Data from NASA Power and surface weather stations under different climates on reference evapotranspiration estimation

Dados da Nasa Power e de estações meteorológicas de superfície em diferentes climas na estimativa da evapotranspiração de referência

Abstract

The objective of this work was to evaluate the data estimated by NASA Power in relation to that measured at surface weather stations under different climates, and to verify the effects of these data on reference evapotranspiration (ETo) estimation. For comparison, data measured at 21 surface weather stations, located in Brazil, Israel, Australia, Portugal, and the United States of America were used, representing different Köppen climate types. The following climatic variables were analyzed daily: maximum (T_max), mean (T_mean), and minimum (T_min) air temperatures; wind speed; incident solar radiation; and mean relative humidity (RH_mean). Wind speed showed the highest variations and was overestimated in the Cfb, BWh, BSh, and Cfa climates. T_mean and mean wind speed were estimated accurately in the Csa and BWh climates, whereas T_max and T_min were underestimated in 13 and 9 climates, respectively; T_min did not show adequate results in tropical climates. Incident solar radiation was overestimated in all climates, except in BSh, but presented the best statistical indicators among the analyzed variables. The scenarios in which ETo was estimated using the Penman-Monteith method and data from NASA Power were consistent even for the climate type that presented the worst association between measured and estimated data.

Index terms
alternative sources; climate data; reanalysis products