Expandable polyethylene bag can improve fruit quality of pineapple cv. ‘MD-2’

Zhang, Yanfang; Yang, Wenxiu; Zhao, Weifeng; Yang, Xiaohuan

doi:10.1590/0103-8478cr20210665

Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Brasil
SciELO.org - Rede SciELO
Blog SciELO em Perspectiva

Abrir menu

Brasil

Español English

Ciência Rural

Submissão de manuscritos
Sobre o periódico
Corpo Editorial
Instruções aos autores
Contato

sumário « anterior atual seguinte »

Resumo (Inglês)
Resumo (Português)

Texto (Inglês)

Download PDF (Inglês)

Compartilhe

Compartilhe
E-mail
Facebook
Twitter
Google+
LinkedIn
Reddit
StambleUpon
CiteULike
Mendeley

Sumário

Compartilhe
E-mail
Facebook
Twitter
Google+
LinkedIn
Reddit
StambleUpon
CiteULike
Mendeley

Resumo (Inglês)
Resumo (Português)

Texto (Inglês)

Download PDF (Inglês)

food technology • Cienc. Rural 53 (2) • 2023 • https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-8478cr20210665 copy

Expandable polyethylene bag can improve fruit quality of pineapple cv. ‘MD-2’

Saco de polietileno expansível pode melhorar a qualidade do abacaxi cv. ‘MD-2’

Authorship SCIMAGO INSTITUTIONS RANKINGS

ABSTRACT:

Paper and plastic bags have been mainly used in fruit bagging of pineapple production. However, they are often discarded as agricultural wastes after harvest of pineapple fruit and threaten environment. In this study, effects of white non-woven fabric bag, expandable polyethylene bag, black plastic bag and kraft paper bag on fruit quality of pineapple cv. ‘MD-2’ were investigated. Results showed that fruits with fruit bagging showed no sunburn. When expandable polyethylene bag was used, fruits of pineapple cv. ‘MD-2’ showed better external qualities, nutrition qualities and texture properties. Expandable polyethylene bag made of degradable and recyclable materials could be recommended as a promising practice to reduce agricultural waste in pineapple production.

Key words:
pineapple; fruit bagging; expandable polyethylene bag; texture properties; agricultural waste

Authorship

Yanfang Zhang

Fruit Research Institute, Fujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Fuzhou, 350013, China. Fujian Academy of Agricultural SciencesChinaChinaFruit Research Institute, Fujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Fuzhou, 350013, China.

http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7008-3222

Wenxiu Yang

College of Tropical Crops, Yunnan Agricultural University, Pu’er, 665000, China..Yunnan Agricultural UniversityChinaChinaCollege of Tropical Crops, Yunnan Agricultural University, Pu’er, 665000, China..

Weifeng Zhao ^*E-mail: zwf9721zwf9721@163.com. *Corresponding author

http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0937-6525

Xiaohuan Yang

College of Agriculture, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taigu, 030801, China.Shanxi Agricultural UniversityChinaChinaCollege of Agriculture, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taigu, 030801, China.

E-mail: zwf9721zwf9721@163.com. *Corresponding author

Editors: Leandro Souza da Silva (0000-0002-1636-6643) Ivo Oliveira (0000-0002-0866-953X)

DECLARATION OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

AUTHORS’ CONTRIBUTIONS

YFZ and WXY performed the experiments. YFZ and WFZ analyzed the data. XHY drafted the manuscript. WFZ and XHY conceived and designed the experiments. WFZ and YFZ reviewed the manuscript. YFZ and WFZ acquisite funding. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

SCIMAGO INSTITUTIONS RANKINGS

College of Agriculture, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taigu, 030801, China.Shanxi Agricultural UniversityChinaChinaCollege of Agriculture, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taigu, 030801, China.

Figures | Tables

Figures (1)
Tables (3)

Thumbnail

Figure 1
Fruit sunburn with no fruit bagging as control (a: Bleached skin; b: yellow-white fruit skin; c: brown fruit skin); Fruits with fruit bagging (a: black plastic bag; b: kraft paper bag; c: white no-woven fabric bag; d: EPE bag); Fruit sunburn with no fruit bagging as control (Left: Bleached skin; Middle: yellow-white fruit skin; Right: brown fruit skin.

Thumbnail

Table 1
Effects of different fruit bags on external fruit quality of pineapple cv. ‘MD-2’.

Thumbnail

Table 2
Effects of different fruit bags on nutrition quality of pineapple cv. ‘MD-2’.

Thumbnail

Table 3
Effects of different fruit bags on texture properties of pineapple cv. ‘MD-2’.

Figure 1 Fruit sunburn with no fruit bagging as control (a: Bleached skin; b: yellow-white fruit skin; c: brown fruit skin); Fruits with fruit bagging (a: black plastic bag; b: kraft paper bag; c: white no-woven fabric bag; d: EPE bag); Fruit sunburn with no fruit bagging as control (Left: Bleached skin; Middle: yellow-white fruit skin; Right: brown fruit skin.

Table 1 Effects of different fruit bags on external fruit quality of pineapple cv. ‘MD-2’.

Treatment	Fruit sunburn rate (%)	Fruit weight without crown (g)	Pulp weight (g)	Longitudinal diameter (cm)	Transverse diameter (cm)	Fruit shape index	Ratio of edible parts	Number of fruit eyes
EPE bag	0±0.00 b	992.86 ± 21.27 b	702.75 ± 12.95 b	13.14 ± 0.09 b	11.42 ± 0.28 b	1.15 ± 0.02 b	0.71± 0.02 b	74.64± 4.68 b
White no-woven fabric bag	0±0.00 b	1073.19 ± 127.13 b	764.42 ± 100.22 b	13.29 ± 0.30 b	11.59 ± 0.53 b	1.15 ± 0.03 b	0.71± 0.01 b	78.75± 6.85 ab
Black plastic bag	0±0.00 b	1093.06 ± 137.83 b	787.22 ± 108.74 b	13.42 ± 0.62 b	11.79 ± 0.34 b	1.14 ± 0.02 b	0.72± 0.01 b	79.89± 6.69 ab
Kraft paper bag	0±0.00 b	1062.89 ± 151.50 b	761.50 ± 128.42 b	13.36 ± 0.64 b	11.71 ± 0.37 b	1.14 ± 0.03 b	0.72± 0.02 b	77.39± 5.00 b
Control	100±0.00 a	1766.00 ± 89.08 a	1374.33 ± 53.78 a	15.97 ± 0.25 a	13.37 ± 0.32 a	1.19 ± 0.02 a	0.78± 0.01 a	91.33± 9.50 a

Note: Different lower-case letters indicate significant differences between treatments at P < 0.05. Values are means ± SE.

Table 2 Effects of different fruit bags on nutrition quality of pineapple cv. ‘MD-2’.

Treatment	Carotenoid content (%)	Total soluble solids content (%)	Vitamin C content (%)	Titratable acidity content (%)	Soluble sugar content (mg/g)
EPE bag	2.63 ± 0.51 bc	10.47 ± 0.87 b	0.31 ± 0.05 ab	0.47 ± 0.03 b	58.89±14.59 b
White no-woven fabric bag	3.43 ± 0.07 b	9.97 ± 1.29 b	0.27 ± 0.01 b	0.52 ± 0.09 ab	81.37±16.28 ab
Black plastic bag	2.71 ± 1.01 bc	7.53 ± 1.62 c	0.35 ± 0.05 a	0.50 ± 0.07 ab	68.69±14.52 b
Kraft paper bag	1.84 ± 0.11 c	9.37 ± 0.32 bc	0.35 ± 0.00 a	0.56 ± 0.01 a	71.92±10.26 b
Control	8.20 ± 0.47 a	13.73 ± 1.50 a	0.18 ± 0.01 c	0.58 ± 0.08 a	101.78±13.52 a

Note: Different lower-case letters indicate significant differences between treatments at P < 0.05. Values are means ± SE.

Table 3 Effects of different fruit bags on texture properties of pineapple cv. ‘MD-2’.

Treatment	Hardness (N)	Cohesiveness (Ratio)	Springiness (mm)	Chewiness (mJ)
EPE bag	31.37 ±7.47 a	0.16 ±0.02 a	15.98 ± 0.86 ab	98.28 ±8.04 a
White no-woven fabric bag	14.13 ±4.76 b	0.15 ±0.01 a	15.56 ± 0.58 b	33.92 ± 10.44 b
Black plastic bag	23.23 ±8.53 ab	0.15 ±0.01 a	15.94 ± 0.79 ab	61.24 ± 7.18 ab
Kraft paper bag	28.50 ±1.01 ab	0.14 ±0.01 a	16.51 ± 1.09 ab	71.33 ± 6.77 ab
Control	21.13 ±3.96 ab	0.14 ±0.03 a	17.64 ±1.56 a	81.32 ± 5.39 ab

Note: Different lower-case letters indicate significant differences between treatments at P < 0.05. Values are means ± SE.

How to cite

copy

Universidade Federal de Santa Maria Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Centro de Ciências Rurais , 97105-900 Santa Maria RS Brazil , Tel.: +55 55 3220-8698 , Fax: +55 55 3220-8695 - Santa Maria - RS - Brazil
E-mail: cienciarural@mail.ufsm.br

Acompanhe os números deste periódico no seu leitor de RSS

Este documento possui uma errata:

10.1590/01038478crerr20210665

Versão para download de PDF

PDF

Inglês

Versões e tradução automática

Versão original do texto

English

Tradução automática

Google Translator
Microsoft Translator

Como citar

RIS

BIBTEX

Outros formatos de citação e exportação:

SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online
Rua Dr. Diogo de Faria, 1087 – 9º andar – Vila Clementino 04037-003 São Paulo/SP - Brasil
E-mail: scielo@scielo.org

Leia a Declaração de Acesso Aberto

Métricas

Expandable polyethylene bag can improve fruit quality of pineapple cv. ‘MD-2’

PlumX

Mensagem

[1] E-mail: zwf9721zwf9721@163.com. *Corresponding author