Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Anthropometry versus subjective nutritional assessment in cancer patients

Abstract

Objective

Compare the results of anthropometry and subjective nutritional assessment applied to cancer patients.

Methods

Cross-sectional study with patients undergoing chemotherapy between March and June 2017. The instruments applied were anthropometry (body mass index, body fat percentage, muscle mass and edema) and the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA). Data were entered into a Microsoft Excel® spreadsheet. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS® version 21.0. Central tendency (mean and standard deviation), absolute frequency and corresponding percentages were measured. The analyses used the t-test and Pearson correlation, considering a significance level of 5%.

Results

Of all 99 participants and based on the body mass index, 60.6% were healthy, 24.2% presented fat depletion, 51.5% had severe or moderate muscle depletion, and 87.9% had edema. According to the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment, 31.3% were well-nourished participants, 37.4% moderately malnourished and 31.3% severely malnourished. Incompatibility of nutritional diagnosis was observed when comparing the body mass index and the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment due to the high frequency of edema in the participants.

Conclusion

The results indicated that the body mass index should not be considered as the only assessment for cancer patients, requiring a complete anthropometric evaluation associated with the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment.

Neoplasms; Anthropometry; Nutritional status; Malnutrition; Edema

Escola Paulista de Enfermagem, Universidade Federal de São Paulo R. Napoleão de Barros, 754, 04024-002 São Paulo - SP/Brasil, Tel./Fax: (55 11) 5576 4430 - São Paulo - SP - Brazil
E-mail: actapaulista@unifesp.br