This article assesses four studies that employed methodological aspects of building composite index. These studies aimed at identifying socioeconomic and health differentials among urban districts in cities. Moreover, the studies attempt to create possibilities of influencing public policy formulation and facilitating data appropriation by the urban poor. The four studies were summarized with the help of a standardized checklist. Taking into consideration the elements of conception, development and dissemination processes, this article seeks to point out which of these elements are likely to influence policy formulation. The elements assessed are: 1) level of participation of social actors during the research; 2) communication strategies between social actors and researchers; 3) clear definition of objectives; 4) visibility of research process and of results dissemination; 5) deadlines met and 6) objectives accomplished. These elements are the first step to build a framework for assessing research ability to influence public policy.
Composite Index; Intersectorial Action; Quality of Life; Urban Health
