Metodologia para avaliação fenotípica de árvores de <i>Guazuma crinita</i> em Ucayali, Peru

Revilla-Chávez, Jorge Manuel; López-Galán, Edinson Eduardo; Gonzales-Alvarado, Antony Cristhian; Sáenz-Ramírez, Lyanna Hellen; Mori-Vásquez, Jorge Arturo; Rojas-Mego, Krystel Clarissa; Abanto-Rodríguez, Carlos; Sebbenn, Alexandre Magno

Jorge Manuel Revilla-Chávez jrevilla@iiap.gob.pe

Formal analysis

Investigation

Methodology

Project administration

Writing – original draft

Writing – review & editing

Research Institute of the Peruvian Amazon, Yarinacocha, Ucayali, Peru

Universidade Estadual Paulista, Ilha Solteira, SP, Brazil

Jorge Manuel Revilla-Chávez Forest Engineer, Master’s in Forests and Forest Resources Management, PhD student in Agronomy

http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5978-5146

Edinson Eduardo López-Galán elopez@inia.gob.pe

Data curation

Investigation

National Institute of Agrarian Innovation, Coronel Portillo, Ucayali, Peru

Edinson Eduardo López-Galán Forest Engineer

http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3593-874X

Antony Cristhian Gonzales-Alvarado gonza.03les@gmail.com

Data curation

Investigation

Federal University of São Carlos, Araras, SP, Brazil

National University of Ucayali, Pucallpa, Ucayali, Peru

Antony Cristhian Gonzales-Alvarado Forest Engineer, Master’s in Plant Production and Associated Bioprocesses

http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3793-0271

Lyanna Hellen Sáenz-Ramírez lsaenz@iiap.gob.pe

Data curation

Investigation

Research Institute of the Peruvian Amazon, Yarinacocha, Ucayali, Peru

Lyanna Hellen Saenz-Ramirez Agroforestry-Aquaculture Engineer

http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6597-3626

Jorge Arturo Mori-Vásquez jorge_mori@unu.edu.pe

Methodology

Investigation

National University of Ucayali, Pucallpa, Ucayali, Peru

Jorge Arturo Mori-Vásquez Forest Engineer, PhD in Science – Sustainable Development Orientation

http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0570-8369

Krystel Clarissa Rojas-Mego krojas@iiap.gob.pe

Data curation

Investigation

Research Institute of the Peruvian Amazon, Yarinacocha, Ucayali, Peru

Krystel Clarissa Rojas-Mego Agronomic Engineer

http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7173-3023

Carlos Abanto-Rodríguez cabanto@iiap.gob.pe

Formal analysis

Universidad Nacional Ciro Alegría, Huamachuco, Sánchez Carrión, Peru

Carlos Abanto-Rodríguez Forest Engineer, PhD in Biotechnology and Biodiversity

http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7956-5482

Alexandre Magno Sebbenn alexandre.sebbenn@unesp.br

Formal analysis

Writing – original draft

Writing – review & editing

Universidade Estadual Paulista, Ilha Solteira, SP, Brazil

Forestry Institute of São Paulo, SP, Brazil

Alexandre Magno Sebbenn Forest Engineer, PhD in Genetics and Plant Breeding

http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2352-0941

Jorge Manuel Revilla-Chávez

Forest Engineer, Master’s in Forests and Forest Resources Management, PhD student in Agronomy

jrevilla@iiap.gob.pe

Edinson Eduardo López-Galán

Forest Engineer

elopez@inia.gob.pe

Antony Cristhian Gonzales-Alvarado

Forest Engineer, Master’s in Plant Production and Associated Bioprocesses

gonza.03les@gmail.com

Lyanna Hellen Saenz-Ramirez

Agroforestry-Aquaculture Engineer

lsaenz@iiap.gob.pe

Jorge Arturo Mori-Vásquez

Forest Engineer, PhD in Science – Sustainable Development Orientation

jorge_mori@unu.edu.pe

Krystel Clarissa Rojas-Mego

Agronomic Engineer

krojas@iiap.gob.pe

Carlos Abanto-Rodríguez

Forest Engineer, PhD in Biotechnology and Biodiversity

cabanto@iiap.gob.pe

Alexandre Magno Sebbenn

Forest Engineer, PhD in Genetics and Plant Breeding

alexandre.sebbenn@unesp.br

	Terminal bud		Branches
Class	Presence	Dominance	Orientation	Positions	Stem	Code
Stem form	yes	yes	vertically	different	straight	F10
	yes	yes	horizontally	different	straight	F11
	yes	yes	vertically	different	crooked	F12
	yes	yes	horizontally	different	crooked	F13
Forked stem	yes	yes	vertically	different	-	F20
	yes	yes	horizontally	different	-	F21
	yes	yes	vertically	single plane	-	F22
	yes	yes	horizontally	single plane	-	F23
	no	yes	vertically	different	-	F24
	no	yes	horizontally	different	-	F25
	no	yes	vertically	single plane	-	F26
	no	yes	horizontally	single plane	-	F27
	yes	no	vertically	different	-	F28
	yes	no	horizontally	different	-	F29
	yes	no	vertically	single plane	-	F210
	yes	no	horizontally	single plane	-	F211
	no	no	vertically	different	-	F212
	no	no	horizontally	different	-	F213
	no	no	horizontally	single plane	-	F214
	no	no	vertically	single plane	-	F215
Inclined stem form	yes	yes	veritcally	different	-	F30
	yes	yes	horizontally	different	-	F31
	yes	yes	veritcally	single plane	-	F32
	yes	yes	horizontally	single plane	-	F33
	no	yes	veritcally	different	-	F34
	no	yes	horizontally	different	-	F35
	no	no	veritcally	single plane	-	F36
	no	no	horizontally	single plane	-	F37
	yes	no	veritcally	different	-	F38
	yes	no	horizontally	different	-	F39
	yes	no	veritcally	single plane	-	F310
	yes	no	horizontally	single plane	-	F311
		Fungal attack	Insect attack	Nutritional deficiencies	Animal damage	Code
Plant symptoms		no	no	no	no	0
		yes	no	no	no	1
		no	yes	no	no	2
		no	no	yes	no	3
		no	no	no	yes	4
		yes	yes	no	no	5
		no	yes	yes	no	6
		no	no	yes	yes	7
		yes	yes	yes	no	8
		no	yes	yes	yes	9
		yes	yes	no	yes	10
		yes	no	yes	yes	11
		yes	yes	yes	yes	12

	Kolmogorov-Smirnova			Shapiro-Wilk
Sector	Test	df	P-value	Test	df	P-value
1	0.392ª	1060	<0.001	0.345ª	1060	<0.001
2	0.427ª	599	<0.001	0.191ª	599	<0.001
3	0.368ª	596	<0.001	0.378ª	596	<0.001

	DBH (cm)	H (m)	SF	BR	HE
Mean
Site 1	8.6^ Pvalue< 0.001;	6.2^* * Pvalue< 0.05;	97.2	12.4^ Pvalue< 0.001;	2.76^* * Pvalue< 0.05;
Site 2	11.8^ Pvalue< 0.001;	10.7^ Pvalue< 0.001;	93.6^* * Pvalue< 0.05;	19.8^* * Pvalue< 0.05;	2.97^* * Pvalue< 0.05;
Site 3	14.0^ Pvalue< 0.001;	13.0^ Pvalue< 0.001;	95.0^ Pvalue< 0.001;	19.1^* * Pvalue< 0.05;	3.16^ Pvalue< 0.001;
Joint	11.5^ Pvalue< 0.001;	9.97^ Pvalue< 0.001;	95.1	17.9	4.03
P-value-Site	<0.001	<0.001	<0.001	<0.001	<0.001
P-value-GxE	0.943	0.328	0.381	0.685	0.872
h_f ²
Site 1	0.281	0.094	0.407	0.065	0.118
Site 2	0.273	0.352	0.409	0.094	0.127
Site 3	0.198	0.304	0.695	0.189	0.087
Joint	0.293	0.356	0.524	0.158	0.123

	Site 1		Site 2		Site 3		Joint
	rg	rp	rg	rp	rg	rp	rg	rp
DBH vs H	0.93^ P< 0.01;	0.92^ P< 0.01;	0.89^ P< 0.01;	0.83^ P< 0.01;	0.87^ P< 0.01;	0.88^ P< 0.01;	0.85^ P< 0.01;	0.93^ P< 0.01;
DBH vs SF	0.72^ P< 0.01;	0.64^ P< 0.01;	0.41^* * P< 0.05.	0.45^* * P< 0.05.	0.45^* * P< 0.05.	0.41^* * P< 0.05.	0.64^ P< 0.01;	0.63^ P< 0.01;
DBH vs BR	0.6^ P< 0.01;	0.55^ P< 0.01;	0.47^* * P< 0.05.	0.3^* * P< 0.05.	1.0^ P< 0.01;	0.36^* * P< 0.05.	0.64^ P< 0.01;	0.33^* * P< 0.05.
DBH vs HE	-0.13	-0.08	-0.36^* * P< 0.05.	-0.07	-0.04	-0.04	-0.29^* * P< 0.05.	-0.2^* * P< 0.05.
H vs SF	1.0^ P< 0.01;	0.54^ P< 0.01;	0.51^ P< 0.01;	0.23^* * P< 0.05.	0.73^ P< 0.01;	0.42^* * P< 0.05.	0.55^ P< 0.01;	0.5^ P< 0.01;
H vs BR	1.0^ P< 0.01;	0.5^ P< 0.01;	0.55^ P< 0.01;	0.56^ P< 0.01;	0.55^ P< 0.01;	0.34^* * P< 0.05.	0.86^ P< 0.01;	0.31^* * P< 0.05.
H vs HE	-0.65^ P< 0.01;	-0.12	-0.91^ P< 0.01;	-0.06	-0.35^* * P< 0.05.	-0.08	-0.16^* * P< 0.05.	-0.15^* * P< 0.05.

[1] Jorge Manuel Revilla-Chávez

Forest Engineer, Master’s in Forests and Forest Resources Management, PhD student in Agronomy

Brasil

Brasil

Metodologia para avaliação fenotípica de árvores de Guazuma crinita em Ucayali, Peru

RESUMO