Sobre vítimas, agressores e espectadores: uma meta-etnografia dos papéis no cyberbullying

Moretti, Constanza; Herkovits, Damián

Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Brasil

Cadernos de Saúde Pública

Español English

Brasil

Español English

sumário « anterior atual seguinte »

Sumário

REVIEW • Cad. Saúde Pública 37 (4) • 2021 • https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311X00097120 copiar

Sobre vítimas, agressores e espectadores: uma meta-etnografia dos papéis no cyberbullying

Autoria SCIMAGO INSTITUTIONS RANKINGS

Resumo:

O cyberbullying é uma agressão virtual entre pares cuja prevalência varia entre 10% e 40%, segundo estudos desenvolvidos em diferentes países. Grande parte da bibliografia académica sobre esta agressão tende a individualizar e a medicalizar as causas da violência, deixando de contemplar o contexto no qual se dá e os sentidos que adquire para quem a exerce. Este trabalho tem como objetivo conhecer as crenças, valores e práticas que os adolescentes mobilizam ao desempenhar os papéis envolvidos no cyberbullying. Foi realizada uma meta-etnografia cujo propósito era produzir uma síntese de pesquisas qualitativas a partir da interpretação teórica dos seus achados fundamentais. O corpus analisado era composto por 33 artigos selecionados nas bases de bibliografia científica BVS, PubMed, SciELO e Scopus. Os resultados descrevem as expressões do cyberbullying, os motivos que o desencadeiam e as vivências de adolescentes agressores, agredidos e observadores. Tomando como referência teórica o interacionismo simbólico, consideramos que o cyberbullying é uma expressão singular da sociabilidade virtual. Argumentamos que é uma prática relacionada com processos de construção da identidade a partir de mecanismos de identificação e oposição com pares, por meio dos quais também reproduzem e disputam posições de reconhecimento na sua sociabilidade. Neste processo, através do cyberbullying são sancionados comportamentos que infringem uma ordem simbólica dominante sobre o dever ser e estar adolescente.

Palavras-chave:
Cyberbullying; Relações Interpessoais; Violência; Adolescente; Revisão

Base de datos	Término de búsqueda	Campo de búsqueda	Filtro	Cantidad de citas
BVS	Cyberbullying	Título, resumen, asunto	Artículo	3.808
PubMed	Cyberbullying	Título, resumen	Journal article	530
SciELO	Cyberbullying	Resumen	-	59
Scopus	Cyberbullying	Título, resumen, palabras-clave	Artículo	1.430
Total				5.827

Autores	Objetivo	Metodología	País	Muestra
Autores	Objetivo	Metodología	País	Edad (años)	Tamaño
Baas et al. ⁵⁴54. Baas N, de Jong MDT, Drossaert CHC. Children's perspectives on cyberbullying: insights based on participatory research. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw 2013; 16:248-53.	Explorar el impacto del ciberbullying, motivos de agresores y lucha contra el ciberbullying	Entrevistas grupales	Países Bajos	11-12	N = 28 (13 mujeres, 15 varones)
Berne et al. ²⁷27. Berne S, Frisén A, Kling J. Appearance-related cyberbullying: a qualitative investigation of characteristics, content, reasons, and effects. Body Image 2014; 11:527-33.	Identificar las características de víctimas o agresores en el ciberbullying dirigido a la apariencia	Entrevistas grupales	Suecia	15	N = 27 (13 mujeres, 14 varones)
Betts & Spenser ⁵¹51. Betts LR, Spenser KA. "People think it's a harmless joke": young people's understanding of the impact of technology, digital vulnerability and cyberbullying in the United Kingdom. J Child Media 2017; 11:20-35.	Analizar los usos de las tecnologías y el concepto de ciberbullying	Entrevistas grupales	Reino Unido	11-15	N = 29 (11 mujeres, 18 varones)
Bowler et al. ⁵²52. Bowler L, Knobel C, Mattern E. From cyberbullying to well-being: a narrative-based participatory approach to values-oriented design for social media. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol 2015; 66:1274-93.	Construir un marco conceptual generado por el usuario para la comprensión del ciberbullying	Entrevistas grupales	EE.UU.	14-20	N = 9 (6 mujeres, 3 varones)
Brandau & Evanson ²⁶26. Brandau M, Evanson TA. Adolescent victims emerging from cyberbullying. Qual Health Res 2018; 28:1584-94.	Explorar los aspectos sociales y psicológicos del ciberbullying desde el punto de vista de víctimas	Entrevistas individuales	EE.UU.	14-21	N = 15 (12 mujeres, 3 varones)
Bryce & Fraser ⁴⁰40. Bryce J, Fraser J. "It's common sense that it's wrong": young people's perceptions and experiences of cyberbullying. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw 2013; 16:783-7.	Analizar las percepciones y experiencias de ciberbullying	Entrevistas grupales	Reino Unido	9-19	N = 108
Bryce & Fraser ⁴¹41. Bryce J, Fraser J. The role of disclosure of personal information in the evaluation of risk and trust in young peoples' online interactions. Comput Human Behav 2014; 30:299-306.	Analizar la comprensión sobre los riesgos asociados a la exposición de información personal y el contacto con desconocidos	Entrevistas grupales	Reino Unido	9-19	N = 108
Connolly ⁴³43. Connolly JP. Exploring the factors influencing gifted adolescents' resistance to report experiences of cyberbullying behavior: toward an improved understanding. J Educ Gift 2018; 41:136-59.	Analizar las razones de adolescentes para no reportar casos de ciberbullying	Entrevistas grupales	Irlanda	13-17	N = 59
DeSmet et al. ⁴²42. DeSmet A, Veldeman C, Poels K, Bastiaensens S, Van Cleemput K, Vandebosch H, et al. Determinants of self-reported bystander behavior in cyberbullying incidents amongst adolescents. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw 2014; 17:207-15.	Analizar los comportamientos de espectadores y sus determinaciones para actuar	Entrevistas grupales	Bélgica	12-16	N = 61 (32 mujeres, 29 varones)
DeSmet et al. ⁶⁸68. DeSmet A, Bastiaensens S, Van Cleemput K, Poels K, Vandebosch H, De Bourdeaudhuij I. Mobilizing bystanders of cyberbullying: an exploratory study into behavioural determinants of defending the victim. Stud Health Technol Inform 2012; 181:58-63.	Analizar las determinaciones de los espectadores para defender a víctimas	Entrevistas grupales	Bélgica	12-15	N = 33 (11 mujeres, 12 varones)
Dredge et al. ⁴⁸48. Dredge R, Gleeson JFM, de la Piedad Garcia X. Risk factors associated with impact severity of cyberbullying victimization: a qualitative study of adolescent online social networking. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw 2014; 17:287-91.	Identificar los factores que intervienen en el impacto de ciberbullying en víctimas	Entrevistas individuales	Australia	15-24	N = 25 (17 mujeres, 8 varones)
Ging & O’Higgins ⁵⁶56. Ging D, O'Higgins Norman J. Cyberbullying, conflict management or just messing? Teenage girls' understandings and experiences of gender, friendship, and conflict on Facebook in an Irish second-level school. Fem Media Stud 2016; 16:805-21.	Analizar cómo las adolescentes comprenden y experimentan la amistad, el conflicto y el ciberbullying en Facebook	Entrevistas individuales	Irlanda	14-17	N = 26 (mujeres)
Keipi & Oksanen ⁵³53. Keipi T, Oksanen A. Self-exploration, anonymity and risks in the online setting: analysis of narratives by 14-18-year olds. J Youth Stud 2014; 17:1097-113.	Analizar cómo adolescentes comprenden y reaccionan ante los riesgos en Internet	Narrativas escritas	Finlandia	14-18	N = 258 (143 mujeres, 115 varones)
Law et al. ⁵⁰50. Law DM, Shapka JD, Domene JF, Gagné MH. Are cyberbullies really bullies? An investigation of reactive and proactive online aggression. Comput Human Behav 2012; 28:664-72.	Analizar los motivos de la agresión virtual, en especial, analizar las agresiones proactivas y reactivas	Entrevistas en profundidad	Canadá	10-18	N = 15 (10 mujeres, 5 varones)
Maher ⁶⁶66. Maher D. Cyberbullying: an ethnographic case study of one Australian upper primary school class. Youth Stud Aust 2008; 27:50-7.	Describir cómo se desarrollan prácticas de ciberbullying en la escuela	Etnografía	Australia	11-12	N = 22
Nilan et al. ⁴⁹49. Nilan P, Burgess H, Hobbs M, Threadgold S, Alexander W. Youth, social media, and cyberbullying among australian youth: "sick friends". Soc Media Soc 2015; 1:205630511560484.	Identificar patrones de comportamientos sociológicos en el ciberbullying	Entrevistas individuales	Australia	15-18	N = 10 (5 mujeres, 5 varones)
O’Brien & Moules ⁶³63. O'Brien N, Moules T. Not sticks and stones but tweets and texts: findings from a national cyberbullying project. Pastor Care Educ 2013; 31:53-65.	Describir las percepciones de víctimas sobre el impacto que tuvo en su vida el ciberbullying	Entrevistas grupales	Reino Unido	10-18	N = 17 (14 mujeres, 3 varones)
Pabian et al. ⁶¹61. Pabian S, Erreygers S, Vandebosch H, Van Royen K, Dare J, Costello L, et al. "Arguments online, but in school we always act normal": the embeddedness of early adolescent negative peer interactions within the whole of their offline and online peer interactions. Child Youth Serv Rev 2018; 86:1-13	Identificar las diferencias y similitudes entre las interacciones negativas presenciales y virtuales	Entrevistas individuales	Bélgica	13-14	N = 34
Parris et al. ⁵⁹59. Parris L, Varjas K, Meyers J. "The internet is a mask": high school students' suggestions for preventing cyberbullying. West J Emerg Med 2014; 15:587-92.	Describir cómo los adolescentes previenen el ciberbullying	Entrevistas individuales	EE.UU.	15-19	N = 40
Parris et al. ⁶⁰60. Parris L, Varjas K, Meyers J, Cutts H. High school students' perceptions of coping with cyberbullying. Youth Soc 2012; 44:284-306.	Identificar las estrategias para superar casos de ciberbullying	Entrevistas individuales	EE.UU.	15-19	N = 20 (7 mujeres, 13 varones)
Patterson et al. ⁴⁴44. Patterson LJ, Allan A, Cross D. Adolescent perceptions of bystanders' responses to cyberbullying. New Media Soc 2017; 19:366-83.	Comprender las percepciones y respuestas de espectadores	Entrevistas individuales	Australia	13-16	N = 24 (13 mujeres, 11 varones)
Pelfrey & Weber ⁶²62. Pelfrey Jr. WV, Weber NL. Student and school staff strategies to combat cyberbullying in an urban student population. Prev Sch Fail 2015; 59:227-36.	Comprender las estrategias de prevención y respuesta ante casos de ciberbullying	Entrevistas grupales	EE.UU.	11-14	N = 24 (16 mujeres, 8 varones)
Price et al. ²⁸28. Price D, Green D, Spears B, Scrimgeour M, Barnes A, Geer R, et al. A qualitative exploration of cyber-bystanders and moral engagement. J Psychol Couns Sch 2014; 24:1-17.	Analizar las percepciones de adolescentes sobre espectadores	Encuestas con preguntas abiertas	EE.UU.	M = 15	N = 961 (443 mujeres, 481 varones)
Radovic et al. ⁵⁵55. Radovic A, Gmelin T, Stein BD, Miller E. Depressed adolescents' positive and negative use of social media. J Adolesc 2017; 55:5-15.	Identificar los usos de las redes sociales en adolescentes con depresión	Entrevistas individuales	EE.UU.	13-20	N = 23 (18 mujeres, 5 varones)
Reason et al. ²⁹29. Reason L, Boyd M, Reason C. Cyberbullying in rural communities: origin and processing through the lens of older adolescents. Qual Rep 2016; 21:2331-48.	Analizar las experiencias de víctimas y las maneras en que lo sobrellevaron	Entrevistas grupales e individuales	EE.UU.	18	N = 8 (4 mujeres, 4 varones)
Samoh et al. ⁵⁸58. Samoh N, Boonmongkon P, Ojanen TT, Samakkeekarom R, Jonas KJ, Guadamuz TE. 'It's an ordinary matter': perceptions of cyberbullying in Thai youth culture. J Youth Stud 2019; 22:240-55.	Analizar las percepciones sobre la definición, causas, consecuencias y formas de abordar el ciberbullying	Entrevistas grupales e individuales	Tailandia	15-24	N = 136
Ševčíková et al. ⁶⁴64. Ševčíková A, Šmahel D, Otavová M. The perception of cyberbullying in adolescent victims. Emot Behav Diffic 2012; 17:319-28.	Describir cómo las víctimas de ciberbullying perciben la agresión y en qué contextos es considerada más grave	Entrevistas individuales	República Checa	15-17	N = 16 (7 mujeres, 9 varones)
Šléglová & Černá ⁵⁷57. Šléglová V, Černá A. Cyberbullying in adolescent victims: perception and coping. Cyberpsychology 2011; 5:4.	Describir cómo las víctimas de ciberbullying perciben la agresión y qué estrategias utilizan para superar la agresión	Entrevistas individuales	República Checa	14-18	N = 15 (13 mujeres, 2 varones)
Stacey ⁴⁵45. Stacey E. Research into cyberbullying: student perspectives on cybersafe learning environments. Informatics in Education 2009; 8:115-30.	Analizar los usos de las tecnologías en adolescentes y sus experiencias de ciberbullying	Entrevistas grupales	Australia	10-17	N = 74
Vandebosch & van Cleemput ⁶⁷67. Vandebosch H, Van Cleemput K. Defining cyberbullying: a qualitative research into the perceptions of youngsters. Cyberpsychol Behav 2008; 11:499-503.	Describir experiencias y perspectivas de ciberbullying	Entrevistas grupales	Bélgica	10-19	N = 279 (137 mujeres, 142 varones)
Varjas et al. ⁴⁶46. Varjas K, Meyers J, Kiperman S, Howard A. Technology hurts? Lesbian, gay, and bisexual youth perspectives of technology and cyberbullying. J Sch Violence 2013; 12:27-44.	Describir experiencias y perspectivas de ciberbullying de adolescentes de la comunidad LGBTQ	Entrevistas individuales	EE.UU.	15-18	N = 18 (5 mujeres, 13 varones)
Varjas et al. ⁴⁷47. Varjas K, Talley J, Meyers J, Parris L, Cutts H. High school students' perceptions of motivations for cyberbullying: an exploratory study. West J Emerg Med 2010; 11:269-73.	Describir las perspectivas de adolescentes sobre los motivos del ciberbullying	Entrevistas individuales	EE.UU.	15-19	N = 20 (7 mujeres, 13 hombres)
Wright ⁶⁵65. Wright MF. Cybervictims' emotional responses, attributions, and coping strategies for cyber victimization: a qualitative approach. Safer Communities 2016; 15:160-9.	Analizar las características de las víctimas de ciberbullying, sus respuestas emocionales y estrategias de superación	Entrevistas individuales	EE.UU.	12-14	N = 76 (39 mujeres, 37 varones)

Estudios	Ítems CASP *
Estudios	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
Baas et al. ⁵⁴54. Baas N, de Jong MDT, Drossaert CHC. Children's perspectives on cyberbullying: insights based on participatory research. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw 2013; 16:248-53.	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	No	Si	Si	Si	Si
Berne et al. ²⁷27. Berne S, Frisén A, Kling J. Appearance-related cyberbullying: a qualitative investigation of characteristics, content, reasons, and effects. Body Image 2014; 11:527-33.	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si
Betts & Spenser ⁵¹51. Betts LR, Spenser KA. "People think it's a harmless joke": young people's understanding of the impact of technology, digital vulnerability and cyberbullying in the United Kingdom. J Child Media 2017; 11:20-35.	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si
Bowler et al. ⁵²52. Bowler L, Knobel C, Mattern E. From cyberbullying to well-being: a narrative-based participatory approach to values-oriented design for social media. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol 2015; 66:1274-93.	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si
Brandau & Evanson ²⁶26. Brandau M, Evanson TA. Adolescent victims emerging from cyberbullying. Qual Health Res 2018; 28:1584-94.	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si
Bryce & Fraser ⁴⁰40. Bryce J, Fraser J. "It's common sense that it's wrong": young people's perceptions and experiences of cyberbullying. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw 2013; 16:783-7.	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si
Bryce & Fraser ⁴¹41. Bryce J, Fraser J. The role of disclosure of personal information in the evaluation of risk and trust in young peoples' online interactions. Comput Human Behav 2014; 30:299-306.	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si
Connolly ⁴³43. Connolly JP. Exploring the factors influencing gifted adolescents' resistance to report experiences of cyberbullying behavior: toward an improved understanding. J Educ Gift 2018; 41:136-59.	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si
DeSmet et al. ⁴²42. DeSmet A, Veldeman C, Poels K, Bastiaensens S, Van Cleemput K, Vandebosch H, et al. Determinants of self-reported bystander behavior in cyberbullying incidents amongst adolescents. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw 2014; 17:207-15.	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	No	Si	Si	Si	Si
DeSmet et al. ⁶⁸68. DeSmet A, Bastiaensens S, Van Cleemput K, Poels K, Vandebosch H, De Bourdeaudhuij I. Mobilizing bystanders of cyberbullying: an exploratory study into behavioural determinants of defending the victim. Stud Health Technol Inform 2012; 181:58-63.	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si
Dredge et al. ⁴⁸48. Dredge R, Gleeson JFM, de la Piedad Garcia X. Risk factors associated with impact severity of cyberbullying victimization: a qualitative study of adolescent online social networking. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw 2014; 17:287-91.	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	No	No	Si	Si	Si
Ging & O’Higgins ⁵⁶56. Ging D, O'Higgins Norman J. Cyberbullying, conflict management or just messing? Teenage girls' understandings and experiences of gender, friendship, and conflict on Facebook in an Irish second-level school. Fem Media Stud 2016; 16:805-21.	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si
Keipi & Oksanen ⁵³53. Keipi T, Oksanen A. Self-exploration, anonymity and risks in the online setting: analysis of narratives by 14-18-year olds. J Youth Stud 2014; 17:1097-113.	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si
Law et al. ⁵⁰50. Law DM, Shapka JD, Domene JF, Gagné MH. Are cyberbullies really bullies? An investigation of reactive and proactive online aggression. Comput Human Behav 2012; 28:664-72.	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	No	Si	Si	Si	Si
Maher ⁶⁶66. Maher D. Cyberbullying: an ethnographic case study of one Australian upper primary school class. Youth Stud Aust 2008; 27:50-7.	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si
Nilan et al. ⁴⁹49. Nilan P, Burgess H, Hobbs M, Threadgold S, Alexander W. Youth, social media, and cyberbullying among australian youth: "sick friends". Soc Media Soc 2015; 1:205630511560484.	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	No	Si	Si	Si
O’Brien & Moules ⁶³63. O'Brien N, Moules T. Not sticks and stones but tweets and texts: findings from a national cyberbullying project. Pastor Care Educ 2013; 31:53-65.	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	No	Si	Si	Si	Si
Pabian et al. ⁶¹61. Pabian S, Erreygers S, Vandebosch H, Van Royen K, Dare J, Costello L, et al. "Arguments online, but in school we always act normal": the embeddedness of early adolescent negative peer interactions within the whole of their offline and online peer interactions. Child Youth Serv Rev 2018; 86:1-13	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si
Parris et al. ⁵⁹59. Parris L, Varjas K, Meyers J. "The internet is a mask": high school students' suggestions for preventing cyberbullying. West J Emerg Med 2014; 15:587-92.	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si
Parris et al. ⁶⁰60. Parris L, Varjas K, Meyers J, Cutts H. High school students' perceptions of coping with cyberbullying. Youth Soc 2012; 44:284-306.	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si
Patterson et al. ⁴⁴44. Patterson LJ, Allan A, Cross D. Adolescent perceptions of bystanders' responses to cyberbullying. New Media Soc 2017; 19:366-83.	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si
Pelfrey & Weber ⁶²62. Pelfrey Jr. WV, Weber NL. Student and school staff strategies to combat cyberbullying in an urban student population. Prev Sch Fail 2015; 59:227-36.	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si
Price et al. ²⁸28. Price D, Green D, Spears B, Scrimgeour M, Barnes A, Geer R, et al. A qualitative exploration of cyber-bystanders and moral engagement. J Psychol Couns Sch 2014; 24:1-17.	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si
Radovic et al. ⁵⁵55. Radovic A, Gmelin T, Stein BD, Miller E. Depressed adolescents' positive and negative use of social media. J Adolesc 2017; 55:5-15.	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si
Reason et al. ²⁹29. Reason L, Boyd M, Reason C. Cyberbullying in rural communities: origin and processing through the lens of older adolescents. Qual Rep 2016; 21:2331-48.	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si
Samoh et al. ⁵⁸58. Samoh N, Boonmongkon P, Ojanen TT, Samakkeekarom R, Jonas KJ, Guadamuz TE. 'It's an ordinary matter': perceptions of cyberbullying in Thai youth culture. J Youth Stud 2019; 22:240-55.	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si
Ševčíková et al. ⁶⁴64. Ševčíková A, Šmahel D, Otavová M. The perception of cyberbullying in adolescent victims. Emot Behav Diffic 2012; 17:319-28.	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si
Šléglová & Černá ⁵⁷57. Šléglová V, Černá A. Cyberbullying in adolescent victims: perception and coping. Cyberpsychology 2011; 5:4.	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si
Stacey ⁴⁵45. Stacey E. Research into cyberbullying: student perspectives on cybersafe learning environments. Informatics in Education 2009; 8:115-30.	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	No	No	Si	Si	Si
Vandebosch et al. ⁶⁷67. Vandebosch H, Van Cleemput K. Defining cyberbullying: a qualitative research into the perceptions of youngsters. Cyberpsychol Behav 2008; 11:499-503.	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	No	Si	Si	Si
Varjas et al. ⁴⁶46. Varjas K, Meyers J, Kiperman S, Howard A. Technology hurts? Lesbian, gay, and bisexual youth perspectives of technology and cyberbullying. J Sch Violence 2013; 12:27-44.	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	No	Si	Si	Si	Si
Varjas et al. ⁴⁷47. Varjas K, Talley J, Meyers J, Parris L, Cutts H. High school students' perceptions of motivations for cyberbullying: an exploratory study. West J Emerg Med 2010; 11:269-73.	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si
Wright ⁶⁵65. Wright MF. Cybervictims' emotional responses, attributions, and coping strategies for cyber victimization: a qualitative approach. Safer Communities 2016; 15:160-9.	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si	Si

Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública Sergio Arouca, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz Rua Leopoldo Bulhões, 1480 , 21041-210 Rio de Janeiro RJ Brazil, Tel.:+55 21 2598-2511, Fax: +55 21 2598-2737 / +55 21 2598-2514 - Rio de Janeiro - RJ - Brazil
E-mail: cadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br

Acompanhe os números deste periódico no seu leitor de RSS

[1] Correspondencia
C. Moretti Instituto de Salud Colectiva, Universidad Nacional de Lanús. 29 de Septiembre 3901, Remedios de Escalada, Lanús, Buenos Aires 1826, Argentina. mariaconstanzamoretti@gmail.com