São José dos Campos, São Paulo State University, Av. Eng Francisco José Longo, 777, São José dos Campos, SP, Brazil. 12245-000. E-mail: tais.barbosa@unesp.br

Brasil

Brasil

Association of Oral Health-Related Quality of Life with the Longevity of ART-Restorations in Children

ABSTRACT

Objective:

Material and Methods:

Results:

Conclusion: