Development of Israeli mango cultivars in the Brazilian semiarid region

Andrade, Maria Jany Kátia Loiola; Oliveira, Alexandre Santos de; Santos, Walber Felix dos; Silva, Luan dos Santos; Cunha, Jenilton Gomes da; Souto, Antônio Gustavo de Luna; Cavalcante, Ítalo Herbert Lucena

doi:10.1590/S1678-3921.pab2023.v58.03173

Maria Jany Kátia Loiola Andrade

Universidade Federal do Piauí, Rodovia BR-135, Km 3, Planalto Horizonte, CEP 64900-000 Bom Jesus, PI, Brazil. E-mail: katiaengagronoma@gmail.com, jeniltongomes@hotmail.com

http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1800-4221

Alexandre Santos de Oliveira

Universidade Federal do Vale do São Francisco, Rodovia BR 407, Km 12, Projeto de Irrigação Nilo Coelho, Lote 543, s/nº, CEP 56300-000 Petrolina, PE, Brazil. E-mail: alexandre.sanoli@hotmail.com, Walber.felix@hotmail.com, gusluso@hotmail.com, italo.cavalcante@univasf.edu.br

http://orcid.org/0009-0007-9181-5270

Walber Felix dos Santos

Universidade Federal do Vale do São Francisco, Rodovia BR 407, Km 12, Projeto de Irrigação Nilo Coelho, Lote 543, s/nº, CEP 56300-000 Petrolina, PE, Brazil. E-mail: alexandre.sanoli@hotmail.com, Walber.felix@hotmail.com, gusluso@hotmail.com, italo.cavalcante@univasf.edu.br

http://orcid.org/0009-0006-8955-3905

Luan dos Santos Silva Corresponding author

Universidade Estadual do Norte Fluminense Darcy Ribeiro, Avenida Alberto Lamego, nº 2.000, Parque California, CEP 28013-602 Campos dos Goytacazes, RJ, Brazil. E-mail: luan_agronomia@hotmail.com

http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4419-6669

Jenilton Gomes da Cunha

Universidade Federal do Piauí, Rodovia BR-135, Km 3, Planalto Horizonte, CEP 64900-000 Bom Jesus, PI, Brazil. E-mail: katiaengagronoma@gmail.com, jeniltongomes@hotmail.com

http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4110-6605

Antônio Gustavo de Luna Souto

Universidade Federal do Vale do São Francisco, Rodovia BR 407, Km 12, Projeto de Irrigação Nilo Coelho, Lote 543, s/nº, CEP 56300-000 Petrolina, PE, Brazil. E-mail: alexandre.sanoli@hotmail.com, Walber.felix@hotmail.com, gusluso@hotmail.com, italo.cavalcante@univasf.edu.br

http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2798-2174

Ítalo Herbert Lucena Cavalcante

Universidade Federal do Vale do São Francisco, Rodovia BR 407, Km 12, Projeto de Irrigação Nilo Coelho, Lote 543, s/nº, CEP 56300-000 Petrolina, PE, Brazil. E-mail: alexandre.sanoli@hotmail.com, Walber.felix@hotmail.com, gusluso@hotmail.com, italo.cavalcante@univasf.edu.br

http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1610-1546

Corresponding author

Figures (3)
Tables (3)

Thumbnail

Figure 1
Number of shoots in the third (A) and fifth (B) formative pruning of the Omer and Shelly Israeli mango (Mangifera indica) cultivars as a function of number of branches. Bars with the same lowercase letters do not differ for cultivars Omer and Shelly within each number of branches after formative pruning. Bars with the same uppercase letters do not differ for number of branches within each Israeli mango cultivar by Tukey’s test, at 5% probability.

Thumbnail

Figure 2
Chlorophyll a index of leaves of the Omer and Shelly Israeli mango (Mangifera indica) cultivars as a function of number of branches after the sixth formative pruning. Bars with the same lowercase letters do not differ for cultivars Omer and Shelly within each number of branches after formative pruning. Bars with the same uppercase letters do not differ for number of branches within each Israeli mango cultivar by Tukey’s test, at 5% probability.

Thumbnail

Figure 3
Water use efficiency values for the Omer and Shelly Israeli mango (Mangifera indica) cultivars as a function of number of branches after the fourth formative pruning. Bars with the same lowercase letters do not differ for cultivars Omer and Shelly within each number of branches after formative pruning. Bars with the same uppercase letters do not differ for number of branches within each Israeli mango cultivar by Tukey’s test, at 5% probability.

Thumbnail

Table 1
Analysis of variance and mean test for the biometric variables of the Omer and Shelly Israeli mango (Mangifera indica) cultivars as a function of number of branches after each formative pruning⁽¹⁾.

Thumbnail

Table 2
Analysis of variance and mean test for the biochemical variables of the Omer and Shelly Israeli mango (Mangifera indica) cultivars as a function of number of branches after each formative pruning⁽¹⁾.

Thumbnail

Table 3
Analysis of variance and mean test for gas exchange of the Omer and Shelly Israeli mango (Mangifera indica) cultivars as a function of number of branches after each formative pruning⁽¹⁾.

Source of variation	Diameter (mm)	Shoot length (cm)	Number of leaves	Crown volume (m³)	Number of shoots
	Third prunning
Cultivars	2.15^ns	71.88*	63.53*	36.24*	103.88*
Omer	7.43a	19.85a	4.67a	0.002a	4.46a
Shelly	7.24a	16.77b	3.14b	0.001b	2.71b
Branches	2.54^ns	4.25^ns	4.39^ns	5.38*	8.55*
Three	7.54a	19.01a	4.31a	0.001a	4.81a
Four	7.30a	18.21a	3.73a	0.002ab	3.38b
Five	7.21a	17.72a	3.68a	0.001b	3.28b
Cultivars × branches	0.62^ns	0.21^ns	0.60^ns	1.61^ns	4.05*
	Fourth prunning
Cultivars	9.58*	11.13*	182.96*	14.33*	0.81^ns
Omer	14.23a	6.15b	5.66a	0.007a	2.65a
Shelly	13.02b	6.55a	3.72b	0.004b	2.55a
Branches	2.72^ns	5.06^ns	0.56^ns	34.24*	2.29^ns
Three	14.18a	6.61a	4.63a	0.009a	2.75a
Four	13.62a	6.25a	4.65a	0.001b	2.59a
Five	13.06a	6.18a	4.81a	0.007a	2.46a
Cultivars × branches	3.26^ns	0.03^ns	3.14^ns	1.87^ns	0.18^ns
	Fifth prunning
Cultivars	0.49^ns	11.13*	0.48^ns	23.24*	2.67^ns
Omer	12.60a	6.15b	7.62a	0.013a	3.24a
Shelly	12.39a	6.55a	8.56a	0.009b	3.06a
Branches	1.15^ns	5.05*	1.1^ns	7.35*	0.17^ns
Three	12.66a	6.61a	7.21a	0.013a	3.15a
Four	12.65a	6.25b	7.58a	0.011ab	3.11a
Five	12.18a	6.18b	9.51a	0.009b	3.18a
Cultivars × branches	1.52^ns	0.03^ns	0.89^ns	0.46^ns	4.12*
	Sixth prunning
Cultivars	9.62*	11.21*	2.51^ns	24.55*	3.85^ns
Omer	9.65a	6.15b	5.89a	0.24a	4.05a
Shelly	8.61b	6.55a	5.43a	0.16b	4.53a
Branches	0.95^ns	5.06^ns	0.34^ns	1.81^ns	0.86^ns
Three	8.80a	6.61a	5.62a	0.222a	4.06a
Four	9.35a	6.25b	5.83a	0.202a	4.44a
Five	9.23a	6.18b	5.54a	0.185a	4.36a
Cultivars × branches	0.06^ns	0.02^ns	0.42^ns	2.21^ns	1.4^ns

Source of variation	Falker chlorophyll index (FCI)			Starch (µg g-¹ fresh mass)	Carbohydrates (mmol g^-1 fresh mass)
Source of variation	Chlorophyll a	Chlorophyll b	Total chlorophyll	Starch (µg g-¹ fresh mass)	Carbohydrates (mmol g^-1 fresh mass)
	Third prunning
Cultivars	14.87*	8.15*	13.67*	0.85^ns	2.77^ns
Omer	37.67b	16.02b	53.71b	0.147a	152.84a
Shelly	39.53a	18.37a	57.91a	0.137a	197.95a
Branches	1.09^ns	1.22^ns	1.51^ns	0.93^ns	0.46^ns
Three	38.2a	16.67a	54.88a	0.152a	179.34a
Four	38.54a	16.81a	55.35a	0.133a	188.96a
Five	39.06a	18.11a	57.17a	0.142a	157.89a
Cultivars × branches	0.13^ns	0.98^ns	0.74^ns	0.89^ns	0.47^ns
	Fourth prunning
Cultivars	219.91*	0.46^ns	40.14*	5.2*	1.71^ns
Omer	46.42a	14.16a	60.58ª	0.208a	204.78a
Shelly	38.9b	13.54a	52.44b	0.129b	225.27a
Branches	0.15^ns	0.32^ns	0.29^ns	0.792^ns	1.25^ns
Three	42.47a	13.61a	56.08ª	0.199a	197.45a
Four	42.67a	14.36a	57.19ª	0.152a	223.03a
Five	42.83a	13.57a	56.24ª	0.154a	224.61a
Cultivars × branches	0.28^ns	0.05^ns	0.06^ns	0.41^ns	3.62^ns
	Fifth prunning
Cultivars	0.03^ns	0.09^ns	0.06^ns	2.78^ns	3.92^ns
Omer	43.81a	18.91a	62.71a	0.173a	235.01a
Shelly	43.83a	18.61a	62.44a	0.147a	204.04a
Branches	0.53^ns	0.64^ns	0.43^ns	5.68*	2.14^ns
Three	43.84a	18.16a	62.00a	0.195a	196.97a
Four	43.68a	19.53a	63.22a	0.133b	234.18a
Five	43.93a	18.57a	62.51a	0.153ab	227.44a
Cultivars × branches	2.00^ns	0.21^ns	0.39^ns	0.12^ns	0.07^ns
	Sixth prunning
Cultivars	118.31*	0.021^ns	33.58*	1.81^ns	0.1^ns
Omer	43.01a	22.53a	65.54a	0.16a	204.96a
Shelly	35.35b	22.41a	57.75b	0.15a	202.01a
Branches	3.84*	0.001^ns	1.0^ns	5.01*	5.41*
Three	39.13ab	22.43a	61.57a	0.18a	220.65a
Four	40.41a	22.48a	62.87a	0.13b	183.41b
Five	38.01b	22.48a	60.49a	0.15ab	206.41ab
Cultivars × branches	4.75*	0.79^ns	2.36^ns	0.26^ns	0.35^ns

Source of variation	A	gs	Ci	E (mmol H₂O m^-2 s^-1)	WUE (μmol CO₂ mmol-¹ H₂O)
Source of variation	-------------------------------(μmol CO₂ m-² s-¹)-------------------------------			E (mmol H₂O m^-2 s^-1)	WUE (μmol CO₂ mmol-¹ H₂O)
	Third prunning
Cultivars	1.076^ns	11.77*	18.58*	0.12^ns	46.26*
Omer	17.83a	0.24a	252.01a	3.87a	0.06a
Shelly	18.53a	0.19b	216.14b	3.92a	0.05b
Branches	0.35^ns	0.81^ns	1.24^ns	0.23^ns	2.05^ns
Three	18.56a	0.21a	226.72a	3.94a	0.05a
Four	18.07a	0.23a	232.88a	3.92a	0.06a
Five	17.93a	0.21a	242.62a	3.84a	0.05a
Cultivars × branches	0.029^ns	0.07^ns	0.244^ns	0.30^ns	0.08^ns
	Fourth prunning
Cultivars	11.14*	7.17*	0.153^ns	1.32^ns	41.00*
Omer	15.58a	0.16a	213.59a	6.19a	0.03a
Shelly	12.45b	0.13b	217.19a	5.81a	0.02b
Branches	1.77^ns	0.09^ns	4.41*	1.09^ns	6.59*
Three	13.56a	0.15a	220.90ab	6.34a	0.02b
Four	15.25a	0.14a	196.57b	5.77a	0.02ab
Five	13.24a	0.15a	228.71a	5.88a	0.03a
Cultivars × branches	3.96^ns	1.08^ns	1.23^ns	1.12^ns	1.24*
	Fifth prunning
Cultivars	0.038^ns	2.25^ns	12.96*	0.17^ns	6.54*
Omer	18.39a	0.17a	203.26a	4.68a	0.04a
Shelly	18.59a	0.16a	186.52b	4.57a	0.03b
Branches	0.03^ns	0.63^ns	2.63^ns	0.41^ns	0.11^ns
Three	18.66a	0.175a	199.84a	4.79a	0.04a
Four	18.46a	0.163a	187.51a	4.48a	0.04a
Five	18.35a	0.171a	197.33a	4.61a	0.04a
Cultivars × branches	2.38^ns	1.74^ns	3.42^ns	1.73^ns	1.00^ns
	Sixth prunning
Cultivars	30.57*	6.43*	0.05^ns	22.30*	2.95^ns
Omer	13.03b	0.11b	176.66a	2.89b	0.04a
Shelly	16.93a	0.14a	179.96a	4.19a	0.03a
Branches	1.33^ns	0.41^ns	0.36^ns	0.8^ns	0.21^ns
Three	14.21a	0.12a	180.36a	3.33a	0.04a
Four	15.16a	0.12a	169.48a	3.54a	0.03a
Five	15.58a	0.13a	185.10a	3.75a	0.04a
Cultivars × branches	3.02^ns	0.53^ns	0.08^ns	1.22^ns	0.08^ns

[1] Corresponding author

Brasil

Brasil

Development of Israeli mango cultivars in the Brazilian semiarid region

Desenvolvimento de cultivares de mangueiras israelenses no semiárido brasileiro

Abstract