Análise fatorial confirmatória do Inventário de Estilos Intelectuais – Revisado 2: amostra do Ensino Médio

Oliveira, Katya Luciane de; Inácio, Amanda Lays Monteiro; Almeida, Leandro da Silva; Santos, Acácia Aparecia Angeli dos; Martins, Gustavo Henrique; Oliveira, Gracielly Terziotti de

Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Brasil

Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas)

Español English

Brasil

Español English

sumário « anterior atual seguinte »

Sumário

RESEARCH REPORT | Psychological Assessment • Estud. psicol. 40 • 2023 • https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-0275202340e200097 copiar

Análise fatorial confirmatória do Inventário de Estilos Intelectuais – Revisado 2: amostra do Ensino Médio

Autoria SCIMAGO INSTITUTIONS RANKINGS

Resumo

Objetivo:

Este estudo teve por objetivo testar, por meio do modelo da Análise Fatorial Confirmatória, a estrutura fatorial proposta no Inventário de Estilos Intelectuais – Revisado 2.

Método:

O estudo envolveu a participação de 1.556 alunos do Ensino Médio, com média de idade de 16 anos e 4 meses (DP = 1,17).

Resultados:

A Análise Fatorial Confirmatória foi empregada e o modelo foi baseado na estrutura de 46 itens distribuídos em nove dimensões, tendo demonstrado bons índices de ajustes e de precisão. Verificou-se que o modelo indicado originalmente pela literatura científica não se confirmou no contexto brasileiro, sendo propostas modificações que aproximem o modelo vigente da realidade nacional.

Conclusão:

Houve uma adequação nas estimativas dos parâmetros empregados, podendo-se considerar estabilidade e generabilidade na forma como o modelo ficou organizado.

Palavras-chave
Educação; Inteligência; Psicometria

Factors	χ²/df	RMSEA	WRMR	CFI	TLI
13 factors	6.07	0.06	2.67	0.77	0.75
5 factors	10.97	0.08	3.99	0.53	0.51
3 factors	10.34	0.08	3.87	0.56	0.54

Items	F1	F2	F3	F4	F5	F6	F7	F8	F9
1	- 0.07	-0.07	- 0.04	-0.01	-0.06	0.02	0.10	-0.06	0.50
2	- 0.05	- 0.03	- 0.07	-0.03	-0.03	0.01	-0.02	0.42	-0.03
3	- 0.03	-0.03	- 0.45	0.21	-0.06	0.17	-0.05	-0.12	-0.07
4	-0.03	-0.02	- 0.06	- 0.00	-0.03	0.77	0.00	-0.02	0.00
5	- 0.54	- 0.00	-0.02	- 0.00	-0.01	- 0.00	0.09	-0.06	0.03
8	- 0.01	- 0.49	- 0.01	- 0.00	-0.03	- 0.06	0.11	0.08	0.10
12	- 0.21	-0.34	0.12	-0.01	- 0.07	-0.03	0.14	-0.01	0.02
13	-0.08	-0.70	- 0.02	- 0.03	-0.02	-0.02	-0.01	0.00	0.02
14	- 0.50	-0.24	- 0.16	-0.06	0.01	- 0.00	0.12	-0.06	0.03
15	- 0.64	-0.08	-0.01	- 0.04	0.01	-0.06	-0.09	0.06	0.01
17	- 0.00	- 0.03	- 0.58	0.14	0.11	0.10	-0.02	-0.14	-0.05
20	0.17	-0.10	- 0.38	-0.05	-0.01	- 0.02	0.16	0.03	0.18
22	- 0.04	-0.35	-0.13	-0.02	- 0.08	- 0.04	0.02	-0.06	0.00
23	- 0.09	- 0.03	- 0.50	-0.02	-0.06	-0.03	0.15	0.08	0.05
24	0.11	-0.05	- 0.23	-0.03	-0.05	- 0.00	0.00	0.01	0.41
25	0.37	- 0.01	- 0.05	0.11	-0.01	-0.07	-0.04	0.14	0.17
26	0.18	- 0.52	-0.03	-0.02	-0.04	- 0.09	-0.23	-0.02	0.05
27	-0.03	-0.04	- 0.25	-0.00	0.51	-0.03	-0.07	-0.02	0.02
28	-0.04	0.73	- 0.04	-0.03	0.01	0.01	-0.03	0.05	0.04
29	0.00	0.13	- 0.27	- 0.04	0.51	-0.02	-0.03	0.00	-0.03
30	0.22	-0.02	- 0.01	-0.03	0.53	- 0.00	0.02	0.07	-0.02
32	0.58	-0.05	- 0.01	-0.06	-0.03	- 0.02	0.04	0.00	0.02
33	0.34	0.06	-0.01	- 0.03	-0.01	0.31	-0.03	0.08	0.07
34	0.16	0.03	- 0.02	- 0.80	-0.06	0.03	0.17	0.02	0.00
35	0.21	0.18	-0.05	0.10	0.06	0.02	0.37	-0.36	0.03
36	0.47	0.31	-0.01	- 0.04	0.06	-0.05	0.02	-0.03	-0.10
37	0.24	0.14	- 0.04	-0.69	-0.01	-0.01	0.07	0.02	0.01
39	0.01	0.74	-0.05	-0.08	-0.01	0.02	0.01	0.04	-0.01
41	-0.08	0.05	- 0.54	-0.32	0.02	-0.04	0.07	0.10	-0.01
42	-0.03	-0.04	- 0.55	- 0.09	-0.09	0.00	0.23	0.16	0.05
43	0.03	-0.02	-0.02	- 0.03	0.03	0.06	0.02	0.62	0.08
44	0.00	- 0.05	-0.03	0.03	-0.09	-0.01	0.05	0.08	0.81
45	0.06	-0.06	-0.08	-0.03	-0.01	-0.01	0.44	0.01	0.21
46	0.01	-0.02	- 0.08	0.77	-0.03	-0.02	0.20	0.03	-0.02
47	-0.02	0.16	-0.01	0.05	0.12	-0.01	0.43	-0.06	-0.04
48	0.07	0.22	0.03	0.01	-0.05	-0.01	0.41	0.05	-0.50
52	-0.03	-0.01	-0.04	-0.02	0.64	- 0.00	0.18	-0.01	0.01
53	0.05	-0.01	- 0.03	0.07	-0.01	-0.03	0.54	0.02	0.08
54	0.02	0.06	-0.01	-0.02	0.03	0.01	0.04	0.75	-0.04
56	0.00	0.05	-0.04	-0.02	0.01	0.74	0.07	0.07	0.00
58	0.02	-0.08	- 0.00	-0.07	0.06	0.02	0.57	-0.05	0.07
59	0.01	-0.01	- 0.02	0.08	0.51	-0.05	0.21	0.14	0.04
60	0.02	0.02	- 0.00	0.05	0.13	-0.09	-0.02	0.57	0.00
63	0.39	0.06	-0.03	-0.38	-0.08	-0.04	0.26	0.07	-0.12
64	0.02	-0.15	- 0.06	0.02	0.01	-0.05	0.52	0.07	0.02
65	-0.01	-0.03	-0.08	-0.04	-0.04	0.05	0.52	-0.06	0.14
No. items	8	8	6	5	5	3	8	5	4
Alpha	0.78	0.68	- 0.75	0.80	0.71	0.65	0.71	0.70	0.65
Omega	0.79	0.68	- 0.76	0.81	0.73	0.66	0.72	0.71	0.66

Items	Description	Factor and precision
5	Legislative: When I encounter a problem, I use my own ideas and strategies to solve it.	Factor 1 Self-Centered Style α = 0.78; ω = 0.79
14	Legislative: I like problems where I can try my own ways to solve them.
15	Internal: When I try to make a decision, I trust my own opinion about the situation.
25	Hierarchical: When dealing with difficulties, I am able to find out which ones are the most important and what to do to face them.
32	Legislative: When working on a task, I like to start with my own ideas.
33	Hierarchical: When there are many things to do, I have a clear sense of the order in which to perform them.
36	Conservative: When I face a problem, I like to solve it in a way that I already know.
63	Internal: I prefer situations in which I can implement my own ideas, without depending on others.
8	Executive: I like to figure out how to solve a problem by following certain rules.	Factor 2 Executive/Conservative Style α = 0.68; ω = 0.68
12	Executive: I like activities that I can perform without following models.
13	Conservative: I prefer to follow rules or ready-made ways of doing things.
22	Conservative: When I’m in charge of something, I like to follow past models and ideas.
26	Conservative: I like situations where I can follow a set routine.
28	Conservative: I like tasks and problems that have fixed rules to be followed in order to complete/solve them.
36	Conservative: When I encounter a problem, I like to solve it in a way that I already know.
39	Executive: I like to follow definite rules or directions when solving a problem or performing a task.
3	External: When I start a task, I like to discuss the matter with my friends and colleagues.	Factor 3 Opening Style α = 0.75; ω = 0.76
17	External: In a school activity, I like to combine my own ideas with those of others.
20	Judicial: I like situations where I can compare and evaluate different ways of doing things.
23	Judicial: I like to check and evaluate different points of view.
41	External: When I work in an activity, I like to share ideas and receive suggestions from others.
42	Judicial: I enjoy activities where I can study and evaluate different views or ideas.
34	External: I enjoy participating in activities where I can interact with other people as part of a team.	Factor 4 External Style α = 0.80; ω = 0.81
37	Internal: I like to work alone on a task or problem.
41	External: When I work in an activity, I like to share ideas and receive suggestions from others.
46	External: I like situations where I interact with others and we all work together.
63	Internal: I prefer situations where I can come up with my own ideas without relying on others.
27	Oligarchic: When discussing or writing about a topic, I get my views accepted by my colleagues.	Factor 5 Oligarchic Style α= 0.71; ω = 0.73
29	Oligarchic: I prefer to work on a project or task that is acceptable and approved by my colleagues.
30	Oligarchic: When there are several important things to do, I do them first for people who are most important to me and to my colleagues.
52	Oligarchic: When there are several important things to do, I choose the most important ones for my friends and colleagues.
59	Oligarchic: When I start a task or project, I focus on the parts that are most relevant to my group of friends.
4	Hierarchical: I like to list the most important things I need to do before I start doing them.	Factor 6 Hierarchical Style α = 0.65; ω = 0.66
33	Hierarchical: When there are many things to do, I have a clear sense of the order in which they should be done.
56	Hierarchical: When I start something, I like to make a list of things to do and sort things by importance.
35	Anarchic: I tend to face several problems at the same time because they are often equally urgent.	Factor 7 Liberal/Decentralizing Styles α = 0.71; ω = 0.72
45	Liberal: I like to challenge old ideas or ways of doing things and look for better ones.
47	Anarchic: I think that when I get involved in a problem, another one pops up always just as important.
48	Global: I like to work on activities that deal with general issues and not in small details.
53	Liberal: When I face a problem, I prefer to try new strategies or methods to solve it.
58	Liberal: I like to do things in new ways that have not been implemented by others in the past.
64	Liberal: I like to change routines to improve the way tasks are done.
65	Liberal: I like to face old problems and find new ways to solve them.
2	Monarchical: When I write or talk about ideas, I prefer to focus on one idea at a time.	Factor 8 Monarchical Style α = 0.70; ω = 0.71
35	Anarchic: I tend to face several issues at the same time because they are often equally urgent.
43	Monarchic: I tend to give full attention to one thing at a time.
54	Monarchic: I like to focus on one task at a time.
60	Monarchic: I have to finish one project before starting another.
1	Local: I prefer to deal with problems that require me to pay attention to many details.	Factor 9 Local Style α = 0.65; ω = 0.66
24	Local: I prefer to work on activities that allow me to use small details at the same time.
44	Local: I like problems where I need to pay attention to details.
48	Global: I enjoy working on activities that deal with general issues rather than small details.

Programa de Pós-Graduação em Psicologia, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas Núcleo de Editoração SBI - Campus II, Av. John Boyd Dunlop, s/n. Prédio de Odontologia, 13060-900 Campinas - São Paulo Brasil, Tel./Fax: +55 19 3343-7223 - Campinas - SP - Brazil
E-mail: psychologicalstudies@puc-campinas.edu.br

Acompanhe os números deste periódico no seu leitor de RSS

[1] Correspondence to: A. L. M. INÁCIO. E-mail: amandalmonteiroo@gmail.com.