Safety and education during COVID-19: prevalence, associated factors and reopening plans of the School of Nursing

Rafael, Ricardo de Mattos Russo; Correia, Luiza Mara; Mello, Alex Simões de; Prata, Juliana Amaral; Gallasch, Cristiane Helena; Pérez Junior, Eugenio Fuentes; Silva, Frances Valeria Costa e; Penna, Lucia Helena Garcia; Morera, Jaime Caravaca; Breda, Karen Lucas; David, Helena Maria Scherlowski Leal

Ricardo de Mattos Russo Rafael

Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Faculdade de Enfermagem. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.

http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1315-4271

Luiza Mara Correia

Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Faculdade de Enfermagem. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.

http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4660-2416

Alex Simões de Mello

Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Faculdade de Enfermagem. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.

http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2078-735X

Juliana Amaral Prata

Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Faculdade de Enfermagem. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.

http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1315-7595

Cristiane Helena Gallasch

Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Faculdade de Enfermagem. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.

http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0823-0818

Eugenio Fuentes Pérez Junior

Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Faculdade de Enfermagem. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.

http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4611-0443

Frances Valeria Costa e Silva

Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Faculdade de Enfermagem. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.

http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0441-2294

Lucia Helena Garcia Penna

Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Faculdade de Enfermagem. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.

http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9227-628X

Jaime Caravaca Morera

Universidad de Costa Rica, Escuela de Enfermería. San José, Costa Rica.

http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6647-217X

Karen Lucas Breda

University of Hartford, College of Education, Nursing and Health Professions. West Hartford, Connecticut, USA.

http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3751-9792

Helena Maria Scherlowski Leal David

Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Faculdade de Enfermagem. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.

http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8002-6830

Corresponding author:Ricardo de Mattos Russo Rafael E-mail: prof.ricardomattos@gmail.com.

Conception of study design. Ricardo de Mattos Russo Rafael. Luiza Mara Correia. Alex Simões de Mello. Juliana Amaral Prata. Cristiane Helena Gallasch. Eugenio Fuentes Pérez Junior. Frances Valeria Costa e Silva. Lucia Helena Garcia Penna. Helena Maria Scherlowski Leal David. Data acquisiton, Ricardo de Mattos Russo Rafael. Luiza Mara Correia. Alex Simões de Mello. Juliana Amaral Prata. Cristiane Helena Gallasch. Eugenio Fuentes Pérez Junior. Frances Valeria Costa e Silva. Lucia Helena Garcia Penna. Helena Maria Scherlowski Leal David. Data analysis. Ricardo de Mattos Russo Rafael. Luiza Mara Correia. Alex Simões de Mello. Juliana Amaral Prata. Cristiane Helena Gallasch. Eugenio Fuentes Pérez Junior. Frances Valeria Costa e Silva. Lucia Helena Garcia Penna. Helena Maria Scherlowski Leal David. Finding interpretation and discussion. Ricardo de Mattos Russo Rafael. Luiza Mara Correia. Alex Simões de Mello. Juliana Amaral Prata. Cristiane Helena Gallasch. Eugenio Fuentes Pérez Junior. Frances Valeria Costa e Silva. Lucia Helena Garcia Penna. Helena Maria Scherlowski Leal David. Jaime Caravaca Morera. Karen Lucas Breda. Writting and revising critically of the manuscript. Ricardo de Mattos Russo Rafael. Luiza Mara Correia. Alex Simões de Mello. Juliana Amaral Prata. Cristiane Helena Gallasch. Eugenio Fuentes Pérez Junior. Frances Valeria Costa e Silva. Lucia Helena Garcia Penna. Helena Maria Scherlowski Leal David. Jaime Caravaca Morera. Karen Lucas Breda. Final approval of the versión of the article. Ricardo de Mattos Russo Rafael. Luiza Mara Correia. Alex Simões de Mello. Juliana Amaral Prata. Cristiane Helena Gallasch. Eugenio Fuentes Pérez Junior. Frances Valeria Costa e Silva. Lucia Helena Garcia Penna. Helena Maria Scherlowski Leal David. Jaime Caravaca Morera. Karen Lucas Breda. Taking responsibility of all aspects of the manuscript contents, the accuracy and cientific integrity of published article. Ricardo de Mattos Russo Rafael. Luiza Mara Correia. Alex Simões de Mello. Juliana Amaral Prata. Cristiane Helena Gallasch. Eugenio Fuentes Pérez Junior. Frances Valeria Costa e Silva. Lucia Helena Garcia Penna. Helena Maria Scherlowski Leal David. Jaime Caravaca Morera. Karen Lucas Breda.

ASSOCIATE EDITOR Cristina Rosa Baixinho

Variable	Suspected case	Discarded case			Confirmed case
Variable	n (%)	n (%)	cOR (CI 95%)*	P	n (%)	cOR (CI 95%) ^* * Crude Odds Ratio (cOR) was calculated using the suspected cases as reference.	P
Age: Mean (SD)	29.63(12.04)	30.34(10.70)	1.00 (.98 – 1.02)	0.572	32.81 (9.65)	1.02 (.99 – 1.04)	0.054
Race / ethnicity		-	-	-	-	-	-
Black	168 (69.71)	44 (18.26)	1.00	-	29 (12.03)	1.00	-
White	165 (65.74)	60 (23.90)	1.39 (0.89 – 2.16)	0.148	25 (10.36)	0.91 (0.51 – 1.62)	0.754
Asian / Indigenous	1 (20.00)	1 (20.00)	3.82 (0.23 – 62.26)	0.347	3 (60.00)	17.38 (1.74-172.86)	0.015
Gender
Woman	304 (68.47)	87 (19.59)	1.00	-	53 (11.94)	1.00	-
Man	31 (57.41)	18 (33.33)	2.03 (1.08 – 3.80)	0.027	5 (9.26)	0.92 (0.34 – 2.49)	0.877
Academic category
Undergraduate students	194 (77.91)	45 (18,07)	1.00	-	10 (4.02)	1.00	-
Specialization students	56 (47.86)	31 (26.50)	2.39 (1.38 – 4.11)	0.002	30 (25.64)	10.39 (4.79 – 22.56)	<0.001
Master doctoral students	16 (50.00)	10 (31.25)	2.69 (1.15 – 6.32)	0.023	6 (18.75)	7.27 (2.34 – 22.59)	0.001
Professors	56 (66.67)	18 (21.43)	1.38 (0.74 – 2.58)	0.304	10 (11.90)	3.46 (1.37 – 8.74)	0.009
Technicians	13 (81.25)	1 (6.25)	0.33 (0.04 – 2.60)	0.294	2 (12.50)	2.98 (0.59 – 15.06)	0.186
Residence area
Capital	101 (69.18)	30 (20.55)	1.00	-	15 (10.27)	1.00	-
Other municipalities	234 (66.48)	75 (21.31)	1.07 (0.66 – 1.75)	0.758	43 (12.22)	1.24 (0.66 – 2.33)	0.509
Income (in dollar) ^ The conversion of values was carried out on Sep 24th, 2020 and used the quotation from $ 1.00 to R$ 0.18.
Up to $181.49	169 (78.24)	37 (17.13)	1.00	-	10 (4.63)	1.00	-
$181.50 to $544.47	47 (53.41)	25 (28.41)	2.43 (1.33 – 4.43)	0.004	16 (18.18)	5.75 (2.45 – 13.51)	<0.001
$544.48 to $807.46	48 (64.00)	13 (17.33)	1.24 (0.61 – 2.51)	0.556	14 (18.67)	4.93 (2.05 – 11.79)	<0.001
$807.46 to $1,814.91	43 (58.11)	17 (22.97)	1.80 (0.93 – 3.51)	0.081	14 (18.92)	5.50 (2.29 – 13.24)	<0.001
More than $1,814.91	19 (55.88)	11 (32.35)	2.64 (1.16 – 6.02)	0.021	4 (11.76)	3.56 (1.01 – 12.45)	0.047

Variable	Suspected case	Discarded case			Confirmed case
Variable	n (%) or mean (SD)	n (%) or mean (SD)	cOR (IC 95%) ^* * Crude Odds Ratio (cPR) was calculated using the suspected cases as reference.	P	n (%) or mean (SD)	cOR (IC 95%)*	P
Risk group
No	196 (67.82)	59 (20.42)	1.00	-	34 (11.76)	1.00	-
Yes	139 (66.51)	46 (22.01)	1.10 (0.71 – 1.71)	0.675	24 (11.48)	0.99 (0.56 – 1.75)	0.987
Family member of risk group
No	118 (65.56)	40 (22.22)	1.00	-	22 (12.22)	1.00	-
Yes	217 (68.24)	65 (20.44)	0.88 (0.56 – 1.39)	0.593	36 (11.32)	0.89 (0.50 – 1.58)	0.691
Health insurance
No	145 (68.72)	42 (19.91)	1.00	-	24 (11.37)	1.00	-
Yes	190 (66.20)	63 (21.95)	1.14 (0.73 – 1.79)	0.553	34 (11.85)	1.08 (0.61 – 1.90)	0.787
Visited family or friends
No	188 (66.20)	62 (21.83)	1.00	-	34 (11.97)	1.00	-
Yes	147 (68.69)	43 (20.09)	0.89 (0.57 – 1.38)	0.597	24 (11.21)	0.90 (0.51 – 1.59)	0.723
Homework
Yes, or unemployed	264 (78.11)	58 (17.16)	1.00	-	16 (4.73)	1.00	-
No; reduced working range	32 (41.56)	23 (29.87)	3.27 (1.78 – 6.00)	<0.001	22 (28.57)	11.34 (5.41 – 23.80)	<0.001
No; normal working range	39 (46.99)	24 (28.92)	2.80 (1.56 – 5.01)	0.001	20 (24.10)	8.46 (4.04 – 17.71)	<0.001
Healthcare frontline
No	269 (77.08)	61 (17.48)	1.00	-	19 (5.44)	1.00	-
Yes	66 (44.30)	44 (29.53)	2.94 (1.83 – 4.71)	<0.001	39 (26.17)	8.37 (4.54 – 15.41)	<0.001
Days of the week in healthcare frontline: Mean (SD)	0.67 (1.48)	1.50 (1.88)	1.34 (1.18 – 1.51)	<0.001	2.34 (1.88)	1.64 (1.41 – 1.91)	<0.001
Person per room: mean (SD)	0.77 (0.65)	0.74 (0.36)	0.90 (0.59 – 1.37)	0.635	0.78 (0.96)	0.99 (0,66 – 1.50)	1.000
Use public transportation (bus, train, boat, etc)
No	80 (57.97)	38 (27.54)	1.00	-	20 (14.49)	1.00	-
Yes	255 (70.83)	67 (18.61)	0.55 (0.34 – 0.89)	0.014	38 (10.56)	0.60 (0.33 – 1.08)	0.089
Use of mask
Always	328 (68.05)	96 (19.92)	1.00	-	58 (12.03)	1.00	-
Most of the time	7 (43.75)	9 (56.25)	4.39 (1.59 – 12.11)	0.004	-	-	-

Variable	Discarded case		Confirmed case
Variable	cOR (IC 95%)**	p	cOR (IC 95%) ^ Statistic of the Wald Test: 58.81 (p-value <0.001).	p
Use public transport: no/yes	0.54 (0.33 - .89)	0.016	0.63 (0.33 – 1.19)	0.155
Use of mask: always/most of the time	5.19 (1.54 – 17.38)	0.008	^-	-
Healthcare frontline: no/yes	2.91 (1.77 – 4.80)	<0.001	7.83 (4.24 – 14.46)	<0.001

[1] Corresponding author:Ricardo de Mattos Russo Rafael E-mail: prof.ricardomattos@gmail.com.

Brasil

Brasil

Safety and education during COVID-19: prevalence, associated factors and reopening plans of the School of Nursing

Abstract

Objective

Methods

Results

Conclusion