ORBITAL REMOTE SENSING FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF AREAS IRRIGATED WITH A CENTRAL PIVOT SYSTEM

Moreira, Wendel K. O.; Maggi, Marcio F.; Venancio, Luan P.; Bazzi, Claudio L.; Santos, Igor S.

doi:10.1590/1809-4430-Eng.Agric.v43n1e20220109/2023

Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Brasil

Español English

sumário « anterior atual seguinte »

Sumário

Scientific Paper • Eng. agríc. 43 (1) • 2023 • https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-4430-Eng.Agric.v43n1e20220109/2023 copy

ORBITAL REMOTE SENSING FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF AREAS IRRIGATED WITH A CENTRAL PIVOT SYSTEM

Authorship SCIMAGO INSTITUTIONS RANKINGS

ABSTRACT

Irrigated agriculture is considered one of the most important techniques for agricultural production in the world, despite being the sector that uses water resources the most. Thus, technological advances have been constantly developed and applied in the sector as a way to improve water management and reduce its consumption, considering that some cultures are affected by economic costs and feasibilities of production, because the water cost has increased significantly in recent years. Remote sensing is a technology that has provided good results for estimating evapotranspiration (ETr) in producing areas, enabling more efficient irrigation management for low costs. This study aimed to answer the question about how the generation of irrigation management zones (IMZs) can be used to optimize water use and improve irrigation systems and which ETr models are better for it. Three ETr estimation models (Surface Energy Balance Algorithm for Land [SEBAL], Mapping Evapotranspiration at High Resolution and with Internalized Calibration [METRIC] and Simple Algorithm for Evapotranspiration Retrieving [SAFER]) were used to design IMZs in center pivot cultivated with cotton. The design of IMZs with ETr data proved to be a viable alternative, making it possible to improve water management in irrigated systems, reducing costs with viability irrigation for cotton and others cultures. The METRIC method displayed the greatest ease in obtaining the data used in the ETr estimation for generating the IMZs.

irrigation management; irrigation management zones; cotton; evapotranspiration

Phenological Stages	Satellite	Sensor	Size pixel	Image date	Julian Day
I	Landsat 7	ETM+	30 m	1/17/2018	17
II	Landsat 8	OLI		2/10/2018	41
III	Landsat 7	ETM+		4/23/2018	113
IV	Landsat 8	OLI		5/17/2018	137
I	Landsat 8	OLI		1/12/2019	12
II	Landsat 8	OLI		2/13/2019	44
III	Landsat 8	OLI		4/18/2019	108
IV	Landsat 7	ETM+		5/12/2019	132
I	Landsat 8	OLI		1/15/2020	15
II	Landsat 8	OLI		3/19/2020	79
III	Landsat 7	ETM+		4/12/2020	103
IV	Landsat 7	ETM+		5/30/2020	151

Year	Method	Stage	N Classes	Tukey’s test				ASC	FPI	MPE	VR%

				C1	C2	C3	C4

				-----------------mm·d^-1--------------
2018	SEBAL	I	2	0.9a	1.5b			0.62	0.067	0.080	74
			3	0.7a	1.1b	1.6c		0.57	0.082	0.083	87
			4	0.6a	1.0b	1.4c	1.7d	0.61	0.059	0.053	94
	METRIC		2	1.8a	2.4b			0.69	0.042	0.051	68
			3	1.6a	1.9b	2.5c		0.58	0.061	0.063	85
			4	1.6a	1.8b	2.1c	2.5d	0.56	0.066	0.060	90
	SAFER		2	2.2a	2.4b			0.60	0.080	0.095	68
			3	2.2a	2.3b	2.5c		0.54	0.081	0.082	82
			4	2.2a	2.3b	2.4c	2.5d	0.54	0.074	0.067	88
	SEBAL	II	2	1.8a	2.6b			0.68	0.038	0.047	57
			3	1.6a	2.0b	2.8c		0.52	0.086	0.087	75
			4	1.5a	1.9b	2.3c	3.2d	0.54	0.074	0.067	82
	METRIC		2	3.2a	3.4b			0.60	0.078	0.095	58
			3	3.1a	3.3b	3.4c		0.54	0.078	0.079	81
			4	3.1a	3.3b	3.3c	3.4d	0.50	0.093	0.083	88
	SAFER		2	4.1a	4.3b			0.51	0.116	0.138	54
			3	4.0a	4.2b	4.3c		0.54	0.080	0.081	73
			4	4.0a	4.1b	4.2c	4.3d	0.50	0.093	0.080	81
	SEBAL	III	2	4.6a	4.7b			0.64	0.066	0.079	69
			3	4.5a	4.6b	4.7b		0.59	0.062	0.068	84
			4	4.5a	4.6b	4.7c	4.7c	0.53	0.084	0.075	90
	METRIC		2	3.5a	3.8b			0.63	0.067	0.080	72
			3	3.5a	3.6b	3.8c		0.57	0.074	0.074	87
			4	3.4a	3.6b	3.7c	3.8d	0.55	0.070	0.068	91
	SAFER		2	4.2a	4.3b			0.61	0.072	0.087	69
			3	4.2a	4.3b	4.3b		0.54	0.089	0.089	83
			4	4.2a	4.3b	4.3b	4.3b	0.55	0.073	0.066	90
	SEBAL	IV	2	4.4a	4.8b			0.76	0.036	0.043	70
			3	4.3a	4.7b	4.9b		0.69	0.048	0.048	88
			4	4.2a	4.5b	4.7c	4.9d	0.68	0.047	0.041	90
	METRIC		2	3.6a	4.3b			0.69	0.070	0.082	66
			3	3.1a	3.9b	4.3c		0.70	0.047	0.047	84
			4	2.9a	3.6b	4.0c	4.3d	0.68	0.045	0.041	91
	SAFER		2	3.3a	3.5b			0.76	0.031	0.038	61
			3	3.3a	3.4b	3.5c		0.65	0.043	0.044	79
			4	3.2a	3.4b	3.5c	3.5c	0.54	0.073	0.067	84
2019	SEBAL	I	2	1.1a	3.4b			0.62	0.084	0.098	75
			3	0.6a	2.2b	3.7c		0.62	0.057	0.058	90
			4	0.6a	1.9b	2.1c	4.0d	0.59	0.060	0.057	94
	METRIC		2	1.4a	2.2b			0.70	0.041	0.049	71
			3	1.3a	1.9b	2.3c		0.56	0.078	0.078	86
			4	1.2a	1.8b	2.1c	2.4d	0.54	0.082	0.074	91
	SAFER		2	4.1a	4.3b			0.61	0.068	0.083	68
			3	4.1a	4.2b	4.3c		0.54	0.083	0.084	83
			4	4.0a	4.1b	4.2c	4.3d	0.54	0.076	0.069	89
	SEBAL	II	2	4.3a	4.4b			0.54	0.099	0.119	62
			3	4.2a	4.3b	4.5c		0.53	0.090	0.091	79
			4	4.2a	4.3b	4.4c	4.5d	0.53	0.089	0.080	87
	METRIC		2	3.5a	3.9b			0.72	0.028	0.034	75
			3	3.5a	3.8b	4.0c		0.60	0.065	0.065	89
			4	3.4a	3.6b	3.9c	4.0d	0.59	0.063	0.057	93
	SAFER		2	4.8a	4.9b			0.63	0.066	0.080	68
			3	4.7a	4.8b	4.9c		0.57	0.072	0.072	83
			4	4.7a	4.8b	4.9c	4.9c	0.55	0.078	0.070	90
	SEBAL	III	2	2.6a	4.6b			0.63	0.075	0.091	68
			3	2.1a	3.7b	4.9c		0.67	0.052	0.052	89
			4	1.6a	2.9b	3.9c	4.9d	0.67	0.054	0.048	95
	METRIC		2	2.9a	5.2b			0.73	0.042	0.050	84
			3	2.5a	3.5b	5.3c		0.63	0.070	0.071	91
			4	2.3a	3.2b	4.3c	5.4d	0.65	0.054	0.049	96
	SAFER		2	3.6a	3.8b			0.59	0.083	0.100	67
			3	3.6a	3.7b	3.8c		0.53	0.095	0.094	81
			4	3.5a	3.6b	3.7c	3.8d	0.52	0.091	0.081	88
	SEBAL	IV	2	4.1a	4.8b			0.88	0.011	0.014	83
			3	3.9a	4.4b	4.8c		0.84	0.018	0.018	93
			4	3.9a	4.3b	4.7c	4.8d	0.63	0.025	0.027	96
	METRIC		2	1.8a	2.3b	2.5c		0.71	0.041	0.042	86
			3	1.8a	2.3b	2.5c		0.71	0.041	0.042	86
			4	1.7a	2.1b	2.3c	2.5d	0.66	0.041	0.038	91
	SAFER		2	3.6a	3.7b			0.78	0.031	0.037	76
			3	3.5a	3.6b	3.7c		0.53	0.084	0.075	92
			4	3.5a	3.6b	3.7c	3.7c	0.72	0.031	0.032	88
2020	SEBAL	I	2	2.3a	5.1b			0.77	0.047	0.054	74
			3	1.6a	3.9b	5.3c		0.72	0.039	0.039	91
			4	1.5a	3.5b	4.6c	5.4d	0.66	0.050	0.045	94
	METRIC		2	3.1a	4.0b			0.64	0.061	0.074	64
			3	3.1a	3.8b	4.4c		0.60	0.059	0.061	80
			4	2.8a	3.4b	3.9c	4.4d	0.60	0.062	0.056	89
	SAFER		2	2.5a	2.9b			0.69	0.049	0.058	75
			3	3.1a	4.9b	5.2c		0.60	0.075	0.075	89
			4	2.4a	2.6b	2.8c	2.9d	0.60	0.059	0.053	94
	SEBAL	II	2	6.4a	6.6b			0.73	0.038	0.046	75
			3	6.2a	6.4b	6.6c		0.70	0.044	0.044	87
			4	3.4a	4.2b	4.7c	5.1c	0.63	0.051	0.046	92
	METRIC		2	3.2a	3.3b			0.52	0.113	0.135	51
			3	3.1a	3.2c	3.3c		0.54	0.083	0.084	71
			4	3.1a	3.2b	3.2b	3.3c	0.54	0.078	0.071	82
	SAFER		2	5.2a	5.5b			0.65	0.073	0.087	65
			3	5.1a	5.3b	5.4c		0.66	0.050	0.050	86
			4	5.1a	5.2b	5.3c	5.4d	0.61	0.051	0.047	91
	SEBAL	III	2	2.6a	3.5b			0.82	0.020	0.023	73
			3	2.5a	3.3b	3.5c		0.48	0.098	0.101	82
			4	2.3a	3.0b	3.4c	3.6d	0.55	0.074	0.067	90
	METRIC		2	1.8a	2.1b			0.51	0.126	0.152	50
			3	1.7a	1.9b	2.3c		0.54	0.084	0.086	74
			4	1.5a	1.8b	2.0c	2.4d	0.57	0.064	0.059	83
	SAFER		2	3.9a	4.1b			0.68	0.048	0.057	61
			3	3.8a	4.0b	4.1c		0.55	0.087	0.088	74
			4	3.8a	3.9b	4.0c	4.1d	0.59	0.070	0.062	86
	SEBAL	IV	2	2.4a	3.5b			0.87	0.018	0.022	70
			3	2.1a	3.2b	3.5c		0.81	0.023	0.024	88
			4	1.9a	2.7b	3.3c	3.5d	0.80	0.023	0.020	86
	METRIC		2	1.9a	2.6b			0.75	0.037	0.045	62
			3	1.5a	2.3b	2.6c		0.67	0.043	0.044	81
			4	1.4a	2.2b	2.5c	2.7d	0.56	0.069	0.063	87
	SAFER		2	3.4a	3.7b			0.77	0.031	0.037	64
			3	3.3a	3.6b	3.7c		0.61	0.055	0.057	84
			4	3.3a	3.5b	3.6c	3.7d	0.60	0.063	0.057	88

Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola SBEA - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola, Departamento de Engenharia e Ciências Exatas FCAV/UNESP, Prof. Paulo Donato Castellane, km 5, 14884.900 | Jaboticabal - SP, Tel./Fax: +55 16 3209 7619 - Jaboticabal - SP - Brazil
E-mail: revistasbea@sbea.org.br

Acompanhe os números deste periódico no seu leitor de RSS

[1] 1*Corresponding author. Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná/Cascavel - PR, Brasil. E-mail: wendelmoreira21@outlook.com